Biz: Contentious Union Vote at Amazon Heads to a Count UPDATE: NO UNION UPDATE 1: NYC Union?

playahaitian

Rising Star
Certified Pussy Poster

Contentious Union Vote at Amazon Heads to a Count
The outcome of a vote at a warehouse in Alabama could have far-ranging implications for both the company and the labor movement.



A rally on Friday in support of the Amazon workers outside the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union’s building in Birmingham, Ala.Credit...Charity Rachelle for The New York Times
By Karen Weise and Michael Corkery
March 29, 2021, 3:00 a.m. ET
SEATTLE — By the end of Monday, thousands of yellow envelopes mailed to a squat brick building in Birmingham, Ala., will hold the fate of one of the most closely watched union elections in recent history, one that could alter the shape of the labor movement and one of America’s largest employers.
The envelopes contain the ballots of workers at an Amazon warehouse near Birmingham. Almost 6,000 workers at the building, one of Amazon’s largest, are eligible to decide whether they form the first union at an Amazon operation in the United States, after years of fierce resistance by the company.
The organizers have made the case in a monthslong campaign that Amazon’s intense monitoring of workers infringes on their dignity, and that its pay is not commensurate with the constant pressure workers feel to produce. The union estimates that roughly 85 percent of the work force at the warehouse is Black and has linked the organizing to the struggle for racial justice.
Amazon has countered that its $15 minimum wage is twice the state minimum, and that it offers health insurance and other benefits that can be hard to find in low-wage jobs.
“Even the fact that the vote is taking place is a referendum on the so-called future of work,” said Beth Gutelius, a researcher who studies the warehousing industry.
Whatever the outcome of the vote — which may not be known for days — the union drive has already succeeded in roiling the world’s biggest e-commerce company and spotlighting complaints about its labor practices. The vote comes at a delicate time for the company, which faces increasing scrutiny in Washington and around the world for its market power and influence, which have grown during the pandemic as consumers flocked online to avoid stores. President Biden has signaled his support for the workers, as have many progressive leaders.
If the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union succeeds, it would be a huge victory for the labor movement, whose membership has declined for decades. A victory would also give it a foothold inside the country’s second-largest private employer. The company now has 950,000 workers in the United States, after adding more than 400,000 in the last year alone.
If the union loses, particularly by a large margin, Amazon will have turned the tide on a unionization drive that seemed to have many winds at its back. A loss could force labor organizers to rethink their overall strategy and give Amazon confidence that its approach is working.

Image
The Amazon warehouse in Bessemer, Ala., was draped in sky blue banners blaring “VOTE.”Credit...Charity Rachelle for The New York Times
The union drive has captured national attention partly because of the nation’s focus on essential workers during the pandemic and on racial inequalities highlighted by the Black Lives Matter movement.
“Obviously, we want to win,” Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont said on Friday when he visited Alabama. “But I think a major point has already been proven. And that is that workers, even in the Deep South, are prepared to stand up and organize and fight for justice.”
In Bessemer, Ala., a pro-union radio spot paid for by Black Lives Matter aired on a local R&B station, while every intersection around the warehouse has been crowded with signs. “Bama has your back! Vote union!” one read. The large building was draped in sky blue banners blaring “VOTE.” On Friday, an Amazon employee drove a golf cart around the parking lot to ward off news media.
A union victory “may change the labor movement, as we have a shift in defining who are workers, who are union members,” said Sara Nelson, the president of the Association of Flight Attendants, who visited Bessemer this month and felt “overwhelming” local support for the union.
But if workers vote against the union, Ms. Nelson said, the result “would be pretty devastating.” Ms. Nelson said “people would have a hard time believing it because of what they are experiencing on the ground.”
Mr. Sanders’s visit appeared to have struck a nerve with Amazon. After he announced the trip, Dave Clark, who runs Amazon’s operations and worldwide consumer business, attacked Mr. Sanders in a series of messages on Twitter, as did the company’s official social media account. “I often say we are the Bernie Sanders of employers, but that’s not quite right because we actually deliver a progressive workplace,” Mr. Clark wrote in one tweet.
Amazon has said it does not believe the union represents the majority of its workers. It declined to speculate on what would happen after the vote.
“Even though we don’t know how the vote will turn out, we believe we have opened the door to more organizing around the country,” Stuart Appelbaum, the union’s president, said in a statement. “And we have exposed the lengths to which employers will go to crush their employees trying to gain a union voice — this campaign has become the prime example for why we need labor law reform in this country.”
The unionization effort came together quickly, especially for one aimed at such a large target. Workers at the building in Bessemer approached the local branch of the retail workers’ union last summer. In October, organizers began showing up at the warehouse daily, trying to talk with workers between shift changes.

Image

“Obviously, we want to win,” Senator Bernie Sanders of Vermont said on Friday when he visited Alabama. Standing alongside him was Michael Render, the rapper who goes by Killer Mike.Credit...Charity Rachelle for The New York Times
By late December, more than 2,000 workers had signed cards indicating that they wanted an election. The labor board determined that figure showed enough interest to hold a vote.
Amazon wanted the voting to happen in person, as is typical, but the National Labor Relations Board found that the pandemic made that too risky and ordered a mail-in election.
The ballots were mailed out to workers in early February and must be signed and received by the labor board at its Birmingham office by the end of Monday.
On Tuesday, the vote counting begins — a process that could take many days.
First, a staff member at the labor board will read the names of the workers, without opening an inner envelope with the actual ballot. Representatives from the union and Amazon will be on a private video conference. As each name is read, they will check the workers’ names against a staff list, and if either side contests whether that worker was eligible to vote, that ballot will be set aside. A representative from each side is also expected to be there in person to observe the process.
After the two sides have had the opportunity to make their objections about eligibility, the N.L.R.B. will begin counting the uncontested ballots. After every 100 votes, the labor board will count those ballots again until all the votes are counted. This portion will be open to reporters on a video conference line.

Image

Kumasi Amin, who drove up from Montgomery, Ala., outside the Amazon warehouse with other volunteers and members of the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union earlier this month.Credit...Bob Miller for The New York Times
If there are more contested ballots than uncontested, that is likely to set off legal arguments by the union and Amazon over the eligibility of each contested ballot. Each side has about a week to make its case before N.L.R.B. certifies the vote.
Either side can contest whether the vote was conducted fairly. The union, for instance, could argue that the company took steps to improperly sway the vote, by potentially making workers fearful of reprisal if they supported organizing.
If the union prevails, workers fear that the company may shut down the warehouse. Amazon has backed away from locations that bring it headaches before. In 2000, it closed a customer service office that was trying to unionize, saying the closing was the result of a reorganization. It stopped construction on an office tower when Seattle wanted to tax the company, and backed out of plans to build a second headquarters in New York City after facing progressive opposition.
But the company has committed more than $360 million in leases and equipment for the Bessemer warehouse, and shutting down the vote of a large Black work force could publicly backfire, said Marc Wulfraat, a logistics consultant who closely tracks the company.
Regardless of the outcome, Mr. Wulfraat said that the election is a sign Amazon has work to do. “For most companies that end up with labor organizing in some capacity,” he said, “it didn’t come about because they were doing a fantastic job managing people.”
If the union loses, Amazon will lose at least one customer: Michael Render, the rapper who goes by Killer Mike. Appearing alongside Mr. Sanders on Friday, he said, “If that vote does not go through, if these conditions do not improve, I won’t be ordering from Amazon again.”
 
Amazon Workers Defeat Union Drive at Alabama Warehouse
The company’s victory deals a crushing blow to organized labor, which had hoped the time was ripe to start making inroads.




Union organizers last year outside the Amazon warehouse in Bessemer, Ala., where workers soundly defeated a unionization drive.Credit...Bob Miller for The New York Times
By Karen Weise and Michael Corkery
April 9, 2021Updated 1:14 p.m. ET
Amazon beat back the most significant labor drive in its history on Friday, when a tally showed that workers at its giant warehouse in Alabama had voted decisively against forming a union.
Workers cast 1,798 votes against a union, giving Amazon enough to emphatically defeat the effort. Ballots in favor of a union trailed at 738, less than 30 percent of the votes tallied, according to federal officials.
The lopsided outcome at the 6,000-person warehouse in Bessemer, Ala., dealt a crushing blow to labor organizers, Democrats and their allies at a time when conditions have been ripe for unions to make advances.
Amazon, which has repeatedly quashed labor activism, had appeared vulnerable as it faced increasing scrutiny in Washington and around the world for its market power and influence. President Biden signaled support for the union effort, as did Senator Bernie Sanders, the Vermont independent. The pandemic, which drove millions of people to shop online, also spotlighted the plight of essential workers and raised questions about Amazon’s ability to keep those employees safe.
But in an aggressive campaign, the company argued that its workers had access to rewarding jobs without needing to involve a union. The victory leaves Amazon free to handle employees on its own terms, as it has gone on a hiring spree and expanded its work force to more than 1.3 million people.
Margaret O’Mara, a professor at the University of Washington who researches the history of technology companies, said Amazon’s message that it offered good jobs with good wages had prevailed over the criticisms by the union and its supporters. The outcome, she said, “reads as a vindication.”
She added that while it was just one warehouse, the election had garnered so much attention that it had become a “bellwether.” Amazon’s victory was likely to cause organized labor to think that “maybe this isn’t worth trying in other places,” Ms. O’Mara said.
The Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, which led the drive, blamed its defeat on what it said were Amazon’s anti-union tactics before and during the voting, which was conducted from early February through the end of last month. The union said it would challenge the election results and ask federal labor officials to investigate Amazon for creating an “atmosphere of confusion, coercion and/or fear of reprisals.”
“Our system is broken,” said Stuart Appelbaum, the union’s president. “Amazon took full advantage of that.”
Amazon said in a statement that “the union will say that Amazon won this election because we intimidated employees, but that’s not true.” It added, “Amazon didn’t win — our employees made the choice to vote against joining a union.”
About 50 percent of the 5,805 eligible voters at the warehouse cast ballots in the election. A majority of votes, or 1,521, was needed to win. About 500 ballots were contested, largely by Amazon, the union said. Those ballots were not counted.
Tally of Amazon Warehouse Unionization Votes
Either side needed 1,521 votes to win.
Yes
738
No
1,798
A total of 505 ballots were challenged; 76 were void.·Source: National Labor Relations Board
William and Lavonette Stokes, who started work at the Bessemer warehouse in July, said the union had failed to convince them how it could improve their working conditions. Amazon already provides good benefits, relatively high pay that starts at $15 an hour and opportunities to advance, said the couple, who have five children.
“Amazon is the only job I know where they pay your health insurance from Day 1,” Ms. Stokes, 52, said. She added that she had been turned off by how organizers tried to cast the union drive as an extension of the Black Lives Matter movement because most of the workers are Black.
“This was not an African-American issue,’’ said Ms. Stokes, who is Black. “I feel you can work there comfortably without being harassed.”
The vote could lead to a rethinking of strategy inside the labor movement.
For years, union organizers have tried to leverage growing concerns about low-wage workers to break into Amazon. The Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union had organized around critical themes of supporting Black essential workers in the pandemic. The union had estimated that 85 percent of the workers at the Bessemer warehouse were Black.
The inability to organize the warehouse also follows decades of unsuccessful and costly attempts to form unions at Walmart, the only American company that employs more people than Amazon. The repeated failures at two huge companies may push labor organizers to focus more on backing national policies, such as a higher federal minimum wage, than unionizing individual workplaces.
The Amazon warehouse, on the outskirts of Birmingham, opened a year ago, just as the pandemic took hold. It was part of a major expansion at the company that accelerated during the pandemic. Last year, Amazon grew by more than 400,000 employees in the United States, where it now has almost a million workers. Warehouse workers typically assemble and box up orders of items for customers.
The unionization effort came together quickly, especially for one aimed at such a large target. A small group of workers at the building in Bessemer approached the local branch of the retail workers’ union last summer. They were frustrated with how Amazon constantly monitored every second of their workday through technology and felt that their managers were not willing to listen to their complaints.
Organizers got at least 2,000 workers to sign cards saying they wanted an election, enough for the National Labor Relations Board, which conducts union elections, to approve a vote.
The election was conducted by mail, a concession to the pandemic. Instead of holding an election over just a few days, workers had more than a month to complete and mail in their ballots, which were due on March 29.
Amazon’s public campaign focused on what the company already provided in benefits and the $15 minimum wage, which is twice the Alabama minimum. Internally it stressed that workers did not need to pay for union membership to have a great job. The company’s slogan — “Do it without dues” — was pushed to workers in text messages, mandatory meetings and signs in bathroom stalls.
The union had complained that those tactics showed how companies like Amazon have an advantage because they can hold mandatory anti-union meetings and have access to workers in the warehouse to persuade them to vote no. In 2018, the union also tried and failed to make inroads at an Amazon warehouse on Staten Island.

Image
The Seattle headquarters of Amazon, which promoted its benefits and pay while campaigning against the union.Credit...Miles Fortune for The New York Times
Ms. O’Mara said the very complaints that the union had surfaced about job stability and security made organizing workers harder. That’s because the transience of warehousing jobs “works against building solidarity and a willingness to invest in that employer and that job,” she said.
Many labor leaders have said unionizing Amazon was critical to reversing the long-term decline in union membership, which has fallen to just over 6 percent of the private sector from the upper teens in the early 1980s.
They argued that Amazon had power over millions of workers across the industries in which it operated. The company’s dominance, they said, forced competitors to adopt its labor practices, which put a priority on efficiency.
“Amazon is transforming industries one after another,” Mr. Appelbaum, the president of the retail workers union, said in an interview in 2019. “Amazon’s vision of the world is not the vision we want or can tolerate.” He has frequently referred to the effort to unionize Amazon as a fight over “the future of work.”
Some union leaders said the campaign in Bessemer would advance labor’s goals even if it ended in a loss.
The election generated “a ton of coverage and discussion, and people all over this country are hearing that unions are the solution,” said Sara Nelson, the president of the Association of Flight Attendants. “We’ve been able to have a real discussion about what the union actually does.”
Noam Scheiber, Sophia June and Miles McKinley contributed reporting.
 
You know what this was very stupid for the people to vote no of all companies Amazon workers need a union because there is a ton of miss treatment going on with employees within this company again this is going to come back and bite them in the ass
 
Too many busted up mammies and coons in the South for something like this to jump off. Some of them probably set up a side deal with Amazon to undermine the union. Many of the unions are stuck in the 1930s/Biden era and have not changed their practices at all.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

aunt_jemima_ab_frost-397x640.jpg


We should let companies like Amazon operate as they see fit and decide as a consumer. If these companies want to be effeminate/trans with their employees by not being honor/duty bound then so be it.

You can bypass many of the products that Amazon sells and deal with the manufacturer directly.
 
I would let predominately white areas unionize first so they can't claim they are not bringing jobs to the South because of labor organizing.
 
anybody putting this on the workers, need to get

a betterr idea on how this world is ran... bruh..

the shit was set up to bust the union from the giddy up....

bruh the fuckin ballot box was on amazon grounds..

that alone should let any thinking person know

amazon fuckery was afoot...

if there were no independent overseer to ensure

votes are counted fairly...

then this whole shit was doomed from the start...

too many of us, truly dont understand how the superwealthy

already stacked the cards in their favor....

mrfreddygoodbud is a professional game peeper
 
I bet the 30% who voted for the union were almost all black.

It is not a defeat for the Democrats; it is a defeat for those
Amazon employees. This was a great victory for all those who
stand in favour of unionisation. A vote actually took place.

When I worked at a big semiconductor maker in this area of America,
one of the engineers tried to unionise us. The company went after him,
and plastered accusations that he was fired because he obtained or
stole intellectual property. They also posted anti-union propaganda
on every message board. I tried to sound out the general sentiment
toward unionisation, and I found the Americans, especially the cacs,
to be resolutely against it. The army of Chinese and Indian engineers
wisely stayed out of the fray.
 
Last edited:
What benefits were they fighting for that they weren't already getting ?
A better wage; more vacation; paid sick leave; the right to have a proper
disciplinary hearing instead of the threat of summary termination. A voice
in the culture of the company.

Americans workers, like all workers in the world, got their highest wage
when their unionisation rates were the highest. Unions managed to get
American workers political power as well.
 
Amazon rejects claims it intimidated Alabama workers during union vote
  • Union leaders allege ‘egregious and blatantly illegal’ conduct
  • Vote not to unionize seen as a blow to US labor movement
A banner encouraging workers to vote in labor balloting is shown at an Amazon warehouse in Bessemer, Alabama. Photograph: Jay Reeves/AP

Richard Luscombe
@richlusc
Sun 11 Apr 2021 11.38 EDT


28

Amazon has rejected claims it intimidated workers voting on whether to create the company’s first union at an Alabama warehouse.

Amazon workers in Alabama vote against forming company’s first union
Read more


The overwhelming decision by employees in Bessemer, a suburb north of Birmingham, to rebuff organised representation was seen as a blow to the US labor movement. Union leaders alleged “egregious and blatantly illegal” conduct by Amazon during the closely watched vote.

In a statement posted to its website, Amazon said the claim by officials of the retail, wholesale and department store union (RWDSU) had no merit.

“It’s easy to predict the union will say that Amazon won this election because we intimidated employees, but that’s not true,” it said.

“Our employees heard far more anti-Amazon messages from the union, policymakers, and media outlets than they heard from us. And Amazon didn’t win – our employees made the choice to vote against joining a union.”

Even so the company, whose owner Jeff Bezos is the world’s richest man with an estimated fortune of $196bn, made a point of thanking workers at the warehouse, known as BHM1, for their verdict.

“There’s been a lot of noise over the past few months and we’re glad that your collective voices were finally heard,” it said. “In the end, less than 16% of the employees at BHM1 voted to join the RWDSU union.”

Among allegations levelled at Amazon were that it forced workers to attend anti-union meetings, bombarded them with text messages and papered the walls of warehouse bathrooms with anti-union posters.

Additionally, there was a wrangle over the erection of a mailbox outside the warehouse that Amazon encouraged workers to use for their votes, raising suspicions the company was seeking to influence the casting and counting of ballots. The Washington Post revealed that the US Postal Service installed the mailbox at Amazon’s urging in February, at the start of the seven-week balloting period.

“We won’t let Amazon’s lies, deception and illegal activities go unchallenged, which is why we are formally filing charges against all of the egregious and blatantly illegal actions taken by Amazon during the union vote,” the RWDSU president, Stuart Appelbaum, said in a statement.

“Amazon knew full well that unless they did everything they possibly could, even illegal activity, their workers would have continued supporting the union.”

The number of ballots being challenged by the union, 505, is not enough to reverse the result.

Bernie Sanders, the progressive Vermont senator who campaigned with workers, said he was “disappointed but not surprised” by the vote, in which 1,798 were opposed and 738 in favor from about 6,000 eligible employees.

“They were up against a company that was willing to spend vast sums of money and use every kind of tactic there is to defeat them,” Sanders said in a tweet, backing the union’s call for an investigation.

“The willingness of Amazon workers in Bessemer to take on the wealthiest man in the world and a powerful company in an anti-union state is an inspiration. It takes an enormous amount of courage to stand up and fight back, and they should be applauded.”

Sanders was a driving force in persuading Amazon to raise its minimum wage to $15 an hour. At the time he thanked Bezos and said he hoped it would be a springboard for other large companies to do the same.

But negotiations to raise the national minimum hourly wage to $15 are stalled. Senate Democrats were forced to drop the proposal in order to secure enough votes to pass Joe Biden’s $1.9tn Covid recovery package.

Amazon insists it is committed to improving pay and conditions for its employees and those outside the company, and is willing to meet Sanders and other campaigners.

“We welcome the opportunity to sit down and share ideas with any policymaker who wants to pass laws ensuring that all workers in the US are guaranteed at least $15 an hour, healthcare from day one and other strong benefits,” its statement said.

“We believe that we can work better together instead of against each other to pass those important laws, and we hope that’s what will happen in the months and years ahead.”
 
The NFL and now Amazon workers. These motherfuckers gonna learn one day :smh:. 50% of the workers felt it wasn't worth their time to vote.

The billionaire class stays winning.

Why Amazon workers in Alabama voted against union
Alabama Amazon employees shared concerns about job security, pay and benefits
By Sebastian Herrera The Wall Street Journal
close

Amazon workers reject unionization

Amazon.com Inc. employees in Alabama who sided against unionization said they had broad concerns about job security and grew convinced that their pay and benefits might not markedly increase with the help of a union.

The resounding victory for Amazon, the nation's second-largest private employer, came after it organized what proved to be a successful local campaign, highlighting the company's strengths and questioning the union's benefits. Nationally, Amazon grew vocal in pushing back against criticism about its workplace conditions, including when a top executive engaged in disputes with members of Congress on Twitter.

Analysts say the defeat of unionization will strengthen Amazon after what has already been a year of tremendous growth and success fueled by the pandemic. The tech giant's revenue last year soared 38% to $386 billion, and its profit nearly doubled, as it added 500,000 people to its global workforce.

Some workers said Amazon helped steer their vote against unionization. Other employees said they didn't need convincing by Amazon and were against unionizing from the start.
TickerSecurityLastChangeChange %
AMZNAMAZON.COM, INC.3,372.20+72.90+2.21%

AMAZON VOTE DEALS BLOW TO EXPANDING LABOR UNION MEMBERSHIP

Amazon pointed to its minimum wage of $15 an hour, double the state's minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, which is also the federal minimum. The company also highlighted its healthcare and retirement benefits.

Workers said they were wary of the cost of union dues and not persuaded that the union would be able to add significantly to their pay or improve benefits. In the end, less than 16% of the facility's total workforce voted to join the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union.

"I work hard for my money, and I don't want any of it going to a union that maybe can get us more pay, or maybe can get us longer breaks," said Melissa Charlton Myers, a 41-year-old employee at the Bessemer, Ala., facility that voted on unionization. "It's not worth the risk."



In company meetings, which some employees described as mandatory, Amazon gave them details about other contracts the RWDSU had negotiated on behalf of employees in other industries. The bargaining agreements that Amazon showed employees didn't seem to indicate that there would be a substantial difference, said Cori Jennings, 40, another worker who voted against unionization.

The union has cited U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics data that show union members on average earning more than nonunion members.

Less than 16% of the facility's total workforce voted to join the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union. (AP Photo/Bill Barrow)
In a news conference Amazon organized Friday, some workers who sided against unionizing said they still sought changes at the facility, such as added training for managers. However, the workers said, they believed they could resolve issues with the company without a third party.
Also playing a role were fears about possible repercussions of forming a union, including the possibility that Amazon would shut down the facility if they decided to unionize, some employees said. Others worried the company would nix plans for two other facilities it had announced last year that it plans to open in a nearby area.

Amazon declined to comment.

Pro-union workers said they wanted more say over break times, how they are monitored by the company and the rate at which they are expected to sort and move packages. The union is expected to appeal the vote.

AMAZON EMPLOYEES CLAIM COMPANY ‘ILLEGALLY INTERFERED IN UNION VOTE’

Iwan Barankay, a labor economist at the University of Pennsylvania, said while unionizing efforts can be popular among employees at the start of drives, the messages from companies over time can wear on employees -- especially if it threatens their livelihood.

"The location of this plant plays a role," Mr. Barankay said. Alabama has many low-income residents, "and other opportunities are not so readily available. These people might really feel the difficulty of living through a pandemic."

The union vote removes one major challenge for Amazon, though others loom.

Late last year, a congressional panel asserted that Amazon has amassed "monopoly power" over sellers on its site, bullied retail partners and improperly used seller data to compete with rivals. Amazon said at the time that "large companies are not dominant by definition, and the presumption that success can only be the result of anti-competitive behavior is simply wrong."

Amazon employees in Alabama who sided against unionization said they had broad concerns about job security and grew convinced that their pay and benefits might not markedly increase with the help of a union. (AP Photo/Jay Reeves, File)

Congress is now considering the most significant changes to antitrust law in decades, including proposals that would make it easier for the government to challenge anticompetitive behavior or force tech giants to separate lines of business.

This week, meanwhile, merchant groups announced a national coalition to campaign for stricter antitrust laws. The effort adds to state and federal investigations and lawsuits Amazon has faced over its power and workplace conditions. Amazon has said its business model has benefited both consumers and the millions of independent sellers that sell on its site.

Amazon isn't finished confronting labor battles. As ballot-processing took place in the Bessemer election, a small number of employees held a protest at a Chicago facility over working conditions. Workers in Europe recently went on strike over similar issues, and the National Labor Relations Board during the past year has found the company at fault on multiple occasions of retaliating against workers who have spoken out on different issues. Amazon has said disciplinary measures with workers are due to violations of workplace policies. The company has said the Chicago protest didn't disrupt its operations.

Still, Amazon's victory in the election gives the company flexibility in running its warehouse, said Sucharita Kodali, an e-commerce analyst at Forrester Research Inc. "They want to be able to make changes quickly and as they see fit" without disruption, she said.

As voting wrapped up in Bessemer, Amazon and its executives became more vocal. Dave Clark, chief executive of Worldwide Consumer, published tweets taking aim at Independent Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont, a frequent Amazon critic who supported unionization in Bessemer and called CEO Jeff Bezos greedy.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

"I often say we are the Bernie Sanders of employers, but that's not quite right because we actually deliver a progressive workplace," Mr. Clark tweeted on March 24, referring to Amazon's $15 minimum wage being higher than Vermont's $11.75 per-hour wage. President Biden and celebrities such as the actor Danny Glover had joined Mr. Sanders in supporting the Alabama workers.

"All I want to know is why the richest man in the world, Jeff Bezos, is spending millions trying to prevent workers from organizing," Mr. Sanders responded on Twitter the same day.

Amazon's news account similarly tweeted defenses of the company. Some of them backfired. The company apologized after publishing a tweet on March 24 by its news account that it said incorrectly challenged accounts of workers having to at times urinate in bottles because of Amazon's demanding schedule to deliver packages.
 
The NFL and now Amazon workers. These motherfuckers gonna learn one day :smh:. 50% of the workers felt it wasn't worth their time to vote.

The billionaire class stays winning.
Well that's no different than how people feel about voting in government elections.
 
Last edited:
2021-04-09T120219Z_766814786_RC2CSM98K3P2_RTRMADP_3_AMAZON-COM-UNION.JPG


Let the predominately white fulfillment centers unionize first, than bust out with a Union in the South. These mammies and coons hearts pump Kool Aide down South and knew this will go nowhere.

Jeff Bezos, Tim Cook, Elon Musk are trans; their sexual identity does not match what is on their birth certificate. We have to accept their gender identity which can be expressed by wearing makeup, dress style, or management style of not being honor/duty bound to workers. Tim Cook got rid of Scott Forstall who was there from the beginning when he took over.

I should not seek out to change the U.S. trans behavior, I should seek out opportunities with other countries.

The Japanese/Europeans have a more masculine corporate structure than the West; although it is starting to change.
 
Last edited:
sears-book.jpg


I never understood the valuation for these companies, I can see if this was the dot com boom where using the internet was all new which Amazon rode. They are a glorified distribution center with their own delivery service which was inaccessible to the consumer but is now accessible through the internet. Sears had this 50 years ago.

The media hypes them up and the next thing you know they are worth a trillion dollars. The next wave is dealing direct with the manufacturer who will have their own delivery service. Once this happens their price will slowly drop because they do not have to pay a middle man like Amazon. Amazon may be a front by the manufacturer to get you comfortable with buying online from them eventually.
 
Last edited:
The demise of unions started when Reagan broke the union representing the Professional Air Traffic Controller Organization (PATCO) by firing all the D.C. controllers back in 1981. Ever since then companies have taken a page out of Reagan's book and have threatened workers with lay offs to discourage formation of unions and used the threat to water down the demands of unions already in place.

Todays workers are just plain scared of losing that paycheck and are content to bitch about how badly a company treats them but not willing do the necessary and band together to effect change with respect to wages, working conditions and job protection. :hmm:
 
Last edited:
The demise of unions started when Reagan broke the union representing the Professional Air Traffic Controller Organization (PATCO) by firing all the D.C. controllers back in 1981. Ever since then companies have taken a page out of Reagan's book and have threatened workers with lay offs to discourage formation of unions and used the threat to water down the demands of unions already in place.

Todays workers are just plain scared of losing that paycheck and are content to bitch about how badly a company treats them but not willing do the necessary and band together to effect change with respect to wages and job protection. :hmm:
They will rue the day. I was a proud member of SPEEA until I moved to Texas. Niggas here got it all fucked up. They are steadily eroding our benefits while SPEEA is holding serve. However, it is a dying cause without expansion. We don't stand a chance against these multi-billion dollar conglomerates while we stand separate and lone.
 
How Corporations Crush the Working Class

Former Secretary of Labor Robert Reich breaks down how power has shifted from labor unions to corporate giants over the last few decades, resulting in the rich getting richer at the expense of the working class.

 
Jeff Bezos' superyacht is so big it needs its own yacht

By Allison Morrow, CNN Business
Updated 1:32 PM EDT, Mon May 10, 2021


New York(CNN Business) Today in ultra-billionaire news, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has purchased a modest 100-foot schooner as he looks forward to a quieter life and hours of reflection on the open seas ... LOL, just kidding.

The world's richest man is reportedly buying a boat, though that word feels inappropriately sensible for the monstrosity going to Captain Bezos: a 417-foot superyacht that's so massive it has its own "support yacht" with a helipad, according to Bloomberg. The estimated cost, not including the boat's support boat, is $500 million.

The luxury yacht's Dutch manufacturer, Oceanco, hasn't released many details about the vessel, called Project 721. The company didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.

Half a billion bucks is an inconceivable amount of money for most people, but it's a small fraction of the $75 billion that Bezos gained in 2020 alone. His total net worth stands just shy of $200 billion, according to Bloomberg.

Amazon (AMZN) stock, the primary source of Bezos' fortune, rose a staggering 75% last year as the pandemic upended consumer behavior in the company's favor — and Wall Street, flush with easy cash thanks to the Federal Reserve, piled into tech stocks.

Bezos wasn't alone: US billionaires collectively gained $1.1 trillion in 2020, making them nearly 40% richer than before the pandemic hit.

Bezos likely put his boat order in well before the pandemic, but news of his extravagant new toy is putting a spotlight on yet another industry benefiting from the stock market boom and the pandemic's disruption of social interaction.

US boat sales hit a 13-year high last year, according to the National Marine Manufacturers Association — safe, socially distant fun for those who can afford it. Those sales reflect more-familiar models of powerboats and other watercraft favored by mere mortals without 10-figure fortunes to their names, but the trend tracks among the yachting class as well. With no galas or lavish parties to attend, the rich are setting sail (or their crews are, anyway).

Recent quarters for superyachts have been record-breaking, one analyst told Bloomberg. Makers of extravagant yachts can barely keep up. "It's impossible to get a slot in a new-build yard," the analyst said. "They're totally booked."

jeff-bezos-yacht.jpg
 
Jeff Bezos' superyacht is so big it needs its own yacht

By Allison Morrow, CNN Business
Updated 1:32 PM EDT, Mon May 10, 2021


New York(CNN Business) Today in ultra-billionaire news, Amazon founder Jeff Bezos has purchased a modest 100-foot schooner as he looks forward to a quieter life and hours of reflection on the open seas ... LOL, just kidding.

The world's richest man is reportedly buying a boat, though that word feels inappropriately sensible for the monstrosity going to Captain Bezos: a 417-foot superyacht that's so massive it has its own "support yacht" with a helipad, according to Bloomberg. The estimated cost, not including the boat's support boat, is $500 million.

The luxury yacht's Dutch manufacturer, Oceanco, hasn't released many details about the vessel, called Project 721. The company didn't immediately respond to requests for comment.

Half a billion bucks is an inconceivable amount of money for most people, but it's a small fraction of the $75 billion that Bezos gained in 2020 alone. His total net worth stands just shy of $200 billion, according to Bloomberg.

Amazon (AMZN) stock, the primary source of Bezos' fortune, rose a staggering 75% last year as the pandemic upended consumer behavior in the company's favor — and Wall Street, flush with easy cash thanks to the Federal Reserve, piled into tech stocks.

Bezos wasn't alone: US billionaires collectively gained $1.1 trillion in 2020, making them nearly 40% richer than before the pandemic hit.

Bezos likely put his boat order in well before the pandemic, but news of his extravagant new toy is putting a spotlight on yet another industry benefiting from the stock market boom and the pandemic's disruption of social interaction.

US boat sales hit a 13-year high last year, according to the National Marine Manufacturers Association — safe, socially distant fun for those who can afford it. Those sales reflect more-familiar models of powerboats and other watercraft favored by mere mortals without 10-figure fortunes to their names, but the trend tracks among the yachting class as well. With no galas or lavish parties to attend, the rich are setting sail (or their crews are, anyway).

Recent quarters for superyachts have been record-breaking, one analyst told Bloomberg. Makers of extravagant yachts can barely keep up. "It's impossible to get a slot in a new-build yard," the analyst said. "They're totally booked."

jeff-bezos-yacht.jpg
Cotdam. An individual doesn’t stand against this machine. Hell a union barely has a chance. Corporate greed is winning.
 
Back
Top