Giuliani associate willing to tell Congress Nunes met with ex-Ukrainian official to get dirt on Biden

thismybgolname

Rising Star
OG Investor
A lawyer for an indicted associate of Rudy Giuliani tells CNN that his client is willing to tell Congress about meetings the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee had in Vienna last year with a former Ukrainian prosecutor to discuss digging up dirt on Joe Biden.

The attorney, Joseph A. Bondy, represents Lev Parnas, the recently indicted Soviet-born American who worked with Giuliani to push claims of Democratic corruption in Ukraine. Bondy said that Parnas was told directly by the former Ukrainian official that he met last year in Vienna with Rep. Devin Nunes.

"Mr. Parnas learned from former Ukrainian Prosecutor General Victor Shokin that Nunes had met with Shokin in Vienna last December," said Bondy.

Shokin was ousted from his position in 2016 after pressure from Western leaders, including then-vice president Biden, over concerns that Shokin was not pursuing corruption cases.

Nunes is one of President Donald Trump's key allies in Congress and has emerged as a staunch defender of the President during the impeachment inquiry, which he has frequently labeled as a "circus." Nunes declined repeated requests for comment.

Bondy tells CNN that his client and Nunes began communicating around the time of the Vienna trip. Parnas says he worked to put Nunes in touch with Ukrainians who could help Nunes dig up dirt on Biden and Democrats in Ukraine, according to Bondy.
That information would likely be of great interest to House Democrats given its overlap with the current impeachment inquiry into President Trump, and could put Nunes in a difficult spot.
Bondy tells CNN his client is willing to comply with a Congressional subpoena for documents and testimony as part of the impeachment inquiry in a manner that would allow him to protect his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination.

Bondy suggested in a tweet on Friday that he was already speaking to House Intel though the committee declined to comment.

Giuliani has told CNN previously about his conversations with Shokin and  Parnas, saying that this was part of his legal work for his client, President Trump. Parnas' claims about Nunes' alleged involvement offers a new wrinkle and for the first time suggests the efforts to dig up dirt on the Bidens involved a member of Congress.

Parnas' claims that Nunes met with Shokin, which has not been previously reported, add further context to a Daily Beast report that Parnas helped arrange meetings and calls in Europe for Nunes last year, citing another Parnas' lawyer, Ed McMahon.
Those revelations came to a head on Thursday when Democratic Rep. Eric Swalwell raised the Daily Beast story publicly during the impeachment hearing.

Parnas, who was indicted on federal campaign finance charges last month, worked with Shokin and Giuliani to push a pair of unfounded claims: that Ukrainians interfered in the 2016 election on behalf of Democrats, and that Biden was acting corruptly in Ukraine on behalf of his son Hunter, who sat on the board of Ukrainian gas company Burisma Holdings.

According to Bondy, Parnas claims Nunes worked to push similar allegations of Democratic corruption.

"Nunes had told Shokin of the urgent need to launch investigations into Burisma, Joe and Hunter Biden, and any purported Ukrainian interference in the 2016 election," Bondy told CNN.
There is no evidence that the Bidens acted inappropriately. Nor is there evidence to support the conspiracy theory that Ukraine worked with Democrats to interfere in the 2016 election.

Yet these claims have been a key part of the public defense of the President put forth by Nunes and other Republicans during the impeachment hearings this month.

Parnas is currently under house arrest in Florida and has pleaded not guilty to charges of federal campaign finance fraud.
Over the past two weeks, CNN approached Nunes on two occasions and reached out to his communications staff to get comment for this story.
In the Capitol on Nov. 14, as CNN began to ask a question about the trip to Vienna, Nunes interjected and said, "I don't talk to you in this lifetime or the next lifetime."

"At any time," Nunes added. "On any question."

Asked again on Thursday about his travel to Vienna and his interactions with Shokin and Parnas, Nunes gave a similar response.
"To be perfectly clear, I don't acknowledge any questions from you in this lifetime or the next lifetime," Nunes said while leaving the impeachment hearing. "I don't acknowledge any question from you ever."

CNN was unable to reach Shokin for comment.

A trip to Europe  

Congressional travel records show that Nunes and three aides traveled to Europe from November 30 to December 3, 2018. The records do not specify that Nunes and his staff went to Vienna or Austria, and Nunes was not required to disclose the exact details of the trip.

Nunes' entourage included retired colonel Derek Harvey, who had previously worked for Trump on the National Security Council, and now works for Nunes on the House Intelligence Committee. Harvey declined to comment.

Bondy told CNN that Nunes planned the trip to Vienna after Republicans lost control of the House in the mid-term elections on Nov. 6, 2018.

"Mr. Parnas learned through Nunes' investigator, Derek Harvey, that the Congressman had sequenced this trip to occur after the mid-term elections yet before Congress' return to session, so that Nunes would not have to disclose the trip details to his Democrat colleagues in Congress," said Bondy.

At the time of the trip, Nunes was chairman of the Intelligence Committee. In January, Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff took over as chairman of the powerful committee, which is now conducting the impeachment inquiry.

Nunes meeting with Parnas

Bondy says that according to his client, following a brief in-person meeting in late 2018, Parnas and Nunes had at least two more phone conversations, and that Nunes instructed Parnas to work with Harvey on the Ukraine matters.

Parnas says that shortly after the Vienna trip, he and Harvey met at the Trump International Hotel in Washington, where they discussed claims about the Bidens as well as allegations of Ukrainian election interference, according to Bondy.

Following this, Bondy says that in a phone conversation Nunes told Parnas that he was conducting his own investigation into the Bidens and asked Parnas for help validating information he'd gathered from conversations with various current and former Ukrainian officials, including Shokin.
Parnas says that Nunes told him he'd been partly working off of information from the journalist John Solomon, who had written a number of articles on the Biden conspiracy theory for the Hill, according to Bondy.

CNN reached out to Harvey on multiple occasions for comment. Reached by phone on Friday morning, Harvey refused to comment and directed CNN to contact the communications director for Nunes. That person, Jack Langer, did not respond to numerous requests for comment from CNN. A spokesman for Schiff declined to comment for this story.

The BLT team

Bondy tells CNN that Parnas is also willing to tell Congress about a series of regular meetings he says he took part in at the Trump International Hotel in Washington that concerned Ukraine. According to Bondy, Parnas became part of what he described as a "team" that met several times a week in a private room at the BLT restaurant on the second floor of the Trump Hotel. In addition to giving the group access to key people in Ukraine who could help their cause, Parnas translated their conversations, Bondy said.

The group, according to Bondy,  included Giuliani, Parnas, the journalist Solomon, and the married attorneys Joe diGenova and Victoria Toensing. Parnas said that Harvey would occasionally be present as well, and that it was Parnas' understanding that Harvey was Nunes' proxy, Bondy said.

Solomon confirmed the meetings to CNN but said that calling the group a team was a bit of a mischaracterization. Solomon said that connectivity happened more organically, and that his role was only as a journalist reporting a story.

Solomon also said that Di Genova and Toensing, his lawyers, introduced him to Parnas as a facilitator and interpreter in early March. "Parnas was very helpful to me in getting Ukraine officials on the record," Solomon told CNN. "I only gradually realized Lev was working for other people, including Rudy Giuliani."

Solomon insists he was only reporting on a story as it unfolded, "Any suggestion that I was involved in any campaign to pressure Ukraine or the United States government to take any actions is categorically false," Solomon said.

Giuliani did not respond to requests for comment. DiGenova and Toensing declined to comment through a spokesperson.
Solomon no longer works at the Hill. After Solomon's reporting came under intense scrutiny during the impeachment inquiry, the paper announced it is reviewing his work.

Parnas wants to talk

In the weeks since his arrest, Parnas has become disenchanted with Trump and Giuliani, according to Bondy as well as other source
s who spoke to CNN. Parnas, these sources say, was particularly upset when Trump denied knowing him the day after Parnas and his associate Igor Fruman were arrested in October.

Last week, CNN reported that Parnas had claimed to have had a private meeting with Trump in which the President tasked him with a "secret mission" to uncover dirt on Democrats in Ukraine.

"He believes he has put himself out there for the President and now he's been completely hung out to dry," a person close to Parnas told CNN. Last week, the White House did not respond to repeated requests for comment to a series of questions regarding the meeting and Trump's relationship with Parnas.

On Thursday, Bondy promoted the hashtag #LetLevSpeak on Twitter in response to a number of questions about whether Parnas would testify in front of Congress.
Bondy tweeted directly at Republican California Rep. Kevin McCarthy Thursday night after McCarthy accused Schiff of blocking important witnesses from testifying, saying "I don't agree with your premise, but please, if you mean what you say, call my client, Lev Parnas. #LetLevSpeak."
 
so a mod sees that this was posted in an ongoing topic an hour ago by @easy_b


.

Technically it's a spin off, to emphasize a particular point and this is not actually part of the hearing, but as I explained before, I haven't been merging similar threads as some folks are on ignore. Also the hearing thread is several pages, if someone isn't following it, they may not have read the entire thing and imo, this also allows focused discussion on one particular aspect. If the OP wants it merged, I'm happy to do so, but otherwise I'm going to let it stand alone. I didn't see easy's post, but it was posted in your thread last night.
 
Technically it's a spin off, to emphasize a particular point and this is not actually part of the hearing, but as I explained before, I haven't been merging similar threads as some folks are on ignore. Also the hearing thread is several pages, if someone isn't following it, they may not have read the entire thing and imo, this also allows focused discussion on one particular aspect. If the OP wants it merged, I'm happy to do so, but otherwise I'm going to let it stand alone. I didn't see easy's post, but it was posted in your thread last night.
yeah …. let me say that every time it was done to me ….. multiple times …. okay "kitchen wench" ... :hmm:


.
 
Recently?
all the time ….. I try to make sure that I don't do it now … that's what the search button and common sense is for ….. if a main topic is already … I don't post it, starting another thread …. I add it as an update for the original …. and if I can't find the original … I put a disclaimer at the top of thread asking a mod or anyone to report it and merge it … mods find shit quicker and easier

sidebar: you see that easy didn't start another thread
.
 
all the time ….. I try to make sure that I don't do it now … that's what the search button and common sense is for ….. if a main topic is already … I don't post it, starting another thread …. I add it as an update for the original …. and if I can't find the original … I put a disclaimer at the top of thread asking a mod or anyone to report it and merge it … mods find shit quicker and easier

sidebar: you see that easy didn't start another thread
.

I stopped merging the duplicates about 6 mos or so ago, and most of the reports I see handled by others are usually closed out without making changes. At first I was merging if there were no replies yet, but I even stopped doing that because of the ignore feature. I hate to see discussions split across two or more threads, so I understand and I'm not being dismissive of your grievance, but normally one thread sinks with few or no replies.
 
Technically it's a spin off, to emphasize a particular point and this is not actually part of the hearing, but as I explained before, I haven't been merging similar threads as some folks are on ignore. Also the hearing thread is several pages, if someone isn't following it, they may not have read the entire thing and imo, this also allows focused discussion on one particular aspect. If the OP wants it merged, I'm happy to do so, but otherwise I'm going to let it stand alone. I didn't see easy's post, but it was posted in your thread last night.

I ain't never seen a nigga bitch and whine so much about thread policing in my fucking life. This nigga so hung up on being the first person to post shit, trying to title his threads to make them THE official threads on shit, mad when niggas fuck w other niggas threads instead of his, etc. Internet psycho shit. Nigga can not take a hint for shit man damn niggas don't really like you like that.

It's the internet nigga damn take a fucking nap or something.
 
Devin Nunes is going to go down also before all is said and done. The look on his face when this was read into the official record during Thursday's hearing was priceless.
Yo you saw the sweat pouring down the side of his face? especially when Schiff turned over to the ranking member for remarks... Nunes said "nope" lmaooo
 
It was on MSNBC but they think Schiff doesn't want to add this dude in case he's full of shit. Unless they have photos or phone records I don't think the Dems will touch him.
Well dude is already indicted and SDNY got him dead to rights,, its pretty much on him to talk if he was an ounce of immunity on other shit that will give him more time.... Trump threw them under the bus when he said he didn't even know those dudes when it was pics going back years of them and trump together... So in dude's mind he def telling lmaooo.

Nunes is finished
 
They better hope Trump wins because a Dem-appointed AG would come in stacking up scalps.
Its looking like this Biden shit was literally their only play for re election and it has completely blown up in their faces... I suspect Nancy going to slow walk these hearings with this new evidence well in to 2020 where the not only will it give the current senators running cover to still campaign for office of POTUS but the current senate will not even have time to even hold a trial and this will completely fuck up Trump's play... If the Dems take the senate and its a gang of states in play to swing blue man listen.... whether Trump win or lose he's finished but yeah the next Dem AG is going for broke on the GOP...

I'm thinking if the Dems when the Presidency Schiff might get tapped to be AG or the lawyer who's representing the Dems in the impeachment hearings lmaooooo
 
Its looking like this Biden shit was literally their only play for re election and it has completely blown up in their faces... I suspect Nancy going to slow walk these hearings with this new evidence well in to 2020 where the not only will it give the current senators running cover to still campaign for office of POTUS but the current senate will not even have time to even hold a trial and this will completely fuck up Trump's play... If the Dems take the senate and its a gang of states in play to swing blue man listen.... whether Trump win or lose he's finished but yeah the next Dem AG is going for broke on the GOP...

I'm thinking if the Dems when the Presidency Schiff might get tapped to be AG or the lawyer who's representing the Dems in the impeachment hearings lmaooooo
dream scenario
 
dream scenario
Nancy can remove any member of a committee for any reason.. Remember Jim Bonner the house speaker before Paul Ryan? He removed 2 gop members from committees because they didn’t vote party lines on a bill and disagreed with him..

This shit wit Nunes goes to the heart of this whole scheme the President was on.. Dude is finished out here and with new info Nancy has every reason to extend these impeachment hearings... Notice Trump and GOP wanted her to hurry it up? This is the exact reason why.. this Nunes info lmaooo
 
Its looking like this Biden shit was literally their only play for re election and it has completely blown up in their faces... I suspect Nancy going to slow walk these hearings with this new evidence well in to 2020 where the not only will it give the current senators running cover to still campaign for office of POTUS but the current senate will not even have time to even hold a trial and this will completely fuck up Trump's play... If the Dems take the senate and its a gang of states in play to swing blue man listen.... whether Trump win or lose he's finished but yeah the next Dem AG is going for broke on the GOP...

I'm thinking if the Dems when the Presidency Schiff might get tapped to be AG or the lawyer who's representing the Dems in the impeachment hearings lmaooooo

If Schiff or Goldman ever became AG, they'd probably have to recuse from anything involving this.
 
If Schiff or Goldman ever became AG, they'd probably have to recuse from anything involving this.
Maybe but they wouldn’t even need to say anything as those cases will prob still be on going.. they will move far away from the DOJ being politicized due to trump and Barr..
 
0845fc4f9fe2b1d29368225c6a1659be51f2881e.jpg
 
Maybe but they wouldn’t even need to say anything as those cases will prob still be on going.. they will move far away from the DOJ being politicized due to trump and Barr..

I hope I'm wrong, but I'm just not confident there would be follow through. Unlike the GOP, dems are notorious for wanting to avoid the appearance of evil when they are in power. If it could be seen as coming after political opponents as revenge or a political end, they might not pursue it. You see how no one in the Bush/Cheney admin was held accountable.
 
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm just not confident there would be follow through. Unlike the GOP, dems are notorious for wanting to avoid the appearance of evil when they are in power. If it could be seen as coming after political opponents as revenge or a political end, they might not pursue it. You see how no one in the Bush/Cheney admin was held accountable.
I don’t think it would be as the current investigation is still ongoing especially being that it’s in the SDNY public corruption unit.. This shit will extend well beyond Trump when he’s out of office
 
Back
Top