U.S. Supreme Court has voted to strike down Roe vs. Wade

Not a big fan of kids in general.

Does anyone else find d it ironic that prolifers also tend to love guns and the death penalty?

They live in a religious dream world... They think they deserve, or will take what they want under divine right and then kill to keep it.
 
Last edited:
Now remember folks... Clarence is Catholic, and think about where the catholic church is on sex. Anything other than a husband fucking his wife and splashing inside her vagina is a sin (I belive a mortal sin). ...any sex that is not open to procreation... sin. This is where that mufucka is at on sex. Not that all catholics are there with him on that shit, cause I know probably most are not.


 
Oh well this is what happens with weak Dems allowing Mitch McConnell to stack the courts. They did nothing when he blocked M. Garland to the Supreme Court and allowed him to rush Barrett to the Supreme Court. Repubs have been stacking the courts especially on the Federal level. If muthafuckas ain't out voting in droves come November, it will get worse. Coon Thomas talking about overturning every thing. :smh:
 
Now remember folks... Clarence is Catholic, and think about where the catholic church is on sex. Anything other than a husband fucking his wife and splashing inside her vagina is a sin (I belive a mortal sin). ...any sex that is not open to procreation... sin. This is where that mufucka is at on sex. Not that all catholics are there with him on that shit, cause I know probably most are not.

But Clarence is a lot like Lightbright:

"His discussion of pornography involving these women with large breasts and engaged in a variety of sex with different people or animals," Anita Hill said.

 
You are seeing a Supreme Court that is saying that settled law is now not settled and can change. Do not be surprised if someone takes up Brown versus Board of Ed all the way to the Supreme Court and you get a change in the ruling.

No court in the US is going to reintroduce segregation - not even the most extreme of justices. I'm sorry, but I strongly disagree w/ this position.

Affirmative action perhaps, but an attack on Brown v Board is simply inaccurate.
 
there is a lot of misleading rhetoric. its a state right issue, not nationwide. So depending where you live, and you choose to live around hillbillies, a woman is forced to keep the child.

I suspect this will be on the ballot in slight red/slight blue states next state election. But to be fair, I think only women by birth should be able to vote on it.

you in Louisiana...forget about it.

OG-GI395_aa8ce3_860PX_20220624120932.jpg
 
Last edited:
Zzzzz y'all done with the fake outrage yet?

They going overboard but I understand. America isn't what people think it is. They really think if they have the education they free to whatever and it's not true. They coming for education next expect a big push towards trades and vocational schools.

They want us poor and grateful more than anything else these laws are going to hurt slot of peoples pockets.

My guess is they'll deal with it regardless since dems prefer higher taxes on the rich.
 
With the numbers he had, I don't think that there was anything they could do to stop turtleman. Not that they aren't weak and worse at playing the game than the GOP'ers, but Mitch had the numbers and thus the power, and was able to prevent a hearing for Garland and then force Barrett through. ...and pretty much said he would do it beforehand. So when voters in conservative states get their 2 senators (whether or not they have 500,000 people or 10+ million people)....

Oh well this is what happens with weak Dems allowing Mitch McConnell to stack the courts. They did nothing when he blocked M. Garland to the Supreme Court and allowed him to rush Barrett to the Supreme Court. Repubs have been stacking the courts especially on the Federal level. If muthafuckas ain't out voting in droves come November, it will get worse. Coon Thomas talking about overturning every thing. :smh:
 
Back
Top