Brazil's tragic ivermectin frenzy is a warning to the US

logic is data, research , double blinded studies and understanding what u read about the science and coming to LOGICAL conclusion based upon the FACTS and provable data points, nothing to do with how YOU FEEL
Get a logic book. People lie, sir. That is the problem we have now. A bunch of liars manipulating data and information. Logic, sir, requires inductive and deductive reasoning. You look at what is written (data) then you form generalize conclusions (inductive reasoning). On the other hand, deductive reasoning requires you to have a theory and you are trying to prove it. Deductive is used in the scientific method, inductive reasoning is not so exact. So, you don't have to have a double blind study to form a concise educated opinion on a topic. So, only scientist use logic?
 
Last edited:
Get a logic book. People lie, sir. That is the problem we have now. A bunch of liars manipulating data and information. Logic, sir, requires inductive and deductive reasoning. You look at what is written (data) then you form generalize conclusions (inductive reasoning). On the other hand, deductive reasoning requires you to have a theory and you are trying to prove it. Deductive is used in the scientific method, inductive reasoning is not so exact. So, you don't have to have a double blind study to form a concise educated opinion on a topic. So, only scientist you logic?
if thats ur final answer , then u actually just proved my point !! :roflmao: :roflmao: :hithead:
 
if thats ur final answer , then u actually just proved my point !! :roflmao: :roflmao: :hithead:
Man, my point is you don't have to do all that fancy shit you posted. You can read the data and surmise what is going on or what happened. I don't need a scientist who have loyalties I may not agree with to explain shit to me. When this is all over, the truth will prevail. So, I do advise stop with the dumb shit. And, reread my original statement. "So, only scientist use logic?"
 
Merck does not “produce” ivermectin, anyone can. It’s off patent. Neither try nor any other drug companies would make anywhere near what they are te making now if people took ivermectin to treat Covid.

Again, I'm not following your logic. Don't you think it would be a political and business windfall for Merck if one of their products (ivermectin, for horses) actually *DID* work for treating Covid-19? It would significantly increase the "Street Cred" for their other products... like their new anti-Covid pill... not to mention their stock price.
(Sigh) This guy sums it up perfectly:

 
Again, I'm not following your logic. Don't you think it would be a political and business windfall for Merck if one of their products (ivermectin, for horses) actually *DID* work for treating Covid-19? It would significantly increase the "Street Cred" for their other products... like their new anti-Covid pill... not to mention their stock price.
(Sigh) This guy sums it up perfectly:


No it would not be in Merck’s best interest to promote a product which is out of patent. They don’t control the product. If Merck said that it worked, generic manufacturers would quickly produce the product and sell it at as low a price as possible, taking the profit from the big companies.

Merck, like every other drug company, is currently spending billions to produce a new patented “cure” for Covid that they intend to sell to the public.
 
Again, I'm not following your logic. Don't you think it would be a political and business windfall for Merck if one of their products (ivermectin, for horses) actually *DID* work for treating Covid-19? It would significantly increase the "Street Cred" for their other products... like their new anti-Covid pill... not to mention their stock price.
(Sigh) This guy sums it up perfectly:


Another reason why they wouldn’t push the generic. They have their own pill, which they sell for 80 times the cost of manufacturing that it says works.

Imagine if it’s a similar ingredient to ivermectin.

 
No I am not. You are so brainwashed by the misleading studies being pushed that you believe blindly that the only way past Covid is the vaccine.

You ignore the clear evidence that Covid is now an endemic disease, like the flu or common cold. No vaccine will ever get rid of it.

Once you accept this, as you will be forced to over the coming months, you’ll begin opening your mind to how we can live with it, instead of calling people names to make yourself feel better.

On ignore, you go.
 
Man, my point is you don't have to do all that fancy shit you posted. You can read the data and surmise what is going on or what happened. I don't need a scientist who have loyalties I may not agree with to explain shit to me. When this is all over, the truth will prevail. So, I do advise stop with the dumb shit. And, reread my original statement. "So, only scientist use logic?"
did u just say u dont need a scientist to explain science to you and said stop with the dumb shit in the same response ?
:roflmao: :roflmao: :hithead:
 
did u just say u dont need a scientist to explain science to you and said stop with the dumb shit in the same response ?
:roflmao: :roflmao: :hithead:

[/QUOTE

You don't comprehend well or you are being disingenuous in your response. Perhaps, even, you are being selective in your response to what I wrote. I said, " I don't need a scientist who have loyalties I may not agree with to explain shit to me." Oh, I listen to scientist, but not to scientist who are paid to mislead. Shit load of information out there that scientist said were good, but turned out bad. They said what they said because the were paid. My question is, what loyalties do the scientist have that you believe in?
 
Back
Top