I gravity is caused by motion how come immobile fat bitch's don't float?
Russia Says Proposed Mission To The Moon Will ‘Verify’ Whether The USA. Actually Landed There
- Thread starter RoomService
- Start date
Please reread what I said:
What I said in my original response was what you said in your first 5 sentences here.
Then you say "But you can never define gravitational force without using G."
Which I agree here, however when we peddle back to when you said :
But then you agreed that "G is a constant and never zero".
That is a contraindication to your argument, bro. It actually is a huge hole in your argument. Because G being zero is the only way that Gravitation Force can be zero.
But do we really want to talk about how G was derived even after I just showed that G was a very small number that bares little significance? I pretty sure no rotation of any such is considered in the calculation of G. If it was, then G would be a much high number.
I'm ready to math any and all concepts right now.
My man seems to hanging on this Gravitational Constant for dear life to get this movement thing to be true.
We at talking about the derivation of G now (possibly).
Ain't NOBODY coming to save this nigga either lmaaaaao
Alex
Cashie B
Freddy
Fourteen
Hell naw. The math has been unleashed now.
They thinking about them algebra classes like
Not arguing not concepts without equations. Fuck that.
Wait
What is niggas talmbout now?
I said niggas ain’t go to the moon in no fucking metal foil box.
How the fuck did we get to math equations and expressions?
What is niggas talmbout now?
I said niggas ain’t go to the moon in no fucking metal foil box.
How the fuck did we get to math equations and expressions?
you mind fuckin me bruh....
the article clearly says... a massive black holes in the center of galaxies stay put...
and again.. I know everything in the universe on a quatum level everything is in motion..
but everything does not move on its own accord like massive black holes.
stop the jedi mind tricks with the semantics..
so you are saying this quote is false correct?
"The really massive black holes at the centers of galaxies will stay there unless something catastrophic happens, like a direct collision between two galaxies."
if so then we will have to agree to disagree there you city slicker....
Boy that tesseract damn near made me spit my drink out
That article means relative to their galaxies or spontaneous movement bro
They are still within their galaxies while also hurtling through space at a few hundred thousand mph
Ain't NOBODY coming to save this nigga either lmaaaaao
Alex
Cashie B
Freddy
Fourteen
Raymond walked in, made a comment, now he’s solo defending the pseudoscience squad
All galaxies are moving.
Why do you keep typing that.
We have images of galaxies colliding.
Right.
I mean it seems like it would be harder to explain how anything could be a non moving object than seeing how nothing is non moving
Because that's how you go to the moon.
It's like a cup in a cup holder in a speeding car.
To the cup, the cupholder is not moving.
But the car is the galaxy... its hauling ass.
They will continue in the harmony indefinitely or until acted upon by another force i.e. crash.
The black holes are all also GROWING. So you CAN NOT grown and remain in the same place. Its impossible.
So in every sense of the word the black holes are moving... through space as the galaxy transits, growing in size as it consumes more mass.
That quote points to the movment of the black hole in relation to its surrounding galaxy.
And yes its false since the black holes are all growing
To the cup, the cupholder is not moving.
But the car is the galaxy... its hauling ass.
They will continue in the harmony indefinitely or until acted upon by another force i.e. crash.
The black holes are all also GROWING. So you CAN NOT grown and remain in the same place. Its impossible.
So in every sense of the word the black holes are moving... through space as the galaxy transits, growing in size as it consumes more mass.
That quote points to the movment of the black hole in relation to its surrounding galaxy.
And yes its false since the black holes are all growing
But it's Wikipedia!
Where is Alexw?
Hope his lesson plan went smooth.
Lmaooo @ we know what class u DONT teach.
Hope his lesson plan went smooth.
Lmaooo @ we know what class u DONT teach.
in comparison to planets are massive black holes in the center of galaxies stationary??
You don't understand at all. When did I ever said that G was zero or that a planet didn't move? I've been saying the exact opposite. And what rotation are you talking about? Now you're sounding like your boy. You're all over the place.
Also, if there is no mass, there is no gravitational force either. It's why you need both. Not just one. This is something you should know.
The fact is you don't know the difference between the property of matter and something that is created such as gravitational force. Someone who claims to know about science should know the difference. So you ramble on about things no one talked about as if they make some kind of point in the argument. Dont change the subject. Lets deal directly with this. Lets use the equation you posted. Show how G was derived.
Last edited:
You have no reply to what I answered, do you? You're like that special kid that needs someone else to come and save you.
Pretty soon ain't nobody going anywhere if they don't clean this bullshit up, the CAC is the dirtiest motherfucker in the universe, like Trump always worried about winning and fuck the future.
How you winning and killing your future at the same time.
I would say it ain't Rocket Science except it is.
INNER SPACE DEBRI CRITICALLY OUT OF CONTROL
How you winning and killing your future at the same time.
I would say it ain't Rocket Science except it is.
INNER SPACE DEBRI CRITICALLY OUT OF CONTROL
Man if you don't shut yo dumb ass up lol don't get mad because the rest of the actual smart people came in the thread And told your buckethead ass the same shit I did.
You trying to repurpose a fucking fundamental equation of physics when EVERYBODY telling you you got it fucked up.
And you know what you haven't done? Supply the equation to support your cockamamie position that I've asked you for like half a dozen times now. Surprise Surprise.
The Council hath spoken.
Motion being relative, that's kind of weird to answer. Plus stars orbit the black holes, and planets orbit those stars.
If we use the solar system as an analog, that would be like asking if the sun was stationary to somebody on an asteroid. So I guess in that sense yes, if you discount for a moment that both of you are speeding yalls asses off through space.
Hold up... this thread dropped two days ago and we are already on 12 fucking pages...
Holy shit..
What did I miss in here?
Why wasn’t I summoned....
Is there some Flat earth tomfoolery going on
Holy shit..
What did I miss in here?
Why wasn’t I summoned....
Is there some Flat earth tomfoolery going on
I must always be summoned for flat earth tomfoolery
Can't wait to see how this ends
Youre getting hung up on words and not understanding the mathematical concepts I have presented to you.
^^ that’s what you said. We’ve asked you to show proof or the equation to support that claim and you haven’t done it.
I specifically said in order for your statement to be true that G would have to be zero because everything has a mass and mass can’t be zero. I never in any response to you said that you said G was zero. I never said that. I was simply presenting a mathematical explainations of how that equation works.
What in the gravitational force equation has movement? You said G because G has a Newton as a unit which includes m/s^2 as you said below.
You telling me I don’t understand, but I’m pretty sure that acceleration does not act on it’s own, so what is causing the acceleration if MASS is being multiplied by acceleration? @sammyjax done explained this to you once but you keep dodging this question.
Since you have in your mind that you know what up, derive G. Show us how G was derived then show us where there is movement within that derivation.
Last edited:
Man this shit been over lol
It ain’t too late to join in. Lots of fuckery going on.
Im baffled right now. I swear to goodness if I didn’t understand something I would admit it. I really would. You know I’m humble that way.
But this shit here, man. All we are asking is the equation to show that movement causes gravity and now he wants to know the derivation of G. Bruh, that is REACHING.
The tap dancing deserves a Tony
I think it's just that dude learned that shit wrong a long time ago, never had it tested, and it has become one of his closely held science beliefs. It's probably just hard to let go something you've been looking at wrong forever. I'm trying to give him the benefit of the doubt.
But it's the arrogance that gets me lol like nigga...all these people telling you you got it fucked up and you just fold your arms instead of being like okay let me reevaluate this a bit.
Crazy.
Similar threads
