RJJ was so fucking quick. Floyd had impeccable defense.

At the time Jones fought Toney, Toney was #2 P4P only behind Julio Cesar Chavez. If you don't know this, you need to brush up on your boxing before you even comment on this topic.
He was #3, in 93. He was behind Chavez who was behind Whitaker. But yea, you're right.

Toney was undefeated in a heavier weight class than Jones AND was considered a killer with GREAT fundamentals. Jones went straight to James Toney for the title shot without even testing the waters in the weight division and dominated every single round by boxing the shit out of Toney. When has Floyd EVER done something like this against an opponent of this caliber? Never! You have to be a fanboy hater to try and discredit this win.

Floyd did it to Canelo, albeit at a catchweight.

And, Virgil Hill was not washed up at all when he fought Jones. He was only 34, had never been stopped before AND after he lost to Jones in 1998, he went on to become a two time champion at cruiserweight and had his last fight in 2015!

Roy continued fighting and winning hollow belts well after getting destroyed by Tarver, Johnson, and countless others. Doesn't take away from him being a shell of himself. Roy declined a lot quicker, but Hill was nowhere near top form in that fight.

It is also hypocritcal to in one breath say Jones was just successful because he was fast and then in the next breath suggest James Toney's skills were not comparable to Floyd's because Floyd was faster and quicker. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Others may have, but I've never said that. I was arguing that Hopkins nor Toney were similar to Floyd in his prime. Floyd's offense was far more potent in his youth.

Both Floyd and RJJ were great fighters but Floyd fans always seem like they need to downplay Jones' greatness in order to elevate Floyd. The often repeated mantra of "Roy was just fast, that's it" is just ignorant and disrespectful to the sport of boxing. You can't be "just fast" in this sport. You have to know what you are doing and actually know how and when to throw punches. In other words, you must have fundamentals no matter how fast you are.

Agree w/ you on this 100%.

A much better comparison would have been possible had Floyd dropped back down to 140 to fight Hatton or even 135 to fight a top contender after fighting at 147. Floyd was definitely smarter than Jones in this aspect as Jones' true downfall was dropping back down from heavyweight so quickly and unhealthily. Chris Byrd did the same thing and had similar tragic results. Hopkins and Floyd were smart because they didn't do that shit and had more longevity because of it.

Agreed. Floyd dabbled at 154 for a fight or two but never strayed too far away from 147. Before Hatton ruined things, and feuding networks aside, Mayweather vs Tszyu was the fight I wanted to see.
 
Last edited:
That Canelo fight was a legit feather in Floyd's cap. He fought a younger, larger, killer that was a force to be reckoned with. Canelo was definitely greenish but he was still a beast especially for a smaller guy coming up. Floyd's defense was beautiful that night. That was probably the first time I really respected it.

Floyd showed the world that there were levels to boxing that night. And Canelo was nowhere near Floyd's level.
 
1. Floyd did it to Canelo, albeit at a catchweight.


2. Roy continued fighting and winning hollow belts well after getting destroyed by Tarver, Johnson, and countless others. Doesn't take away from him being a shell of himself. Roy declined a lot quicker, but Hill was nowhere near top form in that fight.

1. Floyd beating Canelo (at a catchweight no less) is absolutely no comparison to Roy Jones jumping up to 168 and facing a prime and undefeated James Toney. Canelo to this day is still not considered a better boxer than James Toney was.

2. The comment was about Virgil Hill. Virgil Hill won legitimate titles and beat legitimate competition after being destroyed by Roy Jones. I agree, Roy Jones never won anything significant or beat anyone of significance ever again after losing to Tarver and Johnson. However, Hill was nowhere near shot at all when Jones destroyed him. He was fit, strong, larger than Jones and was supposed to be a solid technical challenge for Jones. Like a lot of guys that got destroyed by Jones, after losing Hill went on to win legitimate world titles at cruiser. Jones win over Hill was a shocker at the time (meaning the way he won) so it's revisionist history to attempt to diminish the significance of the win.
 
Last edited:
1. Floyd beating Canelo (at a catchweight no less) is absolutely no comparison to Roy Jones jumping up to 168 and facing a prime and undefeated James Toney. Canelo to this day is still not considered a better boxer than James Toney was.

So, Floyd at 36 years old dominating the bigger 23 year old, undefeated, unified, and future HOFfighter doesn't compare? Right.

Floyd embarrassing Canelo while being WAYYY beyond his prime was a testament to just how great Floyd was in his prime.

2. The comment was about Virgil Hill. Virgil Hill won legitimate titles and beat legitimate competition after being destroyed by Roy Jones. I agree, Roy Jones never won anything significant or beat anyone of significance ever again after losing to Tarver and Johnson. However, Hill was nowhere near shot at all when Jones destroyed him. He was fit, strong, larger than Jones and was supposed to be a solid technical challenge for Jones. Like a lot of guys that got destroyed by Jones, after losing Hill went on to win legitimate world titles at cruiser. Jones win over Hill was a shocker at the time (meaning the way he won) so it's revisionist history to attempt to diminish the significance of the win.

I know the comment was about Hill, I referenced Jones because both continued to fight well after their primes ended, but still managed to pick up a belt or two along the way.

Jones winning in that fashion was definitely shocking, but him winning the fight wasn't all that shocking. Jones was universally viewed as top 2 or 3 p4p, and was steamrolling EVERYONE during that period. Most people (I'm one) ignored the Griffin travesty, and still viewed him as being undefeated. I agree Hill was still the larger/stronger man, but Hill had also been out of the ring for nearly a year. That, coupled with how he looked in his loss to Michalczewski was enough to see he wasn't the same fighter as in years prior. Hill wasn't done, but he was definitely a faded (or fading) fighter.

From 1985 to 1996 Hill was 43-1. From 1997-2007 Hill went 7 and 6.
 
Last edited:
1. Floyd beating Canelo (at a catchweight no less) is absolutely no comparison to Roy Jones jumping up to 168 and facing a prime and undefeated James Toney. Canelo to this day is still not considered a better boxer than James Toney was.

2. The comment was about Virgil Hill. Virgil Hill won legitimate titles and beat legitimate competition after being destroyed by Roy Jones. I agree, Roy Jones never won anything significant or beat anyone of significance ever again after losing to Tarver and Johnson. However, Hill was nowhere near shot at all when Jones destroyed him. He was fit, strong, larger than Jones and was supposed to be a solid technical challenge for Jones. Like a lot of guys that got destroyed by Jones, after losing Hill went on to win legitimate world titles at cruiser. Jones win over Hill was a shocker at the time (meaning the way he won) so it's revisionist history to attempt to diminish the significance of the win.
i don’t know about these statements bro
 
Hill was a good scalp, but it needs to be put in to context. 34, 40+ fights, and I think he was coming off a one sided loss. He was faded.
As was pointed out in this thread Hill was far from done when he loss to Jones.
Has Toney ever been Top 3 p4p? A unified champ? Undisputed? PBF was dominant. Toney never was.
Also pointed out in this thread Toney was a top p4p fighter and was actually the favorite in his fight with Jones. Even if he wasn't are you saying you didn't consider Toney to be an elite fighter?
 
1. Floyd beating Canelo (at a catchweight no less) is absolutely no comparison to Roy Jones jumping up to 168 and facing a prime and undefeated James Toney. Canelo to this day is still not considered a better boxer than James Toney was.
I disagree with this, I think both wins are on the same level.
 
As was pointed out in this thread Hill was far from done when he loss to Jones.

From 1985 to 1996 Hill was 43-1. From 1997-2007 Hill went 7 and 6.

The Jones fight happened in 98. Again, I didn't say 'done' I said faded. Which he clearly was.

Also pointed out in this thread Toney was a top p4p fighter and was actually the favorite in his fight with Jones. Even if he wasn't are you saying you didn't consider Toney to be an elite fighter?
Of course I do. Toney deserves a spot in the HOF.
 
At the time Jones fought Toney, Toney was #2 P4P only behind Julio Cesar Chavez. If you don't know this, you need to brush up on your boxing before you even comment on this topic. Toney was undefeated in a heavier weight class than Jones AND was considered a killer with GREAT fundamentals. Jones went straight to James Toney for the title shot without even testing the waters in the weight division and dominated every single round by boxing the shit out of Toney. When has Floyd EVER done something like this against an opponent of this caliber? Never! You have to be a fanboy hater to try and discredit this win.

And, Virgil Hill was not washed up at all when he fought Jones. He was only 34, had never been stopped before AND after he lost to Jones in 1998, he went on to become a two time champion at cruiserweight and had his last fight in 2015!

It is also hypocritcal to in one breath say Jones was just successful because he was fast and then in the next breath suggest James Toney's skills were not comparable to Floyd's because Floyd was faster and quicker. You can't have your cake and eat it too.

Both Floyd and RJJ were great fighters but Floyd fans always seem like they need to downplay Jones' greatness in order to elevate Floyd. The often repeated mantra of "Roy was just fast, that's it" is just ignorant and disrespectful to the sport of boxing. You can't be "just fast" in this sport. You have to know what you are doing and actually know how and when to throw punches. In other words, you must have fundamentals no matter how fast you are.

A much better comparison would have been possible had Floyd dropped back down to 140 to fight Hatton or even 135 to fight a top contender after fighting at 147. Floyd was definitely smarter than Jones in this aspect as Jones' true downfall was dropping back down from heavyweight so quickly and unhealthily. Chris Byrd did the same thing and had similar tragic results. Hopkins and Floyd were smart because they didn't do that shit and had more longevity because of it.
I agree with everything you said here except the dropping down in weight being the downfall of Jones. What most people don't realize is that Jones had already loss a step or two even before the Ruiz fight. It's sometime hard to tell when a dominate elite fighter starts to fade because they're still winning and sometimes can still look brilliant. When Jones would fight huge lumbering Lt. Heavies like Julio Gonzalez, Glen Kelly, and Clinton Woods and a big lumbering heavyweight in Ruiz he would look spectacular because he was so much faster than they were but when he fought more normal sized Lt Heavies like Eric Harding and and Derrick Harmon he was winning but definitely not as impressively as he would have a year earlier. Jones weighed in at 193 for the Ruiz fight and 175 for the Tarver fight. Knowing that fighters like Roberto Duran and Meldrick Taylor have weighed as much as 200 lbs and had to make 140 or 147 do you really believe that dropping 18 lbs in 8 months is a monumental task? Remember , even though it was a hard fight for him Jones did win the 1st fight with Tarver.
 
That's what I was saying, even if you believe Mayweather is a better than Toney they're still on the same level as fighters.

Understood, and I get what you're saying. Yes, all HOF'ers are world class athletes, but there are levels/tiers. Both Liston and Ali (Clay) are HOF'ers. As great as Liston was, Ali was a different caliber fighter.
 
"HOW MUCH ROY JONES MEANS TO ME" - ANTONIO TAVER AS REAL AS IT GETS ON ROY JONES JR. RIVALRY

 
That's what I was saying, even if you believe Mayweather is a better than Toney they're still on the same level as fighters.

Im not sure about that.

Toney is my favorite fighter ever. But...

Toney is a Hof, while Floyd is an ATG. I think theres a difference there.
 
Im not sure about that.

Toney is my favorite fighter ever. But...

Toney is a Hof, while Floyd is an ATG. I think theres a difference there.
Toney never stayed at any weight class long enough to become an ATG in any one weight class but his accomplishments in his career make him an ATG fighter. World champion in 3 weight classes, started at 160 and moved up to stand in the trenches with the heavies, 87 professional fights and was never stopped.
 
Toney never stayed at any weight class long enough to become an ATG in any one weight class but his accomplishments in his career make him an ATG fighter. World champion in 3 weight classes, started at 160 and moved up to stand in the trenches with the heavies, 87 professional fights and was never stopped.

Hmmm... Im thinking about it, but where would you rank him in his own era?

Cause I dont think I could put him top 5.

Roy
Hops
Pernell
JCC
Holyfield

All guys that i have to put in front of Toney if Im being honest.
 
BERNARD HOPKINS AS REAL AS IT GETS ON TOUGHEST - TRINIDAD, JONES, OR DE LA HOYA - AND EASIEST FIGHTS

 
Hmmm... Im thinking about it, but where would you rank him in his own era?

Cause I dont think I could put him top 5.

Roy
Hops
Pernell
JCC
Holyfield

All guys that i have to put in front of Toney if Im being honest.
Good list, I agree with you on this, I would put Toney behind everyone on this list but keep in mind that everyone on your list are also ATG fighters.
 


If they were the same size, RJJ might have won because Zab Judah gave Floyd fits at first with his speed.

Hall was a BUM..C'mon OP..ANYONE can look good fighting a slow non talent having BUM.How fast was Roy when he took on Tarver:hmm:
 
How fast was Roy when he took on Tarver:hmm:
Jones was still the fastest Lt heavy in the division but he no longer had untouchable speed when he fought Tarver. Even before Jones moved up to fight Ruiz he had already lost a step , he would still look incredible against huge Lt Heavies but against normal sized Lt Heavies he was still winning but he no longer dominated them like he used to.
 
Back
Top