HOLY SHIT.. Trump just fired JAmes Comey

VB-Trump-Resist-This-Bitch.jpeg


Trump's The Head Face of Today's CACism!
That's one ugly diseased looking demonic cac
 
Someone help me here with the following. But isn't it illegal to tape someone without their permission?

Not to mention that if indeed he taped his conversations with him. Then undoubtably it's very likely and highly probable that he taped his conversations with numerous other people.


One of the pundits said DC is a one party state, as long as one party knows they are being recorded, it's not illegal.
 
Sources claim: Comey is REFUSING to testify... 'behind closed doors'.

Ousted FBI boss James Comey 'wants to testify IN PUBLIC' about Trump and Russia after turning down offer to speak behind closed doors

Saturday, May 13th 2017

NY Daily News
http://www.nydailynews.com/news/pol...telligence-committee-public-article-1.3161395

UK Daily Mail

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4501860/James-Comey-wants-testify-public-Russia.html
  • James Comey is willing to testify but only if it is in public, sources have claimed
  • He declined on Friday to testify behind closed doors before the Senate Intelligence Committee next week
  • It came after Trump tweeted that Comey had 'better hope that there are no "tapes" of our conversations before he starts leaking to the press!'
  • President said Thursday that he and Comey spoke three times – including two phone calls and one dinner together
  • Comey's friends are telling NBC and CNN that he hopes the talks were recorded
  • 'He hopes there are tapes. That would be perfect,' said one confidant
2z90fua.jpg


EDIT: ^^ Seems Comey may have refused the intial offer to testify 'behind closed doors'.... because he probably wants the Senate Committee to SUBPOENA him, instead. :yes:

If they hit him with a Subpoena... to testify IN PUBLIC.... he can discuss deeper 'classified details' whenever he responds to direct questioning in a Court of Law. :yes:

 
Take it with a grain of salt. I'm not convinced on this Louise chick, even though she has been right at times.



Also:

He say's he is working on a story with Louise.





 
Take it with a grain of salt. I'm not convinced on this Louise chick, even though she has been right at times.
Was wondering why it said Hatch than I read:

Donald Trump and Mike Pence have both violated their oaths of office in plain sight over the unconstitutional dismissal of Director Comey, these sources say, and elements of the Judicial Branch are asserting the separation of powers described in the Constitution. This matter is separate from, and additional to, the substantive charges of collusion with the Russian state, and of money-laundering, sedition, violation of the Logan Act, and other crimes with which both Trump and Pence may be charged. As I exclusively reported earlier this week, Speaker Paul Ryan, normally third in the line of succession, will be excluded as the intelligence community has an intercept in which Ryan openly admits that he knew Sergei Kislyak was washing Russian money into the GOP. This will convict Ryan on RICO charges; as I have also exclusively reported this week, a RICO case exists against the GOP as a body. The raids earlier this week on a data and consulting firm close to Paul Manafort formed part of evidence gathering in this RICO case.
 
Let’s be clear here: this is not an indictment against a Donald Trump associate or adviser, or some other ancillary player. Taylor and Mensch are jointly stating tonight on Mensch’s site that the sealed indictment is against Donald Trump himself (link). The sitting President of the United States cannot be arrested by law enforcement or tried by the Judicial Branch. But as they explain, the purpose of this indictment is to try to kickstart the impeachment process in Congress.
 
Was wondering why it said Hatch than I read:

Donald Trump and Mike Pence have both violated their oaths of office in plain sight over the unconstitutional dismissal of Director Comey, these sources say, and elements of the Judicial Branch are asserting the separation of powers described in the Constitution. This matter is separate from, and additional to, the substantive charges of collusion with the Russian state, and of money-laundering, sedition, violation of the Logan Act, and other crimes with which both Trump and Pence may be charged. As I exclusively reported earlier this week, Speaker Paul Ryan, normally third in the line of succession, will be excluded as the intelligence community has an intercept in which Ryan openly admits that he knew Sergei Kislyak was washing Russian money into the GOP. This will convict Ryan on RICO charges; as I have also exclusively reported this week, a RICO case exists against the GOP as a body. The raids earlier this week on a data and consulting firm close to Paul Manafort formed part of evidence gathering in this RICO case.
I have been hearing hatch name for a week now make me wonder if something is going on in the background
 
Trump was fishing for information when he said Comey better hope there isn't any recordings of their conversation. He wanted to see if Comey or any other agency was recording the conversation.
 
Was wondering why it said Hatch than I read:

Donald Trump and Mike Pence have both violated their oaths of office in plain sight over the unconstitutional dismissal of Director Comey, these sources say, and elements of the Judicial Branch are asserting the separation of powers described in the Constitution. This matter is separate from, and additional to, the substantive charges of collusion with the Russian state, and of money-laundering, sedition, violation of the Logan Act, and other crimes with which both Trump and Pence may be charged. As I exclusively reported earlier this week, Speaker Paul Ryan, normally third in the line of succession, will be excluded as the intelligence community has an intercept in which Ryan openly admits that he knew Sergei Kislyak was washing Russian money into the GOP. This will convict Ryan on RICO charges; as I have also exclusively reported this week, a RICO case exists against the GOP as a body. The raids earlier this week on a data and consulting firm close to Paul Manafort formed part of evidence gathering in this RICO case.

I have been hearing hatch name for a week now make me wonder if something is going on in the background
sounds like a slow coup

1 Vice President Mike Pence (R)
2 Speaker of the House of Representatives Paul Ryan (R)
3 President pro tempore of the Senate Orrin Hatch (R)
4 Secretary of State Rex Tillerson (R)
5 Secretary of the Treasury Steven Mnuchin (R)
6 Secretary of Defense James Mattis (I)
7 Attorney General Jeff Sessions (R)
8 Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke (R)
9 Secretary of Agriculture Sonny Perdue (R)
 
Last edited:
I have been hearing hatch name for a week now make me wonder if something is going on in the background
sounds like a slow coup
From april

http://www.palmerreport.com/factcheck/fact-check-orrin-hatch-president/2406/

Fact check: if Donald Trump, Mike Pence, and Paul Ryan are impeached, will Orrin Hatch be President?
By Bill Palmer
Updated: 5:56 pm EDT Sun Apr 23, 2017 | 12

Home » Fact Check





paul-ryan-trum-150x150.jpg

Facebook ShareTwitter ShareEmail this articlePrint Article



In light of the publicly announced FBI investigation into the Donald Trump campaign for its alleged election-meddling collusion with Russia, public attention has focused on what happens if Donald Trump is impeached and removed from office. That answer is straightforward: Mike Pence becomes President. But what happens if Mike Pence and Speaker Paul Ryan also turn out to be complicit in the Russia scandal and are also impeached or nudged into resignation? Some have asked if eighty-three year old Orrin Hatch would become President.


To be clear, while there are varying degrees of circumstantial evidence that Trump, Pence, and Ryan may have conspired with Russia to rig the election, there is no publicly available proof that any of them did. This fact check simply answers the question of what would happen if all three did turn out to be demonstrably guilty and were forced out of power.

The Presidential Succession Act of 1947 (link: senate.gov) firmly establishes that third in line after Vice President and Speaker of the House is the President pro tempore of the Senate. That role does currently belong to Senator Orrin Hatch. There is a common mistaken belief that the Senate Majority Leader, Mitch McConnell, is third in line. But as it turns out, Senate Majority Leader is nowhere in the line of succession at all.

Thus on a factual basis, yes, Orrin Hatch would automatically become President of the United States if Trump, Pence, and Ryan all simultaneously were impeached or resigned. As a practical matter, it’s worth pointing out that the odds of all of this happening are very small. Even if all three men end up caught red-handed in the Russia scandal, it’s more likely that they would be forced out of power one at a time. Historical precedent comes from the Richard Nixon administration.

In 1973, Vice President Spiro Agnew was facing a financial scandal at the same time Nixon was facing a deepening Watergate scandal. Agnew was allowed to avoid jail time in exchange for pleading no contest and resigning (source: senate.gov). This allowed a scenario in which Nixon and the Senate agreed upon non-controversial Congressman Gerald Ford as Nixon’s new appointee for Vice President. The Senate confirmed Ford as VP with a nearly unanimous 92-3 vote (source: NY Times archive), with the tacit understanding that Ford would rise to President if Nixon was ousted.

So it’s plausible that the same roadmap will be followed if it turns out that multiple people at the top of the Order of Succession have to be ousted over the Trump-Russia scandal. As a hypothetical, if Trump were impeached and removed, Pence would immediately become President. He could then nominate a non-controversial new Vice President that both parties in the Senate would find acceptable and confirmable. Then if Pence were subsequently ousted, that new VP would become President. This new President would not have been voted into office by the public, but would at least be a consensus pick among the Senate – and it would avoid elevating the eighty-three year old and ill-prepared Orrin Hatch to the Oval Office.


In other words, the odds of Hatch rising to the Presidency from third in line are probably very, very small no matter how the Trump-Russia scandal plays out. Even the odds of Paul Ryan automatically ascending to the Presidency from second in line are probably very small. There’s an even wilder (but technically possible) scenario in which the Democrats win the midterms, Nancy Pelosi becomes Speaker of the House, Trump and Pence are both swiftly impeached and removed, and Speaker Nancy Pelosi automatically becomes President. Again, these are very unlikely scenarios in a practical sense.


But as a strictly factual matter, yes, Senator Orrin Hatch would become President if Donald Trump, Mike Pence and Paul Ryan were ousted in simultaneous or near-simultaneous fashion which didn’t allow a consensus new VP to be nominated and confirmed in the interim. So we rate that assertion as True.
 
Take it with a grain of salt. I'm not convinced on this Louise chick, even though she has been right at times.



Also:

He say's he is working on a story with Louise.







What's her percentage on getting shit correct?

I def know Sen Hatch was third in line and not Ryan
 
Back
Top