He won't.Feel free post the evidence. Enlighten me.
He won't.Feel free post the evidence. Enlighten me.
this is the same MF that accused me of not reading in another thread.Feel free post the evidence. Enlighten me.
First of all WTF are you talking about? Secondly, it’s real convenient when there‘s a pile of evidence for the claim but your goofy ass can’t post a credible link. Like I said, enlighten me.this is the same MF that accused me of not reading in another thread.
Now you are begging @Soul On Ice to do research for you when this topic has been written about for hundreds of years
![]()
How about you post something that proves me wrong instead?Feel free post the evidence. Enlighten me.
Oh my god, you're gonna be the numbskull that asks for a negative to be proven. But, let me show how people typically prove a claim.How about you post something that proves me wrong instead?
took 5 seconds -Oh my god, you're gonna be the numbskull that asks for a negative to be proven. But, let me show how people typically prove a claim.
^^^^Estimates
Drawing on extensive archival records, this digital memorial allows analysis of the ships, traders, and captives in the Atlantic slave trade. The three databases below provide details of 36,000 trans-Atlantic slave voyages, 10,000 intra-American ventures, names and personal information. You can...www.slavevoyages.org
This website has an extensive database with references, links, pictures even!Crazy!
Now, how you would/should respond to this is by posting your own link(s) with databases, references, maybe even pictures that positively prove your claim. That took me a whole 5 minutes while I'm at work.
Again, I'll be waiting for the enlightenment.
....
Oh my god, you're gonna be the numbskull that asks for a negative to be proven. But, let me show how people typically prove a claim.
^^^^Estimates
Drawing on extensive archival records, this digital memorial allows analysis of the ships, traders, and captives in the Atlantic slave trade. The three databases below provide details of 36,000 trans-Atlantic slave voyages, 10,000 intra-American ventures, names and personal information. You can...www.slavevoyages.org
This website has an extensive database with references, links, pictures even!Crazy!
Now, how you would/should respond to this is by posting your own link(s) with databases, references, maybe even pictures that positively prove your claim. That took me a whole 5 minutes while I'm at work.
Again, I'll be waiting for the enlightenment.
....
Smoking gun indeed...took 5 seconds -
AMER'ICAN, noun A native of America; originally applied to the aboriginals, or copper-colored races, found here by the Europeans; but now applied to the descendants of Europeans born in America.
source:![]()
Websters Dictionary 1828 - Webster's Dictionary 1828 - American
Websters Dictionary 1828 - Webster's Dictionary 1828 - Americanwebstersdictionary1828.com
Now we're getting somewhere. I am familiar with Dr. Sertima(non-FBA by the way) however that's not saying anything I didn't already say. There's definitely evidence of African presence across the Atlantic, but what you're arguing is a large civilization of Black natives that were established en masse. Not pockets of exploration, but an entire civilization of Black people. Dr. Sertima's book noted evidence of navigation and transfer of African plants and similar language so that shows there's a possibility. Now, does that say that there was enough Black people to enslave that would account for millions of slaves by the end of the slave trade? I don't think it does. Moreover, why isn't there more accounts of said dark skin (Black) natives by the same enslavers that murdered almost all the brown skin natives? They got no problem referencing those natives in their books and logs, but they just forgot about the Black ones that would obviously stick out like a sore thumb on a continent filled with brown natives. Help me understand that missing piece of the evidence.
They Came Before Columbus: The African Presence in Ancient America (Journal of African Civilizations) https://www.amazon.com/dp/0812968174?tag=vp314-20
This is straight mental illness and I strongly believe this is paid for by Cointelpro just like niggas with trademarks and night club museums.
The Seminoles from Georgia to the Carolinas good enough?Now we're getting somewhere. I am familiar with Dr. Sertima(non-FBA by the way) however that's not saying anything I didn't already say. There's definitely evidence of African presence across the Atlantic, but what you're arguing is a large civilization of Black natives that were established en masse. Not pockets of exploration, but an entire civilization of Black people. Dr. Sertima's book noted evidence of navigation and transfer of African plants and similar language so that shows there's a possibility. Now, does that say that there was enough Black people to enslave that would account for millions of slaves by the end of the slave trade? I don't think it does. Moreover, why isn't there more accounts of said dark skin (Black) natives by the same enslavers that murdered almost all the brown skin natives? They got no problem referencing those natives in their books and logs, but they just forgot about the Black ones that would obviously stick out like a sore thumb on a continent filled with brown natives. Help me understand that missing piece of the evidence.
Not sure how to answer the question you posed. I believe that we were here before slavery.The Seminoles from Georgia to the Carolinas good enough?
This is straight mental illness and I strongly believe this is paid for by Cointelpro just like niggas with trademarks and night club museums.
Is a fact that the Seminole were largely Black? Cause again, the evidence that I can see in the form or photos, paintings done show them to look Black.The Seminoles from Georgia to the Carolinas good enough?
Aight bruh, I don't normally disagree with you because you be on point, but today I got to disagree. If black people came here before Columbus, and they did, does that make their blackness go away? They still black (Akebulanian). That mean their descendants are black too, right? So, this crackhead dumb ass dudes running around the U.S. negating their blackness is still black. I got to call it self hate if anything.I have a few friends that are both Afro American and Native American.. in fact 1 uses his Native American loophole and dosent pay taxes.. so just cause she’s of darker complexion dosent mean she’s not a Native American.. also the original people aka black people touched all continents b4 slavery.. there’s actually proof that shows the ancestors touch down at many places b4 the colonizers forced them here.. those things are actually hidden by powerful people , scientists, etc.. white his-story don’t want you to know that
Thenseminoles took in marooned and runaway slaves resulting in mixed off spring.Is a fact that the Seminole were largely Black? Cause again, the evidence that I can see in the form or photos, paintings done show them to look Black.
Funny that Google picked up my comments and suggested this video lolIs a fact that the Seminole were largely Black? Cause again, the evidence that I can see in the form or photos, paintings done show them to look Black.
Not surprised that the OP posted this thread when he gets his views from this guy:
Funny that Google picked up my comments and suggested this video lol
I fuck with Czech. He goes everywhere and digs very deep into hidden cultures and towns that have Black ancestry.
The mescogos and Seminoles in this video are descendants of escaped people from Florida. John Horse's people.
I actually watched this video and couple other from this guy last year. Cool channel, but even in the video it's saying the Black Seminoles from America were a mix of African descent, freed slaves and native American. It just doesn't give context to how long the Black Indians were on American soil so we're back to the same argument. None of this evidence points to a Native Black population or at at least a Black population that was around long enough to establish their own unique culture and language, but one that mixed in with the brown native population that was here before them and adopted their ways. This is why I'm not buying the wholesale idea that the Blacks enslaved in America were mostly native. Why wouldn't they just enslave all of the population of Indians Black or otherwise? It makes no sense. They killed off one color and enslaved the other? Help me out with this.
Maybe because when they put Mongolian red natives in the fields, they weren't as strong as the Black man?I actually watched this video and couple other from this guy last year. Cool channel, but even in the video it's saying the Black Seminoles from America were a mix of African descent, freed slaves and native American. It just doesn't give context to how long the Black Indians were on American soil so we're back to the same argument. None of this evidence points to a Native Black population or at at least a Black population that was around long enough to establish their own unique culture and language, but one that mixed in with the brown native population that was here before them and adopted their ways. This is why I'm not buying the wholesale idea that the Blacks enslaved in America were mostly native. Why wouldn't they just enslave all of the population of Indians Black or otherwise? It makes no sense. They killed off one color and enslaved the other? Help me out with this.
You're a fag broPrepare for this weird nigga to:
-not answer you directly
- Change the subject
or his favorite;
- devolve into name-calling.
Also are you saying that escaped slaves, became Seminoles once they got out of the USA and started fucking Indians and then Mexicans ?I actually watched this video and couple other from this guy last year. Cool channel, but even in the video it's saying the Black Seminoles from America were a mix of African descent, freed slaves and native American. It just doesn't give context to how long the Black Indians were on American soil so we're back to the same argument. None of this evidence points to a Native Black population or at at least a Black population that was around long enough to establish their own unique culture and language, but one that mixed in with the brown native population that was here before them and adopted their ways. This is why I'm not buying the wholesale idea that the Blacks enslaved in America were mostly native. Why wouldn't they just enslave all of the population of Indians Black or otherwise? It makes no sense. They killed off one color and enslaved the other? Help me out with this.
True to form....You're a fag bro