Median-Priced Homes Not Affordable for Average Wage Earners in 71 Percent of U.S. Housing Markets

lightbright

Master Pussy Poster
BGOL Investor
Dashboard-1-2.png

Home Prices Less Affordable Than Historic Average in 49 Percent of Local Markets; 65 Percent of Markets Less Affordable Than a Year Ago


IRVINE, Calif. – March 28, 2019 — ATTOM Data Solutions, curator of the nation’s premier property database and first property data provider of Data-as-a-Service (DaaS), today released its Q1 2019 U.S. Home Affordability Report, which shows that median home prices in the first quarter of 2019 were not affordable for average wage earners in 335 of 473 U.S. counties analyzed in the report (71 percent).

The report determined affordability for average wage earners by calculating the amount of income needed to make monthly house payments — including mortgage, property taxes and insurance — on a median-priced home, assuming a 3 percent down payment and a 28 percent maximum “front-end” debt-to-income ratio. That required income was then compared to annualized average weekly wage data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics (see full methodology below).

The 335 counties where a median-priced home in the first quarter was not affordable for average wage earners included Los Angeles County, California; Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona; San Diego County, California; Orange County, California; and Miami-Dade County, Florida.

The 138 counties (29 percent of the 473 counties analyzed in the report) where a median-priced home in the first quarter was still affordable for average wage earners included Cook County (Chicago), Illinois; Harris County (Houston), Texas; Wayne County (Detroit), Michigan; Philadelphia County, Pennsylvania; and Cuyahoga County (Cleveland), Ohio.

View Q1 2019 U.S. Home Affordability Heat Map by County

“We are seeing a housing market in flux across the United States, with a mix of tailwinds and headwinds that are pricing many people out of the housing market, but also are creating potentially better conditions for buyers,” said Todd Teta, chief product officer with ATTOM Data Solutions. “Continually rising home prices in many areas do remain a financial stretch – or simply unaffordable – for a majority of households. However, quarterly wage gains have been outpacing prices increases for more than a year and mortgage rates are falling, which have helped make homes a bit more affordable now, than they’ve been in a year. Affordability may improve because of the simple fact that homes are out of reach for so many home seekers, suggesting that prices need to moderate down in order to attract buyers. Of course, a few quarters do not a long-term trend make. The economy could slow. The impact of last year’s tax cuts could fade, and interest rates could go back up, but the signs point to the possibility of an impending buyers’ market.”

49 percent of markets less affordable than historic averages

Among the 473 counties analyzed in the report, 232 (49 percent) were less affordable than their historic affordability averages in the first quarter of 2019, down from 76 percent of counties in the previous quarter but up from 42 percent of counties in the first quarter of 2018.

Counties that were less affordable than their historic affordability averages included Los Angeles County, California; Harris County (Houston), Texas; Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona; San Diego County, California; and Orange County, California.

Most affordable counties in Atlantic City, Baltimore, Philadelphia, Cleveland

Among the 473 counties analyzed in the report, 241 (51 percent) were more affordable than their historic affordability averages in the first quarter of 2019, including Cook County (Chicago), Illinois; Miami-Dade County, Florida; Santa Clara (San Jose), California; Middlesex (Boston), Massachusetts; and Suffolk County (New York), New York.

Counties with the highest affordability index were Warren County (Allentown), New Jersey (151); Mercer County (Trenton), New Jersey (147); Cumberland (Vineland), New Jersey (144); Onslow (Jacksonville), North Carolina (142); and Litchfield (Torrington), Connecticut (139).

65 percent of markets post worsening affordability compared to year ago

A total of 308 of the 473 counties analyzed in the report (65 percent) posted a year-over-year decrease in their affordability index, meaning that home prices were less affordable than a year ago, including Los Angeles County, California; Harris County, Texas; Maricopa County, Arizona; San Diego County, California; and Riverside County, California.

A total of 165 of the 473 counties analyzed in the report (35 percent) posted a year-over-year increase in the affordability index, meaning that home prices were more affordable than a year ago, including Cook County (Chicago), Illinois; Orange County, California; Miami-Dade County, Florida; Kings County (Brooklyn), New York; and Dallas County (Dallas-Fort Worth), Texas.

Highest share of income needed to buy in Brooklyn, Manhattan, San Francisco, Maui

Nationwide an average wage earner would need to spend 32.7 percent of his or her income to buy a median-priced home in the first quarter of 2019, on par with the historic average of 32.7 percent of income.

Counties where an average wage earner would need to spend the highest share of income to buy a median-priced home in Q1 2019 were Kings County (Brooklyn), New York (115.9 percent); New York County (Manhattan), New York (115.0 percent); Santa Cruz County, California (114.1 percent); Marin County, California in the San Francisco metro area (103.1 percent); and Maui County, Hawaii (100.7 percent).

Counties where an average wage earner would need to spend the lowest share of income to buy a median-priced home were Bibb County (Macon), Georgia (11.1 percent); Baltimore City, Maryland (12.4 percent); Wayne County (Detroit), Michigan (13.2 percent); Rock Island County (Quad Cities), Illinois (13.5 percent); and Montgomery County, Alabama (13.9 percent).

Home price appreciation outpacing wage growth in 49 percent of markets

Home price appreciation outpaced average weekly wage growth in 232 of the 473 counties analyzed in the report (49 percent), including Maricopa County (Phoenix), Arizona; Queens County, New York; San Bernardino County (Riverside), California; Clark County (Las Vegas), Nevada; and Tarrant County (Dallas-Fort Worth), Texas.

Average weekly wage growth outpaced home price appreciation in 241 of the 473 counties analyzed in the report (51 percent), including Los Angeles County, California; Cook County (Chicago), Illinois; Harris County (Houston), Texas; San Diego County, California; and Orange County, California.

Report Methodology

The ATTOM Data Solutions U.S. Home Affordability Index analyzes median home prices derived from publicly recorded sales deed data collected by ATTOM Data Solutions and average wage data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics in 473 U.S. counties with a combined population of more than 231 million. The affordability index is based on the percentage of average wages needed to make monthly house payments on a median-priced home with a 30-year fixed rate mortgage and a 3 percent down payment, including property taxes, home insurance and mortgage insurance. Average 30-year fixed interest rates from the Freddie Mac Primary Mortgage Market Survey were used to calculate the monthly house payments.

The report determined affordability for average wage earners by calculating the amount of income needed to make monthly house payments — including mortgage, property taxes and insurance — on a median-priced home, assuming a 3 percent down payment and a 28 percent maximum “front-end” debt-to-income ratio. For instance, the nationwide median home price of $237,500 in the first quarter of 2019 would require an annual gross income of $66,336 for a buyer putting 3 percent down and not exceeding the recommended “front-end” debt-to-income ratio of 28 percent — meaning the buyer would not be spending more than 28 percent of his or her income on the house payment, including mortgage, property taxes and insurance. That required income is higher than the $56,823 annual income earned by an average wage earner based on the most recent average weekly wage data available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, making a median-priced home nationwide not affordable for an average wage earner.

CONTINUED:
https://www.attomdata.com/news/market-trends/attom-data-solutions-q1-2019-home-affordability-report/


.
 
That's why I have been pushing cats to how shall I say it... [Korean grocer]Hurry up and buy[/Korean grocer]

Shit is getting worse
You right about that …….. I'm glad I got a good job and already own two properties ….. once you get one it's a lot easier to get more …. I tell the young bucks in the department to get property as soon as you can .... and live their with as many as you can tolerate(2,3,4 family) before you get a single family home ....


.
 
The way to go is buy a nice size lot, then build and expand as your family grows.

They call them single family houses for a reason, not single person houses.

Americans need to buy the amount of space needed to live comfortable, not buy all the house their lender with qualify them for.

I drive all over the country, there is plenty of land out here for development and privacy available.

Unless you have an above average to upper class income, you should not be trying to buy a home in a major metro area anyway.

If you have a mediocre income or no high paying profession or trade, you need move your ass outside the city limits, or move to the South.

Also, diversify your portfolio so that you are not Land rich, Cash poor like a lot of property owners.
 
The way to go is buy a nice size lot, then build and expand as your family grows.

They call them single family houses for a reason, not single person houses.

Americans need to buy the amount of space needed to live comfortable, not buy all the house their lender with qualify them for.

I drive all over the country, there is plenty of land out here for development and privacy available.

Unless you have an above average to upper class income, you should not be trying to buy a home in a major metro area anyway.

If you have a mediocre income or no high paying profession or trade, you need move your ass outside the city limits, or move to the South.

Also, diversify your portfolio so that you are not Land rich, Cash poor like a lot of property owners.
The problem is that the farther you live from a metro area ….. the lower the job pay is and the farther you have to go for things needed for living or to go to said metro areas ….. that's why prices are cheaper ( as well as most salaries) the farther you go out into the boondocks/sticks (away from people) to get to cheaper lots. I got co-workers that do a2hr plus drive one way to come to work …. the 24/72 work schedule we have now makes it much more doable .

The farther you move from NYC, the cheaper the lots are ...



.



.
 
The problem is that the farther you live from a metro area ….. the lower the job pay is and the farther you have to go for things needed for living or to go to said metro areas ….. that's why prices are cheaper ( as well as most salaries) the farther you go out into the boondocks/sticks (away from people) to get to cheaper lots. I got co-workers that do a2hr plus drive one way to come to work …. the 24/72 work schedule we have now makes it much more doable .

The farther you move from NYC, the cheaper the lots are ...



.



.
Bingo! People fail to understand this. In a smaller market you will make less in salary than one of the bigger markets (LA, NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia and etc.). Even if it's a "good paying" job you will still make less. I know an Associate Media Director at my old job that made about $116k but when she moved to Atlanta she took about a $20k paycut because of the market. She didn't give me the exact number but she said around $20k :smh:
 
Bingo! People fail to understand this. In a smaller market you will make less in salary than one of the bigger markets (LA, NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia and etc.). Even if it's a "good paying" job you will still make less. I know an Associate Media Director at my old job that made about $116k but when she moved to Atlanta she took about a $20k paycut because of the market. She didn't give me the exact number but she said around $20k :smh:
Georgia is one of the worst ….. everyone moving from Jersey to Georgia ….. "Everything is cheaper there" ….. so are the salaries ….. you gotta make the loot up here …. then go there with a pension …. or good savings made from investing smartly … real estate


.
 
Last edited:
But that sounds like adjusting to the cost of living to me?

What city did your friend come from before Atlanta?

Bingo! People fail to understand this. In a smaller market you will make less in salary than one of the bigger markets (LA, NYC, Chicago, Philadelphia and etc.). Even if it's a "good paying" job you will still make less. I know an Associate Media Director at my old job that made about $116k but when she moved to Atlanta she took about a $20k paycut because of the market. She didn't give me the exact number but she said around $20k :smh:

Georgia is one of the worst ….. everyone moving from Jersey to Georgia ….. "Everything is cheaper their" ….. so are the salaries ….. you gotta make the loot up here …. then go there with a pension …. or good savings made from investing smartly … real estate


.
 
East Orange, same as me ..… all the ones I know were from Essex County


.

I lot of people from up north come to Charlotte because of the cheaper cost of living and wage balance.

But now, they are overloading the smaller cities causing the markets to increase because the natives of the city aren’t able to keep up against the up north money that people bring down here.
 
and believe it or not …. it isn't so much as the home itself …. but the land it sits on …… wood …. oak and marble floors are basically the same price everywhere ….. it's where you use them to build the house ….


.
That is correct if we're just talking about custom homes or homes in exclusive areas like Brookhaven or Vinings in Atlanta. I am also talking about homes in South Atlanta that used to cost $200k and they are now $350k,
 
Last edited:
Most mutha fuckas got student loans to pay off they can barely afford to purchase a house because they can barely get a good enough paying job.
 
Most mutha fuckas got student loans to pay off they can barely afford to purchase a house because they can barely get a good enough paying job.
Doesn't help that people are idiots. A couple will take on a house that both of them basically got to work 60 hours to afford. If one goes down, they're fucked. They could use both incomes to qualify and buy less house, but that's too much like right. They going to max out and then cry that they got a wrong deal.

People with student loans and the luxury of two incomes keep fucking up. It's crazy how many working couples I seen talking about they're losing their homes.
 
Most mutha fuckas got student loans to pay off they can barely afford to purchase a house because they can barely get a good enough paying job.

Student loans are definitely real. I still got 49k and it feels like a weight on your neck, and this is coming from somebody making pretty good money.
 
Student loans are definitely real. I still got 49k and it feels like a weight on your neck, and this is coming from somebody making pretty good money.
Not to belittle your loan ….. but $49k ….. ain't that like paying a $600 car note for 5 years ??? :dunno:



.
 
Not to belittle your loan ….. but $49k ….. ain't that like paying a $600 car note for 5 years ??? :dunno:



.

Yeah, I mean its nothing but thats the difference between living on your own in a 2k apartment downtown, to having to live with a roommate, or in the increase your commute with a further out place on 1400 a month. Its a difference. It decreases cash flow.

The good thing is my loans are between 4.6-3.7% and are all federal, so it could be worse, but the debt isnt something you want to hang around.
 

This is one of the biggest reasons I moved away from Canada. Way too much space between cities leads to stagnant wages and overpriced homes. Especially if you work in a niche profession.

For instance, say you are a live sound engineer. You put your resume out to every concert hall, theater, and other live venue around the city and find out that the only jobs available pay far below what you're worth.

If you're in Vancouver you really only have three options.

1) accept a pay drop and hope the boss gives you a raise

2) find a different profession and berate yourself for wasting time in college.

3) move to a city in a completely different province and time zone and try again. Keep in mind that you likely don't even know any person in this city and might have no idea where you're going to live.

That 'take it or leave it' attitude is reflected in the housing. landlords and sellers know that they have a captive audience and really only have to compete with people within their own area.

Now suppose you're an out-of-work sound engineer who can't find a good job in Oakland California. You basically have four options.

1) drive 30 minutes away to San Francisco
2) drive 1 hour away to San Jose
3) drive 2 hours away to Sacramento
4) drive 6 hours away to Los Angeles

this is a big reason why, with some exceptions, homes in the Bay Area tend to be cheaper than they are in Vancouver. It's also why professions that people in Vancouver do for "Molson money" become fully-fledged careers out here.
 
Its either work your ass to death and buy a decent home in a safe place, or buy a pos that has bad schools cause of the property tax and put bars on your house.
 
Doesn't help that people are idiots. A couple will take on a house that both of them basically got to work 60 hours to afford. If one goes down, they're fucked. They could use both incomes to qualify and buy less house, but that's too much like right. They going to max out and then cry that they got a wrong deal.

People with student loans and the luxury of two incomes keep fucking up. It's crazy how many working couples I seen talking about they're losing their homes.
This is so true. My sister in law keeps wondering why we live in South Atlanta in a modest but nice home while she’s renting in a high rent district. Lol.
 
I don't have any kids but made sure to buy my property in areas with a great school system. Resale matters

I think in major metros you are still safe. DINK gay couples are a goldmine from what I see down here in Atlanta.
 
The Next housing crash is going to be very very bad

They don't even know the half:smh:. Housing speculation in America is out of control and unpredictable. I've talked to people up in Toronto and they tell me they have high rises in some places around the city over 90% unoccupied. This is what is going to happen in the "hot" cities in America. Tons of housing inventory and no one to sell or rent to because wages are not keeping up with the cost of living. Oh well people will benefit when the housing market crashes here:yes:.
 
They don't even know the half:smh:. Housing speculation in America is out of control and unpredictable. I've talked to people up in Toronto and they tell me they have high rises in some places around the city over 90% unoccupied. This is what is going to happen in the "hot" cities in America. Tons of housing inventory and no one to sell or rent to because wages are not keeping up with the cost of living. Oh well people will benefit when the housing market crashes here:yes:.
Republican started peeling back the rules when Obama left office you are really seeing the effects of that
 
They don't even know the half:smh:. Housing speculation in America is out of control and unpredictable. I've talked to people up in Toronto and they tell me they have high rises in some places around the city over 90% unoccupied. This is what is going to happen in the "hot" cities in America. Tons of housing inventory and no one to sell or rent to because wages are not keeping up with the cost of living. Oh well people will benefit when the housing market crashes here:yes:.
It’s opposite here. Inventory is quite low, so people are paying high premium prices for regular homes.
 
Back
Top