Pray for Africa under the Clintons.......

water

Transparent, tasteless, odorless
OG Investor
Report: U.S. Arms to Africa and the Congo War - World Policy Institute - Research Project
ARMS TRADE RESOURCE CENTER

REPORTS - Weapons at War - January 2000

Deadly Legacy:
U.S. Arms to Africa and the Congo War

by William D. Hartung and Bridget Moix of the Arms Trade Resource Center



Major Findings

  • Finding 1 – Due to the continuing legacies of its Cold War policies toward Africa, the U.S. bears some responsibility for the cycles of violence and economic problems plaguing the continent. Throughout the Cold War (1950-1989), the U.S. delivered over $1.5 billion worth of weaponry to Africa. Many of the top U.S. arms clients – Liberia, Somalia, the Sudan, and Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo or DRC) – have turned out to be the top basket cases of the 1990s in terms of violence, instability, and economic collapse.
  • Finding 2 – The ongoing civil war in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (formerly Zaire) is a prime example of the devastating legacy of U.S. arms sales policy on Africa. The U.S. prolonged the rule of Zairian dictator Mobutu Sese Soko by providing more than $300 million in weapons and $100 million in military training. Mobutu used his U.S.-supplied arsenal to repress his own people and plunder his nation’s economy for three decades, until his brutal regime was overthrown by Laurent Kabila’s forces in 1997. When Kabila took power, the Clinton administration quickly offered military support by developing a plan for new training operations with the armed forces.
  • Finding 3 – Although the Clinton administration has been quick to criticize the governments involved in the Congo War, decades of U.S. weapons transfers and continued military training to both sides of the conflict have helped fuel the fighting. The U.S. has helped build the arsenals of eight of the nine governments directly involved in the war that has ravaged the DRC since Kabila’s coup. U.S. military transfers in the form of direct government-to-government weapons deliveries, commercial sales, and International Military Education and Training (IMET) to the states directly involved have totaled more than $125 million since the end of the Cold War.
  • Finding 4 – Despite the failure of U.S. polices in the region, the current administration continues to respond to Africa’s woes by helping to strengthen African militaries. As U.S. weapons deliveries to Africa continue to rise, the Clinton administration is now undertaking a wave of new military training programs in Africa. Between 1991-1998, U.S. weapons and training deliveries to Africa totaled more than $227 million. In 1998 alone, direct weapons transfers and IMET training totaled $20.1 million. And, under the Pentagon’s Joint Combined Exchange Training (JCET) program, U.S. special forces have trained military personnel from at least 34 of Africa’s 53 nations, including troops fighting on both sides of the DRC’s civil war – from Rwanda and Uganda (supporting the rebels) to Zimbabwe and Namibia (supporting the Kabila regime).
  • Finding 5 – Even as it fuels military build-up, the U.S. continues cutting development assistance to Africa and remains unable (or unwilling) to promote alternative non-violent forms of engagement. While the U.S. ranks number one in global weapons exports, it falls dead last among industrialized nations in providing non-military foreign aid to the developing world. In 1997, the U.S. devoted only 0.09% of GNP to international development assistance, the lowest proportion of all developed countries. U.S. development aid to all of sub-Saharan Africa dropped to just $700 million in recent years.
http://www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/congo.htm
 
Defenders of the Clinton administration’s policy toward the provision of arms and training to African military forces point out that the United States is not the primary supplier of weaponry to the region, and that in any case U.S. military programs in Africa are designed to promote peacekeeping and professionalism, not proliferation and war. As we discuss below, whatever their intention may be, skills and equipment provided by the U.S. have strengthened the military capabilities of combatants involved in some of Africa’s most violent and intractable conflicts. As to the relative importance of U.S. arms transfers to Africa, data from the most recent edition of the U.S. Arms Control and Disarmament Agency’s publication, World Military Expenditures and Arms Transfers, ranks the U.S. as the second leading arms supplier to both Central Africa (behind China and ahead of France) and Southern Africa (behind Russia and tied for second with France). In contrast, the most recent data from the Congressional Research Service suggests that at best the United States ranks sixth in arms transfers to Africa for the period from 1995-1998, after China, Russia, the United Kingdom, France, and Italy.[6]
 
Moreover, even after the Cold War ended, the U.S. continued to provide military support to the Mobutu dictatorship. In 1991, the U.S. delivered more than $4.5 million in military hardware to Mobutu’s government.[11] That same year, Congress suspended its economic assistance to Congo – not on human rights grounds, but because it had defaulted on loans provided by the U.S. government to cover its weapons purchases.
 
You are absolutely right. On the other hand it is not going
to be easy because Black America won't sit idly by if their
machinations are too obvious. Only Obama could have got
away with assassinating Gaddafi, otherwise Africa is a
forbidden zone for a cac president, unless he acts surreptitiously;

My guess is that they will project a nefarious character like
Susan Rice to do their dirty deeds.... After all, she is the one
who proposed partitioning Zaire, if I remember correctly, when
she was their underSecretary for African Affairs under
Madeline Albright
 
You are absolutely right. On the other hand it is not going
to be easy because Black America won't sit idly by if their
machinations are too obvious. Only Obama could have got
away with assassinating Gaddafi, otherwise Africa is a
forbidden zone for a cac president, unless he acts surreptitiously;

My guess is that they will project a nefarious character like
Susan Rice to do their dirty deeds.... After all, she is the one
who proposed partitioning Zaire, if I remember correctly, when
she was their underSecretary for African Affairs under
Madeline Albright
This is about the Bill Clinton administration correct?

And the US has been an arms dealer forever. Vice news reported on how the US supplied weapons to every faction fighting in Iraq/Syria currently. We are the main reason ISIS is well armed.
 
This is about the Bill Clinton administration correct?

And the US has been an arms dealer forever. Vice news reported on how the US supplied weapons to every faction fighting in Iraq/Syria currently. We are the main reason ISIS is well armed.
Yes... That was when Susan Rice began her career
as one of the token black appointees of Bill Clinton
 
Back
Top