Joe Biden is now POTUS

The video is safe to download. Don't ever let them say shit about backing the blue.



So a trump supporting cop was beaten to death by a trump mob and because the cops are so biased/biggoted the only response was a little gas after the beatdown?

giphy.gif


:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
Fuck you dude. You are full of shit and if you're not white you sure do practice cracka tactics. Say bullshit and follow it with well I should be able to say bullshit and not get called out because ideas.

You better take that pussy ass shit somewhere else weak ass nigga you forget where the fuck you are?

Plus you be doing that shit on purpose so double fuck you.
Saying a Trump appointed Supreme Court who wanted to repeal section 230 may swing in his favor does not warrant the responses you are giving me. Obviously you read my other conversation about the topic so you know exactly what I was saying. So chill
 


I hate "smart" idiots like this. :smh: Not surprising though since she defended that "Latinas won the election" bullshit too.

If anything, this orange fat cac should have been kicked off all that shit a long time ago for violating the TOS.

Secretary_Pompeo_and_Secretary_Mnuchin_Speak_to_Reporters_%2848714042368%29.jpg


If he really wanted to say something, he could go to the fucking briefing room right now and be live on every network. He's too pussy for that though since people might actually get to ask questions and see him run out like a bitch to avoid them.
 
Houston Chronicle calls on Cruz to resign
Celine Castronuovo 1 day ago

Houston Chronicle calls on Cruz to resign
http://a.msn.com/01/en-us/BB1cBLl8?ocid=sf


The Houston Chronicle's editorial board is calling for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas) to resign after he helped lead the effort to challenge the 2020 election results in Congress.

© Getty Images Houston Chronicle calls on Cruz to resign
The Chronicle, which has been a vocal critic of Cruz over the years, wrote in an opinion piece Friday that the senator's actions helped fuel Wednesday's deadly pro-Trump mob at the Capitol.


The Texas senator "knew exactly what he was doing, what he was risking and who he was inciting as he stood on the Senate floor Wednesday and passionately fed the farce of election fraud even as a seething crowd of believers was being whipped up by President Trump a short distance away," the editorial board wrote.

The editorial board blasted what it called "Cruz's cynical gamble," saying he "peddled his phony concern for the integrity of our elections, he argued that senators who voted to certify Biden's victory would be telling tens of millions of Americans to 'jump in a lake' and that their concerns don't matter."

The editorial board then addressed Cruz directly, arguing that "those terrorists wouldn't have been at the Capitol if you hadn't staged this absurd challenge to the 2020 results in the first place."

Cruz has defended his move to object to certification of the Electoral College count, saying in an interview Friday that he wanted to investigate allegations of fraud in order to "reestablish widespread trust in the system."

"What happened at the Capitol was a despicable act of terrorism," Cruz said in the interview with Hearst Newspapers. "The violent criminals who attacked the Capitol should be fully prosecuted and they should go to jail for a very, very long time."

The senator also said that President Trump's rhetoric "certainly contributed to the violence that occurred" when the pro-Trump mob stormed the Capitol complex, the Houston Chronicle reported.


Rioters swarmed the Capitol as Congress met to certify President-elect Joe Biden's win. Several GOP lawmakers ahead of the vote had signaled their support to challenge the validity of certain Biden electors, and Trump ahead of the riots repeated his unsubstantiated claims of a "stolen" election as he urged his supporters at a rally to march toward the Capitol.


AdChoices
Cruz and fellow GOP Sen. Josh Hawley (Mo.) have drawn criticism from fellow lawmakers for seeking to challenge the vote certification, with several Democrats calling on them to resign. Hawley and Cruz proceeded with voting in favor of objecting to slates of Electoral College votes Wednesday, even as some fellow Republicans backed down from the effort following the riot.

This week, The Kansas City Star's editorial board also slammed Hawley, arguing that the senator's "actions in the last week had such impact that he deserves an impressive share of the blame for the blood that's been shed."

Five people died amid Wednesday's chaos, including a woman who was shot by a Capitol Police officer and an officer who died after suffering injuries while responding to the rioting. Both fatalities are under investigation.

Multiple Democratic senators have called on Cruz and Hawley to step down, including Sens. Ron Wyden (Ore.), Patty Murray (Wash.) and Chris Coons (Del.).

"We're done with the drama. Done with the opportunism. Done with the cynical scheming that has now cost American lives," the Houston Chronicle editorial continued, adding, "Resign, Mr. Cruz, and deliver Texas from the shame of calling you our senator."
 
It don’t work like that. It is all about fair use and section 230. To me, the tech companies opened up a hornet nets that they should have left alone.

Now they went a step further to take Parler off line, it makes the case even easier for Trump. The problem with Facebook and Twitter is that people talk recklessly all day on it. On Reddit and other tech companies people talk even more recklessly

For example Apple and Google didn’t remover Twitter or Facebook from the App Store where people talk recklessly but took our Parler. With a Trump appointed Supreme Court who wanted to get at big tech is a win for Trump

Fair use? They are a privately owned service, that is not dependent on the govt for anything at all. They don't use public airwaves to broadcast tv/radio.
 
He won't win.....

Twitter has a terms of service

Twitter warned him several times about his tweets

Twitter warned him the night before he was banned....

He then posts a video of himself..... basically again saying the election was stolen and he was fighting

Twitter then bans him..

They have banned people for WAY WAY WAY Less

In fact you have a case that they were more lenient to him ONLY Because of his status ...

He has nothing
I was looking on Cracka sight that he is rumored a have purchased Gab. Not sure what that is but seem like people are moving over to them

Some one asked what servers was gab on and to report them. Their response was
 
Naw easy case for Trump to win. Basically it is discrimination. Trump has not been charged with anything and those tech companies can’t prove any reason to ban him

They have user term of agreement statements. When yes is clicked the responsibility to abide by the user term of agreement is legally binding. So yes they can ban him if his speech is not in congruence with terms of services.
 
The have user term of agreement statements. When yes is clicked the responsibility to abide by the user term of agreement is legally binding. So yes they can ban him if his speech is not in congruence with terms of services.
So you know anything about Gab? Looks like they are gaining traction with Trump supporters
 
Saying a Trump appointed Supreme Court who wanted to repeal section 230 may swing in his favor does not warrant the responses you are giving me. Obviously you read my other conversation about the topic so you know exactly what I was saying. So chill


Repealing 230 would increase censorship because then Twitter could be held responsible for what Trump did. Sites like BGOL would be impacted also. You think HNIC wants jail time or fines behind the stuff posted on here? Trump wanted 230 to be repealed so he could go after Twitter.
 
@easy_b

Is this shit true? These your people reporting it.

QAnon congresswoman faces calls for arrest after live-tweeting Nancy Pelosi's location to rioters



Oh, shit.



This bitch hasn't even deleted them. Why the fuck is she Tweeting on Nancy's location to the dude with the gun?





 
Last edited:
Back
Top