Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This is false.Pelosi is in the house, not the Senate. In the Senate the dems can't block anything.
Lying.Why did the lawyers quit the Trump lawsuit in Penn over the election?
Probably because their law licenses mean more to them than Trump’s money.
It appears that the lawyers were pretty much on the verge of the judge filing a complaint with the state bar for either bringing a frivolous suit (one that can’t succeed), bringing a vexatious suit (one designed to make life difficult for people) or misleading the court.
It appears the suit was brought to show systemic problems in counting mail-in ballots. For this purpose, the lawyers leaped on a few hundred ballots where the “outer envelope” wasn’t properly prepared. From the pleadings, it appeared the Trump campaign was claiming someone was trying to get in faked ballots. That would be a serious issue that deserved the courts attention.
However, when the evidence came out, it turned out:
So the judge asked “where’s the beef”. It was at that point that the lawyers admitted that the deficiencies were “technical” and not “fraudulent” and that the voters who sent in the ballots and the people counting them were all acting in good faith.
- That most of the outer envelopes in question had technical deficiencies. For example, you’re supposed to put your current address on one side of the envelope, and on some of them the address was on the wrong side.
- The people counting the votes had noted these deficiencies and had put the ballots aside as non-compliant. They weren’t going to count them because they weren’t properly filled out.
That’s when the judge lost it. It’s not uncommon in close races for one party to bring suit to count deficient mail in ballots (it happened in Florida in 2000 when the margin was close and every ballot mattered). However, that wasn’t what the Trump campaign was asking for. They were trying to prove systemic problems in the voting process that just weren’t there.
Seems like Democrats hate her too, based on the current center vs progressive chatter.
Why did the lawyers quit the Trump lawsuit in Penn over the election?
Probably because their law licenses mean more to them than Trump’s money.
It appears that the lawyers were pretty much on the verge of the judge filing a complaint with the state bar for either bringing a frivolous suit (one that can’t succeed), bringing a vexatious suit (one designed to make life difficult for people) or misleading the court.
It appears the suit was brought to show systemic problems in counting mail-in ballots. For this purpose, the lawyers leaped on a few hundred ballots where the “outer envelope” wasn’t properly prepared. From the pleadings, it appeared the Trump campaign was claiming someone was trying to get in faked ballots. That would be a serious issue that deserved the courts attention.
However, when the evidence came out, it turned out:
So the judge asked “where’s the beef”. It was at that point that the lawyers admitted that the deficiencies were “technical” and not “fraudulent” and that the voters who sent in the ballots and the people counting them were all acting in good faith.
- That most of the outer envelopes in question had technical deficiencies. For example, you’re supposed to put your current address on one side of the envelope, and on some of them the address was on the wrong side.
- The people counting the votes had noted these deficiencies and had put the ballots aside as non-compliant. They weren’t going to count them because they weren’t properly filled out.
That’s when the judge lost it. It’s not uncommon in close races for one party to bring suit to count deficient mail in ballots (it happened in Florida in 2000 when the margin was close and every ballot mattered). However, that wasn’t what the Trump campaign was asking for. They were trying to prove systemic problems in the voting process that just weren’t there.
Damn I ain't heard haarp in a minuteWhat in thee fuck is wrong with those people bruh....lol
Them fuckers minds must been compromised by harp or something.
What's so funny about this is that they claimed this would be the democrats, etc....when Republicans win in a landslide.What in thee fuck is wrong with those people bruh....lol
Them fuckers minds must been compromised by harp or something.
like when the Judge asked them if there republicans present in the room observing the count and the fucker says " there were non zero number of people"Why did the lawyers quit the Trump lawsuit in Penn over the election?
Probably because their law licenses mean more to them than Trump’s money.
It appears that the lawyers were pretty much on the verge of the judge filing a complaint with the state bar for either bringing a frivolous suit (one that can’t succeed), bringing a vexatious suit (one designed to make life difficult for people) or misleading the court.
It appears the suit was brought to show systemic problems in counting mail-in ballots. For this purpose, the lawyers leaped on a few hundred ballots where the “outer envelope” wasn’t properly prepared. From the pleadings, it appeared the Trump campaign was claiming someone was trying to get in faked ballots. That would be a serious issue that deserved the courts attention.
However, when the evidence came out, it turned out:
So the judge asked “where’s the beef”. It was at that point that the lawyers admitted that the deficiencies were “technical” and not “fraudulent” and that the voters who sent in the ballots and the people counting them were all acting in good faith.
- That most of the outer envelopes in question had technical deficiencies. For example, you’re supposed to put your current address on one side of the envelope, and on some of them the address was on the wrong side.
- The people counting the votes had noted these deficiencies and had put the ballots aside as non-compliant. They weren’t going to count them because they weren’t properly filled out.
That’s when the judge lost it. It’s not uncommon in close races for one party to bring suit to count deficient mail in ballots (it happened in Florida in 2000 when the margin was close and every ballot mattered). However, that wasn’t what the Trump campaign was asking for. They were trying to prove systemic problems in the voting process that just weren’t there.
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
My bad
![]()
Why?
looks very xcactoryWhich one of yall is that out there with the shades on?
Looking like that boy lost bigly
Watching Trump live right now; dude looks and sounds like he’s been on a cocaine binge since last Tuesday.
![]()
My fucking goodness.....
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I kid you not i've probably watch this clown speak in entirity maybe 3 times.
Once during the debates against Clinton and two other times during his presidency.
I'm still baffled that someone that's obviously beyond his wits is the POTUS.
Ol' Boy isn't even qualified to be a dog walker.
White, Rich(sorta), and Racist! Winning ticket.
It's called contrast. Obama was a high mark and American wanted (especially Republicans) wanted a dumbed down president. Just happens Trump made himself available (low water mark).I kid you not i've probably watch this clown speak in entirity maybe 3 times.
Once during the debates against Clinton and two other times during his presidency.
I'm still baffled that someone that's obvious beyond his wits is the POTUS of the US.
White, Rich(sorta) and Racist! Winning ticket.
One of the people said when asked who does he listen to. He said Alex Jones. That tells you all you need to know. It's clear these folks like to suck on their thumb, cover up in a blanket, and take in nothing but ignorance. Anything else makes them feel unsecure and unsafe.I've been posting this shit for years because I've been reading right-wing media. These muthafuckas think MSNBC and Fox News are the same now. They demand 100% fielty to Trump.