Joe Biden is now POTUS

For fuck sakes, man.

Arizona, PA, and Nevada need to get it together. Dragging this shit way out.

Ok might be too early to have this discussion but i asked the same question last election

Is political polling completely obsolete now?

Can we call this a science?

If the population you targeting is LYING to you? What use is it?

How many polls @easy_b and @Camille post...

and then on game night?

ALL WRONG?

It don't make sense to me.
 
Last edited:
fwke3yfx8bx51.jpg
 
Ok might be too early to have this discussion but i asked the same question last election

Is political polling completely obsolete now?

Can we call this a science?

If the population you targeting is LYING to you? What use is it?

How many polls @easy_b and @Camille post...

and then on game night?

ALL WRONG?

It don;t make sense. to me.

Conservative cacs politicized the polling trying to help trump. They are on their sites/forums bragging about lying to the pollsters so it wont be accurate again for a while I think.
 
I was initially going to say 300k votes but I didn't want to be too aggressive. 150k lead for Biden is the floor in PA. The ceiling is probably 350k votes

no supreme court... etc.... Biden is President-Elect tomorrow. Trump gonna bitch and moan, file 100 lawsuits, go on fox news crying, send his MAGAts out to tear up shit... but it's over for this clown tomorrow.

Now New York... indict this nigga in January.
 
Ok might be too early to have this discussion but i asked the same question last election

Is political polling completely obsolete now?

Can we call this a science?

If the population you targeting is LYING to you? What use is it?

How many polls @easy_b and @Camille post...

and then on game night?

ALL WRONG?

It don;t make sense. to me.

Political polling PURELY statistics. Nothing more than that.

Your data is only as good as your sampling.

It’s not going to be obsolete ever. It’s a measuring indicator for campaigns.

To account for a lying population, you have a margin of error. But when a candidate is only up 2 points and there is a margin of error of 3, then that mean the candidate that is up 2 can go up five or go down one. But the true margin of error doesn’t come out until all the votes are in.
 
To the contrary.

Trump's ire is about to be focused squarely on the GOP once the reality of losing hits him.

He'll start talking about how much he's done for them and cite himself as the only reason they rebounded after Obama only for them to turn on him.

His insecurity and victim complex may work in the Democrats favor during his lame duck period once he turns on the GOP.



This nigga is clearly drunk.

This nigga lol

HEY TWITTER WORLD!
 
Political polling PURELY statistics. Nothing more than that.

Your data is only as good as your sampling.

It’s not going to be obsolete ever. It’s a measuring indicator for campaigns.

To account for a lying population, you have a margin of error. But when a candidate is only up 2 points and there is a margin of error of 3, then that mean the candidate that is up 2 can go up give or go down one. But the true margin of error doesn’t come out until all the votes are in.

You know DAMN f*cking well I ain't understand ANY that fam.

:hmm:

but hold on

there is mathematical process to account for White folk lying?

damn I should have paid more attention in school.
 
You know DAMN f*cking well I ain't understand ANY that fam.

:hmm:

but hold on

there is mathematical process to account for White folk lying?

damn I should have paid more attention in school.

For example, you’re up 2 points in a state based on polling data.

The margin of error is 3. So that’s a plus or minus 3.

2+3 = 5 which mean you performed better.
2-3 = -1 which means you’re losing.

No formulas for people lying or racism when sampling people. You just have to account for the unknowns based on previous elections and data.
 
Back
Top