Stop it with this probably shit, if you have to use probably in anything you say that tells me you don't know what you talking about you just talkin out your ass.
History channel shows Hannibal as a Black man. Whites go crazy cry revisionism.
- Thread starter Dr. Truth
- Start date
Hold on I got Drake on the phone...
He said......
Shut the fuck up ya sound stupid
He will never talk to your idiot ass.
Lol someone noticed already and you got picked APART AGAIN even without the bullshit links you don't understand but still post
I don't care what they say about you.
I'm impressed
Your imagination is vivid...
Keep dreaming....
It may come true one day.
You delusional if you think your weak attempts at character assassination
Can dispute the fact tbst
Hannibal is a black african that spoke an Afro asiatic language which was common for maurs, moors aka berbers at that time
afroAsiatic languages were created by black africans aka berbers
Black africans aka berbers aka moors taught the European Savage how to bathe
Eat with utensils
And not sleep with the farm animals the nasty savages kept farm animals in the house till they were taught by black africans aka maurs aka moors aka ancient berbers
How to built a barn to keep their animals in.
Facts
you repeating the same shit over and over without ever having anything to back you up, down to even the way you write sounds like this to a sane person
"I DONT KNOW WTF IM TALKING ABOUT BUT PLEASE BELIEVE ME!!"
Because it is blatantly obvious by the ASSinine questions,
Silly request, and mentally challenged logic.
The facts are not sinking in.
So I'm trying to help yall out.
Just stop.
Why you hate the facts?
I just gotta correct all you cac history revisionist
It's 2016 time to kill all dat bullshit.
And face the facts....
Hannibal was a black african can you grow some hair on your balls and be a man for once in your life.
And admit this fact
Why was there a problem with lice and fleas in ancient Egypt?what is your pointless point about lice??
According to some of you cats, that's a cac problem and is associated with filth. No cacs, no lice or fleas, right? So either there were a lot of sand cacs walking around or that river bathing wasn't what it was cracked up to be(much like the rest of the ancient world's bathing habits). http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/lice.htm
The ancient Egyptians would have been very sympathetic- and no doubt interested in our remedies as well. They, too, were tormented by these minute parasitic and very unattractive creatures. Much energy and imagination was expended towards their elimination.
This isn't theory. Amongst the glittering treasures, the gold and gems, unearthed from ancient tombs are the remains of head lice. Tormenting the Egyptians in life, they accompanied to them to the grave. Some of their ancient remedies survive as well.
The Ebers Papyrus recommends a potion of date meal and water, served warm and then spat out "in order to drive away the Fleas and Lice that desport themselves. . ."
But once again, you cherrypick. All you talk about is lice and fleas outside of Africa, but don't want to mention that they plagued the elite who had the wealth for pyramids. So the common people were fucking infested.
Why was there a problem with lice and fleas in ancient Egypt?
http://www.touregypt.net/featurestories/lice.htm
The ancient Egyptians would have been very sympathetic- and no doubt interested in our remedies as well. They, too, were tormented by these minute parasitic and very unattractive creatures. Much energy and imagination was expended towards their elimination.
This isn't theory. Amongst the glittering treasures, the gold and gems, unearthed from ancient tombs are the remains of head lice. Tormenting the Egyptians in life, they accompanied to them to the grave. Some of their ancient remedies survive as well.
The Ebers Papyrus recommends a potion of date meal and water, served warm and then spat out "in order to drive away the Fleas and Lice that desport themselves. . ."
But once again, you cherrypick. All you talk about is lice and fleas outside of Africa, but don't want to mention that they plagued the elite who had the wealth for pyramids. So the common people were fucking infested.
lice and ringworm love furry heads, alexander the great fag... and other europeans bought that shit and other diseases with them..
just like the european introduced the rat to america along with herpes aka small pox... and shit...
aint a damn thing change son aint a damn thing change..
just like the lice ridden rat caused the bubonic plague in europe..
which is really what weakend the moors....
so stop reachin wit dat bullshit!!!
nobody in history was more disease ridden then the european..
why you think your father country is named GERMany...??
ol germ, disease carryin, nasty ass cannibals...
spreading their nasty filthy fuck around the globe..
you act as if cacs didnt invade egypt while it was on its decline.. not when Egypt was Nubian and cracker proof..
trust me there was no lice issues in the days of the REAL PHAROAHS..
Rameses (I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, IX, X), Hatshepsut, Amenhotep I..
aint no cac pharoahs in valley of the kings son!!
trust me there was no lice issues in the days of the REAL PHAROAHS..
Rameses (I, II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, IX, X), Hatshepsut, Amenhotep I..
aint no cac pharoahs in valley of the kings son!!
Alexander the Great invaded Egypt when? Lice in Egypt date back to at least 3,000 years before that.
Now what? Cac invaded Egypt in 3,000 bc? Come on now, get your story straight. I've provided a timeline. Didn't ancient Egypt have a serious rat problem and plagues? Damn. You making that place sound like cac land.
Fleas, Lice. Rats. People with 40 year life expectancies. Timeline puts that thousands of years before Alexander. http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/03/0310_040310_blackdeath_2.html
In Egypt Panagiotakopulu combed the workers'-village site in Amarna, where the builders of the tombs of Egyptian kings Tutankhamun and Akhenaton lived. There, the researcher unearthed cat and human fleas—known to be plague carriers in some cases—in and around the workers' homes. That find spurred Panagiotakopulu to believe that the bubonic plague's fleaborne bacteria could also have been lurking in the area, so she went in search of other clues.
Previous excavations along the Nile Delta had turned up Nile rats, an endemic species, dating to the 16th and 17th century B.C. The plague's main carrier flea is thought to be native to the Nile Valley and is known to be a Nile rat parasite.
According to Panagiotakopulu, the Nile provided an ideal spot for rats to carry the plague into urban communities. Around 3500 B.C., people began to build cities next to the Nile. During floods, the habitat of the Nile rat was disturbed, sending the rodent—and its flea and bacterial hitchhikers—into the human domain.
Egyptian writings from a similar time period point to an epidemic disease with symptoms similar to the plague. A 1500 B.C. medical text known as the Ebers Papyrus identifies a disease that "has produced a bubo, and the pus has petrified, the disease has hit."
Come on man. I just don't read the usual sources some of you cats pass around like gospel. "It's true, it's true," type shit. Questionable sources meant for a target audience who doesn't really want to find the truth but just wants to hear what they WANT to hear. So when did the cacs come? I guess you better rework your 'timeline.'
Wow. I just fucked that entire timeline up with my post above.
Go back to the lab.
Alexander the Great invaded Egypt when? Lice in Egypt date back to at least 3,000 years before that.
Didn't ancient Egypt have a serious rat problem and plagues? Damn. You making that place sound like cac land.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2004/03/0310_040310_blackdeath_2.html
In Egypt Panagiotakopulu combed the workers'-village site in Amarna, where the builders of the tombs of Egyptian kings Tutankhamun and Akhenaton lived. There, the researcher unearthed cat and human fleas—known to be plague carriers in some cases—in and around the workers' homes. That find spurred Panagiotakopulu to believe that the bubonic plague's fleaborne bacteria could also have been lurking in the area, so she went in search of other clues.
Previous excavations along the Nile Delta had turned up Nile rats, an endemic species, dating to the 16th and 17th century B.C. The plague's main carrier flea is thought to be native to the Nile Valley and is known to be a Nile rat parasite.
According to Panagiotakopulu, the Nile provided an ideal spot for rats to carry the plague into urban communities. Around 3500 B.C., people began to build cities next to the Nile. During floods, the habitat of the Nile rat was disturbed, sending the rodent—and its flea and bacterial hitchhikers—into the human domain.
Egyptian writings from a similar time period point to an epidemic disease with symptoms similar to the plague. A 1500 B.C. medical text known as the Ebers Papyrus identifies a disease that "has produced a bubo, and the pus has petrified, the disease has hit."
So when did the cacs come? I guess you better rework your 'timeline.'
cac revisionist..
The bubonic plague, better known as the “The Black Death,” has existed for thousands of years. The first recorded case of the plague was in China in 224 B.C.E. But the most significant outbreak was in Europe in the mid-fourteenth century. Over a five-year period from 1347 to 1352,25 million people died.
dude how come it was never an epidemic son in Nubian Egypt....
but in EUROPE it wiped out twenty five fuckin million...
people..
Nubian egyptians had remedies, they were civilized, they bathed...
but in europe twenty five million people got got...
Why was Nubian Egypt able to control it, but in europe it wipes out twenty five fuckin million people.
do you know how many muthafuckas that is son?
nasty filthy fuckin cac europeans....
care to try again son
Wow. I just fucked that entire timeline up with my post above.
Go back to the lab.
after you finish patting yourself on your coochie,
show me where millions of people died over some damn Fleas in Nubian Egypt..
see the numbers prove them dirty cacs wasnt in ancient nubian egypt...
you know what they say,
gene ciscos lie..
numbers dont..
twenty five MILLION people..
ggggggaaaa doooggitty DAAAAYAAAAM!!!
you know what they say,
gene ciscos lie..
numbers dont..
twenty five MILLION people..
ggggggaaaa doooggitty DAAAAYAAAAM!!!
How do you know it was 25 million? Wait, You trust cacs with those numbers, but not with dating the plagues back further? Especially to a population who had a life expectancy of 40 years?
You still haven't explained all the fucking lice, fleas, and rats in Ancient Egypt.
Simple yes or no. Did they come with cacs?
dude you got lice, fleas and ringworms in hoods all over america..
but it does NOT have the same effect on african americans aka the ancient berbers as it does on the
filthy savage cac european..
FACT!!
you find fleas anywhere you find animals...
here some more facts..
Who is at risk for getting head lice?
Head lice are found worldwide. In the United States, infestation with head lice is most common among pre-school children attending child care, elementary schoolchildren, and the household members of infested children. Although reliable data on how many people in the United States get head lice each year are not available, an estimated 6 million to 12 million infestations occur each year in the United States among children 3 to 11 years of age. In the United States, infestation with head lice is much less common among African-Americans than among persons of other races, possibly because the claws of the of the head louse found most frequently in the United States are better adapted for grasping the shape and width of the hair shaft of other races.
twenty five fuckin million..
gene ciscos lie..
numbers dont!!!
Damn this fool stay getting owned. Just won't quit
We are ancient berbers? Again, PROVIDE A TIMELINE. What do you consider ancient? 500 years? 1000? longer?
Oh Ok. So know you are adjusting things. You said africans only got those things when being around cacs(just a few posts ago). Ok. So we have them in the US, right? Why were the same problems in Egypt along with rats?
If I didn't know any better, I'd say you were arguing that ancient Egypt was a mixed society like the US is. Damn. It is right next to Europe and West Asia.
Did other parts of Africa have problems with rats, lice, fleas, and plagues?
He doesn't care about other parts of Africa. He's only counting the pyramid part that civilized Greece but somehow forgot to do those other parts.
That's the part I hate about all of these supremacy arguments. Europeans will claim the same shit, but forget about their barbarians. Cats learned this revisionist history from 19th century Europeans for the most part.
Folks don't want to admit that their were 'successes' and 'failures' within both groups if we are going by advancements.
We are ancient berbers? Again, PROVIDE A TIMELINE. What do you consider ancient? 500 years? 1000? longer?
Oh Ok. So know you are adjusting things. You said africans only got those things when being around cacs(just a few posts ago). Ok. So we have them in the US, right? Why were the same problems in Egypt along with rats?
If I didn't know any better, I'd say you were arguing that ancient Egypt was a mixed society like the US is. Damn. It is right next to Europe and West Asia.
Did other parts of Africa have problems with rats, lice, fleas, and plagues?
I dont need a timeline to prove these parasitic elitist
cacs know we are ancient berbers..
Of course egypt was a mixed society in terms of belief and ideaology, we had christianity before white jesus, we has islam before mohammed and we were hebrews.. berbers and moors are the same thing.. I dont think there was a time we were ever 100 percent monolithic...
did you are reaching again, I never said egyptian nubians "only got those things" I said there were always fleas, ticks, lice, you find that whereever you find animals..
Im saying nubians were clean enough to prevent 25 million people from dying from any type of insect... get it.. was that slow enough for you should I double space
muthafucka..
lol you say IM ADJUSTING THINGS, knigga Im talking about hannibal being a black african..
and you talkin about fleas and shit....
lol...
yes africa had fleas ticks diseases and plagues all that, but again it was never out of control as to wipe out tens of millions of people....
It's true. You don't need anything when you're just making shit up lol
blah blah blah,
dude YOU officially got shut down, when you had the boards
most delusional poster side with you, gotdam entrepamogay or whatever his name is..
agree with you...
and you even quoted him digging your grave deeper..
lol
stay on the sidelines boy....
You sound like a dumbass. No books , knowledge of what you're speaking on , or none of that.
You've been shut down at least 5 different ways by 5 different people. You can hardly talk about anyone being delusional. Youre a Moor with no country lol
go clean your pom poms they dirty...
you silly cheerleading whore, if I was shut down why do you keep responding...
because you are learning truth for once in your life and you cant get enough of it...
the only thing more hollow then your words is your head....
remember entrepnegro cosigned you..
you offcially lost...
LOL
I dont need a timeline to prove these parasitic elitist
cacs know we are ancient berbers..
Of course egypt was a mixed society in terms of belief and ideaology, we had christianity before white jesus, we has islam before mohammed and we were hebrews.. berbers and moors are the same thing.. I dont think there was a time we were ever 100 percent monolithic...
did you are reaching again, I never said egyptian nubians "only got those things" I said there were always fleas, ticks, lice, you find that whereever you find animals..
Im saying nubians were clean enough to prevent 25 million people from dying from any type of insect... get it.. was that slow enough for you should I double space
muthafucka..
lol you say IM ADJUSTING THINGS, knigga Im talking about hannibal being a black african..
and you talkin about fleas and shit....
lol...
yes africa had fleas ticks diseases and plagues all that, but again it was never out of control as to wipe out tens of millions of people....
It's funny. They have DNA on record of North African groups who have been in the region since the times of ancient Egypt. When black Americans who can trace their American ancestors back to the times of slavery(so they are not recent immigrants) take DNA tests to find lineage, it never seems to go back to that region.
It's usually West Africa. So why do you keep saying we? Egyptians still in Egypt man. Other North African groups you claiming still up there man. The Moors were just 500 years ago and are still in North Africa. Why no genetic link? 
Kind of takes the we out of we. As usual, I post sources:
http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2013/02/how_mixed_are_african_americans/3/
I find two things quite fascinating about these results. First of all, simply glancing at these statistics reveals that virtually none of the African Americans tested by these DNA companies is inferred to be 100 percent sub-Saharan African, although each company has analyzed Africans and African immigrants who did test 100 percent sub-Saharan in origin. Ranges, of course, vary from individual to individual. Spencer Wells, director of National Geographic’s Genographic Project, explained to me that the African Americans they’ve tested range from 53 percent to 95 percent sub-Saharan African, 3 percent to 46 percent European and zero percent to 3 percent Native American. So there is a lot of genetic variation within our ethnic group, as is obvious to anyone even casually glancing at black people just walking down the street.
And second, these findings show that the common claim that many African Americans make about their high percentage of Native American ancestry is a myth. Joanna Mountain broke down to me our low amounts of Native American ancestry in this way: “Eighty percent of African Americans have less than 1 percent Native American ancestry. Over 2.5 percent have between 2 percent and 3 percent. And of all African Americans who have at least 1 percent Native American ancestry, the average is 2 percent Native American.” So much for all of those putative Cherokee roots on just about every black person’s family tree, fabricated to explain why your great-grandmother had “high cheekbones and straight black hair”! Why there is such little evidence of genetic mingling between African Americans and Native Americans deserves a column of its own.
There you have it. So much for your other claim that we were Native Americans. Only a few of us have links to Native Americans and that is recent mixture. Why aren't people being linked to any north African groups? Folks aren't even tracing back to East Africa and Ethiopia(another thing we like to claim for Christianity purposes)? Why can't we just be happy with our roots? Hebrews claim west Asia as a homeland, why are you jacking their shit? You west Asian now? Folks running doing the same thing they accuse cacs of doing: jacking cultures and achievements.
There is a thread on here showing a people in modern Egypt who are said to be ancient Egyptians who never left. So either that is a lie or we are lying about our history. Which is it? We prepared to call out people who have been there for thousands of years?
And I've already shown the evidence of bubonic plague in Egypt. As usual, I sourced it. Just didn't say
"it's true, it's true!" without any fucking sources.It's funny. They have DNA on record of North African groups who have been in the region since the times of ancient Egypt. When black Americans who can trace their American ancestors back to the times of slavery(so they are not recent immigrants) take DNA tests to find lineage, it never seems to go back to that region.
As usual, I post sources:
http://www.theroot.com/articles/history/2013/02/how_mixed_are_african_americans/3/
I find two things quite fascinating about these results. First of all, simply glancing at these statistics reveals that virtually none of the African Americans tested by these DNA companies is inferred to be 100 percent sub-Saharan African, although each company has analyzed Africans and African immigrants who did test 100 percent sub-Saharan in origin. Ranges, of course, vary from individual to individual. Spencer Wells, director of National Geographic’s Genographic Project, explained to me that the African Americans they’ve tested range from 53 percent to 95 percent sub-Saharan African, 3 percent to 46 percent European and zero percent to 3 percent Native American. So there is a lot of genetic variation within our ethnic group, as is obvious to anyone even casually glancing at black people just walking down the street.
And second, these findings show that the common claim that many African Americans make about their high percentage of Native American ancestry is a myth. Joanna Mountain broke down to me our low amounts of Native American ancestry in this way: “Eighty percent of African Americans have less than 1 percent Native American ancestry. Over 2.5 percent have between 2 percent and 3 percent. And of all African Americans who have at least 1 percent Native American ancestry, the average is 2 percent Native American.” So much for all of those putative Cherokee roots on just about every black person’s family tree, fabricated to explain why your great-grandmother had “high cheekbones and straight black hair”! Why there is such little evidence of genetic mingling between African Americans and Native Americans deserves a column of its own.
There you have it. So much for your other claim that we were Native Americans. Only a few of us have links to Native Americans and that is recent mixture. Why aren't people being linked to any north African groups? Folks aren't even tracing back to East Africa and Ethiopia(another thing we like to claim for Christianity purposes)? Why can't we just be happy with our roots? Hebrews claim west Asia as a homeland, why are you jacking their shit? You west Asian now? Folks running doing the same thing they accuse cacs of doing: jacking cultures and achievements.
There is a thread on here showing a people in modern Egypt who are said to be ancient Egyptians who never left. So either that is a lie or we are lying about our history. Which is it? We prepared to call out people who have been there for thousands of years?
And I've already shown the evidence of bubonic plague in Egypt. As usual, I sourced it. Just didn't say
Your post is all over the place..
We are indigenous to this land we are not "indians",
the folks crackers consider the quinessential american "indian' are a
genetic mixture of the black olmecs and the chinese that came later......
you could just look at their features to see this, you dont need sources just use
your eyes...and dont be deceived by cac revisionist history....
I base my facts on simple logic.. some folks have it some folks dont..
And nobody is dissing our GLORIOUS history in places like Mali..
but this topic is on Hannibal and how many cacs cannot get over the fact
he was a black african...
you just like to wander all over the place... talkin about fleas and shit...
just out of curiosity have you ever represented in the identity thread..
because the only folks who have problem with obvious logical facts
like Hannibal being a black African are cacs...
cuz Im entertained watching you struggle in so many ways and I know I'm not the only one. The responses only keep this thread up so people can read your nonsense and Multiple ownages. notice that other guy who was using the same bullshit argument and quotes he didn't read, left. At least he had sense to do that. You keep telling me who else is cosigning. I don't care who cosigns you. YOU are the person w the bad credibility all on your own. I'd be more worried the day I'm on the same side of a debate with YOU Lol
Similar threads
