BREAKING: INVASION HAS BEGUN..... Putin's "3-day war"... NOW... 1 YEAR 338 DAYS ...WAGNER HEAD SAYS GROUP STANDING DOWN AFTER CLAIMS OF DEAL
- Thread starter lightbright
- Start date
How long you think those businesses will be active?
Moscow gonna be looking like East Berlin.
This was not Putin's endgame.
Just watched this clip… pretty good clip
You can hear the Uncertainty
I don’t want to say she scared but her voice sounds
I’ve said a few times, I feel like Putin back into a corner might be the worst thing
POLITICS
Ukraine claims it killed another Russian general, other senior officers near Kharkiv
KEY POINTS
CONTINUED:
Russia-Ukraine war: Ukraine claims it killed another Russian general, other senior officers near Kharkiv (cnbc.com)
Ukraine claims it killed another Russian general, other senior officers near Kharkiv
KEY POINTS
- Ukraine’s defense intelligence agency claimed that Russian Army Major General Vitaly Gerasimov was killed, and other senior Russian Army officers “were also killed or wounded” near Kharkiv.
- Gerasimov was identified by the intelligence agency as the chief of staff and first deputy commander of the 41st Combined Arms Army.
- The agency claimed that data obtained related to his death “show significant problems with communication” in Russia’s army, “and with the evacuation of their defeated units.”
- Russian President Vladimir Putin last week confirmed the death of another army general, Andrei Sukhovetsky.
CONTINUED:
Russia-Ukraine war: Ukraine claims it killed another Russian general, other senior officers near Kharkiv (cnbc.com)
Is they playing the game or trying to keep their goods because a drought is likely coming
Serbia is an exporter of basic metals, food products, crops, chemicals and chemical products, rubber and plastic products and electric equipment. Serbia primarily exports to Germany, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Romania, Russia and Macedonia.
Serbia is an exporter of basic metals, food products, crops, chemicals and chemical products, rubber and plastic products and electric equipment. Serbia primarily exports to Germany, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Montenegro, Romania, Russia and Macedonia.
Chinese firms that aid Russia may be cut off from U.S. equipment -commerce secretary
Chinese companies that defy U.S. restrictions against exporting to Russia may be cut off from American equipment and software they need to make their products, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told the New York Times.
The U.S. could “essentially shut” down Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp or any Chinese companies that defies U.S. sanctions by continuing to supply chips and other advanced technology to Russia, Raimondo told the newspaper in an interview published on Tuesday https://nyti.ms/3722ASf.
Washington is threatening to add companies to a trade blacklist if they skirt new export curbs against Russia, as it ramps up efforts to keep a vast array of technology out of the country after it invaded Ukraine last month.
If the United States were to find that a company like Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation was selling its chips to Russia, “we could essentially shut SMIC down because we prevent them from using our equipment and our software,” she was quoted as telling the New York Times. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by Leslie Adler and Sandra Maler)
Chinese companies that defy U.S. restrictions against exporting to Russia may be cut off from American equipment and software they need to make their products, U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo told the New York Times.
The U.S. could “essentially shut” down Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp or any Chinese companies that defies U.S. sanctions by continuing to supply chips and other advanced technology to Russia, Raimondo told the newspaper in an interview published on Tuesday https://nyti.ms/3722ASf.
Washington is threatening to add companies to a trade blacklist if they skirt new export curbs against Russia, as it ramps up efforts to keep a vast array of technology out of the country after it invaded Ukraine last month.
If the United States were to find that a company like Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corporation was selling its chips to Russia, “we could essentially shut SMIC down because we prevent them from using our equipment and our software,” she was quoted as telling the New York Times. (Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by Leslie Adler and Sandra Maler)
They can get back to growing crops
Fyah bun di eagle, di dragon & di bear!
Based on my high level contacts, Russia has made a strategic shift from the Afghanistan where they tolerated Western countries supplying weapons to the resistance such as Al-Qaeda/Bin Laden.
When they lost the war which triggered their USSR collapse a major blow, now they are attacking countries 'entering' the conflict by just supplying weaponry. So instead of entering the separatist regions and fighting Ukrainians forces attacking them. They are going after the whole country and neutralizing it, it is a completely different change in strategic thinking never seen before, many countries are unable to grasp this concept except me. Giving military aid from countries with no nuclear weapons is a failed idea, they will attack that country immediately and eliminate the threat, triggering WWIII. They will not see you as a neutral party just selling weapons, you have entered the conflict directly with them. Again these are hard lessons learned from the Soviet Union defeat in Afghanistan which triggered their collapse.
This is something the U.S. utilized with the Japanese, when they blockaded oil, now it is backfilling military equipment of countries that give military aid. When they responded it allowed the U.S. to enter WWII and the rest is history. Except the U.S. will be trading nuclear weapons with another country.
Everytime one of us kills one of them, that is when they get real interested. They learn quick, they adapt, they develop a whole new set of skills. Their armor might have changed or their weapons, it is amazing...
When they lost the war which triggered their USSR collapse a major blow, now they are attacking countries 'entering' the conflict by just supplying weaponry. So instead of entering the separatist regions and fighting Ukrainians forces attacking them. They are going after the whole country and neutralizing it, it is a completely different change in strategic thinking never seen before, many countries are unable to grasp this concept except me. Giving military aid from countries with no nuclear weapons is a failed idea, they will attack that country immediately and eliminate the threat, triggering WWIII. They will not see you as a neutral party just selling weapons, you have entered the conflict directly with them. Again these are hard lessons learned from the Soviet Union defeat in Afghanistan which triggered their collapse.
This is something the U.S. utilized with the Japanese, when they blockaded oil, now it is backfilling military equipment of countries that give military aid. When they responded it allowed the U.S. to enter WWII and the rest is history. Except the U.S. will be trading nuclear weapons with another country.
Everytime one of us kills one of them, that is when they get real interested. They learn quick, they adapt, they develop a whole new set of skills. Their armor might have changed or their weapons, it is amazing...
Last edited:
Based on my high level contacts, Russia has made a strategic shift from the Afghanistan where they tolerated Western countries supplying weapons to the resistance such as Al-Qaeda/Bin Laden.
When they lost the war which triggered their USSR collapse a major blow, now they are attacking countries 'entering' the conflict by just supplying weaponry. So instead of entering the separatist regions and fighting Ukrainians forces attacking them. They are going after the whole country and neutralizing it, it is a completely different change in strategic thinking never seen before, many countries are unable to grasp this concept except me. Giving military aid from countries with no nuclear weapons is a failed idea, they will attack that country immediately and eliminate the threat, triggering WWIII.
Everytime one of us kills one of them, that is when they get real interested. They learn quick, they adapt, they develop a whole new set of skills. Their armor might have changed or their weapons, it is amazing...
.
Based on my high level contacts, Russia has made a strategic shift from the Afghanistan where they tolerated Western countries supplying weapons to the resistance such as Al-Qaeda/Bin Laden.
When they lost the war which triggered their USSR collapse a major blow, now they are attacking countries 'entering' the conflict by just supplying weaponry. So instead of entering the separatist regions and fighting Ukrainians forces attacking them. They are going after the whole country and neutralizing it, it is a completely different change in strategic thinking never seen before, many countries are unable to grasp this concept except me. Giving military aid from countries with no nuclear weapons is a failed idea, they will attack that country immediately and eliminate the threat, triggering WWIII. They will not see you as a neutral party just selling weapons, you have entered the conflict directly with them. Again these are hard lessons learned from the Soviet Union defeat in Afghanistan which triggered their collapse.
Everytime one of us kills one of them, that is when they get real interested. They learn quick, they adapt, they develop a whole new set of skills. Their armor might have changed or their weapons, it is amazing...
... many countries are unable to grasp this concept except me. ...
Many countries think it is 1980's Afghanistan, just give military aid to the Mujahadeen/Ukraine. The USSR tolerated it because they did not expect the outcome of fleeing the country and USSR collapse where they lose almost everything.
Imagine Vietnam that received military aid from China led to the collapse of the United States that cause California, Texas, or Washington to become independent countries. When your next opportunity come around 40 years later, you are attacking any country giving military aid, you are not playing around anymore because the stakes are high.
Last edited:
The man started his post with "Based on my high level contacts........." and you not only kept reading but actually asked him to clarify something amongst that gibberish
Based on my high level contacts, Russia has made a strategic shift from the Afghanistan where they tolerated Western countries supplying weapons to the resistance such as Al-Qaeda/Bin Laden.
When they lost the war which triggered their USSR collapse a major blow, now they are attacking countries 'entering' the conflict by just supplying weaponry. So instead of entering the separatist regions and fighting Ukrainians forces attacking them. They are going after the whole country and neutralizing it, it is a completely different change in strategic thinking never seen before, many countries are unable to grasp this concept except me. Giving military aid from countries with no nuclear weapons is a failed idea, they will attack that country immediately and eliminate the threat, triggering WWIII. They will not see you as a neutral party just selling weapons, you have entered the conflict directly with them. Again these are hard lessons learned from the Soviet Union defeat in Afghanistan which triggered their collapse.
This is something the U.S. utilized with the Japanese, when they blockaded oil, now it is backfilling military equipment of countries that give military aid. When they responded it allowed the U.S. to enter WWII and the rest is history. Except the U.S. will be trading nuclear weapons with another country.
Everytime one of us kills one of them, that is when they get real interested. They learn quick, they adapt, they develop a whole new set of skills. Their armor might have changed or their weapons, it is amazing...
Then how come none of these "many countries" aren't rushing to hire you to do some consulting?
He's reading your post like...Then how come none of these "many countries" aren't rushing to hire you to do some consulting?
Then how come none of these "many countries" aren't rushing to hire you to do some consulting?
I do interact with high level contacts within many countries. They have reached out to me, pleading for help. My background is impeccable. I have rewritten the book on many things, I am just trying to get situated outside the U.S.
U don’t give him a second chance
A little history on what is going on over there that the American news media won’t talk about.
Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances
The Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances comprises three identical political agreements signed at the OSCE conference in Budapest, Hungary on 5 December 1994 to provide security assurances by its signatories relating to the accession of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT).
The memorandum was originally signed by three nuclear powers: the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States. China and France gave somewhat weaker individual assurances in separate documents.
The memorandum prohibited the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom and the United States from threatening or using military force or economic coercion against Ukraine, Belarus, and Kazakhstan. As a result of other agreements and the memorandum, between 1993 and 1996, Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine gave up their nuclear weapons.
Click Link To View Budapest Accord
I’ve also wondered how this isn’t a major story in this conflict…
Hmmm, could it be that there are only a few major media companies in the world, and controlling the narrative is pretty easy?
Similar threads
