Live action Mulan now on Disney Plus 9/4/2020 for 30 bucks.
- Thread starter veritech
- Start date
Good movie daughter liked it and beats spending 100 at the movies
This. I subscribe to your service and you wanna charge extra? Bitch, not me! I’ll be sure to get the internet special and charge it to the game.
I already subscribe to Disney+, but all I have is three words for watching Mulan...
Kodi or Terrarium.
Kodi or Terrarium.
Did Disney’s ‘Mulan’ Experiment Work? A Binge Mode Investigation - The Ringer
Amanda and Sean are joined by Binge Mode's Jason Concepcion and Mallory Rubin to explore the 1998 Disney classic 'Mulan' and the new live-action remake. They talk about what worked, what didn't, and what was removed…
www.theringer.com
‘Black Widow’ Eyes New Release Date, ‘Soul’ May Move to Disney Plus
Disney will likely delay "Black Widow," and the studio is exploring releasing Pixar's "Soul" on Disney Plus.
variety.com
‘Black Widow’ Pondering Release Date Move; ‘Soul’ Could Still Stay Theatrical
'Black Widow' Pondering Release Date Move; 'Soul' Could Still Stay Theatrical
deadline.com
Disney Considering New Black Widow Release Date with Soul Possibly Moving to Disney+
Disney is eyeing a possible new release date for Black Widow, delaying the film from its November 6 opening though a new release date has not yet been announced.
www.comingsoon.net
Variety - "The reopening of movie theaters may hit another speed bump.
Disney will likely delay “Black Widow,” the superhero adventure from Marvel that was slated to open on Nov. 6, according to multiple individuals with knowledge of the situation. The studio is also exploring various release options for Pixar’s existential cartoon “Soul.” The animated kids’ film is still scheduled to release on Nov. 20, but it is unlikely to move forward with those plans. The studio is even considering releasing it on Disney Plus.
A Disney insider disputed claims that “Soul” was moving to Disney Plus.
An impending “Black Widow” delay comes just days after Warner Bros. announced that “Wonder Woman 1984” will debut in late December instead of early October. STX also moved the Gerard Butler thriller “Greenland” out of September, while Universal pushed “Candyman” into 2021, depriving exhibitors of any major releases until James Bond sequel “No Time to Die” opens on Nov. 20. It is yet another sign that the U.S. box office won’t return to “normal” anytime soon."
Loving this shit man. Keep pushing that shit back. Hope the box office just dies a slow death so streaming can rule. If Biden wins, box office can just chalk it up. He'll tell the states to shut them bitches down if Covid doesn't chill.‘Black Widow’ Eyes New Release Date, ‘Soul’ May Move to Disney Plus
Disney will likely delay "Black Widow," and the studio is exploring releasing Pixar's "Soul" on Disney Plus.
‘Black Widow’ Pondering Release Date Move; ‘Soul’ Could Still Stay Theatrical
'Black Widow' Pondering Release Date Move; 'Soul' Could Still Stay Theatrical
Disney Considering New Black Widow Release Date with Soul Possibly Moving to Disney+
Disney is eyeing a possible new release date for Black Widow, delaying the film from its November 6 opening though a new release date has not yet been announced.
Variety - "The reopening of movie theaters may hit another speed bump.
Disney will likely delay “Black Widow,” the superhero adventure from Marvel that was slated to open on Nov. 6, according to multiple individuals with knowledge of the situation. The studio is also exploring various release options for Pixar’s existential cartoon “Soul.” The animated kids’ film is still scheduled to release on Nov. 20, but it is unlikely to move forward with those plans. The studio is even considering releasing it on Disney Plus.
A Disney insider disputed claims that “Soul” was moving to Disney Plus.
An impending “Black Widow” delay comes just days after Warner Bros. announced that “Wonder Woman 1984” will debut in late December instead of early October. STX also moved the Gerard Butler thriller “Greenland” out of September, while Universal pushed “Candyman” into 2021, depriving exhibitors of any major releases until James Bond sequel “No Time to Die” opens on Nov. 20. It is yet another sign that the U.S. box office won’t return to “normal” anytime soon."
Netflix spent $150 on The Irishman. And $100 million of about 5 other movies and got another one for $200 million. Game is what it is at this point. They must be doing something right boss.Very naive
and do you think you would get $200 million dollar movies on streaming?
A serious covid outbreak under the democrats will shut this down. If Trump wins, I reserve the right to change my prediction.
You keep talking about movies, because you don't go to them
That's rare
a $100 million dollar movie is normal at the box office.
And do you think you're going to see a $250 Spiderman 3 going to streaming?
You would get shit that they cut corners in cost like Bright or Project Power.
A serious Covid outbreak isn't shutting shit down, if you haven't realized that already. Nothing is being shut back down.
You're right, more movies in the spirit of Blight, Brightburn, and Logan are on the horizon. They are entertaining with minimal SFX, which means very low (relatively speaking) budgets.
Also, directors and producers will figure out a way to improve quality or maintain quality while significantly lowering the movie production costs. Hell, even the exclusive use of expensive Red cameras will continue to diminish. Using newer and lesser known actors will be a things as well. All are cost cutting measures.
Last edited:
Who cares for 250 million dollar movies.. 80s and 90s have some of the best movies ever and mad of them cost less than 100 million dollars.. it’s about execution and story more than big budgets... do you need fireworks, holograms, huge screen TVs, to get an exciting performance on a stage by a musician?.. some of the best performances were by a few bands or some person that had great stage presence and nothing else.. some of the best movies were with basic budgets but great stories and great performances
like i said raid redemption was made for less than 50 million with a bunch of nigs you never heard of and was a action masterpiece
and Raid Redemption made how much money?
It was in like 30 theatres across America... if it got released like a major film like avengers there would be 9 figures behind its profit
just found out it cost 1.1 million to make..oh my god 1 million to make that masterpiece.. that shit was better than 95 percent of movies with 9 fig budgets this millennium
No it would not, because it's available to buy and stream right now. Who's doing it?
again, you don't seem to understand.
It's about making money.
It's funny how you know what making money is in the adult industry, but try to act like you don't know what it is the movie industry.
You want the movie industry to be Dollar Tree and just give you product, because you want it.
i have to disagree. if you see the shit coming out on disney plus, amazon, hbo max along with netflix they are putting out some serious budgets. theater quality special effects and great scripts are coming out on streaming. the boys, raised by wolves and the mandalorian have to have ridiculous budgets. and that is only three of many top quality shows out right now.
it is a treat to sit in front of my home theater watching this shit. as a matter of fact i ONLY watch shows like that on my system.
Those are shows to get you to subscribe. That's no different than NBC or CBS. They want you to watch.
That isn't a movie. Those are done by movie studios. Those are financed by banks where they hope to make a profit off it.
Dude there’s a lot of under 20 million dollar movies that makes hundreds of millions of dollars.. comedies and horror flicks were the top 2 genre who were masters of doing that.. in fact it’s what studios use to say everybody know horror and comedy is cheap to make... there’s a bunch of movie genres..you act like it’s a 1 size fits all and that every movie needs a 250 million dollar budget..they don’t.. there are tons of great movies that didn’t cost a lot from every genre... when you are restricted to a budget that means you have to really think about what you put out and how you execute it.. with that type of stipulation chances are better quality films might be released cause you have to utilize a small budget to make nice profits... you seem to just want shitty transformer movies with lots of boom and explosions meanwhile I’ll prefer a district 9 or a short circuit
u say tomato. i say tomato. those shows are on subscription services and are done in many cases better than many movies. it is not a hard leap in logic to having tent pole movies go straight to streaming.
Exactly. Times change. Business models change. Streaming is just in its infancy and they already dropping major bread on production. COVID ain't just going away because we turn the calendar to 2021 and these cornball execs push dates back. Shit is here to stay. So is streaming.
500-1000 bodies per day could be the new normal for the foreseeable future. People ain't going to rush to sit in a theater. Something got to give.
I can see a focus on domestic streaming and international theaters. Release international a week before streaming stateside.
Shit was seriously lacking the cartoon was better.
They made this one boring. Seems like they left a lot on the editing floor.
Maybe when/if they do a part two like the cartoon it will be much better.
They made this one boring. Seems like they left a lot on the editing floor.
Maybe when/if they do a part two like the cartoon it will be much better.
About the same as music I bought since 2000.What movies have you bought for streaming in the past six months
You must have copped at least 10k in theater stock this year. What could you possibly have against streaming?
About the same as music I bought since 2000.
You must have copped at least 10k in theater stock this year. What could you possibly have against streaming?
So VOD is the future, but you aren't buying anything.
Streaming music for a price is huge and I ain't never paid for that shit either. Being able to see market trends doesn't mean you have to spend. It's observation.So VOD is the future, but you aren't buying anything.
So you keep talking about stuff you don't even spend your money on.
CD's aren't comparable to the movie theater.
It's cheaper for for record labels not to have to worry about producing a physical product and then buying them back if they don't sell through.
Again, for like the fourth time, how can the movie industry make, again MAKE trillions from VOD?
Spending money on shit don't have anything to do with it. I still consume the product. I can still observe the trends. Covid has changed the came and moved streaming to the front.
As for music, folks can download anything they want and they still pay. It's comparable in that movie studios will be able to get people to pay for streaming features.
As for making trillions, who says they should?
You may be willing to open up theaters at full capacity and sit in one, but a lot of people ain't on that shit. U.S. is fucked. Ain't shit happening at theaters for a looooong time boss. They can push some shit to streaming or wait until perhaps 2022.
Spending money on shit don't have anything to do with it. I still consume the product. I can still observe the trends. Covid has changed the came and moved streaming to the front.
As for music, folks can download anything they want and they still pay. It's comparable in that movie studios will be able to get people to pay for streaming features.
As for making trillions, who says they should?
It has everything to do with it.
You don't spend money on shit, but are saying it's the future.
And that's why you can't seem to comprehend. It's a business, not fucking charity. It makes trillions. Trillions that are put in to the economy. jobs.
Just because your ass is staying in the house, doesn't mean people aren't going to eventually go out...you didn't go to the fuckin movies before. You keep talking about stuff you have no knowledge of.
80% of movie theaters will be open by Friday.
What we will see, which I am honestly fearful of, is heavier monitoring of internet use with harsher punishment. I wont be surprised if VPNs become illegal. Sites that host the content will be seized and/ or blocked from use in many countries including the U.S.Spending money on shit don't have anything to do with it. I still consume the product. I can still observe the trends. Covid has changed the came and moved streaming to the front.
As for music, folks can download anything they want and they still pay. It's comparable in that movie studios will be able to get people to pay for streaming features.
As for making trillions, who says they should?
No doubt. First the government will tie VPNs to russians, terrorists, human trafficking, anonymous postings that attack safe spaces, or some shit to scare the creatures. They will then pass the 'SAFE act"(Save Americans From Evil) with minimal opposition.
Streaming movies are released online quick as fuck. These greedy fucks will attempt to use their politician puppets to protect profits. Usually, these types of bills come from both sides of the aisle because that's how corporations lobby.
I learned firsthand from Crypto how quickly our government can make U.S. residents toxic in the guise of protecting us.
My man. You called it.
And they get to keep 100 percent instead of splitting. Theaters shook right about now. Telling you if Biden wins theaters can call it a fucking wrap. Trump wins and he'll keep forcing the economy to reopen and theaters stand a little chance of recovering.Bottom line is tenet shit the bed and Mulan didn't. We moving closer to domestic streams with international releases. Best of both worlds. Son, I just don't talk shit. I know wtf I'm talking about.
Mulan Has Earned More Than Tenet Just from Disney+ Streaming Alone
‘Mulan’ Has Earned More Than ‘Tenet’ Just from Disney+ Streaming Alone
‘Mulan’ has proven to be a financial windfall from Disney after becoming the first-ever Disney+ Premier release.
movieweb.com
2020 is going to be a watershed year for theater chains, and not in a good way. Theaters worldwide have been chafing under social distancing policies and lack of new film releases for months now, and to add to their woes, film studios are finding digital VOD releases to be a surprisingly lucrative market. Case in point, according to a report by Yahoo! Finance, Mulan has made more money on Disney+ than Tenet has with a theatrical release.
According to the report by analytics research firm 7Park Data, a third of the households in America with a Disney+ subscription made the decision to fork over the additional $30 fee in order to stream Mulan on the platform. Earlier, Disney had reported that over 60 million people around the world had a Disney+ subscription. If even 50% of those subscribers are from the company's home base in the U.S., that means roughly 9 million users purchased Mulan for $30, which means the Mouse Empire netted a profit of more than $261 million in America alone, since Disney does not have to share any of the profits with theater chains, as is the case with theatrical releases.
Then there is the fact that Mulan's VOD debut also prompted many new users to opt for a Disney+ subscription, and the profits climb even higher. Compare this to Tenet's struggle to break a $50 million gross with a theatrical release in the U.S., with a worldwide total of a little over $207 million globally, which the studio will have to split
with the theater chains which are showing the movie. 
In another ominous portent of the things to come for theaters, China, one of the few countries where Mulan opened theatrically, provided a lukewarm reception to the film, thus bringing Mulan's VOD earnings into even sharper focus.
Hollywood likes to chase trends, and Mulan's success with a streaming distribution model has definitely been noticed by other studios, while the tepid box-office performance from Tenet has caused the same studios to postpone the theatrical release of upcoming blockbuster movies.
For now, at least, the writing on the wall is clear. Even for big-budget spectacle movies, most audiences prefer to watch the feature at home rather than risking infection with a trip to the cinemas. All it would take is a few more big-budget movies to release on VOD for this preference to turn into a habit, and then we will see the majority of the studios start to opt for a VOD or VOD+theaterical release distribution model going forward.
With theater chains relying on big-budget blockbusters to bring in the box office numbers to keep their businesses afloat, the future looks bleak for the industry in a post-lockdown world.
My man. You called it.
Bottom line is tenet shit the bed and Mulan didn't. We moving closer to domestic streams with international releases. Best of both worlds. Son, I just don't talk shit. I know wtf I'm talking about.
Mulan Has Earned More Than Tenet Just from Disney+ Streaming Alone
‘Mulan’ Has Earned More Than ‘Tenet’ Just from Disney+ Streaming Alone
‘Mulan’ has proven to be a financial windfall from Disney after becoming the first-ever Disney+ Premier release.
2020 is going to be a watershed year for theater chains, and not in a good way. Theaters worldwide have been chafing under social distancing policies and lack of new film releases for months now, and to add to their woes, film studios are finding digital VOD releases to be a surprisingly lucrative market. Case in point, according to a report by Yahoo! Finance, Mulan has made more money on Disney+ than Tenet has with a theatrical release.
According to the report by analytics research firm 7Park Data, a third of the households in America with a Disney+ subscription made the decision to fork over the additional $30 fee in order to stream Mulan on the platform. Earlier, Disney had reported that over 60 million people around the world had a Disney+ subscription. If even 50% of those subscribers are from the company's home base in the U.S., that means roughly 9 million users purchased Mulan for $30, which means the Mouse Empire netted a profit of more than $261 million in America alone, since Disney does not have to share any of the profits with theater chains, as is the case with theatrical releases.
Then there is the fact that Mulan's VOD debut also prompted many new users to opt for a Disney+ subscription, and the profits climb even higher. Compare this to Tenet's struggle to break a $50 million gross with a theatrical release in the U.S., with a worldwide total of a little over $207 million globally, which the studio will have to split
In another ominous portent of the things to come for theaters, China, one of the few countries where Mulan opened theatrically, provided a lukewarm reception to the film, thus bringing Mulan's VOD earnings into even sharper focus.
Hollywood likes to chase trends, and Mulan's success with a streaming distribution model has definitely been noticed by other studios, while the tepid box-office performance from Tenet has caused the same studios to postpone the theatrical release of upcoming blockbuster movies.
For now, at least, the writing on the wall is clear. Even for big-budget spectacle movies, most audiences prefer to watch the feature at home rather than risking infection with a trip to the cinemas. All it would take is a few more big-budget movies to release on VOD for this preference to turn into a habit, and then we will see the majority of the studios start to opt for a VOD or VOD+theaterical release distribution model going forward.
With theater chains relying on big-budget blockbusters to bring in the box office numbers to keep their businesses afloat, the future looks bleak for the industry in a post-lockdown world.
If you believe that shit then I have a bridge to sell you
Disney doesn't release the numbers
and that Yahoo article is going by speculation.
If film studios are finding it so lucrative, why aren't they putting them on VOD?
Let's see if they put Black Widow and Morbius up there...that will tell you everything you need to know.
Similar threads
