History channel shows Hannibal as a Black man. Whites go crazy cry revisionism.

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

You're looking bad bro. All ya gotta do is really read. Just know- there is some really awesome BLACK African history. Ghana, Mali, Songhai, just to start. Not as many cool pyramids and shit but very dope nonetheless. That's OUR history. Don't be ashamed of being Black bro. Embrace it. I know you wanna be an Arab or a European so bad but you're not. Unlike me, they WILL ask you for a hand test and when you don't pass, they will laugh at you. Not for not having a history but for not knowing it. Embrace your Black Africaness. The grass ain't greener

Yo gene disappears and you appear

Like a gotdam jekyll and hyde...


Dude it's all African history son

But you need to get over the fact the original Arabs and Asians were African

I dont care what screen name you come at me with it can't change the facts.

So are you Dr jekyll or. Mr hyde?

I'm debating a goddam schizo

 

[exiledking]

You are simple wrong. They were black. The name Phoenician means black. Not that purple cloth shit them damn cacs say it means. The are was dark and then it was lighten by the Romans conquering. Over a long period of time the area lightened up. So, you are wrong my friend.

Lol now phoenician means Black too.

He just says it and we're supposed to believe it.

And here's yet another one who says the area was lightened up way before 700, yet by the time of the Moors, POOF, they're all Black again lol. Whatever works.

 

[exiledking]

Yo gene disappears and you appear

Like a gotdam jekyll and hyde...


Dude it's all African history son

But you need to get over the fact the original Arabs and Asians were African

I dont care what screen name you come at me with it can't change the facts.

So are you Dr jekyll or. Mr hyde?

I'm debating a goddam schizo

If you were just claiming it was African history, cool. Berbers, and arabs right try now don't categorize themselves as black and when you see them you wouldn't either. You've been using the term sand CACs and obsessing over how light they are the whole time. So there's a vast range of African history and all of it isn't Black African history. But you're all over the place anyway. That's understandable because you don't have a clue of what you're talking a lot lol.

 

[gene cisco]

africans always had a slave trade, nothing like the sick ass shit europeans had here.

and ancient rome was NOT dominated by savage euro crackers..

it was multi cultural society due to all the fuckin the black maurs were doing...

your point is pointless...

and again the original Arabs were black africans,


dont even get me started on the original asians...

you havent even admited the original Arabs were black africans yet..

you are just tryin to drown me with words and psycho babble...

and why everytime you attempt to debate me, exiled king comes out of left field...

avoiding the message and attackin the messenger...

Im talkin every fuckin time..

it never fails...

is he your alter ego??

Address post #225...

Stop fucking justifying trading in humans. Also, I'm talking about the Trans-Saharan slave trade. That wasn't African, it was sand cacs. Naturally, Africans participated in it. Do you know how lucky Africans were that there was a natural barrier(Sahara desert) to stop Sand cacs? Meanwhile, sand cacs could order jump right into Europe or head out to Asia.

Stop with the 'original' nonsense. Original doesn't mean much. Someone being in Asia 60,000 years ago don't mean they are the same people after the admixture and other changes that come with time. And you do know racist cacs use that 'original' argument against black people, don't you? They actually love when the term original man is used.

I swear you have to do a lot of UNBIASED reading. You won't even let Native Americans have their pyramids. To you, they too dumb to do that without African assistance. Where is the DNA evidence to support Native Americans have recent African DNA(last 5,000 years)?

Again. Address post #225.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

If you were just claiming it was African history, cool. Berbers, and arabs right try now don't categorize themselves as black and when you see them you wouldn't either. You've been using the term sand CACs and obsessing over how light they are the whole time. So there's a vast range of African history and all of it isn't Black African history. But you're all over the place anyway. That's understandable because you don't have a clue of what you're talking a lot lol.

Wow you say all that to quasi admit I am rigbt

I never said nothing about the mongrel Arabs of today nor did I imply all modern day Arabs are sand cacs or mongrels


I simply said the original Arabs were black african.

And practiced a whole different Islam then the racisf shit being practiced today.

Just say I am correct the original Arabs were "black" African without all the jibber jabber

 

[gene cisco]

If you were just claiming it was African history, cool. Berbers, and arabs right try now don't categorize themselves as black and when you see them you wouldn't either. You've been using the term sand CACs and obsessing over how light they are the whole time. So there's a vast range of African history and all of it isn't Black African history. But you're all over the place anyway. That's understandable because you don't have a clue of what you're talking a lot lol.

A certain segment of the black population is trying to run around and claim everything from stonehenge to the pyramids in South America to the Great Wall to Greece and anything in between just like cacs did. Not one other group of people is competent enough to do things on their own according to such people. Not Native Americans. Not Asians. Not cacs. This is like the Eurocentric thinking that the focus on black history was created to debunk.

SOME have become the very monsters they tried to debunk. What's sad is when you look at the Arab invasion of Africa the contradictions are so obvious that only a child or someone who WANTS to believe will buy the horseshit.

Can we have an honest fucking look at history?

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Address post #225...

Stop fucking justifying trading in humans. Also, I'm talking about the Trans-Saharan slave trade. That wasn't African, it was sand cacs. Naturally, Africans participated in it. Do you know how lucky Africans were that there was a natural barrier(Sahara desert) to stop Sand cacs? Meanwhile, sand cacs could order jump right into Europe or head out to Asia.

Stop with the 'original' nonsense. Original doesn't mean much. Someone being in Asia 60,000 years ago don't mean they are the same people after the admixture and other changes that come with time. And you do know racist cacs use that 'original' argument against black people, don't you? They actually love when the term original man is used.

I swear you have to do a lot of UNBIASED reading. You won't even let Native Americans have their pyramids. To you, they too dumb to do that without African assistance. Where is the DNA evidence to support Native Americans have recent African DNA(last 5,000 years)?

Again. Address post #225.

What do you want me to address that African
Were involved in a slave trade.

OK I acknowledge it but it doesn't compare to the savagery of chattel slavery.

Don't get what your point is

Saying original is very important

It separates the native indigenous from their mongrel offspring..

 

[exiledking]

Wow you say all that to quasi admit I am rigbt

I never said nothing about the mongrel Arabs of today nor did I imply all modern day Arabs are sand cacs or mongrels


I simply said the original Arabs were black african.

And practiced a whole different Islam then the racisf shit being practiced today.

Just say I am correct the original Arabs were "black" African without all the jibber jabber

Lol you're so full of shit. You're trolling now but I think deep down you're gonna go actually read something. Even if ya don't, it's beyond clear that you're clueless. And you hate being Black.

 

[gene cisco]

What do you want me to address that African
Were involved in a slave trade.

OK I acknowledge it but it doesn't compare to the savagery of chattel slavery.

Don't get what your point is

Saying original is very important

It separates the native indigenous from their mongrel offspring..

Africans participated in both the chattel slave trade AND the Trans-Saharan slave trade. Here's your problem. You are claiming the people who were dropping knowledge in Europe and who also operated the Trans-Saharan slave trade. The one that involved mass castration of African males. It's like claiming the fucking British Empire during chattel slavery.

And when can you address post #225.

Addressing original is very important to racist cacs too.

 

[Real2DaC0re]

Anybody know when this show will be on Netflix?

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Lol you're so full of shit. You're trolling now but I think deep down you're gonna go actually read something. Even if ya don't, it's beyond clear that you're clueless. And you hate being Black.

What ever Mr hyde

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Africans participated in both the chattel slave trade AND the Trans-Saharan slave trade. Here's your problem. You are claiming the people who were dropping knowledge in Europe and who also operated the Trans-Saharan slave trade. The one that involved mass castration of African males. It's like claiming the fucking British Empire during chattel slavery.

And when can you address post #225.

Addressing original is very important to racist cacs too.

OK doc jekyll

 

[Joe Money]

Im sayin aint no way cacs coming out of caves with their neanderthal dna and civilizing themselves..

its just retard logic to think thats even the slightest possibility...

I have no idea what your geographical jibber jabber is tryin to convey...

Knowledge flowed from Upper Nubia into Lower Nubia....

by the way Egypt was in Lower Nubia...

again, the only reason these savage europeans

resemble man, is because of all the civilizing (fuckin)

the african has done to bring them out of their savage

ways...

One of the greatest mistakes ever made in the history of the world!

Africa and Africans made europe great...

savage europeans like the goths, vandals
. ... Other Germanic tribes Gepids, Rugian

was the reason for its decline....

FACTS!!!

Mrfreddygoodbud: Two questions...first of all, what are your primary sources of information, as far as books and scholars? Second of all, can you present a very basic general timeline of the history you're talking about, meaning the beginning of Egyptian history to its height to its decline to Greece and Rome and the sand cacs and Moors?

 

[exiledking]

Mrfreddygoodbud: Two questions...first of all, what are your primary sources of information, as far as books and scholars? Second of all, can you present a very basic general timeline of the history you're talking about, meaning the beginning of Egyptian history to its height to its decline to Greece and Rome and the sand cacs and Moors?

Oh now THIS would be worth watching. That's a PERFECT question. I really hope he takes that challenge on.

 

[gene cisco]

OK doc jekyll

Still no answer to the post I told you to look at.

# 225...

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Mrfreddygoodbud: Two questions...first of all, what are your primary sources of information, as far as books and scholars? Second of all, can you present a very basic general timeline of the history you're talking about, meaning the beginning of Egyptian history to its height to its decline to Greece and Rome and the sand cacs and Moors?

mayne listen,

yes if I was going to get a PHD or some shit...

thats waaay too much work....

no I just know truth when I hear it and I know bullshit euro history revisionist shit when I hear it...


I mean if you want refrences for like, the first arabs being african,

thats on the web encyclopedia britanicas website...

but for that thesis you want,

sure I can do it, but there has to be something in it for me, like round trip tickets to seychelles or thailand..

business class preferred....

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Still no answer to the post I told you to look at.

# 225...

there is nothing to answer, africans were all over the planet

the european did not come out of the cave and civilize his savage self...

the european has no history, which is why they steal other cultures..

first greeks were africans, first romans were african...

cac european has no history dating back six thousand years.

why because he did not exist!!!

he is a baby to this existence a savage one at that.....

you keep talking about that post but there is nothing in there that proves the caucazoid civilized himself...

there were ancient africans in russia son..

so what makes you think there werent any in bulgaria..

here a cracker publication that skates around the facts...


but admits caucasions didnt exist eight thousand years ago..

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ns-brought-Europe-Near-East-study-claims.html

cacs simply did not exist six thousand years ago, and when they came into existence,

they were nasty, filthy, cannibal savages that needed to be civilized..

and were to some degree by the black african...


you can take the savage out the cave

but you cant take the savage out the savage..

no matter how much he shaves his furry ass,

and wears expensive suits..

 

[gene cisco]

there is nothing to answer, africans were all over the planet

the european did not come out of the cave and civilize his savage self...

the european has no history, which is why they steal other cultures..

first greeks were africans, first romans were african...

cac european has no history dating back six thousand years.

why because he did not exist!!!

he is a baby to this existence a savage one at that.....

you keep talking about that post but there is nothing in there that proves the caucazoid civilized himself...

there were ancient africans in russia son..

so what makes you think there werent any in bulgaria..

here a cracker publication that skates around the facts...


but admits caucasions didnt exist eight thousand years ago..

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...ns-brought-Europe-Near-East-study-claims.html

cacs simply did not exist six thousand years ago, and when they came into existence,

they were nasty, filthy, cannibal savages that needed to be civilized..

and were to some degree by the black african...


you can take the savage out the cave

but you cant take the savage out the savage..

no matter how much he shaves his furry ass,

and wears expensive suits..

Did you read your source? So the hunter-gatherers had dark(er) skin, the near-east FARMERS had the light-skin gene. It says Caucasians arrived 8,000 years ago. When is the date for the city I posted?

Also, check this out from your source .....

'This data is fun because it shows how much recent evolution has taken place.'

See. That's why I told you using the term original is what some cacs want you to do. You really don't know what you are arguing sometimes. Once people open up doors to racial superiority, shit gets ugly for all sides because there are so many different arguments fielded. You argue original, they argue evolution.

And why some of the light-skin folks coming out of east Asia(sand cacs) right next to Egypt? Again, did you even look at your source. This predates the pyramids.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Did you read your source? So the hunter-gatherers had dark(er) skin, the near-east FARMERS had the light-skin gene. It says Caucasians arrived 8,000 years ago. When is the date for the city I posted?

Also, check this out from your source .....

'This data is fun because it shows how much recent evolution has taken place.'

See. That's why I told you using the term original is what some cacs want you to do. You really don't know what you are arguing sometimes. Once people open up doors to racial superiority, shit gets ugly for all sides because there are so many different arguments fielded. You argue original, they argue evolution.

And why some of the light-skin folks coming out of east Asia(sand cacs) right next to Egypt? Again, did you even look at your source. This predates the pyramids.

why are you ignoring THEIR source.. with your excerpts

The study, which is also published on the open access site BioRxiv, compared the genomes obtained from the remains of 83 people found at archaeological sites across Europe along with the genomes of modern Europeans.


yeah just leave out the havard study..

you sneaky lil snake you....


at the end of the day, the caucasion has no history pass six thousand years..

the caucasion did not come out the caves teaching himself languages...

from english, to french to spanish, to russian..

he was taught and civilzied by the African...

but unfortunately his savage cannibal nature was beyond control.

get over it..!!!

 

[exiledking]

mayne listen,

yes if I was going to get a PHD or some shit...

thats waaay too much work....

no I just know truth when I hear it and I know bullshit euro history revisionist shit when I hear it...


I mean if you want refrences for like, the first arabs being african,

thats on the web encyclopedia britanicas website...

but for that thesis you want,

sure I can do it, but there has to be something in it for me, like round trip tickets to seychelles or thailand..

business class preferred....

Lol you spent ALL THIS TIME in this thread, dropping bullshit links and shit. Now you're punking the fuck out.

 

[gene cisco]

why are you ignoring THEIR source.. with your excerpts

The study, which is also published on the open access site BioRxiv, compared the genomes obtained from the remains of 83 people found at archaeological sites across Europe along with the genomes of modern Europeans.


yeah just leave out the havard study..

you sneaky lil snake you....


at the end of the day, the caucasion has no history pass six thousand years..

the caucasion did not come out the caves teaching himself languages...

from english, to french to spanish, to russian..

he was taught and civilzied by the African...

but unfortunately his savage cannibal nature was beyond control.

get over it..!!!

Sneaky, we are talking about dates, correct?

Do you even know what you are arguing? Human brains are the same. Cacs needed help developing languages but developed the machine language(s) you use to type your beliefs on the computer? You don't argue people are 'new' when all the documented good shit in the ancient world is 'new' and the farmers with the pale gene were in East Asia.

You argue exchange of ideas. Trade. Things of that nature. That's how the world works. That's how civilizations grow. Exchange of ideas, not isolation. It's no coincidence all the major shit in the ancient world seemed to happen where Asia, Europe, and Africa meet. Sure as shit didn't happen in Australia.

The racists say cacs are evolved humans. You keep making their arguments for them and don't even realize it. Shit is crazy.

 

[exiledking]

Sneaky, we are talking about dates, correct?

Do you even know what you are arguing? Human brains are the same. Cacs needed help developing languages but developed the machine language(s) you use to type your beliefs on the computer? You don't argue people are 'new' when all the documented good shit in the ancient world is 'new' and the farmers with the pale gene were in East Asia.

You argue exchange of ideas. Trade. Things of that nature. That's how the world works. That's how civilizations grow. Exchange of ideas, not isolation. It's no coincidence all the major shit in the ancient world seemed to happen where Asia, Europe, and Africa meet. Sure as shit didn't happen in Australia.

The racists say cacs are evolved humans. You keep making their arguments for them and don't even realize it. Shit is crazy.

Let him go bruh. He's more than exposed. I'm just glad he's not trying this bullshit in a debate w white people. He'd get ate up trying to represent us.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Lol you spent ALL THIS TIME in this thread, dropping bullshit links and shit. Now you're punking the fuck out.

You spent all this time ignoring the fact that Africans civilized the Savage caucasion

 

[gene cisco]

Let him go bruh. He's more than exposed. I'm just glad he's not trying this bullshit in a debate w white people. He'd get ate up trying to represent us.

It's not just him though. I encounter folks like him on a regular basis. It's alarming how many educated people spout nonsense. Feel-good history has become on par with religion in our community. It's not good. People are growing more and more obsessed with the past as other move forward -- and the past they are obsessed with isn't even true. It's a double fuck up.

 

[Joe Money]

mayne listen,

yes if I was going to get a PHD or some shit...

thats waaay too much work....

no I just know truth when I hear it and I know bullshit euro history revisionist shit when I hear it...


I mean if you want refrences for like, the first arabs being african,

thats on the web encyclopedia britanicas website...

but for that thesis you want,

sure I can do it, but there has to be something in it for me, like round trip tickets to seychelles or thailand..

business class preferred....

I am just asking for a few main sources. I'm guessing that the bulk of your information is based on Message to the BlackMan by Elijah Muhammad and The Destruction of Black Civilization by Chancellor Williams, but I don't want to assume that without confirmation.

Where does it say that the first Arabs were African on the Encyclopedia Britannica's website (https://www.britannica.com/topic/Arab)? Below is what I see:

"Arab referred to any of the largely nomadic Semitic inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula. In modern usage, it embraces any of the Arabic-speaking peoples living in the vast region from Mauritania, on the Atlantic coast of Africa, to southwestern Iran, including the entire Maghrib of North Africa, Egypt and Sudan, the Arabian Peninsula, and Syria and Iraq."​

and

"This diverse assortment of peoples defies physical stereotyping,"​

And as far as the timeline, just can you simply date, or give a range, for these specific events?

The founding of Egypt

The building of the Egyptian Pyramids

The founding of Greece

The founding of Rome

When the Caucasian/White/CAC race first appeared

When the Moors appeared

When the Africans civilized Europe

 

[Joe Money]

Go read the history.

Where? Got a source?

You spent all this time ignoring the fact that Africans civilized the Savage caucasion

When did this occur?

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Sneaky, we are talking about dates, correct?

Do you even know what you are arguing? Human brains are the same. Cacs needed help developing languages but developed the machine language(s) you use to type your beliefs on the computer? You don't argue people are 'new' when all the documented good shit in the ancient world is 'new' and the farmers with the pale gene were in East Asia.

You argue exchange of ideas. Trade. Things of that nature. That's how the world works. That's how civilizations grow. Exchange of ideas, not isolation. It's no coincidence all the major shit in the ancient world seemed to happen where Asia, Europe, and Africa meet. Sure as shit didn't happen in Australia.

The racists say cacs are evolved humans. You keep making their arguments for them and don't even realize it. Shit is crazy.

Dude you are the king of drivel

Africans civilized the Savage european..

Take a deep breath ...

And get over it

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

I am just asking for a few main sources. I'm guessing that the bulk of your information is based on Message to the BlackMan by Elijah Muhammad and The Destruction of Black Civilization by Chancellor Williams, but I don't want to assume that without confirmation.

Where does it say that the first Arabs were African on the Encyclopedia Britannica's website (https://www.britannica.com/topic/Arab)? Below is what I see:

"Arab referred to any of the largely nomadic Semitic inhabitants of the Arabian Peninsula. In modern usage, it embraces any of the Arabic-speaking peoples living in the vast region from Mauritania, on the Atlantic coast of Africa, to southwestern Iran, including the entire Maghrib of North Africa, Egypt and Sudan, the Arabian Peninsula, and Syria and Iraq."​

and

"This diverse assortment of peoples defies physical stereotyping,"​

And as far as the timeline, just can you simply date, or give a range, for these specific events?

The founding of Egypt

The building of the Egyptian Pyramids

The founding of Greece

The founding of Rome

When the Caucasian/White/CAC race first appeared

When the Moors appeared

When the Africans civilized Europe

Read the iceman inheritance
.just Google the authors name..


It's really not that complicated its simple logic.


Crackers did not come out the caves and civilized themselves


Their only claim to fame was being war mongering savages


See the vandals and the goths

 

[exiledking]

Read the iceman inheritance
.just Google the authors name..


It's really not that complicated its simple logic.


Crackers did not come out the caves and civilized themselves


Their only claim to fame was being war mongering savages


See the vandals and the goths

Michael Bradley. Some kooky CAC from Talladega AL who no one knows. You're literally using Ricky Bobby as a source. Wow.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Where? Got a source?



When did this occur?

Yo this is the information age son

Well incorporating simple logic

Since the Savage european has no history

Past six thousand years...

The civilization process must've been somewhere between five to six thousand years ago....

While they were picking fleas out their asses

African were building shit that to this day can't be duplicated.

The greatest trick the caucasion ever pulled

Was the fallacy he actually had a culture

His only culture is savagery barbarism and cannibalism.

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Michael Bradley. Some kooky CAC from Talladega AL who no one knows. You're literally using Ricky Bobby as a source. Wow.

That's all you do is attack the messenger but run from the actual message.

 

[Joe Money]

Read the iceman inheritance
.just Google the authors name..


It's really not that complicated its simple logic.


Crackers did not come out the caves and civilized themselves


Their only claim to fame was being war mongering savages


See the vandals and the goths

Okay. So you're basing your information primarily on that one book, "The Iceman Inheritance" by Michael Bradley.

As far as the Vandals and Goths; this is why I asked you for a timeline. They sacked the Roman Empire around the 4th century AD. So you're arguing that Africans came into Europe after this date and "civilized" them? 1600 years ago?

Yo this is the information age son

Well incorporating simple logic

Since the Savage european has no history

Past six thousand years...

The civilization process must've been somewhere between five to six thousand years ago....

While they were picking fleas out their asses

African were building shit that to this day can't be duplicated.

The greatest trick the caucasion ever pulled

Was the fallacy he actually had a culture

His only culture is savagery barbarism and cannibalism.

Yes, it's the information age, but you've only cited one source of information. Yet you say here that the civilization process was around five to six thousand years ago? So around 4000 to 3000 B.C.? And what did Africans build that can't be duplicated?

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Okay. So you're basing your information primarily on that one book, "The Iceman Inheritance" by Michael Bradley.

As far as the Vandals and Goths; this is why I asked you for a timeline. They sacked the Roman Empire around the 4th century AD. So you're arguing that Africans came into Europe after this date and "civilized" them? 1600 years ago?



Yes, it's the information age, but you've only cited one source of information. Yet you say here that the civilization process was around five to six thousand years ago? So around 4000 to 3000 B.C.? And what did Africans build that can't be duplicated?

I'm just giving you a jump start...

The civilization process probably started around that time.

That's why Greeks and southern Italians are so dark compared to the German invaders who came later

Africans were fucking the shit out of them Italian and Greek hoes

Dude there isn't a damn thing the caucasion as built that's withstood the test to time like the sphinx.


Can you name one?

 

[Joe Money]

I'm just giving you a jump start...

The civilization process probably started around that time.

That's why Greeks and southern Italians are so dark compared to the German invaders who came later

Africans were fucking the shit out of them Italian and Greek hoes

Dude there isn't a damn thing the caucasion as built that's withstood the test to time like the sphinx.


Can you name one?

Stonehenge.

But, just for the record, you are saying that the "civilization" process of Europe began around 4000 t0 3000 B.C.? That Africans occupied Europe at this time and "darkened" the populations of Greece and Southern Italy? Why did the Africans go to Europe in the first place? Who were they? What did they bring or teach the Europeans that the Europeans did not know?

 

[Mrfreddygoodbud]

Stonehenge.

But, just for the record, you are saying that the "civilization" process of Europe began around 4000 t0 3000 B.C.? That Africans occupied Europe at this time and "darkened" the populations of Greece and Southern Italy? Why did the Africans go to Europe in the first place? Who were they? What did they bring or teach the Europeans that the Europeans did not know?

Are you comparing stonehenge to the sphinx?

Dude fucking europeans used to sleep with their fucking farm animals.

Europeans bathed once a year...

Caucasion Europe was a disgusting smelly ass place.
.where cannibals thrived..

Why my ancestors had so much compassion to deal with that shit and attempt to civilize the beast

Was one of the greatest historic mistakes ever.

But on a spiritual level it was a great move.


But dude don't ever compare stonehenge to the sphinx

Stonehenge did not withstand the test of time

In comparison to the sphinx and great pyramid