I have one problem with the movement and one skepticism.
The problem is related to the name itself. I haven’t looked at name origin but curious the rationale of how they chose “slavery”. Is that name for shock value or is that part of the legal reason for the reparations claim? I would think the former since Moore is an attorney.
The second is the speed of mobilization. Any type of movement I see that publicly mobilizes large numbers of people and resources quickly should be analyzed no matter what the purpose is.
American Descendants of Slavery. First of all, it's historically accurate. I don't see the "shock" there. Second of all, it is legal, which is why we have to correct those who say the "A" is for "African" and/or the "S" is for "Slaves". I'll post his video about it if I find it.
Trump already said today that the Democratic Party was being usurped by Cortez, Omar, Pressley, and Tlaib. That tells me that the Democrats and Republicans are working together to paint those 4 women are lone wolves (typical white power structure rhetoric to avoid group labels) to cause more in-fighting.
Because Pelosi is a racist, she doesn’t care if Trump wins as long as the Presidency stays white male. She’d rather the re-installation of the white power structure be ushered in by the republicans (which I’m sure their party doesn’t mind) and she is fully complicit.
I agree about Pelosi.



I never knew how bad this shit was.
