Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads

BGOL Flat Earth crew - tell us how this is being faked - all woman crew going into space

cashwhisperer said:
What the hell keeps the sun barreling thru a vacuum at 500k mph? What makes the earth wobble at such a precise rate? How the hell is the center of the Earth molten lava? How does the moon control the oceans but not lakes?

ALL YOU DO IS PARROT NASA! Whatever they say that's what you blindly follow! You wanna talk about a CULT?? The solar system is a SYSTEM, that just happened to come together after a random BIG BANG happened outta NOTHING. Oh REALLY??

ALL THE ANCIENTS, the ones who built the pyramids ALL OVER EARTH, the monolithic structures for which we can't even match their technology and replicate their work TODAY, KNEW the earth was flat AND they left records of it.

You REALLY BELIEVE that whitey was on the moon! (@4 Dimensional you too nigga! oughta be ashamed!:p)

SAD!!

Talking about ALL THE SCIENTISTS...How the FUCK do you know what all the scientists know and believe?? Your peer review system is FLAWED!! Why, because humans lie and are corrupt! And y'all know this, in every area of activity, except science. NAW, NIGGA, THEY ARE CORRUPT TOO!

So FUCK yall!

images
Click to expand...


"

Do lakes such as our Great Lakes have tides?​

The answer is yes, our Great Lakes do have tides that occur twice each day, but they are much smaller in scale and barely noticeable unlike the ocean.

The largest “lake tide” that happens is called the Great Lakes spring tide, and is less than 5 centimeters, or 2 inches in height."
Click to expand...


The funny thing is the answers to all those questions were known before NASA even existed.

And the ANCIENTS also thought eclipses were formed by dragons eating the sun. This ignorance you keep showing is what happens when you ignore science.
 
cashwhisperer said:
What the hell keeps the sun barreling thru a vacuum at 500k mph? What makes the earth wobble at such a precise rate? How the hell is the center of the Earth molten lava? How does the moon control the oceans but not lakes?

ALL YOU DO IS PARROT NASA! Whatever they say that's what you blindly follow! You wanna talk about a CULT?? The solar system is a SYSTEM, that just happened to come together after a random BIG BANG happened outta NOTHING. Oh REALLY??

ALL THE ANCIENTS, the ones who built the pyramids ALL OVER EARTH, the monolithic structures for which we can't even match their technology and replicate their work TODAY, KNEW the earth was flat AND they left records of it.

You REALLY BELIEVE that whitey was on the moon! (@4 Dimensional you too nigga! oughta be ashamed!:p)

SAD!!

Talking about ALL THE SCIENTISTS...How the FUCK do you know what all the scientists know and believe?? Your peer review system is FLAWED!! Why, because humans lie and are corrupt! And y'all know this, in every area of activity, except science. NAW, NIGGA, THEY ARE CORRUPT TOO!

So FUCK yall!

images
Click to expand...

Science doesn't really on belief, we go by evidence backed by scientific experiments and observations based off of knowledge that has been scientifically verified, unlike you guys who watch a YouTube or a silly meme and all of a sudden your Dunning Kruger kicks into warp drive having you believe you have the sacred knowledge that has eluded mankind for eons.

I get why people who lack evidence tries to level the playing field for you guys by attempting to reduce it to a my belief vs yours, but only an idiot would agree to accept that crap especially when all of the satisfied evidence is on our side.
PUtting it mildly, your argument that it's your belief vs ours is as asinine as someone saying that your not believing in Santa Claus is equal to me believing in Santa Claus, you see where this is going. Only idiots think this way!
 
Last edited:
RoadRage said:
Science doesn't really on belief, we go by evidence backed by scientific experiments and observations based off of knowledge that has been scientifically verified, unlike you guys who watch a YouTube or a silly meme and all of a sudden your Dunning Kruger kicks into warp drive having you believe you have the sacred knowledge that has eluded mankind for eons.

I get why people who lack evidence tries to level the playing field for you guys by attempting to reduce it to a my belief vs yours, but only an idiot would agree to accept that crap especially when all of the satisfied evidence is on our side.
PUtting it mildly, your argument that it's your belief vs ours is as asinine as someone saying that your not believing in Santa Claus is equal to me believing in Santa Claus, you see where this is going. Only idiots think this way!
Click to expand...

No, of course science doesn't "rely" on belief!! But YOU rely on scientists to tell you what to believe, and you trust that institution BLINDLY, when there's no reason to trust them blindly when they so blatantly and repeatedly lie and are always baffled (SCIENTISTS ARE ALWAYS BAFFLED AT SOMETHING, YOU KNOW THIS!!) finding out some shit that was previously believed to be true or law!!!!

So miss me with that!!

The Non-Euclidean Geometry that you are talking about applies to drawing on spherical SURFACE, but the SPHERE ITSELF is of Euclidean Geometry!!!

And yall won't be honest and acknowledge that because it KILLS your globe argument and you KNOW IT!!


But at least once you slipped up and told the truth:

RoadRage said:
5329.jpg
"A curved line is not straight"
Click to expand...

THANK YOU!!!! FINALLY SOME INTEGRITY!!

d2e433a119194661db9909a4162bcd36.gif


It's been fun.
 
cashwhisperer said:
No, of course science doesn't "rely" on belief!! But YOU rely on scientists to tell you what to believe, and you trust that institution BLINDLY, when there's no reason to trust them blindly when they so blatantly and repeatedly lie and are always baffled (SCIENTISTS ARE ALWAYS BAFFLED AT SOMETHING, YOU KNOW THIS!!) finding out some shit that was previously believed to be true or law!!!!

So miss me with that!!

The Non-Euclidean Geometry that you are talking about applies to drawing on spherical SURFACE, but the SPHERE ITSELF is of Euclidean Geometry!!!

And yall won't be honest and acknowledge that because it KILLS your globe argument and you KNOW IT!!


But at least once you slipped up and told the truth:



THANK YOU!!!! FINALLY SOME INTEGRITY!!

d2e433a119194661db9909a4162bcd36.gif


It's been fun.
Click to expand...

Science it's observable. You never have to believe anything a scientist says you can run an experiment and observe yourself. Human beings have been observing things and recording their observations for thousands of years. If you don't want to use or trust those observations then you are going to have to spend a lot of time proving stuff that a lot of people already have proven. Skepticism is healthy it keeps science evolving. We are continuing to learn about this planet and that is what makes life fun. But we can't ignore the sacrifices that others have made. Do you know men before spent decades traveling without compasses, just observing the stars to prove the world was round. They risked their lives back in the 1400's when people like yourself thought they would just fall off when they got to the end of the earth. It's that the moors magellen etc. travelled around the globe just for us 600 years later with satelites spaceships and space stations to not believe what was proven 1000 years ago.

I honestly think our willful ignorance is what keeps humanity from truly reaching a state of utupia. It's like there is a limiter switch on our brain that forces us to go backwards sometimes. We could be spending our energy trying to figure out some stuff we really don't know instead of trying to reprove some shit everybody should know.
 
cashwhisperer said:
No, of course science doesn't "rely" on belief!! But YOU rely on scientists to tell you what to believe, and you trust that institution BLINDLY, when there's no reason to trust them blindly when they so blatantly and repeatedly lie and are always baffled (SCIENTISTS ARE ALWAYS BAFFLED AT SOMETHING, YOU KNOW THIS!!) finding out some shit that was previously believed to be true or law!!!!

So miss me with that!!

The Non-Euclidean Geometry that you are talking about applies to drawing on spherical SURFACE, but the SPHERE ITSELF is of Euclidean Geometry!!!

And yall won't be honest and acknowledge that because it KILLS your globe argument and you KNOW IT!!


But at least once you slipped up and told the truth:



THANK YOU!!!! FINALLY SOME INTEGRITY!!

d2e433a119194661db9909a4162bcd36.gif


It's been fun.
Click to expand...
And the beautiful thing about it is that all scientific experiments showed you their methods of achieving their results so if you truly do have doubts and feel like something is not on the up and up, we are all free to challenge them by replicating. Now if you go and you are able to debunk a major scientific theory man you'd not only get paid, but also you will have all the clout in the scientific community. But you have to know what the fuck you are doing, because if you try that shit you pull on BGOL, you'd be the laughing stock for years to come.
 
This thread made me laugh so hard. At one point I farted violently and a snot bubble blew up out of my nose. I'm laughing even harder because a high school dropout I know from my construction days. Recently informed me that he is in fact a believer in flat Earth. I laughed so Damn hard that I slept like a baby that night.
 
3r0THe2.jpg


Instead of a shiny ball, try doing it with a less reflective object like a ping-pong ball, and show me how that works out for you. You big Dummy!
Nice parlor trick though!
 
Lunchroom Cashier researched for two days to get that smoking gun, only for it to get shot down in two minutes. Dude is definitely on edge.
smashing-computer-498-x-378-gif-oadj2hctam4dc7h3.gif
 
While the "grad school lunchroom" cashier dumpster dives the internet for more derp, let's take this time to clown more Flat Derpers.

Nathan "the child abuser" Oakly yall, let's give it up for this piece of shit!!!!!
 
Why sit around for his next derp that will be immediately debunked? Time to increase the ante, how about Pre-bunking his shit before he types it out! Just imagine how unhinged he will become when he finds out that three days of dumpster diving for Derp has already been debunked before he could post it.
Man, it's enough to push him over the edge of the Earf.
 
I see our favorite Lunchroom Cashier is struggling to find evidence that supports his derp. Let me help out (and who says RoadRage doesn't care about the feeble-minded). Here you go, I'm gonna do something Cashie never did, that is present to the world the first accurate, Flat Earf map, without any distortions or errors. Ladies and Gentlemen I present to you Exhibit A-Z! Checkmate Bitches!!!!

 
Let's see, all I have to do is type in Flat Earf "proof" and Flat GBT will give me yet another proof. Hopefully, unlike the other 521 times, this one won't be debunked in two minutes.
qUkKuc59W2FwrhgqHtpJVXJuEdoSleN838f0t3cP_hQ.png
 
RoadRage said:
Lunchroom Cashier researched for two days to get that smoking gun, only for it to get shot down in two minutes. Dude is definitely on edge.
smashing-computer-498-x-378-gif-oadj2hctam4dc7h3.gif
Click to expand...

:lol:

No idiot, the shit came across my timeline on fb, but I'm laughing cuz yall love this thread. Yall can't get enough of the flat earth.

On the issue of the moon, you want to make glossiness and shadow direction an issue. There's a difference between the light that hits the moon from the sun vs. the light that the moon produces itself. Both things happen, it's not one or the other. I'll talk about it later. Long day!

:wakeup:
 
cashwhisperer said:
:lol:

No idiot, the shit came across my timeline on fb, but I'm laughing cuz yall love this thread. Yall can't get enough of the flat earth.

On the issue of the moon, you want to make glossiness and shadow direction an issue. There's a difference between the light that hits the moon from the sun vs. the light that the moon produces itself. Both things happen, it's not one or the other. I'll talk about it later. Long day!

:wakeup:
Click to expand...
Ok get a baseball, have a large much larger than the ball, light source across the room then let's both make predictions on how the light would look on the ball. Either it would be lit uniform like the moon or produce a flare like the shiny ball you posted in your parlor trick.
Wanna bet money on this one?
 
cashwhisperer said:
:lol:

No idiot, the shit came across my timeline on fb, but I'm laughing cuz yall love this thread. Yall can't get enough of the flat earth.

On the issue of the moon, you want to make glossiness and shadow direction an issue. There's a difference between the light that hits the moon from the sun vs. the light that the moon produces itself. Both things happen, it's not one or the other. I'll talk about it later. Long day!

:wakeup:
Click to expand...
The Cashie circle continues.

When you come back, explain why an object that is producing light has completely dark areas. How many dark areas are there on a light bulb?

gigamoon-details2.jpg
 
Big Tex said:
The Cashie circle continues.

When you come back, explain why an object that is producing light has completely dark areas. How many dark areas are there on a light bulb?

gigamoon-details2.jpg
Click to expand...
The flat earf response usually is: how come all the impact craters are perfectly round (they love using words like perfect)?
Well to pre-bunk that crap, it's because when objects hit at that high velocity it's like a nuclear explosion where pressure waves of energy radiate out in a circle. However, not all of the times these impacts are perfectly round.
A84093CE-7669-49A0-8058-9BCD74047AF8.jpeg.d4395276171a8b49c96af0a5ba20bb70.jpeg
 
cashwhisperer said:
:lol:

No idiot, the shit came across my timeline on fb, but I'm laughing cuz yall love this thread. Yall can't get enough of the flat earth.

On the issue of the moon, you want to make glossiness and shadow direction an issue. There's a difference between the light that hits the moon from the sun vs. the light that the moon produces itself. Both things happen, it's not one or the other. I'll talk about it later. Long day!

:wakeup:
Click to expand...
Cash
In the flat earth hypothesis are all celestial bodies flat and emit their own light
And if so how do they radiate light
Also does the earth radiate light too
 
dbluesun said:
Cash
In the flat earth hypothesis are all celestial bodies flat and emit their own light
And if so how do they radiate light
Also does the earth radiate light too
Click to expand...
I can answer this question better than Cashie "the grad school lunchroom cashier".
For one Flat Earfers, like most cults, believe in the zeteric belief where the only knowledge you accept is the knowledge you verified firsthand. So in this case they would ask you how do "you" know what a star is, have you ever been to a star and licked yourself? If not then you nor anyone else knows what a star is, so until then, they are just lights in the sky.
At this point,t you can roll out millions of photos of stars via high-powered telescopes and they will usually counter with out-of-focused pictures claiming this is how stars really look like, declaring at best it's your evidence vs his. Even if you were to invite them to an observation location so that you can teach them how to properly capture properly focussed stars, they will surely (as always is the case) refuse to go, for fear of their make-believe world being destroyed.
At the end of the day, they are cult members who are brainwashed to believe that everyone else is brainwashed, and their belief system (one that is to never be properly tested) is all that is keeping them woke.
This is why I don't actually debate Cashie, instead, I intend to expose how silly and foolish his cult beliefs are, which is easy because I know his cult script better than he knows it.
Oh for those who might be thinking zetetic thinking isn't that bad, right? Well just imagine trying to argue that the DNA test that shows that you are the father of the child, by saying I never saw a DNA neither did you judge, so it must be fake, in a courtroom. Yeah, that's the level of stupidity they are on.
 
dbluesun said:
Cash
In the flat earth hypothesis are all celestial bodies flat and emit their own light
And if so how do they radiate light
Also does the earth radiate light too
Click to expand...

Let me say this first, the ONLY concrete flat earth truth that I know is universally accepted among those who say the earth is flat, is that the earth is flat. Beyond that, there are different theories about they sky. So I can't give you one definitive stance that represents all flat earthers, I can only tell you what I think or believe based on what I've studied or observed.

As far as what I believe, I'm not totally sure. I believe they are all flat, but I question if polaris is flat or not. I;m not sure how they generate light.

As far as the earth radiating light, I do believe there is a difference between daylight and sunlight.
 
cashwhisperer said:
Let me say this first, the ONLY concrete flat earth truth that I know is universally accepted among those who say the earth is flat, is that the earth is flat. Beyond that, there are different theories about they sky. So I can't give you one definitive stance that represents all flat earthers, I can only tell you what I think or believe based on what I've studied or observed.

As far as what I believe, I'm not totally sure. I believe they are all flat, but I question if polaris is flat or not. I;m not sure how they generate light.

As far as the earth radiating light, I do believe there is a difference between daylight and sunlight.
Click to expand...
So you are basically saying, hey I don't know how Santa can deliver all those gifs in one night, how the raindeers fly, or where he gets the money for all those toys, but you know he is real, because of "reasons".
 
RoadRage said:
Do you have any evidence that says this cannot happen or are you taking some idiot from the internet at face value like a big dummy?
Click to expand...

Fool have you ever heard of fun house mirrors?? So fucking dense :smh:

006-SQ-Whacky_Mirror_W_Guest_Three_Mirrors_Sm-600x600.jpg


en.wikipedia.org

House of mirrors - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org en.wikipedia.org

"Sometimes the mirrors may be distorted because of different curves, convex, or concave in the glass to give the participants unusual and confusing reflections of themselves, some humorous and others frightening." :eek::eek::eek:


baffling, ain't it?
 
Last edited:

Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top