Science: James Webb telescope just dropped its latest image, the Phantom Galaxy.

Lol. No they dont service satellites in space they just crash them shits into the earth nigga wtf? I can tell already you're one of these flat earther micky fikiees that has never looked through a telescope into space and believes in unfounded esoteric mysticism abhoring math and scientific inquiry. A bad faith actor.

I can tell u one of them niggas that will try to polish a turd
 
It's not 100 billion planets its 100 billion:
Tqq3BVZZAkbUyGvZmSfjQW.jpg


...meaning... exo planets number in the trillions
The photo clearly states that Galaxy has 100 billion planets in it. How they know this?!?
 
GPS is one way tech

A device with GPS isn't actually “contacting” satellites to determine its location. Instead, it's just listening for the radio signals that are being broadcast
:smh:

 
You know the earth is round, right? How would a cellphone signal cross the ocean? The country? What about signal time dilation?

I just realized you think the moon is within the earths atmosphere :oops: . There's no hope for you man.

Your ignorance is exhausting...

They have lines under the ocean to carry the signal

It's not even a debate!! NASA said the moon is in our atmosphere.

Imma start calling u dumb soon.
 
Sci-fi nerd question shit here:
What would you say the probability is of another planet existing that has a population that does not live harmoniously and is in-sync with the planet like humans.
(Or at least the wypipo…)

Honestly, bro.

I think we're the only ones out here.
 
They trying super hard to make it make sense.

I'm starting to feel like a bully.

Ninjas can't concept basic shit but wanna talk about 100 billion galaxies with even more planets in each galaxy.

Don't argue with retards that graduated!!

It's useless!!
I just want an explanation on how this is quantified . I definitely believe there are trillions of exo planets but how they fleeting this number out of a galaxy? By estimating?
 
I just want an explanation on how this is quantified . I definitely believe there are trillions of exo planets but how they fleeting this number out of a galaxy? By estimating?

It's borderline impossible with where we are as a people and the technology we currently have. The whole purpose of them using that info was to wow u. Once u peel back a layer or two it all falls apart.
 
Truth,

You've probably seen photos of the Hubble and Webb Deep Fields. Both represent images of galaxies taken within a piece of the sky about the size of your thumbnail when your arm is held at arm's length. There are thousands of galaxies within an area of space the size of a postage stamp held against the sky. Now extrapolate that to the entire portion of the sky you can see and the other celestial hemisphere you can't see because of the Earth. That's where the estimate for the number of galaxies is derived. Because the universe is relatively uniform the extrapolation is valid.

They are able to estimate the number of stars based on the galaxy's size, and there are also estimates based on observations of planetary transit that provide an estimate of the average number of planets per star.

I just want an explanation on how this is quantified . I definitely believe there are trillions of exo planets but how they fleeting this number out of a galaxy? By estimating?
 
Your ignorance is exhausting...

They have lines under the ocean to carry the signal

It's not even a debate!! NASA said the moon is in our atmosphere.

Imma start calling u dumb soon.
You scored some points but you're still losing (badly). I'll gladly admit I'm just not that familiar with recent changes. That geocoronal information (highly technical) is only a 2 year old discovery, you got me there. But hold on, you just said you dont believe in the science and then use NASA as a reference to defend your thesis? Makes perfect sense.

Satellites are real and satellite based phones use them exclusively just like satellite dishes (wtf are satellite dishes contacting you simpleton?). You're a clever idiot though, I'll give you that.
 
Last edited:
100 billion.

A concept that can't be fully realized unless you really try to be go beyond where you're currently at.

Majority of folks can barely understand the 50 mile radius distance around their place of residence.

Even the distance from the Earth to the Moon, majority of folks cannot comprehend when you tell them, that the time it takes with modern day rocket technology, about 3 days to get there.

They see the Moon in the evening sky and think it’s right over there, like getting there is the same as going to the corner store from their house.
 
Truth,

You've probably seen photos of the Hubble and Webb Deep Fields. Both represent images of galaxies taken within a piece of the sky about the size of your thumbnail when your arm is held at arm's length. There are thousands of galaxies within an area of space the size of a postage stamp held against the sky. Now extrapolate that to the entire portion of the sky you can see and the other celestial hemisphere you can't see because of the Earth. That's where the estimate for the number of galaxies is derived. Because the universe is relatively uniform the extrapolation is valid.

They are able to estimate the number of stars based on the galaxy's size, and there are also estimates based on observations of planetary transit that provide an estimate of the average number of planets per star.
Ok that makes sense thanks
 
Back
Top