To answer your question again, NO, I'm not supporting Trump, or any other presidential candidate yet. I'm simply observing each candidate positions on different topics.
hhhh
LOL! You know damn well none of the republican clown parade yahoos have a chance in hell of winning against Hillary or for that matter Sanders.
I hope Cruz or Trump win the nomination. Everyone knows Trump is bat shit crazy, but you and other republican zombies have bee repeating that if the republican party ran a true conservative, they would win in a landslide since your type say that the country is truly conservative.
Cruz is the perfect wing nut to make an example out of.
I hope it comes down to this so this preposterous meme that the republican right has been spewing since the Goldwater landslide defeat is finally put to rest.
The republicans have been playing the fear and divided and concur game long enough. The world is tired of it!
You might get what you are asking for.
We will see.
...but he is striking a nerve.
In this political correct world we live in, a person who says what he want to say would seem appealing to many who are sick of always being corrected about something.
People use the phrase, "political correct" all the time and in response to just about everything. Donald Trump seems to use it to refer to any and everything he doesn't like or that he doesn't want you to like. Since the phrase appears to refer to things the speaker doesn't like, its seems impossible to give definition to the phrase.
Since you used it so eloquently above and quoted Trump approvingly, how about defining it, so that we will know what you and Trump mean when you say it?
People use the phrase, "political correct" all the time and in response to just about everything. Donald Trump seems to use it to refer to any and everything he doesn't like or that he doesn't want you to like. Since the phrase appears to refer to things the speaker doesn't like, its seems impossible to give definition to the phrase.
Since you used it so eloquently above and quoted Trump approvingly, how about defining it, so that we will know what you and Trump mean when you say it?
The worst thing a racist wants to be called is a racist. So they try and sanitize their racism by labeling it as not being political correct.
Lazy ass whites need to get off of their asses and stop blaming others for their incompetence.
First of all, I'm not speaking for no other man. Should I assume that you speak for President Obama?
He may seem crazy to the people who won't vote for any republican, but he is striking a nerve. Not to mention, he has allies that you would not believe he has.
First of all, I'm not speaking for no other man. Should I assume that you speak for President Obama?
. . . the definition varies from person to person.
Marlon Wayans were talking about this on the Breakfast Club
I agree, so without you speaking for someone else (Trump) or allowing someone else to speak for you (Marlon Wayans);
what is your definition of the term, politically correct ?
because not much offends me.
Why does my definition matter so much to you?
. . . In this political correct world we live in, a person who says what he want to say would seem appealing to many who are sick of always being corrected about something.
To answer your question, what's political correct to me is whatever a person says, or believes in. I'm the wrong person to ask this because not much offends me. Especially nothing from the internet.



Its just a phrase you use when you don't like what someone else has said or done.![]()
Because you used the term (remember?):
and I wanted to to know what you meant by it.
But, apparently, you didn't mean anything. Its just a phrase you use when you don't like what someone else has said or done.
![]()
1. Politically Correct is not a conservative term. It was created by liberal think tanks who was trying to make a less offensive way to speak in workplaces, schools, and public places in general.
Damn, do you listen to anything besides right wing doctrine?
source: Encyclopedia.com
Political Correctness
The term political correctness was first used in the innumerable and acrimonious discussions among Communist ideologues that took place, both in Russia and among members of Communist parties abroad, after the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917. The term was used, without any irony, to judge the degree of compatibility of one’s ideas or political analyses with the official party line in Moscow. Because the Kremlin position kept twisting in response to nationalist and personal interests much more than to ideological consistency, staying politically correct required agile intellectual gymnastics.
After the demise of international Communism around 1990, when there no longer was a correct, official line to be measured against, political correctness took on a second life as a term of derision used mostly by ideologues on the Right. The term was now meant to ridicule or stigmatize conformity with the opinions, or simply the vocabulary, of liberal or leftist intellectuals, mostly in academic circles. The principal targets of that ridicule were generally movements aiming to reduce prejudice and stigmatization against racial and ethnic groups, women, homosexuals, people with disabilities, and other marginalized groups.
Since the most noticeable change brought by such movements was the adoption and diffusion of neologisms and euphemisms aimed at enfranchising such groups, the semantics of tolerance became the main butt of ridicule, notably “gender-neutral” language (e.g., chairperson ); the use of new ethnic labels (such as Native American for American Indian, Roma for Gypsy, or Inuit for Eskimo ); or euphemisms (such as differently abled for disabled, or educationally challenged for slow learner ).
Soon, however, the critics of political correctness extended the scope of their attacks from the relative trivia of semantics to what they saw as a stultifying climate of hypocrisy and conformity, rampant, they alleged, on college campuses. Political correctness, they argued, stifled intellectual discourse in and out of academia, or, worse, punished the pursuit of legitimate research on, for example, the genetic bases of human behavior, sexual orientation, or gender differences.
Some scholars found themselves under assault from both the Left and the Right. For instance, the few social scientists who tried to suggest (and show) that human behavior was the product of biological as well as cultural evolution were simultaneously berated as “secular humanists” by fundamentalist Christians and as racist and sexist by their colleagues in the mainstream of their disciplines.
Intellectual climates keep changing, however, so that what may appear to be the menacing shadow of political correctness from the Left may eventually be neutralized by a rising tide of conservatism from the religious Right and the “intelligent design” movement. Reason and sanity, it seems, are always under attack, from the Left, from the Right, or, indeed, from both simultaneously. The university campus is the main theater for such jousts, and thus, also, the main depository of much nonsense. In the end, each swing of the ideological pendulum leaves a little residue of good sense. We must, however, be vigilant that the university remains the one venue where anything can be said fearlessly, and, thus, where political correctness has no place. Any restriction on intellectual discourse, even when internally generated, clashes with the central mission of the university, namely the critical examination of ideas and the diffusion of knowledge.
At this point, I'm enjoying the show.
But you've been so quiet . . . Sure you're enjoying it ???