Questioning whether men can get pregnant and give birth is transphobic and leads to violence against trans people.
- Thread starter ugk
- Start date
This bug eyed confused bed wench standing up for fags and queers that will never give a shit about her black ass unless she furthering along their agenda.
Fuk was she even talkin’ ‘bout?
Ol’ boy was talking about women and pregnancy and she comes with some stupid shit.
“Is it true, professor - that when you don’t wash yo ass after working out, is it true you you’re gonna be funky?”
“I wnat to recognize that your question is transphobic because you failed to list the 1000 genders and classifications of people we make up hourly.”
“Yo, GTFOHWTBS. I’m going to the bar.”
Ol’ boy was talking about women and pregnancy and she comes with some stupid shit.
“Is it true, professor - that when you don’t wash yo ass after working out, is it true you you’re gonna be funky?”
“I wnat to recognize that your question is transphobic because you failed to list the 1000 genders and classifications of people we make up hourly.”
“Yo, GTFOHWTBS. I’m going to the bar.”
Question: Do you believe that a man can get pregnant?
Answer: My belief in anything is irrelevant. Biological males are incapable of pregnancy.
Considering "man and "woman" are now defined as arbitrary designations for gender. Then it boils down to biological functions and thats male and female. That's the proper answer to that question as it was posed.
Answer: My belief in anything is irrelevant. Biological males are incapable of pregnancy.
Considering "man and "woman" are now defined as arbitrary designations for gender. Then it boils down to biological functions and thats male and female. That's the proper answer to that question as it was posed.
Last edited:
Mane...
I wonder how english writing classes are thought now with all the pronoun stuff that is out.
Yo I was JUST thinking bout that last night!!! Lol not for real, how are you supposed to do an essay when “they” now refers to a single person? This shit is actually retarted and will make people stupider than they are now.
It proceeds just as planned.
I am not changing anything in texts and if challenged, I simply let them know that we have to honor the design and intent of the author. Additionally, I will simply call students by their last name as I have my whole career.
Last edited:
Fuck that bitch
and Hawley too
and Hawley too
Last edited:
Fuck even saying biological. Why play along with this shit? Because even if people play along these nuts still will give that weird ass smile, the crazy eyes, and state some bullshit as fact while talking down to people. What's next, chronological women? Because the founder of this make-believe gender shit did cosign pedos. And if genitals don't define anything, numbers picked out for age sure as fuck won't either.
This entire exchange was fucking embarrassing. Republican or not, this is a fucking senator she is talking crazy too. And he brought up a valid point. How does she interact with students? If she is giving the stupid smile, crazy eyes, and bullshit as a fact to a U.S. senator, what does she do to her students?
How intimidated are college kids dealing with these fucking nuts?Weeks ago, I clowned the left for saying abortion rights was a womens issue and here we are. Saying it is a womens issue is transphobic according to their own bullshit.
We got that thread going on with Dr. Tommy Curry and it ties in perfectly with this shit. These weirdos have confused SOME black women with this bullshit. In order to be successful in academia, they most cosign this weirdo intersectional bullshit and sell the fuck out. From the supreme court justice to this chick, it's embarrassing.
It’s changing. My buddy is an English professor (20+ years) and the pronoun stuff is now recognized in whatever guideline they use.
"Questioning whether men can get pregnant
and give birth is my next topic!!!"
,
It's not a good faith question. None of these Republicans have any policy, so they just fearmonger about boogeymen. No hearings about gas prices, inflation, or any of the other shit they pretend to care about...just beating a dead horse about CRT and trans people.
Trans people exist whether people agree or not, and dehumanizing them makes violence against them acceptable.
More distractions,
so we can focus on dumbshit, while our tax dollars
are being stolen through a fuckin ukraine war
that has nothing to do with us.. I mean well ukraine
is part of the corporation called U.S.A
but it has NOTHING to do with America..
We need to kick u.s.a out the Country..
Its NOT OUR country its a corporation thats mindfuckin
AND RAPING the masses under the guise of a GOVT,
they PURCHASED AND OWN,
and PICK ITS CEO ALL THE TIME
and make a nation of dumbed down muthafuckas,
think its THIER PRESIDENT.. sorry its not,
its the president of u.s.a corporation,
which is owned by foreign entities,
Why most dont know this, because they been dumbed down
by indoctrination, they think is education...
so we can focus on dumbshit, while our tax dollars
are being stolen through a fuckin ukraine war
that has nothing to do with us.. I mean well ukraine
is part of the corporation called U.S.A
but it has NOTHING to do with America..
We need to kick u.s.a out the Country..
Its NOT OUR country its a corporation thats mindfuckin
AND RAPING the masses under the guise of a GOVT,
they PURCHASED AND OWN,
and PICK ITS CEO ALL THE TIME
and make a nation of dumbed down muthafuckas,
think its THIER PRESIDENT.. sorry its not,
its the president of u.s.a corporation,
which is owned by foreign entities,
Why most dont know this, because they been dumbed down
by indoctrination, they think is education...
What?
I don't give a shit who the question is coming from. A broken clock is right twice a day.
Trans people exist, that is true. That doesn't mean everyone around them needs to bend their entire worldview around their existence. No matter what these people say or do, a trans-woman is still a biological male and trans-men are capable of pregnancy because they are biological females.
Fuck even saying biological. Why play along with this shit? Because even if people play along these nuts still will give that weird ass smile, the crazy eyes, and state some bullshit as fact while talking down to people. What's next, chronological women? Because the founder of this make-believe gender shit did cosign pedos. And if genitals don't define anything, numbers picked out for age sure as fuck won't either.
This entire exchange was fucking embarrassing. Republican or not, this is a fucking senator she is talking crazy too. And he brought up a valid point. How does she interact with students? If she is giving the stupid smile, crazy eyes, and bullshit as a fact to a U.S. senator, what does she do to her students?
Weeks ago, I clowned the left for saying abortion rights was a womens issue and here we are. Saying it is a womens issue is transphobic according to their own bullshit.
We got that thread going on with Dr. Tommy Curry and it ties in perfectly with this shit. These weirdos have confused SOME black women with this bullshit. In order to be successful in academia, they most cosign this weirdo intersectional bullshit and sell the fuck out. From the supreme court justice to this chick, it's embarrassing.
So hold on, you raise a good point
So a pedo can now say...
I don't define myself as an adult.
I define myself as a child?
I define myself as a doctor or police officer?
I define myself as a parent?
If we are able to just define what we are...
Does that mean scholarships can no longer be targeted to specific groups?
Or loans? Or grants?
You could just define yourself as native American?
Couldn't just walk in and get an armed service loan or discount without ID?
Because I DEFINE myself as a soldier?
Can we now open a casino and say we native American?
How the fuck does she get a job at Berkeley? As a law professor nonetheless
Because she connects with the younger generations language and sensibilities. Universities will accept that every time.
But it seems that they are nearing that goal.
When not even something indisputable like pregnancy is SAFE from being questioned and parsed?
However absurdly, in a serious public forum
It's concerning and not to be taken lightly.
Women don't think shits a problem until after it's too fucking late. Instead of listening to black men with the best interest in mind, they buck.
Feminism, then get mad when brothers are with white women
Oh leave that gay dude alone he not bothering you, then you got DL brothers spreaing diseases, etc
Trans rights are equal,ok when they start stealing your man don't get mad. Keep that same energy sis
Feminism, then get mad when brothers are with white women
Oh leave that gay dude alone he not bothering you, then you got DL brothers spreaing diseases, etc
Trans rights are equal,ok when they start stealing your man don't get mad. Keep that same energy sis
They are, but let nature handle the rest and watch with a bag of popcorn.
Vulcan cold blooded
No, I'm speaking in a specific context that goes with this weirdo shit that their god John Money cosigned.
If biological fact can't define a person's make believe gender, how can age? I was over 6ft my freshman year. What if I wanted to call myself a man instead of a boy? What if a woman agreed with me? Should it matter that I was 14/15 and she was 30?
After all, if I am 14/15 and a boy but feel I am a girl I get affirmed. Why don't I get affirmed if I disagree with my assigned age and the sexual restrictions that come with it? After all, biology doesn't have shit to do with it. That's their own wording. If a child can consent to challenging biology, why not something random like age?
A 14/15 year old boy is closer to a man than he is to being a girl right? So why should a random number define him if biology doesn't?
This is using their own fucked up logic. And if people think it's a leap, go look up John Money. Also, when did we think anyone would seriously say a man could get pregnant?
So I ask you, when will it be hard to define child?
What is a child?
"Don't ask me that I'm not a biologist!!"
And like I keep saying
I don't know a ton of gay people but I know enough
They ALL hate this stuff.
I've never been called homophobic
I really honestly don't care (which apparently still sounds harsh for some reason I've been told)
But by and large most guys I know find all this stuff not only a headache but caused more resentment from previously so called sympathetic folk.
Don't get it twisted they like pride month (well not as much now that it's just corporate rainbow stamps)
And kids feeling safer and being able to express themselves less shame and suicides etc etc
And who isn't for that right?
But when gay folks are frustrated about the pronouns, drag for tots, gender identity debates, Chappelle, bathrooms etc etc
They don't like it.
So What the f*ck is the cis gender straight black identified make supposed to think?
Apparently many in that community hates all this customer gender stuff to.
So who is really pushing this?
And how the hell were they able to do such a great and effective and successful campaign?
Cause I'd sure take that class.
No, I'm speaking in a specific context that goes with this weirdo shit that their god John Money cosigned.
If biological fact can't define a person's make believe gender, how can age? I was over 6ft my freshman year. What if I wanted to call myself a man instead of a boy? What if a woman agreed with me? Should it matter that I was 14/15 and she was 30?
After all, if I am 14/15 and a boy but feel I am a girl I get affirmed. Why don't I get affirmed if I disagree with my assigned age and the sexual restrictions that come with it? After all, biology doesn't have shit to do with it. That's their own wording. If a child can consent to challenging biology, why not something random like age?
A 14/15 year old boy is closer to a man than he is to being a girl right? So why should a random number define him if biology doesn't?
This is using their own fucked up logic. And if people think it's a leap, go look up John Money. Also, when did we think anyone would seriously say a man could get pregnant?
So I ask you, when will it be hard to define child?
What is a child?
That was pretty good.
Jewish fags run the nation..its Easy to get things done when the head person is part of the agenda…gay nepotism is real.. if what they say is true every Jew born male toddler has had a pedo/gay experience ( read up on what their rabbi does during circumcision)
Take a look at whats happening in women college sports now..specifically swimming
Yahoo Link
FINA votes to restrict transgender swimmers, including Lia Thomas, in elite women's events
Cassandra Negley
·Writer
June 19, 2022·2 min read
In this article:
- Lia Thomas
American swimmer
Swimming's world governing body voted to restrict the participation of transgender athletes in women's events and will look into creating an "open competition" category in a membership vote on Sunday.
FINA members voted 71.5% in favor of a policy that requires transgender swimmers to have completed their transition by age 12 to be able to compete, per the Associated Press. There are 152 national federations with voting rights. The vote applies to all events beginning on Monday. Part of the 24-page policy was a proposal for an "open competition" category.
"I do not want any athlete to be told they cannot compete at the highest level," FINA president Husain Al-Musallam said. The organization said it is setting up "a new working group that will spend the next six months looking at the most effective ways to set up this new category," per the AP.
The decision most immediately impacts Penn swimmer Lia Thomas, who became the first transgender NCAA champion in Division I history when she won the women's 500-yard freestyle in March. Thomas competed on the Penn men's team before transitioning and competing as a woman for the first time in 2021-22. Thomas met NCAA standards for competition after undergoing testosterone suppression therapy for more than two years.
She has said she wants to continue swimming after college and eyed the 2024 U.S. Olympic trials.
It also restricts NCAA swimmers since the organization said in January it would defer to the national and international bodies' rulings.
University of Pennsylvania swimmer Lia Thomas reacts after swimming the 100 freestyle prelims at the NCAA Swimming and Diving Championships on March 19, 2022, at the McAuley Aquatic Center in Atlanta. (Photo by Rich von Biberstein/Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)
FINA restriction follows IOC recommendations
The vote was taken at FINA's extraordinary general congress on Sunday from the world championships in Budapest, Hungary. Members heard presentations from three specialist groups that have been working together to form the policy. They consist of an athlete group, a science and medicine group, and a legal and human rights group.
The new path follows recommendations by the International Olympic Committee (IOC) made last November that urged moving away from focusing on individual testosterone levels to asking for evidence to prove when a performance advantage exists. The IOC said no athlete should be excluded based on “unverified, alleged or perceived unfair competitive advantage due to their sex variations, physical appearance and/or transgender status."
Governing bodies are responsible for regulating their own sports and setting their policies in regards to transgender athlete participation. The cycling governing body updated its rules last week to enact stricter limits that will make riders wait longer to compete.
I guess there's levels to it..what if Russell Westbrooks decides to go play basketball in the WNBA.."nah you can't do that cause you were originally a man"
..argument is silly to me
I been to a bris before
I ain't gonna even start with you bro!
I'm very careful with religion stuff cause every single one has some questionable sh*t.
But I hear you
A rabbi was spreading STDs so last I heard they don't really do that part anymore
How are they effective?
What separates the LGBTQ community and the Black community? White people and economics exist in the LGBTQ
Gay shit generates at lot of money to business to the point that businesses change their logo for an entire month. The LGBQs don’t have to agree with the Ts, but they damn sure aren’t going to publicly go against their rights too hard.
Us on the other hand. Humph…
Where to begin?
Similar threads
