Keystone Pipeline

SPECTRE1

SE for CI, Terrorism, Revenge, Extortion
Registered
KeystonePipeline_entry_0901.jpg


The Keystone pipeline should be built if the oil will be sold to the United States. The United States should determine if this bitumen oil can be utilized.

Oil is not a fungible commodity, what countries we purchase this commodity matters significantly. Canada stands to gain $2 trillion from selling this commodity on the market.

Canadians buy or utilize a significant amount of American products. If we obtain this oil from other countries that will acquire this money and buy European or Asian products then the United States loses out on this deal. Canadians buy American IT products, cars, American franchise such as hotels and fast food, real estate, enter the United States to shop or vacation, and many other activities. This would not occur if the oil was sold to Latin America and Asia countries.

The United States would obtain this oil from other countries that do not have this symbiotic economic relationship as Canada. The United States should seek to purchase oil from countries that have significant trade relationship.

Buying oil from countries that you don’t have that much trade with is a bad idea and inefficient, especially if you can obtain that resource more closely. Why buy oil from Iran or Iraq that don't buy American products?

In the long-term, United States should obtain commitments from the Canadian government to invest in renewable energy projects in Canada or the United States as a condition for the pipeline to offset the horrible consequences to the environment.
 
Last edited:
<iframe width="780" height="1500" src="http://www.factcheck.org/2014/03/pipeline-primer/" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
 


March 19, 2014

FlackCheck.org sifts through the claims and counterclaims and
offers some facts about the proposed Keystone XL pipeline.
This video is based on the FactCheck.org article Pipeline Primer.


<iframe width="780" height="870" src="http://www.flackcheck.org/video-wire/video-wire-march-2014/" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>




 
I say let the Canadians build a pipeline.

<iframe src="http://business.financialpost.com/2014/03/27/keystone-oil-pipeline-energy-east-irving/" width=800 height=1000></iframe>
 
I still say the main reason against Keystone is the same reason I'm against opening the Arctic and deepsea drilling and most ways they dig up the earth for energy (oil, coal, natural gas):
They don't know how to clean up the inevitable spills and leaks. And now seeing that they're only going to "need" 50 workers for a pipeline going across the US, I'm more against it (not thinking that was possible).

The fact that there are major spills all over the country right now and it's not national news proves further that the media is neither liberal or conservative, it's corporate.

http://www.latimes.com/nation/nationnow/la-na-nn-lake-michigan-bp-oil-spill-20140328,0,3358362.story#axzz2xNTUPBLJ
 
What I am concerned about is all this crap being spewed is turning our atmosphere into a conductor. The stuff coming out of your car exhaust and energy plants is a conductor. Let say it is 120 degrees in the desert and -30 in the south pole. By having carbon and other pollutants in the atmosphere at high concentrations, it becomes a medium to exchange energy resulting in 100 degrees in the desert and 20 degrees in the south pole. It is no different than if we took a huge wire and connected both places.

earth_atmosphere-660x627.jpg


If you take a sheet of metal or cardboard, one will conduct energy and equalize temperatures, the other which is what the Earth used to be did not conduct energy, allowing these temperature extremes to exist locking a bunch of fresh water in the North and South poles.

There are spots closer to the Sun and locations that are farther away that receive less energy from the Sun. If you are looking at average temperatures, it can give you a false reading and understate the effect of global warming because of this equalizing of temperatures throughout the world.


The trees on our planet won't be able to lock all that carbon up since this stuff was buried deep in the planet over millions of years.

greenland%20melting%20crop1.jpg



Millions or billions of years ago, the Earth probably had a ton of carbon in the atmosphere or released it slowly. Various organism began to breath and concentrate this carbon and die, storing it in the ground, gradually reducing the carbon content of the atmosphere. We are unpacking in a short amount of time, all this carbon that took millions of year to pull out of the atmosphere.
 
Last edited:
I posted about how a greenhouse is a terrible depiction of what carbon dioxide will do to the Earth. Unlike a greenhouse, the Earth rotates away from the Sun. There is also interaction with a cooler air from the side facing away from the Sun.

In addition, higher ppm atmosphere will drop temperatures causing cooler temperatures. Similar to a piece of concrete, it gets much colder when temperatures drop and much hotter in the Sun.

A better depiction is a taking a glass ball with a spherical object in the center that is placed in a dark room with light facing one side. There will be less buildup of energy because there would be interaction with side facing away.

polls_Earth_02_01_03_1227_988147_poll.gif



There will be a normalization of temperatures or energy between the Sun(light) and distribution of energy to other parts of the Earth.


Even if temperatures do not drop, I do not want to breath air with high carbon content which the fossil fuel industry has changed. The debate is whether we want to alter our air and breath this type of environment when other technologies exist to avoid this that fossil fuel industry is capable of creating. In 200 years, people will be breathing 800ppm of carbon dioxide which will alter our human physiology.

 
Last edited:
I equate the oil companies to a company like Intel refusing to use 20nm processors. Instead they continue to make all their capital investment into making slow, energy wasting 180 nm technologies; hunting and gathering oil for our cars, instead of using agriculture.

They make small tweaks, and make it cheaper to make. They attack/sabotage any companies trying to make faster alternatives. The future is renewable energy, plugin hybrids, and full electric cars.


If a oil company is not making investments in these areas, they will not be around in 40 years. Are they building factories for car batteries? Are they intergrating/building charging stations with solar panels? I know some of them like BP have a solar panel business, but are they creating integrated products that people can use?

chips.jpg


This is what they need to be building.

tesla-gigfactory-rendering-582px.png



hondasolarcharger-9.jpg



If people are going to be charging their cars at home, they could build a connected meter in the garage to sell them renewable energy. It does not have to be a gas station like setup where you pull up and leave in 2 minutes, think outside the box. People are going to be refueling for 8 hours at home.
 
Last edited:
What the public don't understand is that the KEYSTONE pipeline is already built.
The pipeline already runs from Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico. What the repugs and greedy oil companies want to built is the XL pipeline. It's basically a shortcut in the pipeline that would save the oil industry money in pumping that heavy crude.
 

These plunging oil prices and billions in defaulted loans made to shale producers or tar sands goes to show that the only way to energy independence for countries past peak oil is through investments in green energy. This money could have gone to them and they would still be in business. At .59 a gallon equivalent, electricity is still a viable option to cheap gas.

caledonia.png


I have detailed how the government could have sold at $100+ the oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) (100 to 200 million barrels) to fund alternative energy fueling stations with biofuels, hydrogen, and dc fast charging. Or if the private sector wants to step up and build this out, you can give an additional $8,000 tax credit to buy 2-4 million electric, hybrid, fuel cell or other cars. These type of cars relieve the pressure that is placed on the SPR in times of an emergency. Imagine getting a discount of $11,000 to $15,000 on your new car.

Most highways are adjacent to farmland, suitable to having solar panels and chargers. Eminent Domain the land, and every car could be powered by the sun that travels on the highway. Similar to turnpike fuel stations, you can build an off ramp to them. Using the traditional gasoline fuel station model should not be used of locating these facilities after an exit ramp near a densely populated area.

Any politician claiming that we should drill or frack away to energy independence has now been shown to be an idiot and lacking knowledge of how the market works. These poor decisions cost billions in lost opportunity costs, this money that went toward these projects that require prices to be $70 could have went to these renewable energy project. It is projected that over 150,000 lost jobs could happen in one state. Why are people that championed green projects not speaking out more loudly to the media? This is your chance to shine and score political points with the public.

The U.S. has a deficiency of 12 million barrels of oil a day that requires importing. When are people going to wake up and realize this is not sustainable?
 
Last edited:
I know this article is not about the Pipeline, but it is "Environmentally Relevant" -- isn't it ???


EPA: Illinois oil train derailment
threatens Mississippi River



yJjaQ.AuSt.91.jpg

Smoke and flames erupt when a train derailed Thursday, March 5, 2015, near where the Galena River
meets the Mississippi in Illinois. On Saturday, March 7, the Environmental Protection Agency said
the spill posed an environmental threat to the region



WASHINGTON — An oil train derailment and spill in northwest Illinois poses an “imminent and substantial danger” of contaminating the Mississippi River, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said Saturday.

The spill from the derailment, which occurred Thursday, also threatens the Galena River, a tributary of the Mississippi, and the Upper Mississippi National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, one of the most complex ecosystems in North America.

The EPA said it couldn’t estimate how much oil was spilled, but that the 21 cars of the 105-car BNSF Railway train that derailed contained 630,000 gallons of Bakken crude from North Dakota. Small fires from the wreckage continued to burn Saturday.


5 for 5

Earlier Saturday, another oil train derailed and caught fire near Gogama, Ontario, bringing to five the total number of fiery derailments in the U.S. and Canada in as many weeks.

The safety of trains carrying flammable materials has become an issue as the introduction of new drilling technology has allowed the development of crude oil deposits far from traditional pipelines, particularly in the so-called Bakken formation in North Dakota. Rail has become the preferred way to transport that crude to refineries, with railroads moving about 500,000 carloads of oil last year, according to industry estimates, up from 9,500 in 2008. One tank car holds 30,000 gallons.

But recent derailments have cast doubt on the effectiveness of safety efforts and suggest that no tank car currently in service on the North American rail system is tough enough to resist damage in relatively low-speed derailments.

According to the Federal Railroad Administration, which is investigating the Illinois derailment, the train was traveling at just 23 miles per hour when it left the tracks, well below the maximum speed allowed. The damaged tank cars were newer CPC-1232 tank cars, which are supposed to be safer than previous ones, but have failed in at least four derailments this year and at least two in 2014.

Saturday’s derailment of a Canadian National Railway train took place about 23 miles from where another oil train derailed on the same rail line three weeks ago. The railroad said on Twitter Saturday afternoon that five cars were in a local waterway, some of them on fire. About 264,000 gallons of oil were released in the Feb. 14 derailment. The Transportation Safety Board of Canada is investigating both accidents.

The Illinois derailment is the second in three weeks on U.S. rails. On Feb. 16, 28 cars of a 107-car CSX train derailed in Mount Carbon, W.Va., and 19 caught fire. One house was destroyed and more than 100 residents were evacuated for four days. Many residents and first responders witnessed columns of fire rising hundreds of feet in the air as several of the tank cars ruptured from heat exposure.

A Canadian Pacific train carrying ethanol derailed on Feb. 4 along the Upper Mississippi north of Dubuque, Iowa. The EPA estimates about 55,000 gallons spilled, some of which burned and some of which was recovered from the icy river.

In a statement Saturday, BNSF said a temporary road was being built to the Illinois site, about four miles south of Galena, to help extinguish remaining fires and remove damaged cars. The railroad said it “sincerely regrets” the impact of the derailment.

“Protection of the communities we serve, the safety of our employees and protection of the environment are our highest priorities,” the railroad said.

The role of the newer CPC-1232 tank cars in recent derailments and fires raises new worries about the risk shipments of oil pose to the cities and towns through which they travel. The rail industry adopted the CPC-1232 tank cars as standard in 2011 for oil shipments, saying they were an improvement over the DOT-111 tank car, which had been in use for decades to haul a variety of commodities, including ethanol and crude.

But in spite of special reinforcement of exposed areas, the new cars are still prone to spilling their contents, even at relatively low speeds.

On Jan. 30, the U.S. Department of Transportation sent new regulations for oil and ethanol trains to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review. The rule-making package is expected to include a new tank car design that exceeds the CPC-1232 standard.

According to the department’s February report on significant rule-makings, the final rule is scheduled for publication on May 12.

Email: ctate@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @tatecurtis


Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2015/03/07/259010/epa-illinois-oil-train-derailment.html#storylink=cpy



 
I know this article is not about the Pipeline, but it is "Environmentally Relevant" -- isn't it ???


EPA: Illinois oil train derailment
threatens Mississippi River



yJjaQ.AuSt.91.jpg

Smoke and flames erupt when a train derailed Thursday, March 5, 2015, near where the Galena River
meets the Mississippi in Illinois. On Saturday, March 7, the Environmental Protection Agency said
the spill posed an environmental threat to the region



WASHINGTON — An oil train derailment and spill in northwest Illinois poses an “imminent and substantial danger” of contaminating the Mississippi River, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said Saturday.

The spill from the derailment, which occurred Thursday, also threatens the Galena River, a tributary of the Mississippi, and the Upper Mississippi National Wildlife and Fish Refuge, one of the most complex ecosystems in North America.

The EPA said it couldn’t estimate how much oil was spilled, but that the 21 cars of the 105-car BNSF Railway train that derailed contained 630,000 gallons of Bakken crude from North Dakota. Small fires from the wreckage continued to burn Saturday.


5 for 5

Earlier Saturday, another oil train derailed and caught fire near Gogama, Ontario, bringing to five the total number of fiery derailments in the U.S. and Canada in as many weeks.

The safety of trains carrying flammable materials has become an issue as the introduction of new drilling technology has allowed the development of crude oil deposits far from traditional pipelines, particularly in the so-called Bakken formation in North Dakota. Rail has become the preferred way to transport that crude to refineries, with railroads moving about 500,000 carloads of oil last year, according to industry estimates, up from 9,500 in 2008. One tank car holds 30,000 gallons.

But recent derailments have cast doubt on the effectiveness of safety efforts and suggest that no tank car currently in service on the North American rail system is tough enough to resist damage in relatively low-speed derailments.

According to the Federal Railroad Administration, which is investigating the Illinois derailment, the train was traveling at just 23 miles per hour when it left the tracks, well below the maximum speed allowed. The damaged tank cars were newer CPC-1232 tank cars, which are supposed to be safer than previous ones, but have failed in at least four derailments this year and at least two in 2014.

Saturday’s derailment of a Canadian National Railway train took place about 23 miles from where another oil train derailed on the same rail line three weeks ago. The railroad said on Twitter Saturday afternoon that five cars were in a local waterway, some of them on fire. About 264,000 gallons of oil were released in the Feb. 14 derailment. The Transportation Safety Board of Canada is investigating both accidents.

The Illinois derailment is the second in three weeks on U.S. rails. On Feb. 16, 28 cars of a 107-car CSX train derailed in Mount Carbon, W.Va., and 19 caught fire. One house was destroyed and more than 100 residents were evacuated for four days. Many residents and first responders witnessed columns of fire rising hundreds of feet in the air as several of the tank cars ruptured from heat exposure.

A Canadian Pacific train carrying ethanol derailed on Feb. 4 along the Upper Mississippi north of Dubuque, Iowa. The EPA estimates about 55,000 gallons spilled, some of which burned and some of which was recovered from the icy river.

In a statement Saturday, BNSF said a temporary road was being built to the Illinois site, about four miles south of Galena, to help extinguish remaining fires and remove damaged cars. The railroad said it “sincerely regrets” the impact of the derailment.

“Protection of the communities we serve, the safety of our employees and protection of the environment are our highest priorities,” the railroad said.

The role of the newer CPC-1232 tank cars in recent derailments and fires raises new worries about the risk shipments of oil pose to the cities and towns through which they travel. The rail industry adopted the CPC-1232 tank cars as standard in 2011 for oil shipments, saying they were an improvement over the DOT-111 tank car, which had been in use for decades to haul a variety of commodities, including ethanol and crude.

But in spite of special reinforcement of exposed areas, the new cars are still prone to spilling their contents, even at relatively low speeds.

On Jan. 30, the U.S. Department of Transportation sent new regulations for oil and ethanol trains to the White House Office of Management and Budget for review. The rule-making package is expected to include a new tank car design that exceeds the CPC-1232 standard.

According to the department’s February report on significant rule-makings, the final rule is scheduled for publication on May 12.

Email: ctate@mcclatchydc.com; Twitter: @tatecurtis
Read more here: http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2015/03/07/259010/epa-illinois-oil-train-derailment.html#storylink=cpy




How is the private sector going to solve this?
 

Obama rejects Keystone XL project, citing U.S. climate leadership



<iframe width="480" height="290" scrolling="no" src="//www.washingtonpost.com/video/c/embed/5f30fa68-84ab-11e5-8bd2-680fff868306" frameborder="0" webkitallowfullscreen mozallowfullscreen allowfullscreen></iframe>​


Washington Post
November 6, 2015

President Obama announced Friday that his administration will not issue a permit for construction of the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, arguing that approval would undermine the U.S. effort to curb greenhouse gases.

“America’s now a global leader when it comes to taking serious action to fight climate change,” Obama said. “And frankly, approving this project would have undercut that global leadership. And that’s the biggest risk we face — not acting.”

Denying TransCanada Corp. a permit for the 1,179-mile pipeline between Hardisty, Alberta, and Steele City, Neb., ends a seven-year fight over a project that became a symbol in the political battle over climate change.

Several former administration officials said Friday that Obama and Secretary of State John F. Kerry had decided to block the project two years ago but waited for the legally required internal review, a revised permit application and, finally, a politically opportune time to announce the decision.

The president and his top advisers embraced the argument that environmentalists, top party donors and several Democratic lawmakers had made for years: that the United States could not press other countries to make sacrifices for the sake of the climate while locking in a steady supply of high-carbon oil through a major infrastructure project.​


MORE AT: https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-keystone-xl-project-citing-climate-concerns/


 
The Athabasca oil sands are the only major oil sands deposits which are shallow enough to surface mine. In the Athabasca sands there are very large amounts of bitumen covered by little overburden, making surface mining the most efficient method of extracting it.

Approximately 1.0–1.25 gigajoules (280–350 kWh) of energy is needed to extract a barrel of bitumen and upgrade it to synthetic crude. As of 2006, most of this is produced by burning natural gas.[57] Since a barrel of oil equivalent is about 6.117 gigajoules (1,699 kWh), its EROEI is 5–6. That means this extracts about 5 or 6 times as much energy as is consumed. Energy efficiency is expected to improve to average of 900 cubic feet (25 m3) of natural gas or 0.945 gigajoules (262 kWh) of energy per barrel by 2015, giving an EROEI of about 6.5.[58]

Between 2 to 4.5 volume units of water are used to produce each volume unit of synthetic crude oil in an ex-situ mining operation. According to Greenpeace, the Canadian oil sands operations use 349×106 m3/a (12.3×109 cu ft/a) of water, twice the amount of water used by the city of Calgary.[136] However, in SAGD operations, 90–95% of the water is recycled and only about 0.2 volume units of water is used per volume unit of bitumen produced.[137]

The extra-heavy crude oil or crude bitumen extracted from oil sands is a very viscous semisolid form of oil that does not easily flow at normal temperatures, making it difficult to transport to market by pipeline. To flow through oil pipelines, it must either be upgraded to lighter synthetic crude oil (SCO), blended with diluents to form dilbit, or heated to reduce its vicosity.

You have to input all this energy to extract the oil to use in an inefficient internal combustion engine when you could have used this energy input to make electricity and leave this crap in the ground. Simple modifications to an internal combustion engine that are not being use now could negate the need for this oil further. Plugin hybrids are going to become more mainstream soon.

The process being used now is more like biofuels and other processes where water and heat are used to make ethanol.

These investments could have gone towards next generation technologies and production.

The free market could never end slavery in a million years, it took government involvement and planning. The same thing will be needed to get off of fossil fuels and other inefficient processes.
 
Last edited:
Obama rejects Keystone XL project, citing U.S. climate leadership


Trump advances controversial oil pipelines with executive action


President Donald Trump on Tuesday signed executive actions to advance approval of the Keystone XL and Dakota Access oil pipelines. The decision to advance the pipelines cast aside efforts by President Barack Obama's administration to block construction of the two pipelines, while making good on one of Trump's campaign promises.

As he signed the documents Tuesday in the Oval Office, Trump also vowed to "renegotiate some of the terms" of the Keystone bill and said he would then seek to "get that pipeline built."

Trump also issued executive actions declaring oil pipelines constructed in the US should be built with US materials, streamlining the regulatory process for pipeline construction and shortening the environmental review process.



SOURCE: http://www.cnn.com/2017/01/24/politics/trump-keystone-xl-dakota-access-pipelines-executive-actions/


.
 
These plunging oil prices and billions in defaulted loans made to shale producers or tar sands goes to show that the only way to energy independence for countries past peak oil is through investments in green energy. This money could have gone to them and they would still be in business. At .59 a gallon equivalent, electricity is still a viable option to cheap gas.

caledonia.png


I have detailed how the government could have sold at $100+ the oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) (100 to 200 million barrels) to fund alternative energy fueling stations with biofuels, hydrogen, and dc fast charging. Or if the private sector wants to step up and build this out, you can give an additional $8,000 tax credit to buy 2-4 million electric, hybrid, fuel cell or other cars. These type of cars relieve the pressure that is placed on the SPR in times of an emergency. Imagine getting a discount of $11,000 to $15,000 on your new car.

Most highways are adjacent to farmland, suitable to having solar panels and chargers. Eminent Domain the land, and every car could be powered by the sun that travels on the highway. Similar to turnpike fuel stations, you can build an off ramp to them. Using the traditional gasoline fuel station model should not be used of locating these facilities after an exit ramp near a densely populated area.

Any politician claiming that we should drill or frack away to energy independence has now been shown to be an idiot and lacking knowledge of how the market works. These poor decisions cost billions in lost opportunity costs, this money that went toward these projects that require prices to be $70 could have went to these renewable energy project. It is projected that over 150,000 lost jobs could happen in one state. Why are people that championed green projects not speaking out more loudly to the media? This is your chance to shine and score political points with the public.

The U.S. has a deficiency of 12 million barrels of oil a day that requires importing. When are people going to wake up and realize this is not sustainable?
…..
 
Back
Top