Questioning whether men can get pregnant and give birth is transphobic and leads to violence against trans people.

Take a look at whats happening in women college sports now..specifically swimming

Yahoo Link

FINA votes to restrict transgender swimmers, including Lia Thomas, in elite women's events
Cassandra Negley
·Writer
June 19, 2022·2 min read


In this article:


  • Lia Thomas
    American swimmer


Swimming's world governing body voted to restrict the participation of transgender athletes in women's events and will look into creating an "open competition" category in a membership vote on Sunday.
FINA members voted 71.5% in favor of a policy that requires transgender swimmers to have completed their transition by age 12 to be able to compete, per the Associated Press. There are 152 national federations with voting rights. The vote applies to all events beginning on Monday. Part of the 24-page policy was a proposal for an "open competition" category.
"I do not want any athlete to be told they cannot compete at the highest level," FINA president Husain Al-Musallam said. The organization said it is setting up "a new working group that will spend the next six months looking at the most effective ways to set up this new category," per the AP.
The decision most immediately impacts Penn swimmer Lia Thomas, who became the first transgender NCAA champion in Division I history when she won the women's 500-yard freestyle in March. Thomas competed on the Penn men's team before transitioning and competing as a woman for the first time in 2021-22. Thomas met NCAA standards for competition after undergoing testosterone suppression therapy for more than two years.
She has said she wants to continue swimming after college and eyed the 2024 U.S. Olympic trials.
It also restricts NCAA swimmers since the organization said in January it would defer to the national and international bodies' rulings.
University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas reacts after swimming the 100 freestyle prelims at the NCAA Swimming and Diving Championships on March 19, 2022, at the McAuley Aquatic Center in Atlanta. (Photo by Rich von Biberstein/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)
FINA restriction follows IOC recommendations
The vote was taken at FINA's extraordinary general congress on Sunday from the world championships in Budapest, Hungary. Members heard presentations from three specialist groups that have been working together to form the policy. They consist of an athlete group, a science and medicine group, and a legal and human rights group.
The new path follows recommendations by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) made last November that urged moving away from focusing on individual testosterone levels to asking for evidence to prove when a performance advantage exists. The IOC said no athlete should be excluded based on “unverified, alleged or perceived unfair competitive advantage due to their sex variations, physical appearance and/or transgender status."
Governing bodies are responsible for regulating their own sports and setting their policies in regards to transgender athlete participation. The cycling governing body updated its rules last week to enact stricter limits that will make riders wait longer to compete.


I guess there's levels to it..what if Russell Westbrooks decides to go play basketball in the WNBA.."nah you can't do that cause you were originally a man" :dunno: ..argument is silly to me

That shit is crazy. Humans has an interesting way of seeing things.
 
She deserves ALL the smoke coming from the GOP Senate members concerning the growing pronouns that don't like biology. I wish Hawley nipped it in the bud by mentioning that biologically, men can not give birth, to watch that bitch squirm to bring up RARE animals that do
:lol: :roflmao:

She's on the front lines defending a group that would throw her under the bus.
 
Last edited:
I don't give a shit who the question is coming from. A broken clock is right twice a day.

Trans people exist, that is true. That doesn't mean everyone around them needs to bend their entire worldview around their existence. No matter what these people say or do, a trans-woman is still a biological male and trans-men are capable of pregnancy because they are biological females.
Okay I get that. The "I'm just asking questions" line is not based on ignorance in the case of these politicians. Everything is a setup for more rhetoric. We were talking about this instance last night in my black men therapy group, and how the fake outrage is about the black woman's tone and responses. Who is really concerned and who is just joining the Two Minutes of Hate.
 
And like I keep saying

I don't know a ton of gay people but I know enough

They ALL hate this stuff.

I've never been called homophobic

I really honestly don't care (which apparently still sounds harsh for some reason I've been told)

But by and large most guys I know find all this stuff not only a headache but caused more resentment from previously so called sympathetic folk.

Don't get it twisted they like pride month (well not as much now that it's just corporate rainbow stamps)

And kids feeling safer and being able to express themselves less shame and suicides etc etc

And who isn't for that right?

But when gay folks are frustrated about the pronouns, drag for tots, gender identity debates, Chappelle, bathrooms etc etc

They don't like it.

So What the f*ck is the cis gender straight black identified make supposed to think?

Apparently many in that community hates all this customer gender stuff to.

So who is really pushing this?

And how the hell were they able to do such a great and effective and successful campaign?

Cause I'd sure take that class.
I get you dude. I don't care either, and the gay dude I was in a play with said it was insensitive. Office Space explained it perfectly with, "I care enough not to care." I don't want bad shit to happen to you, and I don't concern myself with your personal shit. We're in a play together, and we have a common goal that doesn't have shit to do with how we choose to identify. Not focusing on that shit should let that person know that's not all I see them as.
 
Bitch needs some can goods throw at her face. :angry: :angry: :angry: :angry: Stupid ass ridiculous shit. I'll put this bitch in a camel clutch yo!!!! :angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry::angry:


c0zkLH.jpg
 
No. You all missed the point. A transexual MAN (is a biological woman who is transitioning to becoming a man by removing tits and taking hormones ...I think) CAN get pregnant. And many do (I guess). So when she says "persons" can get pregnant, she is including them...who identify as MEN.

That smug, racist Trump loving cracker KNOWS THAT. He is trying to deny them existence. And they DO Exist. She is MUCH SMARTER than him.....
 
No, I'm speaking in a specific context that goes with this weirdo shit that their god John Money cosigned.

If biological fact can't define a person's make believe gender, how can age? I was over 6ft my freshman year. What if I wanted to call myself a man instead of a boy? What if a woman agreed with me? Should it matter that I was 14/15 and she was 30?

After all, if I am 14/15 and a boy but feel I am a girl I get affirmed. Why don't I get affirmed if I disagree with my assigned age and the sexual restrictions that come with it? After all, biology doesn't have shit to do with it. That's their own wording. If a child can consent to challenging biology, why not something random like age?

A 14/15 year old boy is closer to a man than he is to being a girl right? So why should a random number define him if biology doesn't?

This is using their own fucked up logic. And if people think it's a leap, go look up John Money. Also, when did we think anyone would seriously say a man could get pregnant?

So I ask you, when will it be hard to define child? :eek::eek::eek::eek::eek:

What is a child? :angry: "Don't ask me that I'm not a biologist!!"

I‘d love to see you run this defense in the R.Kelly trial. :roflmao::roflmao3: You probably could’ve got him off.
 
Last edited:
No. You all missed the point. A transexual MAN (is a biological woman who is transitioning to becoming a man by removing tits and taking hormones ...I think) CAN get pregnant. And many do (I guess). So when she says "persons" can get pregnant, she is including them...who identify as MEN.

That smug, racist Trump loving cracker KNOWS THAT. He is trying to deny them existence. And they DO Exist. She is MUCH SMARTER than him.....
He didn't deny their existence. He asked her to explain what a woman is. I would have been confused too. Is a woman a man who got a beyond vagina operation? He asked her to explain what she meant and the unintelligent lady said that his line of questioning leads to violence? WTF?? Like some science experiment is gonna kill itself because I don't know if he/she calls himself a man or a woman.
 
Last edited:
Question: Do you believe men that a man can get pregnant?

Answer: My belief in anything is irrelevant. Biological males are incapable of pregnancy.

Considering "man and "woman" are now defined as arbitrary designations for gender. Then it boils down to biological functions and thats male and female. That's the proper answer to that question as it was posed.
Man and woman are NOT now defined as arbitrary designations for gender. This is the bullshit they are trying to get you to accept. Seems like you've been converted.
 
So hold on, you raise a good point

So a pedo can now say...

I don't define myself as an adult.

I define myself as a child?

I define myself as a doctor or police officer?

I define myself as a parent?

If we are able to just define what we are...

Does that mean scholarships can no longer be targeted to specific groups?

Or loans? Or grants?

You could just define yourself as native American?

Couldn't just walk in and get an armed service loan or discount without ID?

Because I DEFINE myself as a soldier?

Can we now open a casino and say we native American?

Exactly. Since truth and reality don't matter we can identify as anything. We can't? The argument can't be because it simply isn't true. The trans bullshit falls apart with just a little scrutiny. That's why they have to shut you up by calling you "phobic."
 
I get you dude. I don't care either, and the gay dude I was in a play with said it was insensitive. Office Space explained it perfectly with, "I care enough not to care." I don't want bad shit to happen to you, and I don't concern myself with your personal shit. We're in a play together, and we have a common goal that doesn't have shit to do with how we choose to identify. Not focusing on that shit should let that person know that's not all I see them as.

Bro realest talk ever...

You were finally able to express my sentiment I been struggling

I don't care who you f*cking.

I don't introduce my child by her medical condition why do they feel the need to do so with sexual preference?

And how come if we say anything about being black we are told to get over it. That every thing isn't racial. That calling someone racist is the worse thing ever.

But it's ok to throw around homophopic?
 
How are they effective?

What separates the LGBTQ community and the Black community? White people and economics exist in the LGBTQ

Gay shit generates at lot of money to business to the point that businesses change their logo for an entire month. The LGBQs don’t have to agree with the Ts, but they damn sure aren’t going to publicly go against their rights too hard.

Us on the other hand. Humph…

Where to begin?

Damn.

All that logic ain't make me feel no better bro
 
It's not a good faith question. None of these Republicans have any policy, so they just fearmonger about boogeymen. No hearings about gas prices, inflation, or any of the other shit they pretend to care about...just beating a dead horse about CRT and trans people.

Trans people exist whether people agree or not, and dehumanizing them makes violence against them acceptable.

you dam right...cause I will beat the fuck out of em...brah
 
I'm not even sure wtf she's trying to say but I do have a story/question/concern.

A few years back, right before the quarantine, I went on a few dates with this sexy ass half Vietnamese/half white chick. Things were going well for the first two dates then she invited me to her place for dinner & a movie. She never once mentioned to me that she lived with a roommate or that said roommate with a card carrying member of the alphabet gang.

I get there and the three of us are hanging out, eating, and watching the movie. The whole time the chick I'm seeing is talking to the roommate but she's using words like 'they' & 'them' so I assumed that she had more than one roommate. Needlessly to say, I wasn't remotely aware of the changing pronoun landscape that I was standing on.

Like a week later the chick breaks things off with me and she seems like she has a bit of an attitude. She said she didn't like the way I talked and handled myself around her roommate. I still didn't know what I said or did wrong but I'm like, whatever no lost.

It took like another year for me to fully grasp just how serious the alphabet gang were about playing pronoun games. Which bring me to my question/concern....

I'm all for equal rights, I really am, but how does it make sense for everyone else on Earth to have to fundamentally change the way that humans have always talked, just to accommodate these people's preference?

The woman in the video makes statements about, 'people with the compatibility to become pregnant.' I would have assumed the same thing ole boy did and thought she has referring to women. And I don't think it's homophobic or transphobic to not think about the other 8 categories of baby having humans that she brought up at the end.

end rant/my $0.02
 
In Ukraine, all the men between 18 and 64 were ordered to stay and fight...if a similar situation broke out here, you would see a bunch of "new men" running back to their original female gender...its all a fucking game being pushed by the media and the elites allow it because if people ever got truly focused on whats really going on around them there would be hell to pay

I also suspect part of the game is to undermine progressive movements by tying this bullshit to them...this strategy actually works out well for both political parties
 
This is a
Bro realest talk ever...

You were finally able to express my sentiment I been struggling

I don't care who you f*cking.

I don't introduce my child by her medical condition why do they feel the need to do so with sexual preference?

And how come if we say anything about being black we are told to get over it. That every thing isn't racial. That calling someone racist is the worse thing ever.

But it's ok to throw around homophopic?
This is a very good point…
 
Black folks need our own party.
Democrat, Republican,Conservative or Liberal don’t represent us. Look how crazy our sister looks. Imagine our daughters turning out to be just like her?

As crazy as this sister is, our daughters are being taught everything she is saying. The schools have added homosexuality to the curriculum. The pronouns are next. School will teach the same frame of thinking that this sista is communicating.

At the other end is a group another group of CACs that are more racist. How many generations will we only have these two general groups of people to choose to support?
 
Last edited:
Just a matter of time before they are going to start asking men: Do you like getting fucked in the ass? If you say no, then they will call you homophobic. When you ask how this makes you homophobic, they will counter: how do you know you don't like it if you never tried getting fucked in the ass? Then they would twist it, insisting the only way to come up with this conclusion without trying it is due to your fear of being labeled a homo.
This would, inevitably, leave you with two possible options, getting fucked in the ass by some homo, or being labeled as homophobic with all your rights taken away from you.
I say this with tongue and cheek, but seriously, how far away is this from where we are right now?!
 
Black folks need our own party.
Democrat, Republican,Conservative or Liberal don’t represent us. Look how crazy our sister looks. Imagine our daughters turning out to be just like her?

As crazy as this sister is, our daughters are being taught everything she is saying. The schools have added homosexuality to the curriculum. The pronouns are next. School will teach the same frame of thinking that this sista is communicating.

On the other end of the spectrum is racist CACs. How many generations will we only have these two general groups of people to choose to support?
I'm good with all of that, just as long as they're not teaching our kids about slavery and other true history.
 
Just a matter of time before they are going to start asking men: Do you like getting fucked in the ass? If you say no, then they will call you homophobic. When you ask how this makes you homophobic, they will counter: how do you know you don't like it if you never tried getting fucked in the ass? Then they would twist it, insisting the only way to come up with this conclusion without trying it is due to your fear of being labeled a homo.
This would, inevitably, leave you with two possible options, getting fucked in the ass by some homo, or being labeled as homophobic with all your rights taken away from you.
I say this with tongue and cheek, but seriously, how far away is this from where we are right now?!
Bruh. LMBAO
 
I'm good with all of that, just as long as they're not teaching our kids about slavery and other true history.
Yeah the CACs on the other side are much more overtly racist. Imagine our sons sounding like him. They want to deny slavery in our kid’s curriculum, and other racist CACery.


Bruh. LMBAO
Sounds crazy but my son was taught about homosexuality and being an “ally” to homosexuals in Kindergarten. An “ally” means defending any perceived attack against a homosexual. Not just physical, but primarily verbal. Anything a homosexual is verbally offended by, he supposed to be an ally to the homosexual. This was Kindergarten 2 years ago. I’m in California and it might not have gotten where you are yet, but it is coming.
 
Last edited:
Yeah the CACs on the other side are much more overtly racist. Imagine our sons sounding like him. They want to deny slavery in our kid’s curriculum, and other racist CACery.



Sounds crazy but my son was taught about homosexuality and being an “ally” to homosexuals in Kindergarten. An “ally” means defending and perceived attack against a homosexual. Not just physical, but primarily verbal. Anything a homosexual is verbally offended by, he supposed to be an ally to the homosexual. This was Kindergarten 2 years ago. I’m in California and it might not have gotten where you are yet, but it is coming.
They running indoctrination courses in kindergarten now. :(
 
Its your fault for even entertaining this silly bitch. Anything else that could come out her mouth is hoe babble.
 
Back
Top