Police just executed an unarmed 17 yr old brotha (shot 10 times)

I get all that, but again prior to the shooting at what point do people take responsibility for their own actions? He committed a crime prior to being dealt with the law. When you commit a crime, I can't complain or cry about how you get handled with by the law.

Are you out of your mind. You now what the police to be the judge, jury, and executioner? Stealing cigars and pushing someone should not have you put six feet under.
 
why hasn't this cac cop ben arrested yet...that's the question :angry:

execution style murder in front of several real time witnesses :hmm: :smh:
 
This.is.why.we.need.a.voice!!

They release details on this case and now people are confused and dont know what to think

So fucking what about these details? Police over stepped their authority period

There are several other similar cases of police doing the same thing to black men all over the country...the mike brown case is not an isolated issue with certain circumstances..

They release this information to remove our momentum...this is way bigger than that....

Keep focused on the real issue here!!
 
St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch is going to be the real problem.

He's already went at the governor in defense of the Ferguson police department's heavy handed response, so it's obvious their closing ranks.

http://www.stltoday.com/news/local/...cle_0806541b-ed48-5d06-9267-323531ad6cf1.html

I would think what he said would be enough to show bias and somehow get someone not associated with his office to present evidence to the Grand Jury.


The police department will protect theirs no matter what. Maybe he did a Zimmerman and inflicted his own ass whoopin. Or had had a fellow officer pop him a couple times. Just saying.

ain't no maybe about it.

im surprised they're going to show his face

they haven't so far have they?
 
St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch is going to be the real problem.

He's already went at the governor in defense of the Ferguson police department's heavy handed response, so it's obvious their closing ranks.


yup, but this case wont make it past a grand jury now with this new video.





--- previous post ---


here is the store video

http://www.stltoday.com/news/multim...tml_9cdfc317-764d-5ccd-a574-2c75d2d0c753.html



------------- edit -----


ya'll not gonna like what im about to say, but here goes...

shoplifting is grabing the item and leaving.
buglary, is breaking a glass, or door to get an item
robbery (storng arm), is when you hit, push, shove,, threaten someone, and take the item. (watch video)
robbery (armed) is when you threaten someone with a weapon, and take the item.

video link corrected ! http://www.stltoday.com/news/multim...tml_9cdfc317-764d-5ccd-a574-2c75d2d0c753.html


in this case, (watch the video above), he committed robbery (strong arm).

1. the store clerk confrinted him.
2. he could had droped the items, and left the store.
3. he grabed/pushed/shoved the clerk owner.
4. instead of exiting the store, he re-approached the clerk, and gave that stance of "what u gonna do?"
5. then left with the items.


i agree this is VERY VERY petty item stolen (polce report said $49 in merchandise).

a retal box of 40 blunts, maybe what 99c each?.


but if this young man would had simply said to his homie.
"hey lets just go play some ball, or go to the library and read a book"
he may still be alive today.



this is all in vain. sad loss.

it still dont mean the cop should had SHOT him unarmed. but after watching that video. (and seeing what he did to the clerk), the police will have no problem to convey to a grand jury (or trail jury), that mike would not easily surrender, or give up when confronted. and they will continue to claim mike was resisting arrest.
so now, the cop wont even face a trail, or if he does he will be easily acquitted. (even easier than zimmerman).


sad. very sad..


and now that his friend, (via attorney) has ADMITED that mike did indeed stole from the store.

and now in my eyes, and many other followers, all the protest have been in vain.
and not many respectable people will not follow this story.
this isnt like fruitvill station

_h0_w628_m6_otrue_lfalse.jpg

10402005_10102425533663050_6037575916786505947_n.jpg
 
Don't take this post as me being ungrateful or anything...because I'm not!!!


The dispatcher's tape timeframe had me curious to degree . I was wondering about the event prior to the start of the tape. I was thinking what if something was called in, but we wasn't able to hear it.

The leak audio provided costly errors by the law enforcement by but still had me puzzled about events that occurred a hour before the execution...
 
Something don't seem right with those shots. He definitely has sandals on. Secondly, 3 of the 4 shots does not show the top of his head. Then one of them shows him with a cap on with the top of his head facing the camera. Now that could be Photoshoped in that frame. Also, you never see his face. Interesting...simply took time to fix the images to match his clothes maybe?
 
It's funny that they can now release footage of what happened inside the store before the shooting. Ask yourself why there is no footage of the confrontation with the police that led up to the shooting? Every eye witness interviewed stated that the cop killed him in cold blood. No weapon ("strong arm" also means no weapon involved, just physical force) was found but yet the police officer felt the need to shoot the victim repeatedly. Assuming (and this is taking a huge leap according to eye witness accounts) that he indeed did go after the cops gun, the cop had already shot him once from inside the vehicle. The victim turned and ran and was shot yet again from a distance of at least 35 feet. The victim then stopped, turned around with his hands up, attempting to get on his knees as the cop moved towards him. the victim was heard saying that he surrendered and please do not shoot him again.
The cop at that point shot an unarmed suspect who was turning himself in. That's the thing we need to stay focused on. The character assassination is an attempt to misdirect the public. We need to stay focused on the facts of the interaction between the police and the victim. Not the victim and the shop owner.
 
Bottom line is there is a bunch of boot licking mufuckas in our race who crave for white acceptance are okay with their brothers and sisters not being treated as equals

Every mufucka on their high horse better realize they are one slip up, mistaken identity, or set up away from being in the same got damn boat

They see that brown skin and all the same

c/s

:smh::smh::smh::smh:

Do not quote me again, well actually you are free to do as you please but this is my last response

I told him to kill himself earlier
 
What is going to be their excuse of not arresting the friend? If he's involved in a felony they would have picked him up for questioning.
 
Yes chief may have just stuck his foot in his mouth saying the stop wasn't connected to the robbery.

Doesn't matter to some people. As you can see by some of the posts in this thread, 'the niqqer was a thief so he deserved to die.' 'Irrelevant' details like the cop stopping him had nothing to do with the robbery mean nothing to these people.
 
Yes chief may have just stuck his foot in his mouth saying the stop wasn't connected to the robbery.
This is why they havent released the incident report or dispatch tapes surrounding the stop and shooting.

They merely released the store surveillance footage to serve as a distraction from the shooting while acting as a means to destroy the character of the victim.
 
What is going to be their excuse of not arresting the friend? If he's involved in a felony they would have picked him up for questioning.

Even after appearing on the news and all that. It wasn't like dude was on the run hiding.
 
Something don't seem right with those shots. He definitely has sandals on. Secondly, 3 of the 4 shots does not show the top of his head. Then one of them shows him with a cap on with the top of his head facing the camera. Now that could be Photoshoped in that frame. Also, you never see his face. Interesting...simply took time to fix the images to match his clothes maybe?

then his potna could have something to say about that sequence of events and what was "doctored." he is still alive.
 
It's funny that they can now release footage of what happened inside the store before the shooting. Ask yourself why there is no footage of the confrontation with the police that led up to the shooting? Every eye witness interviewed stated that the cop killed him in cold blood. No weapon ("strong arm" also means no weapon involved, just physical force) was found but yet the police officer felt the need to shoot the victim repeatedly. Assuming (and this is taking a huge leap according to eye witness accounts) that he indeed did go after the cops gun, the cop had already shot him once from inside the vehicle. The victim turned and ran and was shot yet again from a distance of at least 35 feet. The victim then stopped, turned around with his hands up, attempting to get on his knees as the cop moved towards him. the victim was heard saying that he surrendered and please do not shoot him again.
The cop at that point shot an unarmed suspect who was turning himself in. That's the thing we need to stay focused on. The character assassination is an attempt to misdirect the public. We need to stay focused on the facts of the interaction between the police and the victim. Not the victim and the shop owner.

this
 
There is no evidence that his friend was complicit in the crime. He can not be charged.

Now come on..buddy
You know if they want someone. They'll make you complicit.
They fucked up on this one and aren't going show they fucked up.
Just keep it moving with their story.
 
The only thing that matters is if he tried to take his gun or if he was shot in cold blood while he had his hands up.nothing ,nothing, nothing else matters..
 
Reporter: So the officer was not aware Mike Brown was the suspect in a robberry. So why did the officer stop Mike Brown.


Chief: Because they were walking down the middle of the street.



This corroborates the account given by eyewitness Dorian Johnson who states the altercation began with the officer pulling beside the young men and yelling "Get the fuck out the street!!!"

Thanks chief. :smh:
 
Back
Top