What reason would there be for the US to send a man to the moon after having visited it 6xs already and have since shifted the focus to exploring mars?
BGOL Space: Famed Physicist Shuts Down Moon Landing Conspiracy Theorists
- Thread starter playahaitian
- Start date
15 Reasons Why Man Has Never Set Foot on The Moon
15. "Tricky Dick" Richard Nixon was president at the time. He was the king of cover-up, secret tapes and scandal. Think about all of his potential antics that were not discovered.
14. A successful manned mission to the moon offered a wonderful pride-boosting distraction for the near revolt of the US citizens over 50,000 deaths in the Vietnam War.
13. The Soviets had a five-to-one superiority to the U.S. in manned hours in space. They were first in achieving the following seven important milestones:
1. First manmade satellite in earth orbit
2. First man in space
3. First man to orbit the earth
4. First woman in space
5. The first crew of three astronauts onboard one spacecraft
6. The first space walk
7. The first of two orbiting space craft rendezvousing
This put America at a perceived military disadvantage in missile technology during the very height of the Cold War.
11. Newly retouched photographs correct errors from previously released versions. Why would they be updating thirty-year-old pictures if they really went to the moon?
With Prop ID "C"
After: "C" Removed
10. Rediscovered lost footage shows the American flag blowing in the wind. The wind was probably caused by intense air-conditioning used to cool the astronauts in their lightened, uncirculated, space suits. The cooling systems in the backpacks would have been removed to lighten the load not designed for earth's six times heavier gravity, otherwise they might have fallen over.
8. Rare, uncirculated photographs, allegedly from the moon's surface, show scenes supposedly lit solely by sunlight. Yet they contain shadows that do not run parallel with each other, indicating supplemental artificial light. Sunlight would cast shadows that would never intersect.
7. The moon is 250,000 miles away. The space shuttle has never gone more than 400 miles from the Earth. Except for Apollo astronauts, no humans even claim to have gone beyond low-earth orbit. When the space shuttle astronauts did get to an altitude of 400 miles, the radiation of the Van Allen belts forced them to a lower altitude. The Van Allen radiation belts exist because the Earth's magnetic field traps the solar wind.
6. The top portion of the lunar module which landed on the moon supposedly popped up off the moon with two astronauts aboard, entered lunar orbit 60 miles up, and docked with the command module in lunar orbit. To look at its design and think such could have actually occurred is absolutely ludicrous. The fuel tanks were nowhere near one-sixth the size of those on the space shuttle as one would expect to achieve lunar orbit
5. The surface of the moon is a vacuum. The landing module would have been heated to 250 degrees on the light side where they landed. There is no way they could have rejected the heat for as long as 72 hours as they claim on some Apollo missions. How long do you think you could keep your car cool on a hot day running off battery power?
4. Take a look at the lunar module which supposedly flew from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon. It is a cylindrical shape with a high center of gravity and one big thrust engine at the bottom. Upon just looking at this design, to think it would not immediately pinwheel and crash, as the lunar module trainer did three weeks prior on Earth, is absurd.
3. After the Apollo 11 mission, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin gave a press conference. When asked whether they remembered seeing any stars from the surface of the moon, Collins, who was supposedly in the command module the whole time, gave a wrong answer to a question he should not have been answering. The relevant portion of this clip is in my documentary; viewing it with an understanding of the circumstances makes it clear they were lying about having traveled to the moon. I'm saying Collins blew it right then and there and I honestly cannot understand why there is even further discussion on the whole topic. Furthermore, if you obtain a written transcript of the press conference you'll see that the comment is erroneously attributed to Aldrin. Honest mistake or cover-up?
2. In 1967 three astronauts were burned alive on the launch pad. The upshot of the congressional inquiry was that the entire Apollo program was in shambles and it was a miracle no one was killed sooner. All of the problems were supposedly fixed by 1969, just two years later. How could they have made such a large improvement in "quality control" in such a short period of time.
1. All Apollo missions stayed in low-earth orbit for the duration of the trip. We uncovered some mislabeled, unedited, behind-the-scenes footage from NASA that shows the crew of Apollo 11 clearly staging a shot of being half-way to the moon.
http://www.darkgovernment.com/moon.html
The US has never required a reason to pillage and plunder. They on that Nike shit.
Check this out when you have some free time.
There's always a reason, they just don't tell the public, but most every war or reason the US went anywhere was because of oil, drugs or gold.
They plundered nuff moon rock.
That's why there's no need to go back.
15 Reasons Why Man Has Never Set Foot on The Moon
15. "Tricky Dick" Richard Nixon was president at the time. He was the king of cover-up, secret tapes and scandal. Think about all of his potential antics that were not discovered.
14. A successful manned mission to the moon offered a wonderful pride-boosting distraction for the near revolt of the US citizens over 50,000 deaths in the Vietnam War.
13. The Soviets had a five-to-one superiority to the U.S. in manned hours in space. They were first in achieving the following seven important milestones:
1. First manmade satellite in earth orbit
2. First man in space
3. First man to orbit the earth
4. First woman in space
5. The first crew of three astronauts onboard one spacecraft
6. The first space walk
7. The first of two orbiting space craft rendezvousing
This put America at a perceived military disadvantage in missile technology during the very height of the Cold War.
12. Neil Armstrong, the first man to supposedly walk on the moon, refuses to give interviews to anyone on the subject. "Ask me no questions, and I'll tell you no lies." Collins also refuses to be interviewed. Aldrin, who granted an interview, threatened to sue us if we showed it to anyone.
11. Newly retouched photographs correct errors from previously released versions. Why would they be updating thirty-year-old pictures if they really went to the moon?
With Prop ID "C"
After: "C" Removed
10. Rediscovered lost footage shows the American flag blowing in the wind. The wind was probably caused by intense air-conditioning used to cool the astronauts in their lightened, uncirculated, space suits. The cooling systems in the backpacks would have been removed to lighten the load not designed for earth's six times heavier gravity, otherwise they might have fallen over.
9. Enlarged photographs underneath the lunar lander's 10,000 lb. thrust engine show the soil completely undisturbed. During ground tests there was grave concern for the vehicle falling into the hole the engine created as it descended. An oversight that they would have to keep consistent for all subsequent moon missions. They attributed it to the effect of no atmosphere (except for the flag blowing in the wind - see # 10!)
8. Rare, uncirculated photographs, allegedly from the moon's surface, show scenes supposedly lit solely by sunlight. Yet they contain shadows that do not run parallel with each other, indicating supplemental artificial light. Sunlight would cast shadows that would never intersect.
7. The moon is 250,000 miles away. The space shuttle has never gone more than 400 miles from the Earth. Except for Apollo astronauts, no humans even claim to have gone beyond low-earth orbit. When the space shuttle astronauts did get to an altitude of 400 miles, the radiation of the Van Allen belts forced them to a lower altitude. The Van Allen radiation belts exist because the Earth's magnetic field traps the solar wind.
6. The top portion of the lunar module which landed on the moon supposedly popped up off the moon with two astronauts aboard, entered lunar orbit 60 miles up, and docked with the command module in lunar orbit. To look at its design and think such could have actually occurred is absolutely ludicrous. The fuel tanks were nowhere near one-sixth the size of those on the space shuttle as one would expect to achieve lunar orbit.
5. The surface of the moon is a vacuum. The landing module would have been heated to 250 degrees on the light side where they landed. There is no way they could have rejected the heat for as long as 72 hours as they claim on some Apollo missions. How long do you think you could keep your car cool on a hot day running off battery power?
4. Take a look at the lunar module which supposedly flew from lunar orbit to the surface of the moon. It is a cylindrical shape with a high center of gravity and one big thrust engine at the bottom. Upon just looking at this design, to think it would not immediately pinwheel and crash, as the lunar module trainer did three weeks prior on Earth, is absurd.
3. After the Apollo 11 mission, Armstrong, Collins and Aldrin gave a press conference. When asked whether they remembered seeing any stars from the surface of the moon, Collins, who was supposedly in the command module the whole time, gave a wrong answer to a question he should not have been answering. The relevant portion of this clip is in my documentary; viewing it with an understanding of the circumstances makes it clear they were lying about having traveled to the moon. I'm saying Collins blew it right then and there and I honestly cannot understand why there is even further discussion on the whole topic. Furthermore, if you obtain a written transcript of the press conference you'll see that the comment is erroneously attributed to Aldrin. Honest mistake or cover-up?
2. In 1967 three astronauts were burned alive on the launch pad. The upshot of the congressional inquiry was that the entire Apollo program was in shambles and it was a miracle no one was killed sooner. All of the problems were supposedly fixed by 1969, just two years later. How could they have made such a large improvement in "quality control" in such a short period of time.
1. All Apollo missions stayed in low-earth orbit for the duration of the trip. We uncovered some mislabeled, unedited, behind-the-scenes footage from NASA that shows the crew of Apollo 11 clearly staging a shot of being half-way to the moon.
http://www.darkgovernment.com/moon.html
Ether.
Moonshine>>>
they stayed on the dark side of the moon the entire time.
come on mayne...not being back since 72 is totally different from not being back AT ALL.
So why does every pic have sun light shadows?
On the hills, rocks, people and craft?
Sunshine>>>
Nice shot...
Especially considering it would have had to be remote controlled from Earth...3 seconds ahead of time.
True.
No stars in any moon photo.
No sun either.
How did they even expose those images perfectly to get visible images to send back?
So a NASA remote controlled camera captures this footage and tilted up as you said with flawless accuarcy?
True. You see all of those craters up there too? You could also have a minature metorites puncture their suits.
But yeah a solar flare on earth can be deadly to electronics alone, let alone humans at high altitudes. Ho would you handle taking on a solar flare on the moon?
because there isnt just one light source in our universe.
That's actually the correct spelling in English.
American English uses the K in Knob.
Hahaha, so by your logic the "Dark Side" of the moon shouldn't be DARK
Hahahaha thanks for the laugh bro
Wtf?
Who supposedly went to the moon,
The english/British or the Americans?
The shit spelled with a k!
There's 1 fucking sun in our solar system!
That's the only source of light close enough
To cast/cause shadows in those pictures!
!
Actually incorrect, the Saturn V rocket, which was engineered and built by Wernher von Braun and carried the Apollo astronauts to travel ti the moon, was the ONLY rocket ever built by man to have NEVER had a failure, we just saw a rocket blow up while being fueled last week, a rocket before that, on a mission to re-supply the ISS, blew up shortly after take-off, in fact, SEVERAL have, launched from here, and China as well!
Rocket science, as much as we'd like to think and believe that we are advanced in, has entered another stage which is still in its infancy.
Russia has lost TWICE as many rockets (and engineers) as the US.
what you just said is patently untrue. the moon reflects light from the earth too.then you need to google cosmic ray visual phenomena.There's 1 fucking sun in our solar system!
That's the only source of light close enough
To cast/cause shadows in those pictures!
wow there are some really smart dummies runnin round here.
bruh, strapping people to what is essentially a nuclear bomb aint NEVER gone be a good idea.
with the name calling huh!
you said light source, the earth does not produce its own light.
like you typed, it reflects thats not the SOURCE! the sun is the source.
cosmic ray visual phenomena, has what exactly to do with the above topic?
This whole topic has been fascinating to me. I was doing a lot of reading on it today.
The actual shuttle was never designed to take a mission to the moon, it's not built to travel that far. The rockets that sent up the Apollo missions were. What I don't get it how the spacecraft that went to the moon, how did it take off and make it back?
They said they spent 3 days on the moon, hope they only stayed on the dark side I guess because the light side temps reaches 250 degrees.
Then the whole distance to get there being 250k miles from earth, just wow...
I don't know what to really believe after all I've read today. 6 missions went there in the 70's. Why wouldn't it be a cakewalk today? I'm sure they have far advanced technology today we don't even know about that would make a trip there easier. Cost is a whole nother beast...
The actual shuttle was never designed to take a mission to the moon, it's not built to travel that far. The rockets that sent up the Apollo missions were. What I don't get it how the spacecraft that went to the moon, how did it take off and make it back?
They said they spent 3 days on the moon, hope they only stayed on the dark side I guess because the light side temps reaches 250 degrees.
Then the whole distance to get there being 250k miles from earth, just wow...
I don't know what to really believe after all I've read today. 6 missions went there in the 70's. Why wouldn't it be a cakewalk today? I'm sure they have far advanced technology today we don't even know about that would make a trip there easier. Cost is a whole nother beast...
The whole thing was a hoax. Just the mere fact the equipment they had back then was poor, cheap and worthless, and wouldn't have sustained anything. Also do some research on the
Van Allen radiation belt, there is nothing that can withstand the radiation......no rocket, no suit nothing. It was the biggest hoax of the 20th century.
Van Allen radiation belt, there is nothing that can withstand the radiation......no rocket, no suit nothing. It was the biggest hoax of the 20th century.
Crazy...
reflected light is no different from any other light source. it doesnt matter where it came from originally.
as for the name calling...a hit dog hollers.
They had a GoPro up there man!
