sorry tical, your movie sucks. Early Batman V Superman Reviews Are Largely Negative

How many jokes are being cracked in the Batman and Superman comics? How many jokes were cracked in the Dark Knight Returns graphic novel. Hell, the Avengers were my favorite book as a kid and there was hardly any joking around in them.

If the source material isn't jokey jokey, why do the movies have to be?
To me its not about jokes... The problem with batman and superman is that they try waaaayyy too hard to make them look bad ass (especially batman)... They got them flexed up in every picture trying to buff them out, looking mad tight, then its the silly voices, way too over the top, it seems like they are marketing them being bad ass more than them actually marketing the story or anything else..
Now compare their approach to, lets say Daredevil, where there are times where he looks and feels human... He bleeds he gets beat up, he comes off like someone who is a bad ass, not because of how he looks,talks or how he throws people around like rag dolls, but instead he is a bad ass because of the things he does and the way he is able to endure his hardships, pains and defeats....
Maybe D.C. should take a page towards this approach and stop trying to have their guys come off as people with cheat codes on showing people how bad ass they are...
 
fanboy..nig i don't own stock in either company so there's no need for me to root for either team..but as far as a person who watches movies marvel bad guys suck in fact a lot of marvel films hasn't been great to tell u the truth..2 out of 3 iron men sucked and the first was ok...avengers 2 was wack..winter soldier is been the best thing they put out..even avengers was lacking to me loki was very forgettable and the 1000 foot soldiers yay juss a bunch of expendable nigs... joker hands down carried dark knight without him that movie would've been blah and my man zod and crew held man of steel down... dc for bad guys marvel for whatever campy crap people like...i actually hate the concept of supes fighting a human and thought they should go with another badguy

What you're saying has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. All I did was disagree and give my personal reasoning as far as the overall tone on the films. This "who's villians are better" debate is irrelevant.
 
To me its not about jokes... The problem with batman and superman is that they try waaaayyy too hard to make them look bad ass (especially batman)... They got them flexed up in every picture trying to buff them out, looking mad tight, then its the silly voices, way too over the top, it seems like they are marketing them being bad ass more than them actually marketing the story or anything else..
Now compare their approach to, lets say Daredevil, where there are times where he looks and feels human... He bleeds he gets beat up, he comes off like someone who is a bad ass, not because of how he looks,talks or how he throws people around like rag dolls, but instead he is a bad ass because of the things he does and the way he is able to endure his hardships, pains and defeats....
Maybe D.C. should take a page towards this approach and stop trying to have their guys come off as people with cheat codes on showing people how bad ass they are...

This guy gets it....
 
What you're saying has nothing to do with what I'm talking about. All I did was disagree and give my personal reasoning as far as the overall tone on the films. This "who's villians are better" debate is irrelevant.
i'm saying winter soldier had more of a serious tone in its film and would u say that was a "fun" movie... you can be serious and it still be a good fun movie.. watchmen was serious and most of us liked it.. so what's the gripe if dc goes the serious route
 
i'm saying winter soldier had more of a serious tone in its film and would u say that was a "fun" movie... you can be serious and it still be a good fun movie.. watchmen was serious and most of us liked it.. so what's the gripe if dc goes the serious route

Go back and re-watch "Winter Soldier"... even with the serious tone. There was a lot of humor in the banter between the heroes. It was integrated in way way that you chuckle and don't notice.
 
Go back and re-watch "Winter Soldier"... even with the serious tone. There was a lot of humor in the banter between the heroes. It was integrated in way way that you chuckle and don't notice.
i laughed when superman destroyed ole boy truck...i laughed when zod couldn't take all the noise he was hearing when his helmet broke.. i laughed when zod went into fuck it mode and took off his cape... does man of steel get the fun movie mode now??
 
i laughed when superman destroyed ole boy truck...i laughed when zod couldn't take all the noise he was hearing when his helmet broke.. i laughed when zod went into fuck it mode and took off his cape... does man of steel get the fun movie mode now??

Dude.... you're right. MOS is the most fun I've had at the movies.
:rolleyes2::rolleyes::rolleyes2::rolleyes:
 
Dude.... you're right. MOS is the most fun I've had at the movies.
:rolleyes2::rolleyes::rolleyes2::rolleyes:
iron man 3 aka the tony starks movie with an iron man appearance was the best fun i ever had.. i laughed a lot when the bad guy was an actor playing a bad guy, i thought it was really fun when tony starks girl became a fucking mutant aka ms johnny storm, it was so much fun when all the iron man suits went off like fireworks yayyyyyyyyy... wait a sec he destroyed all his iron man suits, took the shit out of his chest, and yet in avengers 2 he had a suit and the the thing back in his chest with no explanation..but wait who cares about making sense when ur having so much fun
 
I think the bigger point is nobody cares why you disliked the movie. :lol: and that goes for all you sucka ass fanboys. For those that saw the movie and hated it, props. For those who havent, who gives a fuck what you think?

Where did I say I didn't like MOS? Or DK? Folks always trying to create conflict out of nothing. Call me a fan boy, but I'm a fan boy of comics in general. My opinion, is just that... my opinion. Everbody is entitled and we don't have to agree. To be completely honest, I'm burnt out on most of the DC and Marvel film franchies. There's a whole wealth of unused material in the Marvel and DC cannon. Arguing about the tonal mistakes of MOS is redundant and pointless.
 
why would Luthor be in this movie..? unless its a scene of him being interviewed about the events of BvS

They already had pictures of him on set and the universe is being connected so he will be in the film but no one knows hud role yet.

Batman is in the film because he has a long history with all the members of the squad in the Dceu.
 
Yikes, Time Out New York just crucified the movie.
this review doesn't apply to most of our POV- its non geek




Long before the first punches are thrown, creative exhaustion kills the mood like Kryptonite.
If there’s any justice, dawning or otherwise, at the multiplex, audiences will reject Zack Snyder’s lumbering, dead-on-arrival superhero mélange, a $250 million tombstone for a genre in dire need of a break. It’s supposed to be the glorious ramp-up to a new crime-fighting franchise, DC Comics’ Justice League, but you’ll wish this strenuously empty movie had boned up on a few lessons beforehand: There’s zero humor or self-deprecation, as there was in Joss Whedon’s pitch-perfectThe Avengers; no performance of unlikely depth, like the one Heath Ledger pulled off in The Dark Knight; and no animating spirit of decency, a trait Christopher Reeve’s Superman had in spades.

Instead, we have Henry Cavill’s persistently inert Clark Kent and, somehow worse, Ben Affleck’s one-dimensionally vexed Bruce Wayne (less playboy than paycheck) squaring off in a Metropolis still reeling from the devastation of 2013’s Man of Steel. Neither actor is capable of setting the screen on fire—their first verbal showdown is hardly Pacino versus De Niro in Heat—but the imbalance feels especially acute in a city that’s supposed to be publicly debating the philosophical merits of omnipotence. Add to the mix Jesse Eisenberg’s instantly annoying, tic-laden Lex Luthor, a millennial billionaire who speaks in chattering screenwriter-ese (“The red capes are coming!”), and Amy Adams’s Lois Lane, never more lost in a film that has no use for her softness, and you have a distinctly plastic affair.

The plot turns on the shocking, never-mentioned-again destruction of a symbolic American edifice, a bloodless explosion that one-upsIndependence Day’s White House flattening for glibness. Minutes later, we’re supposed to be whipped into a fanboy frenzy by the tribal drumming that accompanies our first hints of Gal Gadot’s severely corseted Wonder Woman (a character that could use some complexity and, if it’s not too late, a better actor). The endgame is your typical WrestleMania nonsense, bereft of weight or grandeur, set in a generic rubblescape that’s emblematic of the script’s lack of human stakes. (Affleck brings on his Argo writer Chris Terrio, but the impact is negligible.) Only the movie’s seesawing, Sergei Prokofiev–inspired score, by Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL, contains a glimmer of wit. Shamelessly, Batman v Superman lunges for a funereal mood in its final stretch, but come on: We all know superheroes don’t die, not when there are reboots in the balance. After this one, you’ll wish a few of them did.
 
Last edited:
Long before the first punches are thrown, creative exhaustion kills the mood like Kryptonite.
If there’s any justice, dawning or otherwise, at the multiplex, audiences will reject Zack Snyder’s lumbering, dead-on-arrival superhero mélange, a $250 million tombstone for a genre in dire need of a break. It’s supposed to be the glorious ramp-up to a new crime-fighting franchise, DC Comics’ Justice League, but you’ll wish this strenuously empty movie had boned up on a few lessons beforehand: There’s zero humor or self-deprecation, as there was in Joss Whedon’s pitch-perfectThe Avengers; no performance of unlikely depth, like the one Heath Ledger pulled off in The Dark Knight; and no animating spirit of decency, a trait Christopher Reeve’s Superman had in spades.

Instead, we have Henry Cavill’s persistently inert Clark Kent and, somehow worse, Ben Affleck’s one-dimensionally vexed Bruce Wayne (less playboy than paycheck) squaring off in a Metropolis still reeling from the devastation of 2013’s Man of Steel. Neither actor is capable of setting the screen on fire—their first verbal showdown is hardly Pacino versus De Niro in Heat—but the imbalance feels especially acute in a city that’s supposed to be publicly debating the philosophical merits of omnipotence. Add to the mix Jesse Eisenberg’s instantly annoying, tic-laden Lex Luthor, a millennial billionaire who speaks in chattering screenwriter-ese (“The red capes are coming!”), and Amy Adams’s Lois Lane, never more lost in a film that has no use for her softness, and you have a distinctly plastic affair.

The plot turns on the shocking, never-mentioned-again destruction of a symbolic American edifice, a bloodless explosion that one-upsIndependence Day’s White House flattening for glibness. Minutes later, we’re supposed to be whipped into a fanboy frenzy by the tribal drumming that accompanies our first hints of Gal Gadot’s severely corseted Wonder Woman (a character that could use some complexity and, if it’s not too late, a better actor). The endgame is your typical WrestleMania nonsense, bereft of weight or grandeur, set in a generic rubblescape that’s emblematic of the script’s lack of human stakes. (Affleck brings on his Argo writer Chris Terrio, but the impact is negligible.) Only the movie’s seesawing, Sergei Prokofiev–inspired score, by Hans Zimmer and Junkie XL, contains a glimmer of wit. Shamelessly, Batman v Superman lunges for a funereal mood in its final stretch, but come on: We all know superheroes don’t die, not when there are reboots in the balance. After this one, you’ll wish a few of them did.


this review doesn't apply to most of our POV- its non geek

Thanks for the assist. Check the part on Gal Godot. It's exactly what I thought when they cast her. Marvel gets ScarJo and DC gets....GalGo?
Even Marvel's secondary chickies are hotter than Godot. Colbie Smolders, Jamie Alexander. Caps neighbor. Oh yeah, forgot Pepper Potts and Jane Foster.
 
all jokes aside...the biggest complaints I'm reading on metacritic is it's "not fun" or takes itself too "seriously"...marvel movies have their niche w/ the levity that they offer and it works...for them...I don't need all superhero flicks to be jokey...I will easily watch it...that long running time tho is all I'm worried about and that would be the case for any movie...still think I'll catch this one @ home tho...being able to see watchmen @ home and take my time w/ it and pause or rewind shit is what allowed me to enjoy it and most other movies as well

Bruh, folks need campiness and corny, slapstick humor to enjoy it. Me??? I can fucks with da dark shit. Both Marvel & DC has their lanes. DC is behind as far as movies but for whatever reason, folks think they should follow along da lines of Marvel with da bright, campy, happy go lucky shit.
 
Truth be told people complaining about how dark and serious the movie is has actually made me want to see this way more than I was prior to their reviews.

I'm more Dark Knight Rises than Iron Man or Avengers personally so this seems right up my alley.

Likewise. It's one of da reasons for me that Capt. America: Winter Soldier was so good. It's why it stood out amongst da other Marvel movies.
 
Back
Top