Iran vs Israel/US: Israel have elections Tuesday, Trump & NetInYahoo don’t like the results, war restarting with Iran likely soon!!!

It started much longer than that, a lot of that shit goes back to the biblical days, but in recent years it really started popping off during the Opec Nations' attempt to hold back oil production to artificially inflate oil prices, causing the recession of the 70s that led to the Bronx burning down and NYC to go bankrupt. The reason why I bring that up is to show how economics affect the black community in ways many people don't consider.
nah - what we are seeing today really only goes back to the british empire
contrary to what the govt of Isreal and the bible would have you believe - there was never an Isreali empire - they rolled over like the sea by every empire - Babylon to Ottoman

OPEC didn't try shit.... they did that

The city's trouble in the 70s would have happened regardless of the of embargo / recession - the bill for the sins of Robert Moses came due

and yes when the economy is bad - its always worse for us
 
saying this is inaccurate would be too weak -
historically -this is a complete fantasy...

bad credit? please explain Haiti Honduras Columbia El Salvador etc.
there are many countries with great "credit" that have gotten or are getting fucked over by the US

shit - there are even parts of the US including san juan getting fucked



as for Cuba -true context begins with the spanish american war -then the 2 revolutions before Castro


its not credit - its gangsterisim

just imagine if JP Morgan Chase sent lawyers with thugs to intimidate your family & friends...
then went and told every bank and corporation around the world that:
If they do business of any kind with RoadRage... that JP Morgan will nolonger do any business with them
Also, keep in mind that banking and even money is nothing more than record keeping, a way of keeping track of promised services for up-front goods.
For example, if you wanted a home today, you would give a note or promise to payback, with money, or notes that proved that you have worked or earned a given amount. And with this note, you can pay back the note that you got from the bank.
Its a way of being able to afford things you cannot afford in real time. The problem is when they start doing shady business by making terms that are too confusing and worded to rip people off. This usually works on an individual level, but with Nations they should have enough lawyers and accountants to protect them, I say should, because it still happens, especially in under developed Nations that aren't to econmically savy, usually those that are run by military dictators without any economic experience or education, and who refuse to allocate power to anyone else but themselves.
 
Hati got fucked by France, and charged them for the infrastructure they built over there, not once considering the free labor they used to build it. As far as El Savador, they like Cuba brought into the Russians' claim that they would be taken care of once they said fuck you to the debt they accumulated by building, but just like Cuba, once they didn't get their naval base, and especially after the Berlin wall collapsed, their support dried up and they were still left with the debt.
This would be like someone convincing you not to pay your bank mortgage because the banks are corrupt and that they have your back, just as long as they can set up a trap house in one of your rooms. But then they get arrested, and now you are stuck with the bill plus interest.
The Russians did the same thing to Venezuela, and look how hard they collapsed. As a matter of fact, can you tell me one developed nation that hasn't used some form of banking system to help advance them? And before you say Lyberia, they used it to build up, but had enough wealth to create their own banking system that they wanted to employ, but just like every other banking system, people who borrowed from them would have been obligated to pay them back with interest, thats how banks work. But yeah this is also how racism works, and why they were targeted.

since the late 1800s who was France's enforcer in Haiti?
the US.

Who blockaded and then invaded Haiti in 1915 to 1935
the US

Who emptied Haiti treasury and forced Haiti to borrow for everything
the US

who has controlled Haiti's manufacturing, imports and exports since 1935
the US
 
since the late 1800s who was France's enforcer in Haiti?
the US.

Who blockaded and then invaded Haiti in 1915 to 1935
the US

Who emptied Haiti treasury and forced Haiti to borrow for everything
the US

who has controlled Haiti's manufacturing, imports and exports since 1935
the US
Again, this has more to do with colonialism than the banking system.
 


This actually why many in the USA didn’t want this to happen.

They didn’t see a way to win this fight.
It won’t be quick and over..

you can not send foot soldiers in for a quick visit

You have too much personnel in the region that can be targeted

You can not afford to have the shipping lanes blocked


Just to remove a 80yr old man from power and install someone who’s living in America to run Iran
 
Why would Turkey be next


control of cyprus and syria

The Russians did the same thing to Venezuela, and look how hard they collapsed. As a matter of fact, can you tell me one developed nation that hasn't used some form of banking system to help advance them? And before you say Lyberia, they used it to build up, but had enough wealth to create their own banking system that they wanted to employ, but just like every other banking system, people who borrowed from them would have been obligated to pay them back with interest, thats how banks work. But yeah this is also how racism works, and why they were targeted.
again your history is really bad
When Chavez took over and nationalized the oil - soviet union was long dead and russia was very weak

venezuala has a central bank and IMF membership - thats why the US has been able to inflict so much damage these last 15 year
 
control of cyprus and syria


again your history is really bad
When Chavez took over and nationalized the oil - soviet union was long dead and russia was very weak

venezuala has a central bank and IMF membership - thats why the US has been able to inflict so much damage these last 15 year
Yes but he was backed by Russia. BTW, Trinidad also has national oil from the same reserves, yet they don't have the same economic problems.
 
the 2 cannot be seperated
sameway you can not seperated capitalisim from white supremacy from western civilization
You can have a banking system without capitalism and white supremacy. What do you think China is doing, and what Lyberia tried to do?
I will say this, though: if you have a banking system, you have to be able to defend it, because that would be like being a loan shark in the hood and not having the weight to protect your assets. And when I say protect, I mean protect, politically, militarily, and this does include embargos.
 
Yes but he was backed by Russia. BTW, Trinidad also has national oil from the same reserves, yet they don't have the same economic problems.
he was backed by the fact that at the time the US was completly dependant on their heavy crude and couldn't afford disruption

Trinidad hasn't nationalized all of their oil production nor LNG and they have contracts with BP Shell and Texaco for extraction and exploration
 
he was backed by the fact that at the time the US was completly dependant on their heavy crude and couldn't afford disruption

Trinidad hasn't nationalized all of their oil production nor LNG and they have contracts with BP Shell and Texaco for extraction and exploration
They allowed other vendors for revenue and parlayed that money to develop their own oil and gas production. Thats how you properly work the system.
 
You can have a banking system without capitalism and white supremacy. What do you think China is doing, and what Lyberia tried to do?
I will say this, though: if you have a banking system, you have to be able to defend it, because that would be like being a loan shark in the hood and not having the weight to protect your assets. And when I say protect, I mean protect, politically, militarily, and this does include embargos.
china is not really capitalisim - everything is ultimatly state owned

Libya failed so.......

and not every banking system is based in capitalisim - socialist countries and theocratic muslim countries all have banks that abide by their country's laws
 
Trump Stays Out of Public View After U.S. Launches Military Assault on Iran

President Trump did not deliver a formal address to the American public to explain why the country was at war, a departure from his predecessors.

By Zolan Kanno-Youngs
Reporting from Palm Beach, Fla.
February 28, 2026


From the moment he announced a massive military attack against Iran by posting an edited social media video at 2:30 a.m. Saturday, President Trump made clear that he would be taking a different tone and approach than his wartime predecessors.

Mr. Trump did not scramble back to the White House from Mar-a-Lago, his private club and residence in Palm Beach, Fla., to oversee the U.S. and Israeli strikes. He did not deliver a televised address informing the public of the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was the nation’s supreme leader for nearly four decades.

Instead, the president was set to cap an extraordinary day of U.S. aggression abroad by attending a glitzy fund-raising dinner at his club.

Mr. Trump’s lack of public engagement — after launching a military attack that could spur a broader conflict and put U.S. lives at risk — was a striking departure from how other presidents have handled the gravity of war.

“What Americans of our time are accustomed to is a president giving a White House speech — usually from the Oval Office — that befits the supreme importance of making war,” said Michael Beschloss, a presidential historian and the author of the book “Presidents of War: The Epic Story, from 1807 to Modern Times.”

“We are in a time where so many political traditions are being sidelined,” he said. “And this is another.”

Mr. Trump’s decision not to address the public on Saturday also came after he made little effort before the attack to lay out the case for a military assault against Iran.

The result is that the military offensive may have been a bewildering surprise to many in the United States on Saturday morning...
 
if Washington say they had enough of this shit, the region gonna have to battle Iran on their own…

Or let’s say Israel, they been getting hit with pop shoots over the last day…

Send 6 projectiles and 2 get thru

Nothing like the 12 day war when Iran sent 60 projectiles at once
Then the next day send just 1 and it got thru


Iran focus is on everyone but mainly the US own territory in the region

Boy if they focus solidly on Israeli territory it game over…. Because this time they said we stopping when we want to
 


The U.S. actually has a large stockpile of munitions.

Those stockpiles are with NATO.

When Bush went against Saddam in 91, he had support of NATO.

When Bush 2 went against Afghanistan/Iraq, he had support of NATO.

When Biden backed Ukraine against Russia, he had support from NATO.

The U.S. is dependent on NATO for logistical support for large scale operations, it helps keep the U.S. Defense operating budget low….under normal circumstances.

Trump has been on a warpath to work against NATO and not support the pact.

Because of that, he knew NATO was not gonna support him against Iran, when he is not supporting NATO’s support with Ukraine.

He did this on his own (against the Joint Chiefs warnings) with Israel who is fully dependent on the U.S.
 

How would the US run out of ammunition so fast? Because we sold most of our stockpile to Ukraine and Israel? I'm curious how Israel's "Iron Dome stockpile is.

@Mask I suspect that Iran is taking out these airbases to set up a drone attack on Israel. Last year they sent thousands of drones and supposedly most of the drones got intercepted by planes from Airbases between Iran and Isreal. Taking out these airbases might make their drones more effective. Lets see how this plays out.
 
The U.S. actually has a large stockpile of munitions.

Those stockpiles are with NATO.

When Bush went against Saddam in 91, he had support of NATO.

When Bush 2 went against Afghanistan/Iraq, he had support of NATO.

When Biden backed Ukraine against Russia, he had support from NATO.

The U.S. is dependent on NATO for logistical support for large scale operations, it helps keep the U.S. Defense operating budget low….under normal circumstances.

Trump has been on a warpath to work against NATO and not support the pact.

Because of that, he knew NATO was not gonna support him against Iran, when he is not supporting NATO’s support with Ukraine.

He did this on his own (against the Joint Chiefs warnings) with Israel who is fully dependent on the U.S.
:lol:
had
:lol:
NATO's stock has also been tapped for Ukraine & Isreal






soo many bombs killing all those innocents in Gaza....

the ancestors will have their revenge


 

"Guns..no bullets!!!!"
679fe-17512868382857.jpg
​
 
Back
Top