Is anyone on here REALLY voting for Kamala ? Why should I vote for Kamala?

I want to explain to the guy how blatant of a logical fallacy he's engaging in, but ................... what's the point??? :dunno: He's set in his ways.
You hunt and search for bullshit about Kamala and bullshit associated with Kamala to post here that fits your agenda and narratives.

Those are the facts and that was the point. I even provided three examples from that same account.

You're also set and your ways and you guys are definitely just fucking with me.
 
I want to explain to the guy how blatant of a logical fallacy he's engaging in, but ................... what's the point??? :dunno: He's set in his ways.
You hunt and search for bullshit about Kamala and bullshit associated with Kamala to post here that fits your agenda and narratives.

Those are the facts and that was the point. I even provided three examples from that same account.

You're also set and your ways and you guys are definitely just fucking with me.
Again even if that's true..and it isn't in my case...how bout we deal with what was presented
 
He's definitely comedic




Do you see what we're able to find and post when we hunt and search sources with a specific agenda?










But you all have no idea what I'm talking about. :confused:
 
You hunt and search for bullshit about Kamala and bullshit associated with Kamala to post here that fits your agenda and narratives.

Those are the facts and that was the point. I even provided three examples from that same account.

You're also set and your ways and you guys are definitely just fucking with me.

What "bullshit" have I posted from Kamala?

And I don't care how many examples you post from that account. It doesn't not invalidate the CNN clip. If she had doctored the clip or edited it in a certain way, then you may have a case. But as it is, she posted a legitimate clip, regardless of her political persuasion. If anything, get mad ad Don Lemon for using his anecdotal conversations as indicative of the who Black men will be voting for.

But otherwise, you're engaging in blatant logical fallacies and you don't even know (or won't acknowledge it): https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_...logic_in_argumentative_writing/fallacies.html
 
Your third-party candidate ain't winning so you might as well.

"While 3rd party contenders may not often secure victory, their presence can significantly impact elections. Experts believe the 2024 election could be exceptionally close, making third party candidacies potentially decisive. Groups like No Labels claim they won’t merely be spoiler candidates and proponents argue offering voters more candidate choices force major party nominees to address overlooked social issues. From Ross Perot in 1992 and 1996 to current day, Dr. Tammy Greer’s expertise sheds light on this complex electoral landscape. "

 
But none of what you said has anything to do with what was said. @VAiz4hustlaz posted the same shit from a different source...it's just your way of not dealing with what is said...it doesn't change the facts.
All they said is black men are voting for trump over a stimmy check... none of this mentions or forwards the agenda either you or vaiz advocate....it makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE for you two to be giddy like teenage white girls at a taylor swift concert siince you two believe and KNOW that BOTH SIDES are for shit.

Hell vaiz is voting GREEN PARTY for president so what the hell is his happy about?

Whoever gets in that office off the black vote you expect and demand they deliver for the black community very SPECIFIC things IN THEIR TERM not later...NOW makes reparations a real thing....NOW free black political prisoners....NOW create laws and policies ONLY for blacks...

if trump wins based on the black man vote...do you believe those things will happen in his term??

its a yes or no answer


open question for ANYONE
 
All they said is black men are voting for trump over a stimmy check... none of this mentions or forwards the agenda either you or vaiz advocate....it makes ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE for you two to be giddy like teenage white girls at a taylor swift concert siince you two believe and KNOW that BOTH SIDES are for shit.

Hell vaiz is voting GREEN PARTY for president so what the hell is his happy about?

Whoever gets in that office off the black vote you expect and demand they deliver for the black community very SPECIFIC things IN THEIR TERM not later...NOW makes reparations a real thing....NOW free black political prisoners....NOW create laws and policies ONLY for blacks...

if trump wins based on the black man vote...do you believe those things will happen in his term??

its a yes or no answer

open question for ANYONE
I've answered this a few times...you know my answer
 
@REDLINE Above is an example of at least four blatant logical fallacies - Ad hominem, Ad populum, Red Herring, and Straw Man.

Pure Blue Hat MAGA thinking.

You're using terms they do not understand


I'm always amused. I've told yall on more than one occasion that I don't take you seriously so I don't give yall serious answers. So when you're saying I'm attacking the people instead of the argument you're making the assumption that the people making the argument....yall.....should be viewed as deserving being taken seriously.
 
I'm always amused. I've told yall on more than one occasion that I don't take you seriously so I don't give yall serious answers. So when you're saying I'm attacking the people instead of the argument you're making the assumption that the people making the argument....yall.....should be viewed as deserving being taken seriously.
Word salad..try to follow along...don lemon made a statement...someone u guys don't like retweeted it..the end
 
I'm always amused. I've told yall on more than one occasion that I don't take you seriously so I don't give yall serious answers. So when you're saying I'm attacking the people instead of the argument you're making the assumption that the people making the argument....yall.....should be viewed as deserving being taken seriously.

If you're in here defending yourself/your candidate choice you are taking the thread seriously
 
I'm always amused. I've told yall on more than one occasion that I don't take you seriously so I don't give yall serious answers. So when you're saying I'm attacking the people instead of the argument you're making the assumption that the people making the argument....yall.....should be viewed as deserving being taken seriously.

Which one of us asked your opinion or asked a serious answer of you? Certainly not me. No one takes you seriously either.
 
Back
Top