Racism or Bad Parenting in the Gorilla Killing?

ballscout1

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
Earl Ofari Hutchinson

The moment that pictures popped up of the parents of the child who tumbled into the gorilla enclosure at the Cincinnati zoo, the predictable sparks flew. The parents are African-American. The 3-year-old toddler is African-American. The issue no longer was simply the heartbreaking tragedy of the killing of a prized and endangered animal. Nor was it simply heaving a big sigh of collective relief and much joy that a child was saved. The issue now was the enraged finger point at the parents for being bad parents. And the equally enraged charge that the only reason there was a finger point was because they were Black, and that if they were white it wouldn’t be a peep of condemnation, just joy.

Cincinnati police officials raised the stake in the debate when they announced with great fanfare that the parents could face charges presumably for child negligence or endangerment. This is yet another near textbook case of where race again, sometimes sneakily, sometimes nakedly, crops into a flashpoint issue. Trying to make a guess on the motives of those who line up on both sides is a close run up. Topping the checklist of the attributes of a good parent of toddlers and young children is fierce vigilance, awareness and protection at all times of a child’s well-being and safety. The paramount concern of every child welfare agency on the planet is to insure that children stay out of harm’s way at all times. The penalty for violating that responsibility is severe; that being the removal of a child from an unsafe home, whatever the parent or child’s color.

In part what fanned the gorilla killing to a fever pitch and prompted the merciless finger point at Michelle Gregg, the boy’s mother, for negligence, was the almost surreal circumstance of a once in a lifetime, horrific scene. That is a toddler falling into the enclosure of a prize and potentially dangerous zoo attraction in full and socking view of dozens, including the mother. A video captured the horror in graphic and terrifying detail of the child being bandied about by the gorilla, and of course, the gunning down of the gorilla. This was a drama that even Hollywood on its best or worse days would have trouble concocting.

The other part is, of course, race. The fact that the parents are black fed into the ancient stereotype that black parents are chronic shirkers, lax, uncaring, and plain lousy parents. Case after case has been cited of some incident where a white kid was in danger, including one involving a kid in a gorilla enclosure at an Illinois zoo in 1996. Yet there were no mass calls for the parents to be drawn and quartered or the kid snatched away from them. There was certainly no petition circulated that thousands eagerly rushed to sign demanding that the parents be brought up on charges by family services. There was no rush by Fox News and other news outlets to dig up and blare every piece of dirt some about the father’s past run ins with the law. The fact that the father wasn’t even at the zoo was by inference more damning proof supposedly of parental indifference. White parents in those rare times of similar tragedy were not hounded on their job, and called every vile name under the sun in countless rants on Facebook and tweets. These are ridiculous and outlandish stretches to bash the parents, but with a hyper charged emotional issue involving a child’s safety, anything, no matter how irrational, goes.

Yet, it’s the emotionalism over the issue that makes it impossible to just wave off the contention that something went badly awry in that fateful moment when a child could easily have been injured or even killed in the grip of a massive animal. One can rail at Cincinnati zoo officials all day for not constructing a breach proof barrier around the gorilla enclosure to insure the safety or the animal and the patrons, and they wouldn’t be off base with that. But even without the seeming lapse in security, the brutal reality remains that millions of people visit zoos every year. Yet it’s the rarest of rare occasions when anyone tumbles into an animal enclosure.

There are lessons to be learned by all in this tragedy about how best to insure the safety of animals, the safety of patrons, the responsibility of parents to be just that, responsible at all times for their child’s safety, what a child protective agency should or shouldn’t do in this situation, and the never ending cautionary note about the danger of dragging race into a tragedy.

There were no winners here. A prized endangered animal is dead, a child was in and then escaped harm’s way, two parents are on the public hot seat for supposed negligence, and zoo officials must do a soul search about what, if anything, they could or should have done better to prevent the tragedy. Racism or bad parenting, it’s both and neither.

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His latest book is How “President” Trump will Govern (Amazon Kindle) He is an associate editor of New America Media. He is a weekly co-host of the Al Sharpton Show on Radio One. He is the host of the weekly Hutchinson Report on KPFK 90.7 FM Los Angeles and the Pacifica Network.


http://thehutchinsonreportnews.com/...BlogPost:89245&xgs=1&xg_source=msg_share_post
 
When the story first came out everyone was talking about bad parenting thinking the kid was white. There are multiple posts in that thread about this talking about "if the kids/parents were BLACK it would been this and that", now that it has come out that the parents are black, people are still saying the samething, bad parenting, as before but now some people wanna flip it and say oh "if the kids/parents were WHITE it would have been this and that"
 
When the story first came out everyone was talking about bad parenting thinking the kid was white. There are multiple posts in that thread about this talking about "if the kids/parents were BLACK it would been this and that", now that it has come out that the parents are black, people are still saying the samething, bad parenting, as before but now some people wanna flip it and say oh "if the kids/parents were WHITE it would have been this and that"

I read the story and thought it was a white family because I thought of the ass kicking I would have received for trying to climb into the gorilla enclosure...no way it was a black family was my first thought. Either way, she's a shit parent that went on Facebook to try to defend herself and looked even more the dimwitted parent. Saying that "everyone knows me and that I keep a close eye on my kid, but accidents happen" is such a Bullshit and unverifiable excuse. Who knows that? Neighbors? Relatives? The amazon delivery guy? Accidents happen? Accidents are spilled milk on the couch, throwing a ball and knocking a candle off the table....gross incompetence is allowing your child to evade your attention in a public space, crawl through a barrier, and drop twelve feet into the gorilla enclosure. The kid didn't fall in. Falling in, on, or down an object or place is fair and can happen to anyone at anytime. Kids, teens, and adults accidently fall down the stairs all the time...no one accidently maneuvers through a barrier and falls into a gorilla habitat. Accidents don't require effort, getting into a gorilla exhibit requires a lot of involvment.

What was everyone else doing while this mom was not watching the kid? I've checked a couple little kids at the laundromat a few years back when the boy was trying to stuff his sister in the dryer...and their mom was standing five feet away.
 
Peace,

There was plenty of enraged finger pointing on this site as well, but not from me. All it takes is a few seconds for a kid to wander off and get into trouble. I'm thankful that the kid is alright, and I feel for the parents because they're going to have to defend themselves from charges of neglect, probably for the foreseeable future.
 
I wonder why nobody really watched the video.

That gorilla was protecting that kid...

And nobody mentions the danger of shooting with the kid in proximity...
 
I wonder why nobody really watched the video.

That gorilla was protecting that kid...

And nobody mentions the danger of shooting with the kid in proximity...
it would have taken 7 minutes for a tranquilize to take effect or longer because his adrenaline is pumping , and it would take a split second for that gorrilla to kill that kid
 
I wonder why nobody really watched the video.

That gorilla was protecting that kid...

And nobody mentions the danger of shooting with the kid in proximity...

There were 3 different vids, the vid that most people saw showed the gorilla protecting the kid, had his hand on the kid back and stuff like that so that's why people are all like "he was protecting the kid". No way you can watch the 2nd video that showed the gorilla dragging the kid around by his leg and believe the kid was in no harm. The video showed him drag the kid one time, eyewitnesses in the story said he also drug him again
 
There were 3 different vids, the vid that most people saw showed the gorilla protecting the kid, had his hand on the kid back and stuff like that so that's why people are all like "he was protecting the kid". No way you can watch the 2nd video that showed the gorilla dragging the kid around by his leg and believe the kid was in no harm. The video showed him drag the kid one time, eyewitnesses in the story said he also drug him again

still no harm was intended since that is how they do there young...
 
No parent can and will maintain 100% surveillance on their chuldren 24/7.

Thats not necessary.

Surveillance is definitely necessary and consistent for parents when their child is in a danger zone like being near heavy traffic, crowds and wild animals.

It has been reported that the 4 years announced he was going into the enclosure with the apes before taking this actions.

Cincinnati-Zoo-Gorilla-enclosure-graphic.jpg


cincinnati_zoo_148-12766.jpg
 
No parent can and will maintain 100% surveillance on their chuldren 24/7.

nobody is talking 24/7....

they are in public place that not only has the danger or the place but kids get stolen everyday.

anybody not watching their kid in that type in environment is lacking.

if you live on a busy street you are not going to leave your child unattended while you go in the house and then wonder why your child ran into traffic and is dead now.
 
still no harm was intended since that is how they do there young...

It doesn't matter if the gorilka intended to harm the kid or not, the fact is the gorilla could've seriously injured the kid by dragging him like that. When you ask people the question of "IF" it was your child what would you have wanted the zoo to do, they will never answer it, instead they all act like they would never be in that situation because they are the perfect parent that always keeps a eye on their kids or that their kids are perfect and would never do anything like that
 
Its racism, the parent didn't purposely send their kid into the gorilla area, it was an accident. If this was some blonde hair blue eyed kid you bet he would be all over the morning news
 
nobody is talking 24/7....

they are in public place that not only has the danger or the place but kids get stolen everyday.

anybody not watching their kid in that type in environment is lacking.

if you live on a busy street you are not going to leave your child unattended while you go in the house and then wonder why your child ran into traffic and is dead now.
The next time your kid falls I will call child protective services on you for not making sure you kid is wearing elbo and knee guards 24/7
 
Back
Top