Tariq Nasheed VS Antonio Moore - FBA vs ADOS - The Fight Has Begun! [UPDATE] Now Attacking Byron Allen

Remember that 'In Living Color' skit - "Hey Mon!" Where they made fun of Jamaicans and how they worked 100 jobs and called each other lazy if they only had one job? I remember being in high school and everyone on class laughing at that skit and thinking it was funny. Hell, we laughed at it at home, but there was some truth to it.

Immigrants aren't any more different than Americans (and that's all immigrants from all countries, Asia or Europe too). There's a reason they'll live 300 people to an apartment and scrape their crumbs together to survive.
yep! i remember seeing that shit , and it was funny to me , we laughed at it, we laughed at jokes all the time about the carribean & afrikan stereotypes, even being called a coconut becos some classmates knew i had some carribean heritage , no skin off our back , it rolled off becos my parents raised me with a high level of self esteem and we were made to understand the workings of human & black conditions from a young age.
I seen cats from the motherland who shacked 6 to an apartment in harlem ,take shifts with sleep & cooking for the whole house scheduling cos some worked night security & went to school , some hustled on canal street ,grown ass men !,
The things we take for granted they cherish ,cos all they seek is a fighter's chance and all they see is opportunity!!,
now, their grandkids will very likely be less tolerant of alot of things they went thru but thats just the human story. immigrants have never been more special or more hardworking, peoples miseducation
 
Yeah but you can't knock a brother for repackaging the info and getting out to the people. For some black folks that was their first intro to that knowledge
thats what i took it for , it was a gateway for alot of folks who never came in contact with that info in that format, those of us who were raised in the struggle and on that info, already knew most of the things in there, and can honestly say there were holes all over his docs, but it did add something to the body of work of educating our people and imho , its more positive than negative, even i will admit that. i copped 2 at the time just to support , watched a bit of it but i found holes in some of the info provided but kept it moving regardless ,for me it was just that there were gonna be alot of people who that would be their gateway and we should always encourage folks to dig deeper.
its more positive than negative imho becos it hopefully sets folks up to seek more and get more involved in the process
 
NastyFewAuk-small.gif
16deac98ad263bcaeb01b35f5d98c6a10.gif
 
I'm just going to leave this here: https://threader.app/thread/1194941064693657602

Read the highlighted parts



A BLACK BILLIONAIRE'S RUSE

1 of 22

Caution ahead. Proceed at your own peril. Receipts needed. Can someone please provide me with the tangible evidence of black media mogul Byron Allen's undying and unwavering commitment to black Americans before now?

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/comcast-s-supreme-court-battle-byron-allen-may-make-racial-ncna1080956 …

2 OF 22

I need you to get this. Courts will only rule on the issues put before them. Thurgood Marshall & his gang of civil rights titans spent decades plotting legal strategy & were very careful of what cases they put before the United States Supreme Court.

3 of 22

They understood the consequence of bad precedent. They also fully understood the consequences of a court striking down good law & upholding bad law. It should also be noted that what Marshall & Co. were fighting for is much different from what Allen has his eyes set.

4 of 22

As a civil rights attorney and member of the U.S. Supreme Court bar, I am very sensitive to bad precedent. We were one justice's death away from Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and the doctrine of "Separate but Equal" being upheld in Brown v. Board of Education (1954).

5 of 22

Had Chief Justice Fred Vinson not suffered a heart attack in 1953 on the eve of Brown v. Board and had Earl Warren not been elevated in his stead, you don't get the unanimous 9-0 outcome in Brown v. Board and segregation would still be the law of the land today.

6 of 22

I mention this brief history to explain how Supreme Court composition affects the outcome of cases. This is a majority conservative court that has demonstrated a hostility towards civil rights & issues involving race. Mr. Allen has given them a stab at a signature law.

7 of 22

Given the conservative leaning of this court, if a Las Vegas casino window was taking bets on the outcome of this case, what side would you bet on winning? Unfortunately, in this hypothetical, what happens in Vegas does not stay in Vegas, but has ramifications nationwide

8 of 22

I need to reiterate, Courts will only decide on issues put before them & Mr. Allen has put the first post-Civil War federal law defining citizenship & guaranteeing civil rights squarely in the crosshairs of a conservative Supreme Court. We are not to take this lightly.

9 of 22

Mr. Allen is framing the narrative that Comcast is attempting to destroy the Civil Rights Act of 1866. However, Comcast, like any defendant in any case would do, is simply responding to the arguments Mr. Allen put in his original lawsuit.

10 of 25

Suing someone and then complaining about how they defend themselves is a dangerous ruse, especially when you are resting your case on a signature piece of legislation that protects so many black Americans.

11 of 22

Byron Allen is playing a dangerous game of chicken, a game that he can walk away from unscathed, but a game most black Americans cannot. It is not Comcast, but Mr. Allen who has put the Civil Rights Act of 1866 at risk.

12 of 22

Let's dig deeper. Mr. Allen has draped his capitalistic crusade in the traditional verbiage of civil rights and an unwavering concern for black Americans, but his past business dealings with the ultraconservative Sinclair network is quite unsettling.

13 of 22

There are some in our community that argue that Mr. Allen could be a wolf in sheep's clothing, a mole in blackface. I'm not sure, but their concerns are not to be ignored. Be leery of anyone who tells you to just shut up, get in line, and follow us. Question everything.

14 of 22

Nevertheless, herein lies the problem with casting your buckets in oligarch ponds. You never know where their financial interests lie. People of Mr. Allen's ilk did not get to where they are by fighting for everyday people.

15 of 22

They are capitalists with capitalistic ambitions and every move they make is to be viewed with suspicion. Otherwise, you run the risk of reducing an entire movement for black Americans to the capitalistic ambitions of a black billionaire.

16 of 22

Mr. Allen would not be the first wealthy black celebrity to fleece black Americans for support. O.J. Simpson is a cautionary lesson of black Americans galvanizing support for a person who had not demonstrated any fidelity to black Americans prior to a court appearance

17 of 22

I will not wast space here, but there are stark similarities between the backgrounds of Mr. Allen and Mr. Simpson sans the murder charge. Do not take this statement as a personal shot. This statement is about the thorough vetting of all people who seek our support.

18 of 22

Mr. Allen must not be given plausible deniability on his whether he has demonstrated historically a fidelity to black Americans. If so, we run the risk of presuming that Mr. Allen is working for all black Americans when he is actually working for himself.

19 of 22

If the latter is true, then Mr. Allen is doing to poor black people what President Trump is doing to poor white people: manipulating the emotion of the less fortunate to support their more nefarious capitalistic exploits. This is a hard charge, but not one to be ignored

20 of 22

These are the questions that must be posed. Again, I caution you to be leery of those who chastise you for merely posing such questions. These are tough times and black Americans can ill afford any wrong turns. Follow no one blindly.

21 of 22

As the article above points out, if the Civil Rights Act of 1866 is overturned, it will "make it very hard for even ordinary people to have a full court hearing on race discrimination" and "ordinary people who have been maltreated could well pay the price."

22 of 22

Bryon Allen is not "ordinary people," but we are. Indirectly, Mr. Allen is telling us that his capitalistic ambitions are worth our civil rights. If the Civil Rights Act of 1866 falls, it will be us left to pick up the pieces while Mr. Allen flies home in a private jet.

You can follow @DrAlexHamilton.


Share this threadBookmark

____
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Sign up.

Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.
 
I'm just going to leave this here: https://threader.app/thread/1194941064693657602

Read the highlighted parts



A BLACK BILLIONAIRE'S RUSE

1 of 22

Caution ahead. Proceed at your own peril. Receipts needed. Can someone please provide me with the tangible evidence of black media mogul Byron Allen's undying and unwavering commitment to black Americans before now?

https://www.nbcnews.com/think/opinion/comcast-s-supreme-court-battle-byron-allen-may-make-racial-ncna1080956 …

2 OF 22

I need you to get this. Courts will only rule on the issues put before them. Thurgood Marshall & his gang of civil rights titans spent decades plotting legal strategy & were very careful of what cases they put before the United States Supreme Court.

3 of 22

They understood the consequence of bad precedent. They also fully understood the consequences of a court striking down good law & upholding bad law. It should also be noted that what Marshall & Co. were fighting for is much different from what Allen has his eyes set.

4 of 22

As a civil rights attorney and member of the U.S. Supreme Court bar, I am very sensitive to bad precedent. We were one justice's death away from Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) and the doctrine of "Separate but Equal" being upheld in Brown v. Board of Education (1954).

5 of 22

Had Chief Justice Fred Vinson not suffered a heart attack in 1953 on the eve of Brown v. Board and had Earl Warren not been elevated in his stead, you don't get the unanimous 9-0 outcome in Brown v. Board and segregation would still be the law of the land today.

6 of 22

I mention this brief history to explain how Supreme Court composition affects the outcome of cases. This is a majority conservative court that has demonstrated a hostility towards civil rights & issues involving race. Mr. Allen has given them a stab at a signature law.

7 of 22

Given the conservative leaning of this court, if a Las Vegas casino window was taking bets on the outcome of this case, what side would you bet on winning? Unfortunately, in this hypothetical, what happens in Vegas does not stay in Vegas, but has ramifications nationwide

8 of 22

I need to reiterate, Courts will only decide on issues put before them & Mr. Allen has put the first post-Civil War federal law defining citizenship & guaranteeing civil rights squarely in the crosshairs of a conservative Supreme Court. We are not to take this lightly.

9 of 22

Mr. Allen is framing the narrative that Comcast is attempting to destroy the Civil Rights Act of 1866. However, Comcast, like any defendant in any case would do, is simply responding to the arguments Mr. Allen put in his original lawsuit.

10 of 25

Suing someone and then complaining about how they defend themselves is a dangerous ruse, especially when you are resting your case on a signature piece of legislation that protects so many black Americans.

11 of 22

Byron Allen is playing a dangerous game of chicken, a game that he can walk away from unscathed, but a game most black Americans cannot. It is not Comcast, but Mr. Allen who has put the Civil Rights Act of 1866 at risk.

12 of 22

Let's dig deeper. Mr. Allen has draped his capitalistic crusade in the traditional verbiage of civil rights and an unwavering concern for black Americans, but his past business dealings with the ultraconservative Sinclair network is quite unsettling.

13 of 22

There are some in our community that argue that Mr. Allen could be a wolf in sheep's clothing, a mole in blackface. I'm not sure, but their concerns are not to be ignored. Be leery of anyone who tells you to just shut up, get in line, and follow us. Question everything.

14 of 22

Nevertheless, herein lies the problem with casting your buckets in oligarch ponds. You never know where their financial interests lie. People of Mr. Allen's ilk did not get to where they are by fighting for everyday people.

15 of 22

They are capitalists with capitalistic ambitions and every move they make is to be viewed with suspicion. Otherwise, you run the risk of reducing an entire movement for black Americans to the capitalistic ambitions of a black billionaire.

16 of 22

Mr. Allen would not be the first wealthy black celebrity to fleece black Americans for support. O.J. Simpson is a cautionary lesson of black Americans galvanizing support for a person who had not demonstrated any fidelity to black Americans prior to a court appearance

17 of 22

I will not wast space here, but there are stark similarities between the backgrounds of Mr. Allen and Mr. Simpson sans the murder charge. Do not take this statement as a personal shot. This statement is about the thorough vetting of all people who seek our support.

18 of 22

Mr. Allen must not be given plausible deniability on his whether he has demonstrated historically a fidelity to black Americans. If so, we run the risk of presuming that Mr. Allen is working for all black Americans when he is actually working for himself.

19 of 22

If the latter is true, then Mr. Allen is doing to poor black people what President Trump is doing to poor white people: manipulating the emotion of the less fortunate to support their more nefarious capitalistic exploits. This is a hard charge, but not one to be ignored

20 of 22

These are the questions that must be posed. Again, I caution you to be leery of those who chastise you for merely posing such questions. These are tough times and black Americans can ill afford any wrong turns. Follow no one blindly.

21 of 22

As the article above points out, if the Civil Rights Act of 1866 is overturned, it will "make it very hard for even ordinary people to have a full court hearing on race discrimination" and "ordinary people who have been maltreated could well pay the price."

22 of 22

Bryon Allen is not "ordinary people," but we are. Indirectly, Mr. Allen is telling us that his capitalistic ambitions are worth our civil rights. If the Civil Rights Act of 1866 falls, it will be us left to pick up the pieces while Mr. Allen flies home in a private jet.

You can follow @DrAlexHamilton.


Share this threadBookmark

____
Tip: mention @threader_app on a Twitter thread with the keyword “compile” to get a link to it.

Enjoy Threader? Sign up.

Threader is an independent project created by only two developers. The site gets 500,000+ visits a month and our iOS Twitter client was featured as an App of the Day by Apple. Running this space is expensive and time consuming. If you find Threader useful, please consider supporting us to make it a sustainable project.
To be clear, I don't completely disagree with this article. I don't think Byron Allens case helps the proverbial "US", and I think he's plaginnnthe race angle hard, and playing it to the public Emotion to help his case. I think his issue with Comcast is probably a personal issue with someone on their staff. He's been in this business a long time, and is working his way into being a serious player in the game.

Comcast as a company , SUCKS. Not on no race shit, just as a company, period. From customer service , the lack.of competition in markets, and apparently, even for employees.

Byron seems to know his shit , from top to bottom. Great salesman, producer, and broad knowledge of the whole game. He's looking to be a conglomerate. 7 channels is a step toward that.

He knows all these guys personally.

Al.sharpton, NAACP, Urban.league,all these civil rights industry organizations are being given fish. He wants and knows how to FISH. the spot they hold, belongs in the hand of someone credible like him.

Someone who knows the business, rather than some appointees. Nothing wrong with Being a capitalist. He's a great one.

I would like for him to win. Am I gonna riot if he don't? No. Are Black people gonna see something great if he wins? No. HE will win. And he should.
 
While I admire his business success and would love to see him win the case as another Black man, the unspoken reality remains that Byron Allen is only #ADOS when it is financially beneficial and convenient. In "Black Hollywood" he had always been thought of as a much more right-wing version of BET founder Robert Johnson. :eek2:

(Allegedly) he has never previously fucked with or given a fuck about the Black community, so this overwhelming embrace by Tone and Yvette and company is $uspicou$. If you can find facts to contradict me I would love to see them and apologize, but I've followed Byron's career since "Real People" back in the 70s. I hate hate hate using the term "playing the race card" but when the shoe fits...

Unless something has changed recently, not one Black person even sits on the board of ANY of his 20+ companies and networks. He has NEVER fucked with Black people like that unless they can be exploited for profit. AFAIK, the only person of color who has ever been allowed into his personal or professional inner circle is his mother Carolyn Folks. And that is a pretty damning observation considering the majority of the content his companies produce.
 
Last edited:
To be clear, I don't completely disagree with this article. I don't think Byron Allens case helps the proverbial "US", and I think he's plaginnnthe race angle hard, and playing it to the public Emotion to help his case. I think his issue with Comcast is probably a personal issue with someone on their staff. He's been in this business a long time, and is working his way into being a serious player in the game.

Comcast as a company , SUCKS. Not on no race shit, just as a company, period. From customer service , the lack.of competition in markets, and apparently, even for employees.

Byron seems to know his shit , from top to bottom. Great salesman, producer, and broad knowledge of the whole game. He's looking to be a conglomerate. 7 channels is a step toward that.

He knows all these guys personally.

Al.sharpton, NAACP, Urban.league,all these civil rights industry organizations are being given fish. He wants and knows how to FISH. the spot they hold, belongs in the hand of someone credible like him.

Someone who knows the business, rather than some appointees. Nothing wrong with Being a capitalist. He's a great one.

I would like for him to win. Am I gonna riot if he don't? No. Are Black people gonna see something great if he wins? No. HE will win. And he should.


I agree with your take as it pertains to Byron Allen
Ultimately he cares about himself and making it to a place he wants to get and he'll use whatever he can to get to it
And I can't be completely mad at him in this case for doing it.

Don't mean I fuck with HIM though.
 
Karen Hunter asked him 4 years if these lawsuits were for him or the collective good of Black people and he was clear that this is about him & his ambitions, but hopefully other Blacks can walk through the door he's opening.

I agree with your take as it pertains to Byron Allen
Ultimately he cares about himself and making it to a place he wants to get and he'll use whatever he can to get to it
And I can't be completely mad at him in this case for doing it.

Don't mean I fuck with HIM though.
 
I agree with your take as it pertains to Byron Allen
Ultimately he cares about himself and making it to a place he wants to get and he'll use whatever he can to get to it
And I can't be completely mad at him in this case for doing it.

Don't mean I fuck with HIM though.
Yeah cool. I don't know him. He could be a total asshole. I'm sure that's part of the job description


I've sat and listened to his story and how much work he put in, all the networking he's done, and all the DISCIPLINE it took to get him where he is. Whoever these white boys in Comcast are, I'm.sure he's worked as hard or more to get there. And that's the part where the head start of being white in that industry , when networks were started , just a generation ago, access to capital to lay all the cable and infrastructure that goes into tv and internet , effects Black folks, while we clearly play a large part in making this industry a success on the talent side. He's had to be a talent, a producer, a salesman , and an executive to get here. I can't do nothing but tip my hat to that. I wanna see him win and be an inspiration to others. Even guys like Diddy and Magic , who took the deals available to them, but also have the same work ethic he does, can see how much MORE they can get.
 
While I admire his business success and would love to see him win the case as another Black man, the unspoken reality remains that Byron Allen is only #ADOS when it is financially beneficial and convenient. In "Black Hollywood" he had always been thought of as a much more right-wing version of BET founder Robert Johnson. :eek2:

(Allegedly) he has never previously fucked with or given a fuck about the Black community, so this overwhelming embrace by Tone and Yvette and company is $uspicou$. If you can find facts to contradict me I would love to see them and apologize, but I've followed Byron's career since "Real People" back in the 70s. I hate hate hate using the term "playing the race card" but when the shoe fits...

Unless something has changed recently, not one Black person even sits on the board of ANY of his 20+ companies and networks. He has NEVER fucked with Black people like that unless they can be exploited for profit. AFAIK, the only person of color who has ever been allowed into his personal or professional inner circle is his mother Carolyn Folks. And that is a pretty damning observation considering the majority of the content his companies produce.
What's does it mean to "fuck with the Black community"? Show up and give people shit? You don't know how much he's donated to what.and you don't know who his staff is. But yes, he hasn't done much "black targeted " content, so what? Even when people do, then you can get the complaints Tyler got. Don't do slave movies, don't do gangster movies, don't do Bill Cosby shit, CUZ BLACK PEOPLE DONT LIVE LIKE THAT. There's no pleasing people. He did what he wants to do. You wanna do something better? He's proving that you CAN. Get to work.

And how is Bob Johnson the bad guy when.he did this shit first? Clearly more people need to be following his example , and be "right wing" if that's what made him the first owner of a Black channel and his other business ventures.
 
Last edited:
Yeah cool. I don't know him. He could be a total asshole. I'm sure that's part of the job description


I've sat and listened to his story and how much work he put in, all the networking he's done, and all the DISCIPLINE it took to get him where he is. Whoever these white boys in Comcast are, I'm.sure he's worked as hard or more to get there. And that's the part where the head start of being white in that industry , when networks were started , just a generation ago, access to capital to lay all the cable and infrastructure that goes into tv and internet , effects Black folks, while we clearly play a large part in making this industry a success on the talent side. He's had to be a talent, a producer, a salesman , and an executive to get here. I can't do nothing but tip my hat to that. I wanna see him win and be an inspiration to others. Even guys like Diddy and Magic , who took the deals available to them, but also have the same work ethic he does, can see how much MORE they can get.


By him I mean his programming which is historically bad

Not him the person
I don't know him the person
 
What's does it mean to "fuck with the Black community"? Show up and give people shit? You don't know how much he's donated to what.and you don't know who his staff is. But yes, he hasn't done much "black targeted " content, so what? Even when people do, then you can get the complaints Tyler got. Don't do slave movies, don't do gangster movies, don't do Bill Cosby shit, CUZ BLACK PEOPLE DONT LIVE LIKE THAT. There's no pleasing people. He did what he wants to do. You wanna do something better? He's proving that you CAN. Get to work.
"If you can find facts to contradict me I would love to see them and apologize, but I've followed Byron's career since "Real People" back in the 70s. "

Damn you built and attacked five different straw men that NO ONE even mentioned! Still waiting on those requested FACTS...

giphy.gif
 
"If you can find facts to contradict me I would love to see them and apologize, but I've followed Byron's career since "Real People" back in the 70s. "Damn you built and attacked five different straw men that NO ONE even mentioned! Still waiting on those requested FACTS...

giphy.gif

You clearly dont know how the argument you just tried to make works.

I'm not the one who made the claim that he "don't fuck with Black people".

You did.

And theres really no way you could even prove that shit cuz it's a meaningless statement. You're the mouse and the cat in your own example
 
Last edited:
You clesybdont know how the argument you just tried to make works.

I'm not the one who made the claim that he "don't fuck with Black people".

You did.

And theres really no way you could even prove that shit cuz it's a meaningless statement. You're the mouse and the cat in your own example
You keep intentionally glossing over that word ALLEGEDLY. My OPINION is based on the FACTual racial make up of his boards (their pictures are on several of the corporate websites) and the FACT that I haven't read any published articles over the past FORTY YEARS that he's been a public celebrity where he has expressed any interest whatsoever in positively beneficial "tangibles" to anyone Black besides himself (and his Mom). His (alleged) lack of involvement would not even an issue but for the fact that his entire case is 100% predicated on a claim of racial discrimination. That card is glaringly obvious!

If you refuse to see the obvious parallels between Byron and Monique then :dunno:

But he may have a valid claim and I *still* want him to win and continue to succeed. Once again, if you know something that I don't, then by all means go ahead and show us all the repeatedly requested FACTS. I *want* to be wrong! But don't simply gloss over the stated reasons why I feel how I feel and continue making totally unprovoked personal attacks. Not quite sure why you seem so bigmad butthurt that an anonymous person states an OPINION about a public celebrity, but I would not attack YOUR personal opinion... if you had actually stated one instead of fixating on semantics.... :confused:
 
You keep intentionally glossing over that word ALLEGEDLY. My OPINION is based on the FACTual racial make up of his boards (their pictures are on several of the corporate websites) and the FACT that I haven't read any published articles over the past FORTY YEARS that he's been a public celebrity where he has expressed any interest whatsoever in positively beneficial "tangibles" to anyone Black besides himself (and his Mom). His (alleged) lack of involvement would not even an issue but for the fact that his entire case is 100% predicated on a claim of racial discrimination. That card is glaringly obvious!

If you refuse to see the obvious parallels between Byron and Monique then :dunno:

But he may have a valid claim and I *still* want him to win and continue to succeed. Once again, if you know something that I don't, then by all means go ahead and show us all the repeatedly requested FACTS. I *want* to be wrong! But don't simply gloss over the stated reasons why I feel how I feel and continue making totally unprovoked personal attacks. Not quite sure why you seem so bigmad butthurt that an anonymous person states an OPINION about a public celebrity, but I would not attack YOUR personal opinion... if you had actually stated one instead of fixating on semantics.... :confused:
If we end wtith he same.desire to see him succeed , I'm fine with that. Not gonna waste time with the other parts. Respect
 
Joe Brown wants some smoke.




:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Even this fuck nigga going hard at ADOS.

When are cats going to realize....People in the real world have already formed chapters repping ADOS.

ADOS is beyond the philosophical phase.

Damn.....why is this so hard to understand?

and LGBT....You wouldnt even know yvette sexuality because she has literally NEVER MENTIONED it.

Tariq just needs to hold that L and move on.....
 
Joe Brown wants some smoke.


I like Joe Brown. He should do this in a format where he can actually back.up some of the claims he's making. This kinda shit don't work on Twitter. I did hear him on his podcast , but even then it was just claims. Combine that with Twitter and it looks kinda raggedy. He's better than that.
 
While I admire his business success and would love to see him win the case as another Black man, the unspoken reality remains that Byron Allen is only #ADOS when it is financially beneficial and convenient. In "Black Hollywood" he had always been thought of as a much more right-wing version of BET founder Robert Johnson. :eek2:

(Allegedly) he has never previously fucked with or given a fuck about the Black community, so this overwhelming embrace by Tone and Yvette and company is $uspicou$. If you can find facts to contradict me I would love to see them and apologize, but I've followed Byron's career since "Real People" back in the 70s. I hate hate hate using the term "playing the race card" but when the shoe fits...

Unless something has changed recently, not one Black person even sits on the board of ANY of his 20+ companies and networks. He has NEVER fucked with Black people like that unless they can be exploited for profit. AFAIK, the only person of color who has ever been allowed into his personal or professional inner circle is his mother Carolyn Folks. And that is a pretty damning observation considering the majority of the content his companies produce.

Interesting...

I saw a video, I think it was on the Breakfast Club, where he makes references to blacks in Amerikkka as Africans and that we come from kings and that we should not forget that. Do the ADOS or FBA also speak like that?
 
Not happening. She is completely dissecting this muthafucka like a protozoa on a petrie dish and he doesn’t have the intellectual ammo to stop it.



Tariq is a scammer and bullshit artist who is accustomed to beefing with other scammers and bullshit artists for the entertainment of his fanbase, which is mostly comprised of people who like bullshit, "nigga shit", and the like. See the beefs with Tommy, Dr Umar, Cynthia G and some of those alt-right white boys. Keep in mind that he was once on good terms with all of them, and then they "fell out". So whenever he butts heads with someone who is serious about their shit, regardless of what their cause is, he gets his ass handed to him. I first saw this happened when he beefed with a black feminist named Pearl Jr., who slaughtered him and had him stuttering. But Afrobabe, Tucker Carlson, and Jared Taylor twisted his head up as well. The guy is NO intellectual and doesn't understand or respect any kind of scholarship, so he struggles against people who do. This is why Yvette has him grasping at straws.

And with ADOS, he's made the mistake of thinking it's only a social media hashtag and not a real movement. I've attended a couple of ADOS meetings myself, and there was a cross-section of us in there, from working poor to educated and middle-class.

He'll have to save face with his core fanbase at this point by dropping a puppet or roast video, because he has nothing else left.

:lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

Even this fuck nigga going hard at ADOS.

When are cats going to realize....People in the real world have already formed chapters repping ADOS.

ADOS is beyond the philosophical phase.

Damn.....why is this so hard to understand?

and LGBT....You wouldnt even know yvette sexuality because she has literally NEVER MENTIONED it.

Tariq just needs to hold that L and move on.....

:yes:
 
Interesting...

I saw a video, I think it was on the Breakfast Club, where he makes references to blacks in Amerikkka as Africans and that we come from kings and that we should not forget that. Do the ADOS or FBA also speak like that?

you an immigrant too?
 
you an immigrant too?

Brother Kefta is not ADOS. And apparently is going for the "Black Americans who self identify can't be African or a part of the diaspora" angle. He's promoted reparations in the past but more along the everybody black should get reparations from the US Government than just those who's ancestors were directly affected. I linked a thread he made about Caricom 5 years ago and he didnt sugggest ADOS be a part of that.

Pan Africanism teaches diaspora blacks to look down on and underappreciate ADOS contributions. The ideology is heavily dependent on ADOS erasing itself and having low self esteem in their identity (see Dynast Amir). Thats why its most practiced in the US and NOT Africa.
 
thanks for the clarification.

kefta another immigrant trying to steal micro reparations we’ve gotten in the past like the white immigrants and $5 Indians?

:smh:

Brother Kefta is not ADOS. And apparently is going for the "Black Americans who self identify can't be African or a part of the diaspora" angle. He's promoted reparations in the past but more along the everybody black should get reparations from the US Government than just those who's ancestors were directly affected. I linked a thread he made about Caricom 5 years ago and he didnt sugggest ADOS be a part of that.

Pan Africanism teaches diaspora blacks to look down on and underappreciate ADOS contributions. The ideology is heavily dependent on ADOS erasing itself and having low self esteem in their identity (see Dynast Amir). Thats why its most practiced in the US and NOT Africa.
 



Two other Scott donors, both billionaires, also benefit: Jorge Pérez, the Related Group chairman and CEO known as the condo king of South Florida; and Stephen Ross, a prominent Trump fundraiser, real estate magnate, and Miami Dolphins and Equinox gym part-owner. Ross’ Related Companies owns a quarter of Related Group, which is Rybovich’s partner on the planned Marina Village development.

Rybovich, which describes itself as a “world renowned luxurious resort-style Superyacht marina,” can accommodate $100 million-plus yachts that stretch more than 300 feet. It offers an on-site concierge, tiki bar and yoga. (Saul Martinez for ProPublica)
It’s unclear how valuable the tax break could be, and the public may never know because the Trump law included no public reporting requirements. But Pérez recently boasted that the new subsidy would add jet fuel to the investment returns, telling Bloomberg this year: “It worked as a market-rate rental. Now, it works that much better as an opportunity zone.”
Huizenga and Pérez weren’t the only beneficiaries of Scott’s largesse. In a separate case in Tampa, the Florida documents show, Scott made a wealthy downtown area an opportunity zone at the request of a firm controlled by yet another billionaire donor, Tampa Bay Lightning owner Jeff Vinik. This, too, does not involve a new investment. Since as early as 2014, Vinik has been planning a massive redevelopment project in the area that will include luxury residences, hotels and shops.
Trump has hailed the opportunity zone program. Opportunity zones “are doing unbelievably well. And you’ll see that, and you’ve already seen it,” he said in August. “And the biggest beneficiary there is African Americans.”
 
Tariq is a scammer and bullshit artist who is accustomed to beefing with other scammers and bullshit artists for the entertainment of his fanbase, which is mostly comprised of people who like bullshit, "nigga shit", and the like. See the beefs with Tommy, Dr Umar, Cynthia G and some of those alt-right white boys. Keep in mind that he was once on good terms with all of them, and then they "fell out". So whenever he butts heads with someone who is serious about their shit, regardless of what their cause is, he gets his ass handed to him. I first saw this happened when he beefed with a black feminist named Pearl Jr., who slaughtered him and had him stuttering. But Afrobabe, Tucker Carlson, and Jared Taylor twisted his head up as well. The guy is NO intellectual and doesn't understand or respect any kind of scholarship, so he struggles against people who do. This is why Yvette has him grasping at straws.

And with ADOS, he's made the mistake of thinking it's only a social media hashtag and not a real movement. I've attended a couple of ADOS meetings myself, and there was a cross-section of us in there, from working poor to educated and middle-class.

He'll have to save face with his core fanbase at this point by dropping a puppet or roast video, because he has nothing else left.



:yes:
Yeah he should’ve went comedy right out the gate lol. I mean, he even lost a debate with an actual white supremacist. If you can’t debunk a oerson who thinks white people are superior, you’re really stupid. He ended up actually TELLING the guy that white people are superior lol. That’s how dumb this guy is, when he tries to play serious. And this is the guy who’s “documentaries” people are watching for intellect? Lol you actually walk away from them shits with LESS. I’d love to see his followers discover his fraud and leave him high and dry, but of course it won’t happen. I’ll settle for a few more.
.
 
Back
Top