Kavanaugh accuser breaks silence about sexual misconduct allegations, UPDATE 9/26 5th ACCUSER & MORE

Not directly like that, but the first thing the female prosecutor said to him before they pushed her out was to ask him to take a look at some document she gave him that described sexual assault.


Have they ever asked Kavanaugh what he thinks a sexual "assault" is?
 
most entertaining television, second only to netflix.

I don't even watch much UK news anymore, only thing they report on is brexit, everybody here is sick of that.
I keep up with local news tho.

This and the trump shit we view as a weird comedy show, cos part of us still don't believe its actually real. cos it's just too insane. No diss.
None taken :cool:
 
most entertaining television, second only to netflix.

I don't even watch much UK news anymore, only thing they report on is brexit, everybody here is sick of that.
I keep up with local news tho.

This and the trump shit we view as a weird comedy show, cos part of us still don't believe its actually real. cos it's just too insane. No diss.
It's comedy. U.S. politics is the laughing stock.

I only caught the end of this shit. :hmm: "did you drink on weekdays during high school?"

He got an allegation from 98 on the table and that's what they come with? It's like both sides tried to lose this shit today. :lol:
 
For those who missed it...




wow!!!!! shots fired @@Bill... fuck this cac grandstanding


giphy.gif
 
After all is said and done....he about to be confirmed.

He about to drop the hammer on white wimmens for 30+ years....and it's all their fault.
Politics
If I Didn't Know This Was All Rigged, I'd Think Brett Kavanaugh Is in Serious Trouble
Charles P. Pierce,Esquire 8 hours ago



Politics
If I Didn't Know This Was All Rigged, I'd Think Brett Kavanaugh Is in Serious Trouble
Charles P. Pierce,Esquire 8 hours ago


1e40952cc4df42a60289d7fdfe686a4e


From Esquire

And Senator Kamala Harris said, "Be sure about your answer, sir."

You know, if I didn't know that this whole thing is a rigged wheel, if I didn't know that all the wheels had been greased years ago, I'd think Brett Kavanaugh's nomination to the Supreme Court was making a brief stop in Harriet Miersville on its way to G. Harold Carswelltown. Now into his second day of testimony, he was flummoxed and floundering. He was nowhere near as slick as was Neil Gorsuch, whose thickly armored arrogance carried him past his obvious partisan bona fides. However, Kavanaugh is under a great deal more pressure than was Gorsuch.

Gorsuch was merely the penultimate step in the long march toward what would be an all-but-permanent conservative majority on there Supreme Court. Kavanaugh, as everybody knows, but pretends not to know, is the whole ballgame. He's probably the only reason that many Republicans have put up with the maniac in the White House. He's probably the reason that the now-famous Anonymous op-ed writer in The New York Times decided to be Anonymous instead of being a mensch and going over the side under his/her own name.

989a7afa3dea1271aef76ebd94bfcfd1

That's a lot of pressure on a guy with what seems to be a terribly erratic memory, and who looked very much as though he thought Senator Harris might melt him with a glare right there in the chair. She was after him on how much of a bag job his nomination was, and she was basing her questions on "committee/confidential" documents that he knows she has, but that she is forbidden from using in her interrogation. (More on this fictitious bit of Senate hocus-pocus in a minute.) She knew and he knew she knew and there was flopsweat on every syllable.

HARRIS: "You've been speaking for almost eight hours to this committee about all sorts of things you remember. How can you not remember whether or not you had a conversation about Robert Mueller or his investigation with anyone at that law firm?" KAVANAUGH: "I'm not remembering, but I'm happy to be refreshed or if you want to tell me who you're thinking of." HARRIS: "I think you are thinking of someone, and you don't want to tell us."
We now move to Thursday morning, when all hell broke loose. The "committee/confidential" documents started to leak. A story in The New York Timesbased on some of those documents cited one of them that seemed to completely demolish Kavanaugh's tap-dancing on Roe v. Wade.

61fd2596f0705599f2a853382b0f662e

Judge Kavanaugh was considering a draft opinion piece that supporters of one of Mr. Bush’s conservative appeals court nominees hoped they could persuade anti-abortion women to submit under their names. It stated that “it is widely accepted by legal scholars across the board that Roe v. Wade and its progeny are the settled law of the land.” Judge Kavanaugh proposed deleting that line, writing: “I am not sure that all legal scholars refer to Roe as the settled law of the land at the Supreme Court level since Court can always overrule its precedent, and three current Justices on the Court would do so.”

Asked about this quote by Senator Dianne Feinstein, Kavanaugh caviled about who "legal scholars" were, and he went back to his original gambit about how Roe and its progeny are precedent-on-precedent, which he said was "quite important," but which, obviously, is not an answer to what Feinstein asked.

Other leaked documents made it clear that, in his service in the Bush White House, on issues from privacy to whether or not native Hawaiians could be treated like other native peoples, Kavanaugh functioned as the political activist that he was for his entire career before he was elevated to the bench. More significantly, the leaked documents showed that Kavanaugh was far more involved in the failed nomination of Charles Pickering, Jr. than he led the committee to believe in 2006, when he was nominated to the seat on the federal appeals court that he now holds.

And yet another showed him as designing for other nominees the very game plan he is obviously following in these hearings:

“She should not talk about her views on specific policy or legal issues,” he wrote. “She should say that she has a commitment to follow Supreme Court precedent, that she understands and appreciates the role of a circuit judge, that she will adhere to statutory text, that she has no ideological agenda.”

This confrontation escalated when Senators Cory Booker and Maizie Hirono told the committee that they intended to release other "committee/confidential" documents, including one allegedly dealing with racial profiling. Booker's announcement prompted an extended hooley in which John Cornyn, Republican of Texas, threatened Booker with disciplinary action up to and including expulsion from the Senate.

"Bring it," Booker replied, and his Democratic colleagues took his back. Richard Durbin of Illinois pronounced himself fed up with the farce of having Bill Burck, a former Bush administration lawyer who numbers among his clients Reince Priebus, Don McGahn, and Steve Bannon (!), decide which documents can be released publicly. He told Booker:

"I concur with what you're doing. Let's jump into this pit together. If there's going to be some retribution against [Booker], I want to be part of this process!"

As I said, if I didn't know this whole thing wasn't a monumental bag job, I'd think Brett Kavanaugh was in a lot of trouble.
 
I think he'll get confirmed. Ford is already being erased. The media is giving the rundown (front page stories on the major media sites) and focusing on Kavanaugh and Graham. This will be Anita Hill 2.0.
Gop wants that conservative Supreme Court and if it takes putting a lying, sexual assaulting Kavanaugh on the bench to do it, they're ok with that. Just like they're fine with Trump.
 
I think he'll get confirmed. Ford is already being erased. The media is giving the rundown (front page stories on the major media sites) and focusing on Kavanaugh and Graham. This will be Anita Hill 2.0.
Gop wants that conservative Supreme Court and if it takes putting a lying, sexual assaulting Kavanaugh on the bench to do it, they're ok with that. Just like they're fine with Trump.
Democrats dropped the ball. They had 4 downs at the 1 yard line and couldn't get the rock in. :smh:

Checking comments online, it's still partisan shit. Nothing has changed.
 
sooooooooo......



how long before this dude is on the Supreme Court...

tomorrow?
Naw.. committee vote tomorrow.. and then as early as next week it would go to the senate floor for a vote. They want him on the bench by October 1st so he can participate in the next set of cases coming up to the Supreme Court..one case being to give Trump pardon power over both federal and state crimes.

edit: senate floor vote scheduled for Saturday
 
If the Democrats had any political willpower, when they got back the presidency and Senate they would immediately vote to expand the Supreme Court bench by two seats, but they won't because they're soft
 
If the Democrats had any political willpower, when they got back the presidency and Senate they would immediately vote to expand the Supreme Court bench by two seats, but they won't because they're soft
That's impossible.
 
Democrats never had enough votes to stop him.

This entire expose was the democrats shooting their only shot, and it was brilliant.
It was great the way they did it timing wise. I still think the main purpose was to flush out recent allegations. But even using white tears from high school is a great position to fall back on in this climate.

But they had their heavy hitters -- Harris and Booker -- in at the end and they just whiffed. Then some cat sound like Leatherface's uncle get the final word in on god. :smh:

Feels like watching the Cleveland Indians in '16. Like how do you fuck up being up 3-1. Only the democrats could do it.
 
Back
Top