Is Pam Bondi Creating A Gun Owners Registry In America?
A federal judge in Reese v. ATF recently ordered gun rights groups—among them the Second Amendment Foundation and Firearms Policy Coalition—to provide a verified membership list to the government, a demand that has drawn fierce criticism and fueled fears of a de facto gun registry.
Yuvraj Tyagi
Oct 12, 2025
Pam Bondi’s DOJ backed a court order requiring gun rights groups to hand over membership lists in Reese v. ATF, sparking backlash and accusations of a secret gun registry. While Bondi later joined a motion to narrow the order, critics point to her prior support of red-flag laws and age limits as...
www.timesnownews.com
BELLEVUE, Wash. — Oct. 10, 2025 — After a district court in Louisiana ruled earlier this week that the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) must turn over its member list as part of the court’s judgment in Reese v. ATF, the organization, in partnership with the Department of Justice (DOJ), filed...
saf.org
In the case Reese v. ATF, US District Judge Robert Summerhays ordered that plaintiffs including the Second Amendment Foundation (SAF) and Firearms Policy Coalition (FPC) turn over a verified list of their members from November 2020, a decision reached after the Department of Justice (DOJ) convinced the court of its necessity. This order extends only to those groups’ members already identified and verified during the litigation, the DOJ argued. In reaction, SAF immediately filed a motion to amend, declaring that “SAF has never — and will never — provide the government a list of our members.”
Trump Appointed, United States District Judge of the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, Robert Summerhays
The demand, critics say, amounts to a state-sponsored registry of gun rights activists. Gun Owners of America slammed the move on social media: “This is just another illegal, unconstitutional registry of gun owners in the making,” the group argued on Facebook. They directly accused Pam Bondi of orchestrating a gun registry by leveraging DOJ power.
Pam Bondi’s Record on Gun Policy Adds Fuel to Fears
The timing and nature of the membership demand has stirred controversy for Bondi, whose track record includes support for red-flag laws in Florida and backing age-based gun purchase limits. GunRights.org’s profile of her record notes she helped draft Florida’s 2018 “Gun Violence Restraining Order” legislation, giving law enforcement authority to seize firearms temporarily in certain cases. Questions persist as to whether, now as US Attorney General, Bondi’s DOJ will more aggressively push oversight over gun rights groups.
Bondi has defended her department’s direction at her Senate Judiciary Committee hearing, accusing critics of politicizing justice while asserting that the DOJ will “end weaponization.” She declined to comment in detail on the membership disclosure matter, citing ongoing litigation.
A Narrow Order, But Precedent or Overreach?
The court order is itself limited: it applies only to the small subset of members already identified, verified, and residing in the Fifth Circuit (Mississippi, Louisiana, Texas). The majority outside that jurisdiction appear unaffected. Legal analysts caution, however, that even a narrow ruling can set a precedent. As legal blog Guns.com put it, the court found the federal ban on handgun sales to 18–20-year-olds unconstitutional in principle—but then demanded the lists anyway, “an almost laughable contradiction.”
SAF and FPC are asking the judge to change the language from “shall provide” to “may provide” in the judgment to avoid forced disclosure. The DOJ joining that motion suggests it sees the optics risk. But for critics, the damage is done — the public is left wondering whether that “all available funds” rhetoric by Bondi includes power to peer into private associations.
United States Attorney General, Pam Bondi