The proof of UFOs was supplied live again for everyone to see yesterday (21 July 2021)

[Nzinga]

Test Pilot: Yuri Vaschuk (Hero of the Russian Federation)



If anyone tells you that you cannot take a 24-yard long plane from a
curvilinear speed of 500 miles per hour, point the nose up, and come
to a dead stop in the sky, show him this video:
Su35s standing dead still in the air




This plane weighs 19000kg (19 metric tons)=42,000lbs and its length is halfway
from the end-zone to the center line of an American football field.

Data from KnAAPO,[41][195] Jane's All The World's Aircraft 2013[196]

General characteristics

• Crew: 1
• Length: 21.9 m (71 ft 10 in)
• Wingspan: 15.3 m (50 ft 2 in)
• Height: 5.9 m (19 ft 4 in)
• Wing area: 62 m2 (670 sq ft)
• Airfoil: 5%
• Empty weight: 19,000 kg (41,888 lb) [197]
• Gross weight: 25,300 kg (55,777 lb) with 50% internal fuel
• Max takeoff weight: 34,500 kg (76,059 lb)
• Fuel capacity: 11,500 kg (25,400 lb) internal
• Powerplant: 2 × Saturn AL-41F1S afterburning turbofan engines, 86.3 kN (19,400 lbf) thrust each dry, 142 kN (32,000 lbf) with afterburner

Performance

• Maximum speed: 2,400 km/h (1,500 mph, 1,300 kn) / M2.25 at altitude 1,400 km/h (870 mph; 760 kn) / M1.13 at sea level
• Cruise speed: 1,250 km/h (780 mph, 670 kn) / M1.1+ supercruise at medium altitude[198]
• Range: 3,600 km (2,200 mi, 1,900 nmi) at altitude1,580 km (982 mi) at sea level
• Combat range: 1,600 km (990 mi, 860 nmi) approx[199]
• Ferry range: 4,500 km (2,800 mi, 2,400 nmi) with 2 external fuel tanks
• Service ceiling: 18,000 m (59,000 ft)
• g limits: +9
• Rate of climb: 280 m/s (55,000 ft/min) +
• Wing loading: 408 kg/m2 (84 lb/sq ft) With 50% fuel 500.8 kg/m2 (102.6 lb/sq ft) with full internal fuel
• Thrust/weight: 1.13 with 50% fuel 0.92 with full internal fuel

 

[woodchuck]

The fuck?!!! That was sick!

 

[Mr.Mojo]

Are UFOs usually that loud?

Shit was hot tho..dude skilled it.

 

[big enos burrnet]

that free fall then takeoff was kold....

 

[Nzinga]

The fuck?!!! That was sick!

You have to give them credit, whether the planes can fight in war or not.
The guy is fearless. He almost died in testing another plane in 2002, when
one of the wings sheared off. They were testing an experimental model
to see if it could fly without a tail. That and other hazards he has gone
through is why he was awarded the title of "Hero of Russia"

I try to look at these performances from a purely aesthetic and technical
point of view. All politics aside. The pilot is also a design engineer, and he
is the lead test pilot of this plane. It is his job to push it to the limit, and see
what it can do.

 

[Nzinga]

that free fall then takeoff was kold....

Yes it is but apparently, with thrust vectoring engines, the plane is always in control.
In a plane without engine nozzle that can be directed by the pilot, the wings of the
machine have to be oriented in such a direction of travel that the air passing around
is generating enough lift. If such a plane is ever in a situation where it loses that lift,
it could be lost. With this plane, it is always recoverable because the thrust can be so
directed that the wings begin to cut the air in a direction that generates lift.

 

[peterlongshort]

Thats some gangsta shit.

 

[TENT]

This is boring shit and total waste of money.
Instead of spending money for warships, spend money on getting nations to cooperate together and form the new world order.
Fighting each other is just going to destroy human life.

Anyways. What does this have to do with UFOs @Nzinga ? Can you please elaborate?

 

[peter.parker1]

That take off distance is quite impressive !!!

 

[ghoststrike]

A bit boring compared to UFO's exiting the ocean at higher speeds with greater agility but nice attempt.

 

[Darrkman]

This is regularly done with fighter planes at air shows. I've seen it done a few times with the F22 Raptor at the Jones Beach air show.

The other cool move is that these fucking jets are LOUD but they'll have the Raptor fly by the beach is "whisper mode" and it's impressive how quiet it becomes.

I'd tell everyone if you every get a chance to go to an air show definitely do it.

 

[sammyjax]

How OP be jocked out over Russian and German shit is top 5 weirdest things on this board

 

[Nzinga]

This is boring shit

I think it is very entertaining and very impressive that man can make 42,000 lbs
of metal do acrobatics in the sky

This is [a] total waste of money.

The world is hostile, and if you are not prepared for war, someone is gonna
take your shit. NATO is on their borders threatening them with annhilative
war; China is on the other coveting their land and resources, what do you
expect them to do? I assure that they would rather be spending this money
on strengthening their economy, but they have to have a secure country first.

Whether you and I agree with that thinking, that is how things look from their
point of view.

Fighting each other is just going to destroy human life.

They can tell you that better than anyone else can. They lost 1/3 of their
economy and 27 million lives fighting Hitler. That was on top of fending
off all of the Western countries that tried to rape them in 1922.

And you wonder why they seem to be paranoid.

Anyways. What does this have to do with UFOs @Nzinga ? Can you please elaborate?

The kinematics of the machine defy conventional wisdom. The thing does
activities in the sky other planes cannot.

 

[Nzinga]

That take off distance is quite impressive !!!

Actually it can be shorter than that, but the exact minimum distance is
a military secret. Good catch though

 

[Darrkman]

Post any video of the F22 Raptor doing any of these aerobatics.

Yes the Russian AL41FS engines on this plane are known to be
very loud.

YouTube is your friend you can go find the video your damn self. Fucking fake African on here giving orders

 

[peterlongshort]

A bit boring compared to UFO's exiting the ocean at higher speeds with greater agility but nice attempt.

Sir....
That shit was amazing.

 

[ghoststrike]

Sir....
That shit was amazing.

By IFO standards, yes
By UFO standards, nah

 

[lightbright]

You have to give them credit, whether the planes can fight in war or not.
The guy is fearless. He almost died in testing another plane in 2002, when
one of the wings sheared off. They were testing an experimental model
to see if it could fly without a tail. That and other hazards he has gone
through is why he was awarded the title of "Hero of Russia"

I try to look at these performances from a purely aesthetic and technical
point of view. All politics aside. The pilot is also a design engineer, and he
is the lead test pilot of this plane. It is his job to push it to the limit, and see
what it can do.

The only one that has to give them credit is your Russian loving, goat fucking ass...... Does Putin's gun taste like a "white Russian" when he jizzes in your mouth?



.

 

[Bluelaser]

This is regularly done with fighter planes at air shows. I've seen it done a few times with the F22 Raptor at the Jones Beach air show.

The other cool move is that these fucking jets are LOUD but they'll have the Raptor fly by the beach is "whisper mode" and it's impressive how quiet it becomes.

I'd tell everyone if you every get a chance to go to an air show definitely do it.

Harrier Jet Hover Tricks


I'm not so in awe of this air craft because I've seen those maneuvers done year after year at the Chicago Air & Water show with the Harrier Jet that in my opinion is a predecessor to the Su 35.
If anything that craft is a modified version of the Harrier in my opinion.

 

[Nzinga]

Harrier Jet Hover Tricks
I'm not so in awe of this air craft because I've seen those maneuvers done year after year at the Chicago Air & Water show with the Harrier Jet that in my opinion is a predecessor to the Su 35.
If anything that craft is a modified version of the Harrier in my opinion.

This is a completely different issue. The Harrier was not even the best VTOL
aircraft. That distinction belonged to the Russian Yakovlev 141.

1. The Harrier was very unstable and killed pilots.
2. The Harrier was barely able to carry a combat load because much of its fuel was used to take off and land.
3. The Harrier was strictly subsonic and could not go supersonic
4. The Harrier could only hover for 45 seconds, after which the engine risked flaming out as it only carried 150
gallons of cooling water

This is why the US junked the Harrier and went with Russian technology
in designing the F35B

Do not listen to me. Listen to Lockheed Martin. When the time came to
incorporate VTOL technology in the F35B, the US went with the Russian
Yak141. Lockheed Martin bought 2 Yak 141 prototypes, and build out the
F35B on that basis. It is known by fair minded observer, that the F135
engine on the F35, which at 43,000lbs of afterburning thrust is the most
powerful engine ever put on jet fighter, basically is a development of the
RD79-300 Russian engine that the US acquired when Lockheed Martin
bought the 2 Yaks in 1994.



The YAK 141 broke 12 records and was the first supersoninc VTOL plane

 

[Nzinga]

YouTube is your friend you can go find the video your damn self. Fucking fake African on here giving orders

Anyway...

 

[CoTtOnMoUf]

Nice!

Camera man needs a raise!

 

[peterlongshort]

This is a completely different issue. The Harrier was not even the best VTOL
aircraft. That distinction belonged to the Russian YAK 141.

1. The Harrier was very unstable and killed pilots.
2. The Harrier was barely able to carry a combat load because much of its fuel was used to take off and land.
3. The Harrier was strictly subsonic and could not go supersonic
4. The Harrier could only hover for 45 seconds, after that the engine risked flaming out as it only carried 150
gallons of cooling water

This is why the US junked the Harrier and went with Russian technology
in designing the F35B

Do not listen to me. Listen to Lockheed Martin. When the time came to
incorporate VTOL technology in the F35B, the US went with the Russian
YA141. Lockheed Martin bought 2 Yak 141 prototypes, and build out the
F35B on that basis. It is known by fair minded observer, that the F135
engine on the F35, which at 43,000lbs of afterburning thrust is the most
powerful engine ever put on jet fighter, basically is a development of the
RD79-300 Russian engine that the US acquired when Lockheed Martin
bought the 2 YAKS in 1994.



The YAK 141 broke 12 records and was the first supersoninc VTOL plane

Well damn…

 

[Nzinga]

Nice!

Camera man needs a raise!

He and another camer man, Konstantin Kimelik, are excellent at this sort of
photography. Also, he must have a very powerful camera.

 

[Nzinga]

That take off distance is quite impressive !!!

There is a 3 or 4 hour long video on YouTube explaining the engineering
of the Su27 family, to which this plane belongs. As you can see, the nose
droops down, and then it has shoulders like cobra, plus a large wing area.
The whole body was designed to be one aerofoil, and so it generates
tremendous lift in every part. The leading edge root extensions and the
fuselage alone generate more than 40% of the lift. It reminds of the DC10
freighters I see at DFW airport which seem to soar effortlessly into the
air. The chief designer of the Su27 was the brilliant Soviet/Russian engineer
Oleg Samoilovich, who incidentally came as a visiting professor at the Univ
of Michigan, following during rapprochement between the West and the
Soviet, that occurred after the Berlin Wall came down.

 

[Nzinga]

By IFO standards, yes
By UFO standards, nah

A little hyperbole never hurt anyone

 

[Dr. Truth]

Cac op worships Nazi’s Russians and Chinese

 

[Bluelaser]

This is a completely different issue. The Harrier was not even the best VTOL
aircraft. That distinction belonged to the Russian YAK 141.

1. The Harrier was very unstable and killed pilots.
2. The Harrier was barely able to carry a combat load because much of its fuel was used to take off and land.
3. The Harrier was strictly subsonic and could not go supersonic
4. The Harrier could only hover for 45 seconds, after that the engine risked flaming out as it only carried 150
gallons of cooling water

This is why the US junked the Harrier and went with Russian technology
in designing the F35B

Do not listen to me. Listen to Lockheed Martin. When the time came to
incorporate VTOL technology in the F35B, the US went with the Russian
YAk141. Lockheed Martin bought 2 Yak 141 prototypes, and build out the
F35B on that basis. It is known by fair minded observer, that the F135
engine on the F35, which at 43,000lbs of afterburning thrust is the most
powerful engine ever put on jet fighter, basically is a development of the
RD79-300 Russian engine that the US acquired when Lockheed Martin
bought the 2 YAKS in 1994.



The YAK 141 broke 12 records and was the first supersoninc VTOL plane

Good points.
So are the Soviets superior to U.S. in aeronautics ?

 

[Nzinga]

Good points.
So are the Soviets superior to U.S. in aeronautics ?

No. The US created that miracle in engineering called the SR71.
The US created the U2. They all build on top of each other. If
you see the plane the Russians announced yesterday, it looks
like cross between the Boeing entry and the Northrop YF23
to that competition which Lockheed Martin won.

Before the Soviets achieved the Yak 141, they failed miserably
with its predecessor the Yak 38, but meanwhile Hawker Harrier
of the English was already in service.
_______________________________________________




Boeing solutions to stealth fighter competition

See that intake at the bottom of the Boeing entry




+

Plus the tail/elevator back section. As you can see, this
plane does not have a rudder or elevators. It has wings
in the back angled at 45 degrees which provide for
both pitch and roll


=

This is the new plane announced by the Russians yesterday

1. It has the mouth of the Boeing plane
2. It has the same back section.

The two planes above are from more than 20 years ago.
Did the Russians just wake up and dream of the things
that American engineers innovated decades ago?




When I saw its pictures 2 days ago, I almost started a thread
saying "Boeing should sue Sukhoi" for royalties ..

That being said, Corsair, or whatever company it rolled into
might have something to say since they had that same intake
in their F8 Crusader more than 50 years ago.

 

[RoadRage]

So the plane, that the video identifies as the Su-35, is proof of a UFO (where the U literally stands for unidentified), wow talk about an oxymoron. Thumbs up for the dope video, but middle finger for the misleading title.

 

[Nzinga]

So the plane, that the video identifies as the Su-35, is proof of a UFO (where the U literally stands for unidentified), wow talk about an oxymoron. Thumbs up for the dope video, but middle finger for the misleading title.

Hyperbole you dummy. Are you one of those people the comedian
always has to explain the joke to?

 

[ORIGINAL NATION]

I think it is very entertaining and very impressive that man can make 42,000 lbs
of metal do acrobatics in the sky




The world is hostile, and if you are not prepared for war, someone is gonna
take your shit. NATO is on their borders threatening them with annhilative
war; China is on the other coveting their land and resources, what do you
expect them to do? I assure that they would rather be spending this money
on strengthening their economy, but they have to have a secure country first.

Whether you and I agree with that thinking, that is how things look from their
point of view.




They can tell you that better than anyone else can. They lost 1/3 of their
economy and 27 million lives fighting Hitler. That was on top of fending
off all of the Western countries that tried to rape them in 1922.

And you wonder why they seem to be paranoid.



The kinematics of the machine defy conventional wisdom. The thing does
activities in the sky other planes cannot.

America and N.A.T.O are the two biggest klans organizations in the world. The need for military dominance comes from being prepared to keep the truth out.

 

[cashwhisperer]

That wasn't shit!

I'll take my jacket off, wrap it around my arm and show a muthafucka how to fly a plane!!

 

[RoadRage]

Hyperbole you dummy. Are you one of those people the comedian
always has to explain the joke to?

Your jokes are stale as fuck, you're the type that has to explain your corny jokes to others, not knowing they know what you were trying to say, but they didn't laugh because it's as corny and dry as your ashy toes.

 

[Nzinga]

Your jokes are stale as fuck, you're the type that has to explain your corny jokes to others, not knowing they know what you were trying to say, but they didn't laugh because it's as corny and dry as your ashy toes.

I do not give a fuck about what you think. You know
that. Now get the fuck out of my thread.