Iran vs Israel/US: 6/21 USA bombed 3 nuclear plants in Iran, ceasefire agreed 6/24 The Next War possible. EU/Us impose snapback sanctions on 9/28
- Thread starter Mask
- Start date
Guess I’m not the only one who noticed thisAs I think of something I come post it
This another one of them thoughts…
Every media channels has pictures of the destroy nuclear site soon as day broke this morning.
we haven’t seen no satellite photos of neither Israeli military bases from them. We haven’t seen pretty much nothing from the Haifa port. It’s been a fucking week, yet no detailed photos.
Bibi and em’ have to choose what to shoot down but everything is being intercepted.
Now they might’ve showed that hospital being destroyed. They show that like it was a direct hit even tho allegedly shockwaves hit it
instead of midnight hammer they should have called it "desperately trying to save Israel" cuz today's reality is that Israeli AD system is crumbling they can't keep up !
@0:50 a larger number of Iranians missiles making an impact
@4:25 Israeli interceptors are not made to deal with second generation Iranian missiles
@5:22 Israelis didn't expect that level of destruction !
All these motherfuckas death should be celebrated while smoking on that pack.
No one should be sent any positive well wishes nor sympathy to them.
I'm gonna shit on them once they're gone.
Last edited:
Russia ready to help Iran: Kremlin spokesperson
Russian presidential spokesperson Dmitry Peskov noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin plans to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday, and the two plan to discuss options for assistance.
BY SARAH FORTINSKY
06/23/25
In this picture released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, center, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, greet each other as Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi stands at right, during their meeting in Tehran, Iran, Tuesday, July 19, 2022.
Russian presidential spokesperson Dmitry Peskov noted that Russian President Vladimir Putin plans to meet with Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi on Monday, and the two plan to discuss options for assistance.
BY SARAH FORTINSKY
06/23/25
Russia ready to help Iran: Kremlin spokesperson
Russia stands ready to help Iran in the ongoing conflict in the Middle East, but Tehran first needs to articulate its requests, a Kremlin spokesperson said Monday. Russian presidential spokesperson…
thehill.com
In this picture released by the official website of the office of the Iranian supreme leader, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, center, and Russian President Vladimir Putin, left, greet each other as Iranian President Ebrahim Raisi stands at right, during their meeting in Tehran, Iran, Tuesday, July 19, 2022.
Is Iran still signatory to NPT??
they're Persians they keep their emotions in check [ whatever they decide to do (update based on current evolution
) ]vent their frustration a lil' bit but don't fall into whatever remote trap/bait is sent toward them -> they stay focused on that business and Israelis are really REALLY feeling that shit !Edit : fixed !
northern Israel today
Last edited:
Iranian Lessons for North Korea
The most pressing question in South Korean media right now is whether the US will be able to strike North Korea's nuclear facilities after what happened in Iran.
This immediately brings to mind the 1994 nuclear crisis. At the time, the United States actively discussed a preemptive strike on North Korea. Former Defense Secretary William Perry wrote in detail about the preparation for this operation in his memoirs.
More than 30 years have passed, the realities in North Korea have changed, but is a strike possible? The mood in the local media is ambiguous, but the prevailing answer is that such an operation is unlikely.
Firstly, unlike Iran, North Korea is already a nuclear power de facto. Moreover, Pyongyang's ability to inflict damage on the Americans exceeds that of Tehran.
Secondly, Pyongyang has two allies - Beijing and Moscow. According to two treaties, if one side is attacked, the other must provide military assistance.
And although China's participation in a hypothetical conflict remains a debatable issue, the "testing" of the Russian-North Korean treaty in the Kursk regionshowed that this document does work. This means that the likelihood of Russia's participation on the side of its ally is greatly increased.
What the local media calls "Kim's obsession with nuclear weapons" is now effectively saving North Korea from the Iranian scenario. The current situation also adds points against the formulations about the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula - a mantra that was considered the basis for any negotiations with the North Koreans.
️Therefore, any possible dialogue, whether the US, its allies, or even China like it or not, will be built on different principles. And the Americans themselves have once again created the prerequisites for such changes, adding confidence to Pyongyang that getting rid of nuclear weapons is more trouble than it's worth
The most pressing question in South Korean media right now is whether the US will be able to strike North Korea's nuclear facilities after what happened in Iran.
This immediately brings to mind the 1994 nuclear crisis. At the time, the United States actively discussed a preemptive strike on North Korea. Former Defense Secretary William Perry wrote in detail about the preparation for this operation in his memoirs.
More than 30 years have passed, the realities in North Korea have changed, but is a strike possible? The mood in the local media is ambiguous, but the prevailing answer is that such an operation is unlikely.Firstly, unlike Iran, North Korea is already a nuclear power de facto. Moreover, Pyongyang's ability to inflict damage on the Americans exceeds that of Tehran.
Secondly, Pyongyang has two allies - Beijing and Moscow. According to two treaties, if one side is attacked, the other must provide military assistance.
And although China's participation in a hypothetical conflict remains a debatable issue, the "testing" of the Russian-North Korean treaty in the Kursk regionshowed that this document does work. This means that the likelihood of Russia's participation on the side of its ally is greatly increased.
What the local media calls "Kim's obsession with nuclear weapons" is now effectively saving North Korea from the Iranian scenario. The current situation also adds points against the formulations about the denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula - a mantra that was considered the basis for any negotiations with the North Koreans.️Therefore, any possible dialogue, whether the US, its allies, or even China like it or not, will be built on different principles. And the Americans themselves have once again created the prerequisites for such changes, adding confidence to Pyongyang that getting rid of nuclear weapons is more trouble than it's worth
It’s up to them, they likely stay to sho their commitment to not having nukes
Yes, but...
=============================CORRECTION===========================
It has not been confirmed that Iran left the IAEA. Stay tuned.
Last edited:
North Korea has a nuke. Diplomacy will take place first before any military action.Iranian Lessons for North Korea
The most pressing question in South Korean media right now is whether the US will be able to strike North Korea's nuclear facilities after what happened in Iran.
This immediately brings to mind the 1994 nuclear crisis. At the time, the United States actively discussed a preemptive strike on North Korea. Former Defense Secretary William Perry wrote in detail about the preparation for this operation in his memoirs.
Firstly, unlike Iran, North Korea is already a nuclear power de facto. Moreover, Pyongyang's ability to inflict damage on the Americans exceeds that of Tehran.
Secondly, Pyongyang has two allies - Beijing and Moscow. According to two treaties, if one side is attacked, the other must provide military assistance.
And although China's participation in a hypothetical conflict remains a debatable issue, the "testing" of the Russian-North Korean treaty in the Kursk regionshowed that this document does work. This means that the likelihood of Russia's participation on the side of its ally is greatly increased.
Seems that nukes are now a deterrent. Don't blame Iran for trying to get one.
In all honesty that’s the Right thing to do
Let's be thankful that Putin is the Russian president and not Medvedev.
World war 3 would've started already.
It truly is, especially considering Benny's step-n-fetch-it within IAEA.
On a side note, the expired propaganda of "this was Iran in 1979", propping up an EXHILED puppet on social media, etc., falls flat, considering events like this...
Last edited:
The global pieces on the board are shifting...
Bro we have spoke about this a number of times… folks don’t really like to hear it but it the true
Same with the Iranian they current government is more west like than anything
He wanted to normalize with the west but what happened they said naw
Same thing folks said happened with Putin. He wanted to be included into the Russia but they told him no…
Folks laugh saying he wanted to join NATO.
NATO goal and his views must’ve mirrored for him to think that way
So basically Trump like it’s fuck the American military, the American people (gas prices), and let’s alienate the rest of the world
Similar threads
