Breaking:Flynn has offered testimony on Trump team's Russia ties in exchange for immunity

They gonna get Trump


This whole Trump Russia thing is like an episode of 24 :lol:


Trump is president Logan

tumblr_m1rfrugcxw1qh2q2zo1_400.gif


tumblr_m1rfrugcxw1qh2q2zo2_400.gif

tumblr_m1rfrugcxw1qh2q2zo4_400.gif







This must of been one of the seasons I missed :lol:
 
His next step will be to de-brief. Feds call it king for a day. As long as you debrief truthfully, they can't use against you what you say, unless the same information would have been derived another way.

Feds love snitches. They make 99 percent of their cases on snitches. They might have surveillance, but they love putting the snitch on the stand to explain it all. He will probably get immunity.......if not a 5k1.1 with a saftey valve...first in, first out
On what basis was the FBI investigating General Flynn?
 
On what basis was the FBI investigating General Flynn?
They weren't. It was routine for the FBI to monitor the calls he made with the Russian ambassador.....but found no wrong doing.....so there was nothing to investigate. Flynn is coming out to do some snitchin himself because he got a story to tell that could possibly bring down somebody in the Trump administration.......maybe even Trump himself.
 
I feel its time to really load up on some type of stock in something..............or get ready to. I just don't know what. Something is going down. I can feel it festering underneath this beautiful lie we all live in.

Ever since Hillary Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump on November 8, Obama’s Democratic party had been pushing a narrative that “Putin hacked the election.” The narrative continues to have two major flaws.

First, while the Russian dictator may have preferred Trump to Clinton, there is no evidence that his Russian regime did anything to compromise the voting process.

The second flaw is that, although Trump has made disturbingly flattering remarks about Putin, there is no evidence his campaign has given or promised Russia any actual accommodation in exchange for Putin’s favor. Democrats hope to erase this problem by finding something, anything, that could be spun as a quid pro quo. Obviously, they hoped the Flynn–Kislyak conversation would answer their prayers. No such luck.

It is what it is. Trump and his crew have hustled all the way to the highest office in the world. Cant hate them for that and this Flynn/Putin/Russia thing is just a smoke screen.
-NR

Cant hate the playa, hate the game
 
Last edited:
We said this a week ago and that he was in PC

This chick called it too.

And she got mocked for doing so in this article. She is also laughing right about now.

HOMELAND SECURITY
CNN Analyst Juliette Kayyem Walks Back Incendiary Claim of Mike Flynn Flipping to FBI
BY PATRICK POOLE MARCH 26, 2017

juliette-kayyem-mike-flynn.sized-770x415xc.jpg


Former top Obama Homeland Security official and "Security Mom" author Juliette Kayyem appeared on Don Lemon's CNN program this weekend and made an astounding claim: former Trump National Security Adviser Mike Flynn had flipped against the administration and cut a deal with the FBI.

That claim flew around social media all day yesterday and continues to be circulated, despite the fact that Kayyem quickly backtracked on it.

Now if anyone is to blame for making this now seemingly false claim go viral it's Kayyem herself, as she is the one who posted the video of her making the claim on CNN to her Twitter account.



One of the first to jump on board to push out her inflammatory claim was Huffington Post contributor Seth Abramson, who invoked his own legal background to lend credence to Kayyem's story:




Then Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe jumped in:



Next, left-wing blogs pushed the story out:



Needless to say, there were some skeptics:



With the sensational story making the full rounds on social media Kayyem then backtracked, posting the following "clarification" on Facebook:



Of particular note was this line:

Having rolled out the rumor rug, Kayyem pulled it out from underneath everyone hyping her claim.

Note that in her tweet pushing out the Don Lemon segment where she made the claim, she invoked "her sources." As mentioned above, if anyone was responsible for pushing out misleading or intentionally misdirecting anyone, it was Kayyem herself.

Distraught supporters then began their own walkbacks, beginning with Seth Abramson:



One wonders about the timing of all this, as a full day had passed for the story to fully circulate in time for the Sunday morning news talk shows. Will anyone invoke Kayyem's claim despite her walkback? We'll see.

As I noted last month, immediately following Mike Flynn's resignation as Trump's national security adviser, the stories that had dogged him and led to his departure quickly came apart.



Namely, that the FBI had no intention of charging Flynn.





So what exactly Flynn would be cutting a deal with the FBI over is far from clear.

It should be noted that Kayyem, a former Obama administration official, has been actively hyping Trump-Russia conspiracy theories.





And she has been given to making incendiary statements, such as appearing on CNN during the 2014 Ferguson riots and calling Mike Brown's death "a murder":



And her terrorism analysis could be charitably described as "suspect," as when she declared on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks that "the war on terrorism is over" or pronounced the death of Al-Qaeda in 2012 (it's still very much alive and thriving):



Given this current episode of her passing Harvard parlor-room gossip as breaking news and indulging in Trump-Russia fantasies, perhaps the followup book to her "Security Mom" should be "Manchurian Mom."
 
They weren't. It was routine for the FBI to monitor the calls he made with the Russian ambassador.....but found no wrong doing.....so there was nothing to investigate. Flynn is coming out to do some snitchin himself because he got a story to tell that could possibly bring down somebody in the Trump administration.......maybe even Trump himself.
But why did the FBI and the Justice Department investigate Flynn — and why did “officials” make sure the press found out about it. Trump will regret keeping a transparently political operative like James Comey as FBI director. Its a basic thing any leader should do.

Classic Art of war / The Prince by Machiavelli.
 
Ever since Hillary Clinton’s loss to Donald Trump on November 8, Obama’s Democratic party had been pushing a narrative that “Putin hacked the election.” The narrative continues to have two major flaws.

First, while the Russian dictator may have preferred Trump to Clinton, there is no evidence that his Russian regime did anything to compromise the voting process.

The second flaw is that, although Trump has made disturbingly flattering remarks about Putin, there is no evidence his campaign has given or promised Russia any actual accommodation in exchange for Putin’s favor. Democrats hope to erase this problem by finding something, anything, that could be spun as a quid pro quo. Obviously, they hoped the Flynn–Kislyak conversation would answer their prayers. No such luck.

It is what it is. Trump and his crew have hustled all the way to the highest office in the world. Cant hate them for that and this Flynn/Putin/Russia thing is just a smoke screen.

Cant hate the playa, hate the game

I thought this sounded familiar.........
ScreenShot2017-03-30at8.09.46PMc97c0.png

Nigga stole word for word like it was some logical response to what I said. I post random high thoughts on here mostly. Trust, you DO NOT want to debate. Cite your sources instead of blatantly plagiarizing the National Review.
 
Last edited:
To see all the smoke about Russia around the Trump campaign and to conclude that there's no fire producing it is to engage in a kind of intellectual dishonesty that begs the question "why not just get a lobotomy?"

The worst part is that when this shit is corroborated fully however many years from now the dullards that really don't understand how Russia bent America over will never hold themselves to account for their simplicity.
 
That might be why Pence is quiet as a church mouse, Trump is flipping out on other Repugs when he has a 35% approval rating and he know its time for Trump to go so he is waiting for his time, which looks like it coming sooner than later.
Pence hands dirty too... if both are out them Oren Hatch is Pres pro tempre
 
this is the must fucked up parts of this is...flynn knows all about the surveillance process the stupid m-f did this to himself..
but if russia didnt attack hack the US they would hav gotten away with it...
 
Flynn better stay in hiding until its time to testify. They might try to take his ass out on some broad day assassination type shit.
 
This chick called it too.

And she got mocked for doing so in this article. She is also laughing right about now.

HOMELAND SECURITY
CNN Analyst Juliette Kayyem Walks Back Incendiary Claim of Mike Flynn Flipping to FBI
BY PATRICK POOLE MARCH 26, 2017

juliette-kayyem-mike-flynn.sized-770x415xc.jpg


Former top Obama Homeland Security official and "Security Mom" author Juliette Kayyem appeared on Don Lemon's CNN program this weekend and made an astounding claim: former Trump National Security Adviser Mike Flynn had flipped against the administration and cut a deal with the FBI.

That claim flew around social media all day yesterday and continues to be circulated, despite the fact that Kayyem quickly backtracked on it.

Now if anyone is to blame for making this now seemingly false claim go viral it's Kayyem herself, as she is the one who posted the video of her making the claim on CNN to her Twitter account.



One of the first to jump on board to push out her inflammatory claim was Huffington Post contributor Seth Abramson, who invoked his own legal background to lend credence to Kayyem's story:




Then Harvard Law professor Laurence Tribe jumped in:



Next, left-wing blogs pushed the story out:



Needless to say, there were some skeptics:



With the sensational story making the full rounds on social media Kayyem then backtracked, posting the following "clarification" on Facebook:



Of particular note was this line:

Having rolled out the rumor rug, Kayyem pulled it out from underneath everyone hyping her claim.

Note that in her tweet pushing out the Don Lemon segment where she made the claim, she invoked "her sources." As mentioned above, if anyone was responsible for pushing out misleading or intentionally misdirecting anyone, it was Kayyem herself.

Distraught supporters then began their own walkbacks, beginning with Seth Abramson:



One wonders about the timing of all this, as a full day had passed for the story to fully circulate in time for the Sunday morning news talk shows. Will anyone invoke Kayyem's claim despite her walkback? We'll see.

As I noted last month, immediately following Mike Flynn's resignation as Trump's national security adviser, the stories that had dogged him and led to his departure quickly came apart.



Namely, that the FBI had no intention of charging Flynn.





So what exactly Flynn would be cutting a deal with the FBI over is far from clear.

It should be noted that Kayyem, a former Obama administration official, has been actively hyping Trump-Russia conspiracy theories.





And she has been given to making incendiary statements, such as appearing on CNN during the 2014 Ferguson riots and calling Mike Brown's death "a murder":



And her terrorism analysis could be charitably described as "suspect," as when she declared on the 10th anniversary of the 9/11 attacks that "the war on terrorism is over" or pronounced the death of Al-Qaeda in 2012 (it's still very much alive and thriving):



Given this current episode of her passing Harvard parlor-room gossip as breaking news and indulging in Trump-Russia fantasies, perhaps the followup book to her "Security Mom" should be "Manchurian Mom."


Thanks for posting all this. Looks like a lotta work. very informative.

Hope everyone remembers it was the WSJ that had the "story" of the CIA and intel communities not giving Trump full briefings and withholding information.

Everyone (CNN,MSNBC) is referring to WSJ for this story. I havent seen anything from Flynn's lawyer or Flynn himself saying this immunity from prosecution story is true.

There is this ... Denial of the WSJ story from Sen/House committees as reported by this guy. But i'm looking to verify this

 
Back
Top