Im a fan Holly... But i dont wanna hear this shit now. You sat on it too long sista.
Joe Biden is now POTUS
- Thread starter Spectrum
- Start date
Im a fan Holly... But i dont wanna hear this shit now. You sat on it too long sista.
What? Niggas niece wrote a whole book on his fuk shit and didnt mean nuttin. So why would her claim carry weight?
why did she not say anything all this time?
Black ppl will be the first one to defend this.
At this point this would be wasted energy.
So they can't do nothing.
Investigations aint going to do shit. Have you forgotten the previous Investigations and how they went?
Once again what can they actually do to stop what going on, especially against mad man. The only people that can do something about Trump are the people in his circle. They aint about to find him unfit for the office.
Nothing will come of it.
https://lawandcrime.com/2020-electi...n-with-challenged-ballots-in-bucks-county-pa/
Attorneys representing President Donald Trump’s re-election campaign in challenging thousands of ballots in Bucks County, Pennsylvania agreed to sign court documents on Wednesday informing the court that there was no evidence of fraud or misconduct pertaining to those ballots.
The lawsuit—filed last week by the campaign as well as the Republican National Committee and two GOP candidates for state office—sought to have the Bucks County Court of Common Pleas invalidate more than 2,200 “defective ballots” that were counted following a review by the Board of Elections.
According to Biden campaign attorney Marc Elias, the campaign agreed to sign a joint stipulation of facts—an instrument meant to provide the court with facts relevant to the case that are undisputed by either party in the action—which clearly disavows any claims that voting in the commonwealth’s fourth-largest county was affected by any fraudulent conduct. A partner at law firm Perkins Coie and the Democratic Party’s top election lawyer, Elias has filed to intervene in nearly every post-election lawsuit challenging voting tabulations.
“Petitioners do not allege, and there is no evidence of, any fraud in connection with the challenged ballots,” the joint stipulation stated.
The stipulation further specified that the campaign was not alleging, and there was no evidence of any “misconduct,” “impropriety,” “undue influence,” associated with the legal challenge, nor was there evidence that the Board of Elections “counted ballots without signatures on the outer envelope.”
During a Tuesday hearing, both parties also agreed that election observers from each party were permitted access to watch the pre-canvassing and canvassing processes.
Despite President Trump’s oft-repeated false claim that he “won Pennsylvania by a lot” and that he is only losing the state to Joe Biden due to fraudulent ballots, Trump’s campaign lawyers have had to take a far different approach when they get before a judge.
Indeed, Trump attorneys previously disavowed voter-fraud allegations before judges in three separate jurisdictions: two state courts in Pennsylvania and one county court in Arizona.
These statements to the court stand in direct contravention to the claims made by the Trump campaign’s newly added attorney Rudy Giuliani during a hearing in federal court on Tuesday.
As previously reported by Law&Crime, the former mayor of New York City alleged that 1.5 million votes had been illegally counted in Pennsylvania, though he failed to explain to a federal judge how he arrived at that number. At one point later on in the hearing, Giuliani himself even said, “This is not a fraud case.”
Giuliani also falsely claimed that Republican observers had not been allowed to watch the ballot count, an assertion he soon undercut by saying that they were kept too far away from the process. While the federal hearing was happening on Tuesday, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled 5-2 on that an election observer in Philadelphia was not entitled to stand within a particular distance from employees who were processing mail-in ballots, overturning a lower court’s ruling on the matter.
Maybe she did and it didn't make the news?
Trying to give her the benefit of doubt.
Maybe she did and it didn't make the news?
Trying to give her the benefit of doubt.
Nah she said she didn't which I understand.
There was more than enough proof of his being a racist piece of shit and no one cared.
There was no benefit to her telling that story and if she did it would only have resulted in her and her family being subjected to constant attacks from his rabid followers.
You're right. I wouldn't have mattered. Lol.
Joy Reid is holding that coon J’Ron Smith’s feet to the fire.
Last edited:
That was disastrous he went on wanting it to be one way..........the shock on Joy's face afterwards was hilarious
Does that mean something?
My public school education can't crack that code
probably butt-tweeting... Q-Anon gonna have a field day with this
I'll bet the one thing that could (temporarily) unite the voter's of this country regardless of party affilation would be a nationwide vote on both term and age limits for members of the house and senate.
Does that mean something?
My public school education can't crack that code
Public school education >>>>>>>
Bitch wtf
So sure, idiots. Have no clue of the world they are in
Always has been
"Climate Activists Condemn Biden’s Appointment of Rep. Cedric Richmond, a Major Fossil Fuel Ally"
Already getting climate change heat.
She made a straight fool of him. Literally used his own words against him. All that hemming and hawwing. If he had said that he was willing to overlook the blatant racism because the mofo pays me. He would still be a piece of shit for doing so but I would respect his honesty. Even Michael Steele and JC had their limits.
Last edited:
Wow wow wow she dropped the People’s elbow on his head
Similar threads
