The term Moor is a European one regarding there observation and identification of African people.
Peep this....
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/jDFcC9OP70Y" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
If so called black americans are NOT moors
- Thread starter Mrfreddygoodbud
- Start date
The term Moor is a European one regarding there observation and identification of African people.
Peep this....
Who is an Arab? Peep this. The pale albinos lightened up everyone and destroys their antiquity or claim it as their own.
www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Misc/True_Negros/The_True_Negro_2.htm
www.realhistoryww.com/world_history/ancient/Misc/True_Negros/The_True_Negro_2.htm
Its all about following that path back to whom we were,
every term coming out of our mouth is european, they stole our culture
and imposed this one on us...
check out my last post,
they aint gonna fuck wit dat son!!!!
being mrfreddygoodbud
such thankless work..
sigh....
such thankless work..
sigh....
You've yet to tell me of all the advancements in Africa before Arabs invaded(don't go back to ancient Egypt or whites can go back too). Can we start there? You have yet to explain why you are so proud to claim people Arabs controlled.
And which berbers are you referring to? The ones with the genetic link to the Saami? Those berbers? The berbers who genetically are closer to Mediterranean people? Those berbers? Which ones?
That's why SOME black folks out here taking the extreme opposite approach. Having to live in the past. Having to make the past greater than it was. Claiming Europeans, Asians, and even Native Americans were too dumb to come up with shit on their own.
Cats so stuck on their narrow selection of approved reading material that I had to actually show a poster on this board links to show all ancient Europeans didn't live in caves. I forget which thread that was. But I easily showed that they had cities dating back thousands of years BC.
But at the same time, you have white people who think all Africans lived in huts. Why? Because they only read select shit.
I hate ignorance on both sides.
cacs cant even admit we are genetically superior, culturally and emotionally superior why the fuck
would they admit we were moors, orginal hebrews, Hell the original people.
they are jealous because we are from the tropics life is warm and sunny and food in abundant...
and the cards they been dealt are fucked up, cold, cave dwelling flea pickin cave men....
HATERS HATERS HATERS
their greatest fear is us taken back everything that was stolen..
and its fuckin ZILLIONS.....
but nature is gonna handle that, while they looking for a race war...
the birth rate is declining and suicide rate is climbing...
WE just need to get back to OUR ancient roots in the sense of diet and sciences.
we count on these cracker doctors and wonder why we number one in heart disease and shit...
I aint been to the doctor in decades, smoking blunts all that time.. I go running with forty pound weight vest and ten pounds in each hand because
I dont put my life in no fuckin crackers hands..
thats just DUMB!!!
all the meat eating wonder why we get constipated and colon cancer.. like clock work kniggas gettin swollen prostates at thirty years ol and shit..
I wake up with a fuckin erection EVERYFUCKIN day.. dudes be needing all types of blue pills
and they in their twenties..
GET BACK to yo ancient roots my people...!!
Im going to SHUT EM DOWN NOW!!!!
ITS BEEN FUN!!!
THE
NEGRO LAW
OP
SOUTH CAROLINA,
COLLECTED AND DIGESTED BY
JOHN BELTON O'NEALL,
UNDER A RESOLUTION OF THE STATE AGRICULTURAL SOCIETT OF SOUTH CAROLINA;
COLUMBIA :
according to Act of Congress, in the year 1848
BY JOHN a. BOWMAN
Office of the District Court of South Carolina.
University of California. .
Digitized by
TO HIS EXCELLENCY, DAVID JOHNSON,
Governor and Commander-in-Chief in and over SotUh Carolina.
This work, passing through your hands to the Legislature of the
State, may, I trust, be appropriately dedicated to you, as a slight
testimonial of the friendship which, for more than thirty years, at
the ]par, on the Bench, in your present high and dignified office,
and in all the relations of life, has existed, and I hope ever will exist
between us.
JOHN BELTONO'NEALL.
Springfield, Oct. 3, 1848.
Digitized by
To the State Agricultural Society of South Carolina :
The undersigned, charged with the preparation of a digest of
Law in relation to Negroes, (slave or free,) and directed to r
such suggestions of amendment as to him may seem expedient,
leave to submit the following as the result of an examination of
subject committed to him, so far as his time and opportunity alio'
JOHN BELTON O'NEAL
Springfield^ August 14, 1848.
NEGRO LAW OF SOUTH CAROLINA,
CHAPTER I.
The Status of the Negro, his Rights and Disabilities.
Section 1. The Act of 1740, sec. I, declares all negroes and
Indians, (free Indians in amity with this Government, negroes, mu- p. ^
lattoes and mestizoes, who now are free, excepted) to be slaves: — "^^^^
the offspring to follow the condition of the mother: and that such
slaves are chattels personal.
Sec. 2. Under this provision it has been uniformly held, that color
is prima facie evidence, that the party bearing the color of a negro. Hard
mulatto or mestizo, is a slave : but the same prima facie result does ^^^
not follow from the Indian color. ^J^^
Sec. 3. Indians, and descendants of Indians are regarded as free
Indians, in amity with this government, until the contrary be shown. ^ ..
In the second proviso of sec. 1, of the Act of 1740, it is declared son
that " every negro, Indian, mulatto and mestizo is a slave unless 174.
the contrary can be made to appear" — yet, in the same it is immedi- mon*
ately thereafter provided — " the Indians in amity with this govern- Jg^l'
ment, excepted, in which case the burden of proof shall lie on the ^u^
defendant," that is, on the person claiming the Indian plaintiff to be
a slave. This latter clause of the proviso is now regarded as furnish-
ing the ruie< The race of slave Indians, or of Indians not in amity
to this government, (the State,) is extinct, and hence the previous
part of the proviso has no application.
Sec. 4. The term negro is confined to slave Africans, (the ancient,
Berbers) and their descendants. It does not embrace the free in- J?£
habitants of Africa, such as the Egyptians, Moors, or the negro MUi.
Asiatics, such as the Lascars. Scot
Stat«
Sec 5. Mulatto is the issue of the white and the negro. 1 Ba
^ The
Sec. 6. When the mulatto ceases, and a party bearing some Scot
slight taint of the African blood, ranks as while, is a question for the ^Obm
solution of a Jury. stat<
2 Hi
Digitized by VjOOQ IC
The TERM NEGRO IS CONFINED TO WHAT?????
this aint the conscience community writing that, this aint the angry rappers on the street yelling at cacs and black woman saying this...
this aint an ebony or jet magazine opinion piece..
YALL CAN GO BACK TO THE MUTHAFUCKIN DRAWING BOARD NOW!!!
hey repeaty the dog and his ball licker, yall owe me an ounce...!!!
What does chapter one section four say, I cant quite see it...
EASY PEASY ALL DAY FOR ME SEE!!!
Peace to all MY blackamoors aka ancient berbers aka
Fellow KEMETIC TRUE SEMETIC PEOPLE!!!
Welcome to use my references anytime to shut em up and shut em down!!!
ONE!!!!
Ancient Berbers STAND UP!!!
What does chapter one section four say, I cant quite see it...
EASY PEASY ALL DAY FOR ME SEE!!!
Peace to all MY blackamoors aka ancient berbers aka
Fellow KEMETIC TRUE SEMETIC PEOPLE!!!
Welcome to use my references anytime to shut em up and shut em down!!!
ONE!!!!
Ancient Berbers STAND UP!!!
You have those name(s) for me?
I'm going to have to check out the video.
When DNA testing came out, a lot of cats on both sides of the aisle got exposed. Whites wanting mummies to be white. Black folks wanting Native Americans to be black.
Gone are the days when you can just make claims and jack cultures. People want genetic testing to back those claims or it didn't happen. If we accept those claims for Egypt, we have to accept them in the Americas and elsewhere as well.
It's hard to take people seriously when they only cosign testing when it backs the worldview they want. It's like when I showed the testing that those European Jews have West Asian(what people call middle east) roots and are different from other Europeans. Cats didn't want to hear that. But when you show there were some West African jews(forgot the tribes name) with the same roots who are different than other Africans, it's all good.
White? Do you mean Albino's? The phenotypical trait or mutation causing albinism can be traced back roughly 20,000 years. White people aka Caucasians are as indigenous to Africa as they are to what is now called the Americas? White people are genetically linked to Neanderthals where as Africans are not.
African Albinos
Asian Albino
East Indian Albino
All non-Africans are mutations. That goes for the dark-skinned 'black' ones as well. You just can't talk about one mutation that occurred TWICE that we know of(Asians and Europeans).
And I always bring up Neanderthals. Asians have the most Neanderthal DNA out of every group. Native Americans have Neanderthal DNA. And here's the big elephant in the room folks won't discuss. North Africans have it too.
See, some cats want to erect a force field over northern Africa. That's not how life works. Humans mixed with Neanderthals in what is now known as Israel. It was Neanderthal territory before there were humans. Yet this is supposed to be the holy land for so-called African religions. A place where humans and Neanderthals intermixed and Neanderthals owned first.
Amazing how we cherry pick.
Then AFTER human and Neanderthal intermixing there is BACKFLOW of mutated humans into certain areas of North Africa and West Asia(which you claim is part of Africa). This is only natural because of how the area is setup. The area is a gateway.
Genetic tests have proven this. Furthermore, we can look at some of the natives in these areas whose DNA goes back thousands of years. Cats insist on posting just the dark-skinned natives. They won't post the Saddam Hussein looking cats who have been in the area for thousands and thousands and thousands of years.
So how we going to claim Neanderthal = CAC and then in the next breath claim the land they had first where there have always been people who looked like them since the first mixing happened there.
Guess what fam. Neanderthals never left Israel/West Asia(what you claims is Africa. The 'mutts' that resulted from intermixing been there for 50,000 years.
This is what happens when folks try to wash history in any type of way instead of looking at it objectively.
I'm going to have to check out the video.
When DNA testing came out, a lot of cats on both sides of the aisle got exposed. Whites wanting mummies to be white. Black folks wanting Native Americans to be black.
Gone are the days when you can just make claims and jack cultures. People want genetic testing to back those claims or it didn't happen. If we accept those claims for Egypt, we have to accept them in the Americas and elsewhere as well.
It's hard to take people seriously when they only cosign testing when it backs the worldview they want. It's like when I showed the testing that those European Jews have West Asian(what people call middle east) roots and are different from other Europeans. Cats didn't want to hear that. But when you show there were some West African jews(forgot the tribes name) with the same roots who are different than other Africans, it's all good.
All non-Africans are mutations. That goes for the dark-skinned 'black' ones as well. You just can't talk about one mutation that occurred TWICE that we know of(Asians and Europeans).
And I always bring up Neanderthals. Asians have the most Neanderthal DNA out of every group. Native Americans have Neanderthal DNA. And here's the big elephant in the room folks won't discuss. North Africans have it too.
See, some cats want to erect a force field over northern Africa. That's not how life works. Humans mixed with Neanderthals in what is now known as Israel. It was Neanderthal territory before there were humans. Yet this is supposed to be the holy land for so-called African religions. A place where humans and Neanderthals intermixed and Neanderthals owned first.
Amazing how we cherry pick.
Then AFTER human and Neanderthal intermixing there is BACKFLOW of mutated humans into certain areas of North Africa and West Asia(which you claim is part of Africa). This is only natural because of how the area is setup. The area is a gateway.
Genetic tests have proven this. Furthermore, we can look at some of the natives in these areas whose DNA goes back thousands of years. Cats insist on posting just the dark-skinned natives. They won't post the Saddam Hussein looking cats who have been in the area for thousands and thousands and thousands of years.
So how we going to claim Neanderthal = CAC and then in the next breath claim the land they had first where there have always been people who looked like them since the first mixing happened there.
Guess what fam. Neanderthals never left Israel/West Asia(what you claims is Africa. The 'mutts' that resulted from intermixing been there for 50,000 years.
This is what happens when folks try to wash history in any type of way instead of looking at it objectively.
crackers mutate, kemetic people evolve...!!!
I have no idea what the fuck you are talking about...
Just sit your ass in that sun for five hours without sunscreen or umbrella,,,
let me sit my supermelanated ass out there for the same amount of time
and tell me we are the same.
fuck outta here..
One of us will shine like gold(if we eat and drink like we are supposed to)
the other would get literally get poisoned..
how the fuck could something as ORGANIC as sunlight POISON you..
we are NOT The same cut the fuckin bullshit..
We are far superior for life on a solar planet..
I know it burns yo little dim spirit to acknowledge this..
but truth does everybody good....
crackers are genetically inferior, thats why my people are fools for running to hospitals for medication... thats just slow suicide..
all your medication is right there in all the fruits and veggies and herbs we love to avoid...
Im really not here debating you, I am planting seeds for my kemetic fam...
There is NO DEBATE just facts..
cacs are genetically inferior on a solar planet..
again THEY MUTATED we evolve..
but the less melanin you have the weaker your genes are!!
so you may want to think twice about getting becky preggy...
if you are trying to keep your genetic code strong!!!!
FACTS!!!
Mrfreddy....if you even knew the basics regarding evolution, you wouldn't have said CACs mutate kemetic people evolve. Evolution depends on mutation. 
....
You see, that's the problem when any person -- white, black, Asian, or whatever -- tries to make racial superiority claims. They usually end up talking themselves into a hole they can't get out of because such claims usually have their foundation in ignorance.
And I thought racists ass CACs were on some shit. You are actually making a racial superiority claim because of sunlight? Step away from the weed man.
I can just alternate between the shit you talk and the shit those CACs post on yahoo as proof people are more alike than they care to admit.
.... You see, that's the problem when any person -- white, black, Asian, or whatever -- tries to make racial superiority claims. They usually end up talking themselves into a hole they can't get out of because such claims usually have their foundation in ignorance.
And I thought racists ass CACs were on some shit. You are actually making a racial superiority claim because of sunlight?
Step away from the weed man. I can just alternate between the shit you talk and the shit those CACs post on yahoo as proof people are more alike than they care to admit.
Interesting how this thread developed.
Y'all both have some good points gene and freddy.
Its just descriptively whenever Moor was used it commonly meant someone of dark complexion and dark skin.
Y'all both have some good points gene and freddy.
Its just descriptively whenever Moor was used it commonly meant someone of dark complexion and dark skin.
Mrfreddy....if you even knew the basics regarding evolution, you wouldn't have said CACs mutate kemetic people evolve. Evolution depends on mutation.
You see, that's the problem when any person -- white, black, Asian, or whatever -- tries to make racial superiority claims. They usually end up talking themselves into a hole they can't get out of because such claims usually have their foundation in ignorance.
And I thought racists ass CACs were on some shit. You are actually making a racial superiority claim because of sunlight?
I can just alternate between the shit you talk and the shit those CACs post on yahoo as proof people are more alike than they care to admit.
what are you babbling about,
an albino is a mutated black man, are you telling me,
albinos are evolving on a solar planet??
Albinism is caused by a mutation in one of several genes. Each of these genes provides instructions for making one of several proteins involved in the production of melanin. Melanin is produced by cells called melanocytes, which are found in your skin and eyes. A mutation may result in no melanin at all or a significant decline in the amount of melanin.
In some types of albinism, a person must inherit two copies of a mutated gene — one from each parent — in order to have albinism (recessive inheritance).
http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/albinism/basics/causes/con-20029935
How can you be evolving on a solar planet, when you cant
take the sun??
does that even make sense to you son??
stop lying gene dont have any good points, he is just
a professional babbler!!
when it comes to debating me that is...
Mrfreddy....if you even knew the basics regarding evolution, you wouldn't have said CACs mutate kemetic people evolve. Evolution depends on mutation.
You see, that's the problem when any person -- white, black, Asian, or whatever -- tries to make racial superiority claims. They usually end up talking themselves into a hole they can't get out of because such claims usually have their foundation in ignorance.
And I thought racists ass CACs were on some shit. You are actually making a racial superiority claim because of sunlight?
I can just alternate between the shit you talk and the shit those CACs post on yahoo as proof people are more alike than they care to admit.
Dude without sunlight would we have a fuckin planet???
and if your species aka race could turn sunlight into food... Vit D...
would that not make you more superior to the one, that gets poisoned by it..?????
cmon son... got more babble??
It's funny this thread was bumped today. Just yesterday, we had a poster make a claim about black people in the United States and SUB-SAHARAN and European DNA. He was doing so to prove Obama was black because black Americans have a certain percentage of Euro DNA.There isn't any mention of NORTH AFRICAN DNA.
The shit you trying to claim is NORTH AFRICAN and has nothing to do with the 40 so or something ethnic groups in Africa that we trace our ancestors too. And DNA has already proved that the current North Africans have been there for thousand and thousands of years.
Again, the planet is mostly water and creatures left the water and evolved to live on land. Why do that on a mostly liquid planet?
Stop talking about the sun when you're talking about a group of people plotting a trip to Mars. Do you know how much radiation has to be dealt with to make the trip? Once again, humans use tools to deal with the elements, diseases, and so on. We are not fucking plants.
stop lying gene dont have any good points, he is just
a professional babbler!!
when it comes to debating me that is...
Dark skin or dark complexion doesn't mean they are related to black people stateside. Aboriginal Australians have dark skin, no relation. Indians in India can have dark skin, no relation. Native Americans had dark skin in some cases, no relation. North Africans can be dark skin and DNA shows them to be a different population than Sub-Saharan Africans.
All populations outside of Sub-Saharan Africa have Neanderthal DNA and are basically MUTANTS regardless of skin color.That's why I told the poster yesterday to watch when using DNA claims to back one claim, while opening the door to refute other claims.
This muthafucka talking about other threads and mars and shit!!
Dude its a fucking SOLAR PLANET!!!!
Get the fuck over it!
as as far as PLANTS..
Like PLANTS the ORIGINAL people... transform sunlight into food!!!
aka Photosynthesis!!!
the fact that we get VIT D from it proves this fact!!
Look you stay on mars, obviously you cant handle this debate...
You do realize civilization is based on agriculture and domesticated animals, not turning sunlight into food.
And I keep telling you to watch it with the original people talk. European and Asian racists think they are evolutionary upgrades of the original people. They admit to mixture with other humanoids and other mutations. I told you to watch how you argue shit if you argue about racial superiority. You are basically arguing for white supremacy in both Europeans and Asian forms.
Besides, you still talking about skin color when you don't even realize mutants can be just as dark as some Africans.
Damn.You do realize civilization is based on agriculture and domesticated animals, not turning sunlight into food.
And I keep telling you to watch it with the original people talk. European and Asian racists think they are evolutionary upgrades of the original people. They admit to mixture with other humanoids and other mutations. I told you to watch how you argue shit if you argue about racial superiority. You are basically arguing for white supremacy in both Europeans and Asian forms.
Besides, you still talking about skin color when you don't even realize mutants can be just as dark as some Africans.
Are you NOW trying to imply black folk are NOT the original race of people???
first another thread, then mars NOW DENIAL...
dude this has nothing to do with what you are calling racial superiority
talk.
its a fact.. so called black folks are the original people.. I think you
have a problem with reality!
and reality and your definition of racial superiority talk are two different things...
So are you saying black folk are NOT the original people...??
Can I get that on record!?!
are you denying black folk were the first civilazations on this
planet now??
Un fuckin believable!!!
I never said that. I said racists will argue that Africans ARE the ORIGINAL PEOPLE. Racists will then argue that they are superior because of evolution. You seem to think calling them mutants hurts their feelings. I pointed out evolution is based on mutation, so you just argue their points for them.
I see you haven't touched on the genetic differences between North African and Sub-Saharan Africa. You do realize that 20 to 10 thousands of years ago mutants returned to Africa. DNA tests prove that. Berber populations and other populations prove that. I've already posted the research.
So why are you claiming these populations? You insist on claiming mutts while shouting original man. It's crazy.
I never said that. I said racists will argue that Africans ARE the ORIGINAL PEOPLE. Racists will then argue that they are superior because of evolution. You seem to think calling them mutants hurts their feelings. I pointed out evolution is based on mutation, so you just argue their points for them.
I see you haven't touched on the genetic differences between North African and Sub-Saharan Africa. You do realize that 20 to 10 thousands of years ago mutants returned to Africa. DNA tests prove that. Berber populations and other populations prove that. I've already posted the research.
So why are you claiming these populations? You insist on claiming mutts while shouting original man. It's crazy.
SO a mutated man that burns in the sun without putting on sun screen,
if more evolved than the man he mutated from who doesnt need it?? ON A SOLAR PLANET??
Is this what your implying??
you need to stop shaking your head, I think any bit of logic you may have left is slipping out your ears...
Lol someone needs a class on what mutation means. Poor fella. Wants to discuss things he has no clue about.
Dark skin RELATIVE to white skin
Moors had a word for darker skin people from sub Saharan Africa - Sudan, zanj, swarthy, etc...
Read anything by actual MOORS (ibn batutta, Leo africanus, world traveling Muslim scholars of the era) and they Mae a clear delineation between them and our ancestors.
oh lawd here goes the tag team queens!!
so your are saying a mutated caucasion is an evolved man?
you must be like a general in the babble mafia...the fuckin
babble mob!!
Have you answered my initial question before you came swooping
in here. tryin to save your fellow babble partner in crime
with your panty wedgie emotional logic...
The original question is...
If black americans were not moors how did the african american boxer
I mentioned in the initial post get his nick name??
Show me another man from any other race or country nick named the moor,
thats just a bunch of personal hyperbole, disguised as logic...
I also provided a legal document that proved the slave masters knew who we were...
Why are you ignoring that tho???
Last edited:
I did answer that already.
Think about it.
The Moors in Spain were from 700-1100 in Southern Europe and in a totally different language.
You're talking about the use of the same term in the late 1700s in a totally different country. Different time, different place.
You're calling Black Americans Moors right now in 2015 and you're dead wrong.
What makes you think that in the 1700s there wasn't a completely different usage of the term by then?
So they called ONE guy a moor in 17 something. Who cares? For some reason they called us Africans in the same period.
At the same time the English, Spanish, Dutch, and Portuguese were actually TRADING Africans from Africa to the new world and they don't call it the MOORISH slave trade for some reason. Why not?
And even worse, you using this guy completely betrays your point. The description of the guy has him BORN AS A SLAVE IN VIRGINIA.
oh lawd here goes the tag team queens!!
so your are saying a mutated caucasion is an evolved man?
you must be like a general in the babble mafia...the fuckin
babble mob!!
All men are evolved. You don't know what evolution is so I don't know why you even attempt to use it. You think of the word mutation and think of mutilated. Te use of the term in genetics doesn't have that connotation you're associating with.
What Gene was pointing out is how your own argument about Blacks being original can be easily turned on its head by White men the same way you wanna use being "original" as being great.
so what other race was born a slave in virgina in the 1700s?
and show me another race of man that was nick named the moor?
He did a piss poor job..
lol
again if the caucasion man has evolved, why does he not have the tolerance for sunlight on a solar planet..
If he evolved he would be equipped to handle life of a solar planet without the use of topical cremes...
subbed
The Moors were initially of Berber and Arab descent, though the term was later applied to Africans, Iberian Christian converts to Islam, and people of mixed ancestry.
So his nickname was "the moor" in the ring. What did they call him as his family off the stage?
Again, it would be so easy for you to look up all the notable Moors FROM THE TIME WHEN THEY ACTUALLY CONTROLLED SPAIN, and see where they came from.
Many of those same people travelled in west Africa where your and my ancestors are from and had descriptions of them.
What he said makes total sense but you're too hung up on your pre conceived notions to get it.
Explain to me what a solar planet is and what other types of planets there are since you stay hung up on that term you made up.
Similar threads
