Umar Johnson vs. Roland Martin

Article below is from The Root.
Written by Michael Harriot @michaelharriot


http://www.theroot.com/we-fact-chec...source=theroot_facebook&utm_medium=socialflow


While everyone is grabbing the popcorn for the Blac Chyna/Rob Kardashian beef, the real donnybrook was happening yesterday on TV One’s News One Now, when Roland Martin invited ankh-right leader Umar Abdullah-Johnson on his morning show.

Everything seemed cool in The Great Ascot vs Daishiki War, and then everything exploded. Umar called a panelist on the show a “coon” and the segment erupted into a shouting match whose volume is rarely heard outside of Baptist church deacon board meetings. Even though Umar went into his belligerent “this-motherfucker-is-lying” voice in record time, he made a number of claims about himself that many have asked for years. Instead of wild speculation, we decided to look into these claims and settle them once and for all.


To be clear, The Root does not have a vendetta against Umar Johnson, but we believe anyone who has collected almost three-quarters of a million dollars from black people should be vetted. You think Newsweek would do this? Do you think The Washington Post even knows who Umar Johnson is?

While we didn’t look into some of the more defamatory accusations that have emerged in the last weeks, the “Conscious stripper” fiasco, or that weird screaming video against another Hotepticon where he answered the phone while it was still ringing, we decided to focus on the claims that have emerged from Umar’s own un-mustachioed mouth.


He said he a certified school psychologist. Is he?


In a word: Yes

ysbixukxvpkd5ms5xeuu.png


The Root did as Johnson suggested to Roland Martin and called Millersville University. We talked to the admissions office, who sent us to the registrar’s office, who told us that all verification of degrees, enrollment and credentials are handled by the National Student Clearinghouse—who contracts with many colleges and Universities.

The National Student Clearinghouse verified Johnson’s graduation from Millersville University, but because there has been speculation that the Umar Abdullah-Johnson in those records was a different guy, we searched the archives and found this picture of Johnson as a senior at Millersville University.

We also found evidence that Johnson is certified as a school psychologist in the state of Pennsylvania.

i5pqepo6s6puvxxx7ju9.png


So what happened to all that money he raised?

For more than 5 years, Johnson has traveled the country raising money to open the Frederick Douglass Marcus Garvey Leadership Academy for Black Boys (FDMG), receiving donations from thousands of his supporters. In 2014 he informed the public that he was looking to buy the now-defunct St. Paul’s College in Virginia and turn it into a boarding school. When confronted about the specifics, he has refused to answer the question, as he did in this video:



Two weeks after that video was uploaded in January 2015, Johnson told a crowd that because people didn’t want to take their “lazy ass to the post office and get a stamp” he opened an account with Paypal. However, in the same video, Johnson informed his followers that Paypal froze more than $100,000 in donations because he didn’t have 501©(3) status required for tax-exempt, non-profit organizations. He then states that he has applied for the tax-exempt status.



On March 3, 2015, Johnson created a GoFundMe page with the express purpose “to acquire and rehabilitate either the Historically Black St.Paul’s College in Lawrenceville Virginia or the Chamberlain-Hunt Academy in Port Gibson Mississippi”

To date, GoFundme says that he has raised $375,989 in the 28 months since he began his campaign. This does not include the cash he has raised through in-person solicitations at speaking engagements or the money that has been mailed to him by supporters outside of his online campaign. On Monday’s NewsOne Now show, Johnson told Martin that he has raised $700,000.

To date, no one has seen financial documentation showing how much money he has collected, or how he has used any of the funds. No one has seen a business plan, an application for accreditation or nothing tangible that indicates he is making strides towards this mythical school.


According to IRS rules, all non-profit organizations are required to “make available for public inspection certain annual returns and applications for exemption, and must provide copies of such returns and applications to individuals who request them.” Plus, Internal Revenue Service mandates that “no part of a section 501©(3) organization’s net earnings may inure to the benefit of any private shareholder or individual.”

This solves everything, right? Since Johnson said he applied for tax-exempt status in 2015, anyone who asks for financial records for the FDMG school get them, right? Anything else wouldn’t just be unscrupulous, it is illegal for a non-profit to hide its finances, and there is video, of Johnson, saying he applied two-and-a-half years ago for 501©(3) status.


But, when The Root searched the IRS database for the Frederick Douglass Marcus Garvey School, they could find no record of Johnson’s application, under his name, the name of the school (There is a “Frederick Douglas Mastery Charter School listed in Pennsylvania, but that’s not it) or any variation of the name. We even searched for the address he lists for donations—nothing.


As it stands, there are thousands of people who have donated between half a million and three-quarters of a million dollars for black empowerment and uplift, but no one knows what happened to their money.

Is he a descendant of Frederick Douglas?

During his rise to prominence, Johnson has been accused of lying about his familial relationship to civil rights hero Frederick Douglass, forcing the family to issue a statement that reads in part:




Johnson told Roland Martin that he has never claimed to be a direct descendant of Frederick Douglass. Instead, Johnson asserts that his great great great great grandfather was Douglass’ first cousin.



Yet, Johnson has often claimed, as he does in this clip, to be a “direct ancestor” of Frederick Douglass, even though almost every genealogical researcher agrees that the term applies to “someone from whom you descend in a direct line, parent to child, grandparent, great-grandparent, etc.

Also, the Douglass, family’s claims that he doesn’t correct people when he is referred to as a “direct descendant” is supported in this short video.

To be clear: None of Frederick Douglass blood flows through Umar Johnson’s veins. The closest he will admit is that maybe he shares a lineage with Douglass, which is akin to thinking you end up in Snoop Dogg’s will because he calls you “cousin.” This research foiled my plans to inherit a great booty-shake fortune from my Uncle Luke.


But is he a doctor?

This is the million-dollar question. It is impossible to prove a negative. Just like you can’t prove that I am not a Jedi and an X-Man who possesses the ability to fly, even if you’ve seen no evidence of it—I can’t prove Umar Johnson is not a doctor of Psychology.


However, The Root searched every level of Umar Johnson’s education but could find no proof that he holds a doctorate in Psychology. But what started off as simple educational research has turned into a mystery.


The school Johnson claims he attended for his doctorate—Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine—also participates in the National Student Clearinghouse. They could not verify a degree for any variation of Umar Abdullah-Johnson’s name, or his birth name, Jermaine Shoemake.

Every doctoral candidate must submit a dissertation and PCOM makes their students’ dissertations available online. When we looked through the University’s archives, we found a link to Umar Johnson’s dissertation, “The Relationship between Self-Concept and Academic Achievement in African American Middle School Students: A Correlational Study,” which indicates that Johnson indeed submitted a thesis in PCOM’s Doctor of Psychology program. But unlike the other dissertations, Johnson’s was not available for download.

We then looked at the graduation ceremony program for 2010 —the year Johnson’s dissertation was submitted. He was not listed on the commencement program, even though he appears in the 2009 program as a doctoral candidate. In fact, we could not find any evidence that Johnson graduated from PCOM.


Mysteriously, a .pdf program of every commencement exercise at the Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine is available online except for the years Umar Johnson supposedly graduated. 99% of students who received a doctorate from PCOM have their dissertation available online, but Umar Johnson’s is not.


PCOM also posts videos of their graduation ceremonies online (They have cataloged them on YouTube in a playlist)—except someone has submitted a copyright infringement claim for the only the graduate ceremony on the year Umar Johnson supposedly graduated.

The fact that Johnson’s dissertation, commencement program, graduation ceremony and every other piece of documentation that he graduated from PCOM with a doctorate disappeared from the internet is either the biggest coincidence in the history of histories or he does not have a doctoral degree,


So, What now?

Well, if I had the cure for racism, black unity, the education of black boys or whatever he claims to know, and the only thing holding me back was the widespread belief that I was a Hotep charlatan—when I walked on the set of Roland Martin’s show, I’d have my degree and a transcript. When I showed up at The Breakfast Club studio, I’d have certified financial breakdowns of where people’s donations went. The fact that he does not and will not do this is Donald Trump tax returns-level strange.

So I’m not saying that Umar Johnson is a lying con-man who stole money from his own people (many of whom are poor, but hopeful) by lying about his credentials, his family history and his past. I’m not even trying to insinuate that all of what Umar says is a lie. I also would never tell anyone that they shouldn’t trust Johnson simply because he lies and steals (although I think it says somewhere in Fourth Thessalonians that you should never trust a man who wakes up in the morning and shaves his mustache off). When he gives speeches about uplifting the black woman, I’d never remind you of this tweet:



All I’m saying is that just because Umar Johnson is hiding his financial records, lying about where he gets his money from, defaming women on Twitter, and travels around the country fooling poor, uneducated people that he is on their side, doesn’t mean he is a con man...



Maybe he’s just colluding with the Russians.

View the video below:



This is why there aren't a lot of people stepping into the forefront (when people say somebody else besides themselves should do something). There will be an all out attack on that person/s (including from the people who called for someone besides themselves to do something).
No one should be exempt from criticism or scrutiny but we see what sparks these things.

1. Start talking about black folk doing for themselves.
2. The LBGTABCD community feels slighted
3. Start talking about black men and women being together
 
Last edited:
This is why there aren't a lot of people stepping in the forefront (when people say somebody should do something). There will be an all out attack on that person/s (including from the people who called fro someone to do something.
No one should be exempt from criticism or scrutiny but we see what sparks these things.

1. Start talking about black folk doing for themselves.
2. The LBGTABCD community feels slighted
3. Start talking about black men and women being together

Took the words right outta my mouth.
 
This is why there aren't a lot of people stepping in the forefront (when people say somebody else besides themselves should do something). There will be an all out attack on that person/s (including from the people who called for someone to do something.
No one should be exempt from criticism or scrutiny but we see what sparks these things.

1. Start talking about black folk doing for themselves
2. The LBGTABCD community feels slighted
3. Start talking about black men and women being together
It's funny. Every other communnity marries within their own but when black people say it folk lose they shit.
 
This is why there aren't a lot of people stepping in the forefront (when people say somebody else besides themselves should do something). There will be an all out attack on that person/s (including from the people who called for someone to do something.
No one should be exempt from criticism or scrutiny but we see what sparks these things.

1. Start talking about black folk doing for themselves.
2. The LBGTABCD community feels slighted
3. Start talking about black men and women being together

And too many of them are right here on bgol.
 
This is why there aren't a lot of people stepping in the forefront (when people say somebody else besides themselves should do something). There will be an all out attack on that person/s (including from the people who called for someone besides themselves to do something).
No one should be exempt from criticism or scrutiny but we see what sparks these things.

1. Start talking about black folk doing for themselves.
2. The LBGTABCD community feels slighted
3. Start talking about black men and women being together
That is a contradiction. On the one hand you are saying, "no one should be exempt from criticism or scrutiny" but then in the next breath you're saying that when people do scrutinize it must be motivated by irrational offense by the LGBTQ community - which in essence decides that those who question him must be gay. Or else they must be against Black men and women being together.

I disagree with that.

People have eyes, ears and brains. Plain and simple. There have been a number of questionable things about Umar. Some folks just wanna know what kat's deal is. So the questionable things should just be ignored and never spoken of or looked into - for the greater good? I mean, I'm not at all in favor of trying to eradicate the man from existence. I believe that Umar should be part of the discourse and his words and ideas deserve to be heard. But it is ridiculous to condemn those who fact check the things he said just for them having done their homework about the things he says and uncovered things that don't make him look good.

If any of us are in doubt about the assertions of the fact checkers (The Root in this case) we can fact check their "facts" to see if their findings are accurate or inaccurate.
 
That is a contradiction. On the one hand you are saying, "no one should be exempt from criticism or scrutiny" but then in the next breath you're saying that when people do scrutinize it must be motivated by irrational offense by the LGBTQ community - which in essence decides that those who question him must be gay. Or else they must be against Black men and women being together.

I disagree with that.

People have eyes, ears and brains. Plain and simple. There have been a number of questionable things about Umar. Some folks just wanna know what kat's deal is. So the questionable things should just be ignored and never spoken of or looked into - for the greater good? I mean, I'm not at all in favor of trying to eradicate the man from existence. I believe that Umar should be part of the discourse and his words and ideas deserve to be heard. But it is ridiculous to condemn those who fact check the things he said just for doing their homework. If any of us are in doubt about the assertions of the fact checkers (The Root in this case) to see if their assertions are true.

First of all my post is not just about Dr. Umar but any black person period that steps forward and speaks on such issues. So there is no contradiction in my post because articles like that from The Root get started when anyone of the examples I provided happens. Then it's an all out attempt to destroy that person (even by people who asked such a person to step forward).
 
That is a contradiction. On the one hand you are saying, "no one should be exempt from criticism or scrutiny" but then in the next breath you're saying that when people do scrutinize it must be motivated by irrational offense by the LGBTQ community - which in essence decides that those who question him must be gay. Or else they must be against Black men and women being together.

I disagree with that.

People have eyes, ears and brains. Plain and simple. There have been a number of questionable things about Umar. Some folks just wanna know what kat's deal is. So the questionable things should just be ignored and never spoken of or looked into - for the greater good? I mean, I'm not at all in favor of trying to eradicate the man from existence. I believe that Umar should be part of the discourse and his words and ideas deserve to be heard. But it is ridiculous to condemn those who fact check the things he said just for them having done their homework about the things he says and uncovered things that don't make him look good.

If any of us are in doubt about the assertions of the fact checkers (The Root in this case) we can fact check their "facts" to see if their findings are accurate or inaccurate.

I don't think it's just the "fact-checking." It's the outright vitriol directed at the man.
 
Interesting. Not one sentence in the article addressed the brotha's actual ideas. The black twitter crowd seems to be dominated by whites in blackface.
So what it didn't address his ideas. They did their homework. Yes they did have a negative bias towards him. But at least they took the time to investigate and not just come on some unreasoning hating shit.

If you still like the dude and support him, more power to you. If you don't like some things about him, more power to you. If you reject him outright, more power to you.

Everyone has a right to form their own opinions on someone based on what they see, hear, feel and intuit - positive, negative and in between.
 
I don't think it's just the "fact-checking." It's the outright vitriol directed at the man.
True. The writer clearly had a bias against Umar.

But does that negate the information they found or mean that it's incorrect?

All of the info found was not negative. For example, they came to the conclusion that he was telling the truth that he was certified as a child pychologist and that he had earned degrees at one of the schools he claimed.

So it was not totally unbalanced.

Further, we can always fact check the article.
 
First of all my post is not just about Dr. Umar but any black person period that steps forward and speaks on such issues. So there is no contradiction in my post because articles like that from The Root get started when anyone of the examples I provided happens. Then it's an all out attempt to destroy that person (even by people who asked such a person to step forward).
I hear you. But your comment was in response to this thread about Dr. Umar and clearly he was contained among those Black people who step forward and speak on issues of Black liberation, that you mentioned. We should certainly be aware that we have enemies. No question about that.

Let me ask this. Is it irrational to want to see proof of one's credentials that they have not made publicly available on their website? Is it wrong to ask these questions when they say they want to start a school and are collecting donations to that end? Is it irrational to want to see a public accounting of those funds? Is it wrong to pay attention to his conduct? As we listen to his words and take in his message, should we not also keep our eyes open so that we know who he is -for the good, bad and in-between?

Or are we just going to put on blinders and ignore everything except for the things he says that are pleasing to our ears?
 
So what it didn't address his ideas. They did their homework. Yes they did have a negative bias towards him. But at least they took the time to investigate and not just come on some unreasoning hating shit.

If you still like the dude and support him, more power to you. If you don't like some things about him, more power to you. If you reject him outright, more power to you.

Everyone has a right to form their own opinions on someone based on what they see, hear, feel and intuit - positive, negative and in between.
I had no idea who he was before this vid. I seen cats make posts on here but never read the shit. Now I'm interested.
 
I hear you. But your comment was in response to this thread about Dr. Umar and clearly he was contained among those Black people who step forward and speak on issues of Black liberation, that you mentioned. We should certainly be aware that we have enemies. No question about that.

Let me ask this. Is it irrational to want to see proof of one's credentials that they have not made publicly available on their website? Is it wrong to ask these questions when they say they want to start a school and are collecting donations to that end? Is it irrational to want to see a public accounting of those funds? Is it wrong to pay attention to his conduct? As we listen to his words and take in his message, should we not also keep our eyes open so that we know who he is -for the good, bad and in-between?

Or are we just going to put on blinders and ignore everything except for the things he says that are pleasing to our ears?
Bruh..my response was in response to the The Root article/poster and I clearly stated that no one is above criticism or scrutiny.
You clearly read my post out of context. As I stated we see what sparks these things and that's regardless of whether that person has questionable things about them or not. What matters most is what they've stated in regards to black empowerment or perceived slight to ABC group.
 
Bruh..my response was in response to the The Root article/poster and I clearly stated that no one is above criticism or scrutiny.
You clearly read my post out of context. As I stated we see how these things get started and that's regardless of whether that person has questionable things about them or not. What matters most is what they've stated in regards to black empowerment or perceived slight to ABC group.
Duly noted.

Certainly it's important to pay attention to the tricks of the enemy. When Nate Parker was being attacked last year, in discussions about it, I always asked folks WHO initially re-introduced this finished chapter of his past? Nate's conduct was exemplary throughout his whole movie career. That was nothing more than a witch hunt with the agenda of NOT letting a message of violent uprising against the oppressors supported by Scripture become a popular theme.

In Umar's case, his vitriol at anyone who ever questioned his credentials, the money trail or anything about his public conduct at all for that matter opened all of this up. It didn't just surface out of a wormhole like in Nate Parker's case.

I believe that we as a Black people can discuss these things and that we will be ok. I believe we have the intelligence, street sense and analytical skill to see when things move beyond the factual into made-up irrational shit by haters - be they an LGBTQ agenda or white supremacists.

I also believe in taking seriously those who are doing more than traveling around lecturing and/or just sitting on YouTube talking. It's gonna take more than that to get our liberation. Those who are actually in the trenches for our liberation are not YouTube stars. For example, you know the muhfukkas who actually pose a threat to the status quo on the issue of police reform and a change in the justice system by the amount of pushback by government, law enforcement and police unions And by attempts to silence or smear them in the media or worse. If Kats are sitting up on YouTube and going around lecturing and they aren't getting the same, its because they don't pose a threat, bottom line. That goes for anyone else "talking" about liberation. Just like when the F e d s figured out in the 90s that conscious rappers were merely talking about liberation - but not galvanizing folks to demand it or take it.

Tupac, the son of Black Panthers was in the process of going beyond that and was after two failed attempts snuffed out for his efforts.
 
Last edited:
I did hear it. He said he needs to be criticized too. However, while refusing to recognize those Civil Rights icons that married white women, he has no problem letting the world know he a descendant of Fredrick Douglass. By HIS LOGIC, he shouldn't even acknowledge any relationship to Douglass do to him marrying a white woman. Shit on the Rock Newman show he brags about Douglass being his great great great grand uncle and naming his future school after him.


Go to 53:06 when he talks about naming his future school. So yes, he is giving Douglass a pass for marrying a white woman.

I don't know you personally but IMO your comprehension could use a small tweak. I saw that Rock Newman a long Long time ago and it does absolutely nothing to add validity to you statement claiming he "Umar Johnson" giving a pass to his to his great great great grand uncle Fredrick Douglass. ANYONE here with decent reading/listening comprehension knows that by you making the statement that you made you totally misconstrued what he said..C'mon bruh..was your volume low when you peeped the video or something :confused:
 
I don't know you personally but IMO your comprehension could use a small tweak. I saw that Rock Newman a long Long time ago and it does absolutely nothing to add validity to you statement claiming he "Umar Johnson" giving a pass to his to his great great great grand uncle Fredrick Douglass. ANYONE here with decent reading/listening comprehension knows that by you making the statement that you made you totally misconstrued what he said..C'mon bruh..was your volume low when you peeped the video or something :confused:
When you get a chance, explain to me what you think I am not understanding or misunderstanding. Because to me, if your whole argument is that marrying white is one of the worse things that you can do (and basically cancels out anything you have done otherwise) why are you constantly bringing up a blood relative that married a white woman before he died. Is he not going to name his school after Douglas and Garvey? Is Douglas no longer a hero of his? As I said before, I am going by his argument.

I don't take your responses as any form of disrespect. I can tell you deeply respect Brother Johnson...never said I didn't. I was just saying I can understand Roland's train of thought on that particular point.
 
When you get a chance, explain to me what you think I am not understanding or misunderstanding. Because to me, if your whole argument is that marrying white is one of the worse things that you can do (and basically cancels out anything you have done otherwise) why are you constantly bringing up a blood relative that married a white woman before he died. Is he not going to name his school after Douglas and Garvey? Is Douglas no longer a hero of his? As I said before, I am going by his argument.

I don't take your responses as any form of disrespect. I can tell you deeply respect Brother Johnson...never said I didn't. I was just saying I can understand Roland's train of thought on that particular point.
Now on THAT I can say I feel where your coming from in ref to what Roland Martin was trying to convey.
 
Before the Umar interview, Roland had his fair share of fans and defenders, people wondering why Tariq went so hard on him.. After the Umar interview, his facebook page is littered with jokes and people challenging him about the interview..

One youtuber called Roland gay for using the phrase "boy bye"
 
Where Roland fucked up is bringing on a ill prepared or debate qualified panel.

Umar ability to articulate and his level education lead me to believe he intentionally misleads with his words. Why does he continue to have to clarify his statements? However, he never clarified where the money went or was or why it will take him that ling to find a building.

Also, he said he doesn't respect black men who marry white women but stopped short of FD only saying he needs to be criticized.
 
Before the Umar interview, Roland had his fair share of fans and defenders, people wondering why Tariq went so hard on him.. After the Umar interview, his facebook page is littered with jokes and people challenging him about the interview..

One youtuber called Roland gay for using the phrase "boy bye"

That phrase is mad feminine and so is have several seats but I've seen straight men use both terms
 
Before the Umar interview, Roland had his fair share of fans and defenders, people wondering why Tariq went so hard on him.. After the Umar interview, his facebook page is littered with jokes and people challenging him about the interview..

One youtuber called Roland gay for using the phrase "boy bye"

On YouTube I was surprised by how many people were riding for Dr Umar, which is a good thing. I think people underestimate the influence and the number of followers that people like Tariq, TBA, PBT, Dr Boyce and Dr Umar have. Young people are looking for answers and guidance. It makes me wonder if the Old Black Media is dead like TBA says. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if the video on Roland's YouTube page got more views than when it originally aired on TVOne.
 
On YouTube I was surprised by how many people were riding for Dr Umar, which is a good thing. I think people underestimate the influence and the number of followers that people like Tariq, TBA, PBT, Dr Boyce and Dr Umar have. Young people are looking for answers and guidance. It makes me wonder if the Old Black Media is dead like TBA says. Also, I wouldn't be surprised if the video on Roland's YouTube page got more views than when it originally aired on TVOne.
I think there are a lot of people riding with Umar who are not followers or are semi followers because he stood strong and unapologetic.
 
Back
Top