Iran vs Israel/US: Israel have elections Tuesday, Trump & NetInYahoo don’t like the results, war restarting with Iran likely soon!!!

It makes sense that Trump gambled on this decapitation strike as a quick operation that might end with minimal casualties. I can see how this was sold to him as a fast operation.

I am blown away, however, that Trump couldn’t see that this has become existential for Iran and the depth of deception we displayed by using peace talks as a ruse means no more negotiation is possible.

From a game theory perspective alone, Iran’s only choice at this point is war.




​

He wasn't sold shit. Yall keep thinking this is his own doing and choices. The Mossad got the evidence of him and Epstein with underage girls. None of his moves make sense even from an ego driven standpoint. Iran is not an easy or guaranteed target. We can't do shit to Iran unless we put troops on the ground. They talking weeks of what they can maintain and that should tell you everything you need to know about our capabilities. It's only weeks strong from an air and missiles standpoint.
 
yeah .... so.... what you wrote just does not happen
thats just disinformation the media pushes

even the crazy ones understand power or die fast
Anyone who knows me understand I do not turn to typical media for my information, most of what I say goes against their grain.
 
No but I did ask you to name a developing Nation that didn’t use dome form of banking for development snd you kindly arm waved it away due to " reasons".
it was an irrelevant question -cause every nation considered "developing" is doing it with outside debt from europe US or china

the countries that are actually rebeling against imperialisim are not considered developing countries / emerging markets.... a la Burkina Faso & Myanmar

read up on BRICS and de-dollarization
 
it was an irrelevant question -cause every nation considered "developing" is doing it with outside debt from europe US or china

the countries that are actually rebeling against imperialisim are not considered developing countries / emerging markets.... a la Burkina Faso & Myanmar

read up on BRICS and de-dollarization
Where fo BRIC Nations get their money snd what are their requirements for back payment?
 
Anyone who knows me understand I do not turn to typical media for my information, most of what I say goes against their grain.
maybe so - but not really
your frame of thinking of international history, economic systems, russia, venezuala etc is close to US mass media narratives
 
maybe so - but not really
your frame of thinking of international history, economic systems, russia, venezuala etc is close to US mass media narratives
Trust me I don't speak from narrative, I seek information and being you cannot answer my question without questioning my intentions, I will seek the answer myself, and leave the trust me bro, shit to others who are good with shortcuts.
 
Trust me I don't speak from narrative, I seek information and being you cannot answer my question without questioning my intentions, I will seek the answer myself, and leave the trust me bro, shit to others who are good with shortcuts.
I'm not questioning your intentions and I've posted some sources and listed some things that would be better if you looked it up
 
I'm not questioning your intentions and I've posted some sources and listed some things that would be better if you looked it up
To elaborate on my background, my primary focus is in physics, particularly on the implications of a potential peak oil crisis and the accelerating impact of AI and automation, which I believe are positioned to eliminate millions of jobs globally.


From an energy systems perspective, I see helium-3 fusion as one of the few long-term solutions capable of sustaining advanced industrial civilization beyond the next decade. However, the economic barrier is enormous. Mining helium-3 on the Moon would require permanent infrastructure, large-scale regolith processing, and sustained Earth–Moon transport capabilities. The cost of such an undertaking appears too great for any single nation — including the United States, China, or Russia — to bear independently.


Based on that logic, I hypothesize that these major powers may eventually be compelled to cooperate in order to reduce costs, consolidate technological capabilities, and establish a permanent lunar mining base. If such a structural alignment occurs, it could significantly alter the global balance of power.


In that scenario, smaller states that historically leveraged rivalry among major powers — such as Ukraine or Venezuela — may find it more difficult to maneuver diplomatically or economically if the dominant powers begin coordinating rather than competing.


I view current geopolitical developments in Ukraine, Venezuela, Taiwan, and especially North Korea as potential indicators of this structural shift. In particular, if China were to meaningfully distance itself from North Korea, I would interpret that as evidence supporting my hypothesis of emerging major-power consolidation.
 
How would the US run out of ammunition so fast? Because we sold most of our stockpile to Ukraine and Israel? I'm curious how Israel's "Iron Dome stockpile is.

@Mask I suspect that Iran is taking out these airbases to set up a drone attack on Israel. Last year they sent thousands of drones and supposedly most of the drones got intercepted by planes from Airbases between Iran and Isreal. Taking out these airbases might make their drones more effective. Lets see how this plays out.
More numbers

 
More numbers



This part...

The math of this war is devastating for the U.S. and its allies.

Reports indicate 6-7 interceptors are being fired per incoming Iranian missile. Here's what that costs:
Iranian missiles (estimated cost per unit):→ Shahab-3: ~$1-2 million → Emad/Ghadr: ~$2-3 million → Fateh-110: ~$500K-1 million → Houthis/proxy drones: ~$20-50K each

Allied interceptors (estimated cost per unit):→ Arrow-3: ~$3-5 million → Arrow-2: ~$2-3 million → David's Sling: ~$1-2 million → SM-3 (Navy): ~$15-30 million → THAAD interceptor: ~$12-15 million → Patriot PAC-3: ~$4-6 million

At 6-7 interceptors per missile:
One $2M Iranian missile costs the coalition $18-100M+ to defeat.

Iran has fired 200+ missiles. That's potentially tens of billions in interceptors burned in 48 hours. Iran doesn't need to win the air war. They just need to make it financially unsustainable. Every missile they launch drains the Western arsenal AND the budget.

This is asymmetric warfare at its purest. Iran is bleeding the empire.
 
Back
Top