Texas teacher colors in a young Black boys haircut with a SHARPIE as punishment

They knew what they were doing with this shyt! They thought this shyt would be funny to do: "Where gonna call your mom and get you in trouble, or you can just fill it in with this marker so we won't have to call your mom and get you in trouble..." Got this kid shook thinking permanent marker was his best option, when letting his mother fight this battle was his best bet. We need to let our children know to let us fight for them. This should have been a 15min call:

School: We have a standard here at the school, no carvings. It is a little vague, but with the different hair types we kinda have to. But the M in your sons head would be considered a carving.
Mother: Okay I understand thank you for the call. My son and I will make sure this doesn't happen again. Now are parts considered carvings or is it just extreme cases that are considered "carvings"?
 
sue for the PTSD caused by the embarrassment caused
This right here!!

How could any teacher think that was a good idea. Surprised some of these teachers don't get they asses whooped for shit like this.
 
Oh really? Apparently you didn't, or just dismissed it, given what you wrote bruh. :rolleyes:

Dude I live here in Houston, this case is all over my feed and we here have discussed it for days straight. All I mentioned was the danger of the ink, calm down. Nobody here knows more about the racism of cacs in this city than me.
 
Texas teacher just opened up a can of whip ass on herself. Regardless of whether or not the haircut met the school's rules, that's not her child. She has no right touching that child and to color it with a magic marker. I see DOLLARS coming their way.
 
Dude I live here in Houston, this case is all over my feed and we here have discussed it for days straight. All I mentioned was the danger of the ink, calm down. Nobody here knows more about the racism of cacs in this city than me.

No need to beef, I think we're just talking past each other. My point was your point was focused entirely on characteristics on the ink which is not the point of the story; and to the point, the issue and only issue is what was done, or should have been done, about a white "teacher" who felt, or thought beforehand, that what was about to occur was okay and had no fear of repercussions. Damn the ink... I didn't mean to suggest you don't know anything about racism, I just thought the content of your comment seemed to reflect more of an interest in chemistry than a racist criminal act. :hmm:
 
Dude I live here in Houston, this case is all over my feed and we here have discussed it for days straight. All I mentioned was the danger of the ink, calm down. Nobody here knows more about the racism of cacs in this city than me.


what ended up happening? this happened four months ago.
 
what ended up happening? this happened four months ago.

The story just broke online so it's just now dusting up here in Houston as well. Dont know exactly what happened as of yet. Pearland is full of shit anyway, shit this whole fucking state.
 
No need to beef, I think we're just talking past each other. My point was your point was focused entirely on characteristics on the ink which is not the point of the story; and to the point, the issue and only issue is what was done, or should have been done, about a white "teacher" who felt, or thought beforehand, that what was about to occur was okay and had no fear of repercussions. Damn the ink... I didn't mean to suggest you don't know anything about racism, I just thought the content of your comment seemed to reflect more of an interest in chemistry than a racist criminal act. :hmm:

Got you. I think you just caught my remark after the fact. I already talked about this racism in the other forums. I was just drive by posting...anyway I'm debating you on the "broad gets beat by 300 pound dude" post.
 
No need to beef, I think we're just talking past each other. My point was your point was focused entirely on characteristics on the ink which is not the point of the story; and to the point, the issue and only issue is what was done, or should have been done, about a white "teacher" who felt, or thought beforehand, that what was about to occur was okay and had no fear of repercussions. Damn the ink... I didn't mean to suggest you don't know anything about racism, I just thought the content of your comment seemed to reflect more of an interest in chemistry than a racist criminal act. :hmm:

His post was very weird to say the least. I saw his first post but the second post was focused on the ink.

Sharpies are called “Permanent” markers. A poster stated “Permanent Marker” and dude chimed on how the marker wasn’t “Permanent”.

Telling us about the chemical makeup and what harm the ingredients does to skin! :roflmao:

Shit was very weird but I don’t have time to talk about the chemical reactions to the skin of “Non-Permanent” markers :roflmao3:
 
His post was very weird to say the least. I saw his first post but the second post was focused on the ink.

Sharpies are called “Permanent” markers. A poster stated “Permanent Marker” and dude chimed on how the marker wasn’t “Permanent”.

Telling us about the chemical makeup and what harm the ingredients does to skin! :roflmao:

Shit was very weird but I don’t have time to talk about the chemical reactions to the skin of “Non-Permanent” markers :roflmao3:

Maybe because I'm an artist that works with markers everyday. Hey it's bgol. Casual comments get turned into full-blown fights here I get it..
 
Last edited:
Maybe because I'm an artist that works with markers everyday. Hey it's bgol. Casual comments get turned into full-blown fights I here I get it..meh

We’re having a “Comprehension/Perception” issue, on your behalf. You know Much more about markers than me and you do great work from what I remember.

The point is:

The article states that the child was drawn on with a “Permanent” marker.

A poster was surprised that she wrote on the child with a, “Permanent” marker.

You then responded to him by telling him the marker isn’t permanent and it’ll “Eventually wash out”...
Then you go on to state that there’s carcinogens that can irritate his skin.

Another point. The marker says “Permanent” on it!

supersharpie2_480x480.png

The poster only called the item by its given name and you want to focus on how it’ll “Wash out” and possibly give rashes :roflmao:

You’re over there thinking we’re the issue and we’re looking at you like

giphy.gif


Another example just in case there’s still a misunderstanding.


Random Parent: At school the teacher sprayed spray paint in my child’s face!

Drayonis: Don’t worry, wash with Dove or any other mild detergent. Once dry, use shea butter and it’ll wipe right off.

That’s how you look to us. :roflmao:
 
Last edited:
We’re having a “Comprehension/Perception” issue, on your behalf. You know Much more about markers than me and you do great work from what I remember.

The point is:

The article states that the child was drawn on with a “Permanent” marker.

A poster was surprised that she wrote on the child with a, “Permanent” marker.

You then responded to him by telling him the marker isn’t permanent and it’ll “Eventually wash out”...
Then you go on to state that there’s carcinogens that can irritate his skin.

Another point. The marker says “Permanent” on it!

supersharpie2_480x480.png

The poster only called the item by its given name and you want to focus on how it’ll “Wash out” and possibly give rashes :roflmao:

You’re over there thinking we’re the issue and we’re looking at you like

giphy.gif


Another example just in case there’s still a misunderstanding.


Random Parent: At school the teacher sprayed spray paint in my child’s face!

Drayonis: Don’t worry, wash with Dove or any other mild detergent. Once dry, use shea butter and it’ll wipe right off.

That’s how you look to us. :roflmao:
Bro dray fucks white bitches

He will always have a soft spot for them.

That’s why I ain’t even argue with famo like that
 
Back
Top