USC shooter breaks down in tears after getting 40 years to life

If he would have killed someone that would have changed everything. In that case, I wouldn't have any sympathy for him; and I wouldn't care how much time he got. But no one died.

Yeah... but the people he shot... gotta wear those scars forever... Not to mention, whatever other injuries they have to live with.

This PUNK muthafucka needs to do 1000 years because his SOLE PURPOSE for busting his gun was TO FUCK SHIT UP... :smh:

... and I guarantee you after he let off those shots... He felt like the man... :smh:

WELP!!!! I hope it was worth it... :yes:
 
Made example of, for any other niggas that might try to visit that white/oriental privileged campus and act up...all black males are asked for id now...no sympathy for that fuckin herb
 
Re: USC shooter Breaks Down When Sentenced to 40 Years in Shooting at USC Party

I've always found it amazing how a muthafucka can revert back to an almost infantile state when faced with the punishment for crimes that they undoubtedly committed in the most testosterone fueled mindset. That tells me that they were just bitches in disguise. If they're gonna do state time they better shed that look quick, fast and in a damn hurry because other lifers will peep it right away.

very well said. I cannot disagree with that at all. Murderers like him are cowards even if he didn't kill anybody he tried to and nearly killed more then he intended. somehow people need to see that retribution be gets more retribution which he gets more retribution. It does not end and in the process how many people get caught up unintentionally in Each bout of retribution? those people don't know or don't care. All they see is bloody revenge for whatever app they deemed either disrespected hurt, or someone they know was killed or hurt. In the end they say they feel sorry for what they did and cry like little babies.
 
So the cat gets shot and survives and now wants a second chance at life? He had a second chance at life already. Busting into crowds. The worst type of 'gangster'. Type who kills and maims innocent bystanders.

I agree that a cold blooded murderer is the worst kind of person to be free. And though he killed no one, he intended to kill one and his misfired bullets could have killed more. He had No consideration for the welfare of those involved. He basically threw a grenade in the crowd, and those nobody died he is still punished for 40 years for his act.
 
:smh::smh:

you're on trial for attempted murder for shooting a rival gang member

but crying saying you're not a thug!?
 
No one died, so he deserves a second chance at life. Besides punishment, and deterrence, one of the purposes of criminal law is to rehabilitate. That young man is only 21 years old. If a 21 year old can't be rehabilitated then our criminal law system is irreparable.

I'm not saying that he shouldn't spend a considerable amount of his life in jail for his crimes. However, there is no need to take his life away, by making him spend the majority of it prison, which will cost society--i.e., tax payers--a considerable amount of money, if he can be rehabilitated. While he serves his time, he can be counseled, and trained to be a productive member of society. Moreover, he can learn a trade. If after 10 years, or so, a parole board determines he's fit to return to society then he should be released.

Agreed... But 10 years in jail might destroy that knucklehead... Too bad he doesn't suffer from Afluenza... Didn't that rich whiteboy kill 4 people? And only got probation (subsidized by the govt)
 
No one died, so he deserves a second chance at life. Besides punishment, and deterrence, one of the purposes of criminal law is to rehabilitate. That young man is only 21 years old. If a 21 year old can't be rehabilitated then our criminal law system is irreparable.

I'm not saying that he shouldn't spend a considerable amount of his life in jail for his crimes. However, there is no need to take his life away, by making him spend the majority of it prison, which will cost society--i.e., tax payers--a considerable amount of money, if he can be rehabilitated. While he serves his time, he can be counseled, and trained to be a productive member of society. Moreover, he can learn a trade. If after 10 years, or so, a parole board determines he's fit to return to society then he should be released.

the bottom line is he had all those chances before he decided to pull a trigger...he didn't make a mistake he made a deliberate and now has to deal with the consequences.

niggas are lining up to go into neo slavery:smh:
 
Agreed... But 10 years in jail might destroy that knucklehead... Too bad he doesn't suffer from Afluenza... Didn't that rich whiteboy kill 4 people? And only got probation (subsidized by the govt)

whats the key words in that post?

and what is BLACK IN AMERICA 101?
 
Typical bitchmade muhfucka hiding behind a gun and a gang.

Alot of niggas cry in jail out of anger because your in position where you cant kill out of anger...its actually best to just cry because anger will get you a black eye back to your cell in the bounty.

I heard he got caught because he ran his big lips on twitter :smh:

Blood went 21 yrs without his dad ever known he banged at all

Where shit went wrong is the twitter we barely know what was said (only the tygs and a few homies know) but im waiting to see what he said on twitter. Im kinda upset he got himself like this off of twitter fame. :smh: this nigga was very very smart like i said his dad never even knew he banged but he was with the extras

FREE Gunplay aka Babybleep from IFGB
 
Dude starts shooting into a crowd of innocent people with every intention of killing someone he had beef with. And because he didn't kill anyone heads here want me to feel sorry for him? Are you fucking kidding me? :hmm:
 
If he would have killed someone that would have changed everything. In that case, I wouldn't have any sympathy for him; and I wouldn't care how much time he got. But no one died.

So if I mail 4 cats anthrax and nobody dies, I should get leniency?

FOH!!

I got family going to USC that worked hard to get in. Why should some chump bitch ass bastard have the right to go there and act a fool?

Fuck him and anybody making excuses for him.
 
Man i feel for brah gonna be locked down for 15+ years they done rip van winkled his ass now!!! but considering the crime he lucky at least one day ( one lllllllllllooooooooooooooooonnnnnnnnnnnng ) fuckng day he will get out so to that :dance::dance::dance::dance::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol::lol: see ya bitch done drop your soap cause Tyrone be looking at ya :eek::eek::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
The fucked up part is if he would have committed the same crime in the hood he would not have got a fraction of that sentence.
 
So if I mail 4 cats anthrax and nobody dies, I should get leniency?

FOH!!

I got family going to USC that worked hard to get in. Why should some chump bitch ass bastard have the right to go there and act a fool?

Fuck him and anybody making excuses for him.



Why should a 21 year old lose his life by spending it behind bars when he didn't take a life? Do you think such a sentence is proportionate to the crime he committed, and the harm he caused? What does society gain by meting out such harsh and unnecessary sentences?

His sentence should only be severe enough to punish him for the harm he caused. Moreover, his sentence should be long enough to deter him, and others, from committing similar crimes. Any sentence that goes beyond that is excessive and unnecessary. Such sentences are what the Founders intended to prohibit when they enacted the Eighth Amendment.
 
Last edited:
Why should a 21 year old lose his life by spending it behind bars when he didn't take a life? Do you think such a sentence is proportionate to the crime he committed, and the harm he caused? What does society gain by meting out such harsh and unnecessary sentences?

His sentence should only be severe enough to punish him for the harm he caused. Moreover, his sentence should be long enough to deter others from committing similar crimes. Any sentence that goes beyond that is excessive and unnecessary. Such sentences are what the Founders intended to prohibit when they enacted the Eighth Amendment.

I agree with you. When you have the rich white kid who killed I think 4 people and got off with an expensive rehab. This guy made an incredible mistake. He appears remorseful. I think he made a mistake and fortunately for him no one died for his mistake. He should be locked up for his actions because he didn't think then as hard as he's thinking now. I think 5-7 years would be sufficient to rehabilitate him. 40 years is more than they gave to the people ripping off peoples life savings and actual murderers. He was wrong and should do time but I think his life could be saved and he could actually become productive. If it was 40 years it should be like 40 years probation minus time served. If he slips up again then he gets this sentence.
 
He fucked up. Should've stalked that nigga and caught him at a red light.

Sent from my SM-N900T using Tapatalk
 
I agree with you. When you have the rich white kid who killed I think 4 people and got off with an expensive rehab. This guy made an incredible mistake. He appears remorseful. I think he made a mistake and fortunately for him no one died for his mistake. He should be locked up for his actions because he didn't think then as hard as he's thinking now. I think 5-7 years would be sufficient to rehabilitate him. 40 years is more than they gave to the people ripping off peoples life savings and actual murderers. He was wrong and should do time but I think his life could be saved and he could actually become productive. If it was 40 years it should be like 40 years probation minus time served. If he slips up again then he gets this sentence.

I hate when people use the word MISTAKE because they almost ALWAYS use it incorrectly..

that man did NOT make a mistake...everything he did that night was thought out and deliberate.

He saw a rival gangbanger at a party...left the party..CAME BACK WITH A GUN and shot at him (apparently poorly) with INTENT to kill and injured other people in the process. There was nothing he did that night that was mistaken. Or if there was one it was that he didn't kill the person he was after and he accidentally shot up a bunch of others in the process those were his mistakes...beyond that the shooting period was NOT a mistake.

bringing up how rich cacs are treated is totally beside the point. Like I said earlier (and no one answered) WHAT IS BEING BLACK IN AMERICA 101??

Answer: Understanding that you as a black person and most likely a POOR black person WILL not get the same treatment as CACs doing the same thing. Its historical and institutional.

So if your a young black man acting out you open yourself up to the HISTORICAL FUCKING OVER the US judicial system WILL do to you.

you and black camus are making an argument coming from a different mindset that deals with the world and country as it SHOULD BE rather than AS IT IS..

This sums up perfectly what that dude thought and was hoping for for..

23eb3d8b5891a08b8e8cde73694a116b507ec6da117b17fb3e77b01d0ec7df88.jpg


the second he decided to get his gun and come back to that campus his fate was SEALED:smh::smh::smh:
 
Last edited:
If he would have killed someone that would have changed everything. In that case, I wouldn't have any sympathy for him; and I wouldn't care how much time he got. But no one died.

So your sympathy is rooted in the fact the he has poor aim?

U think he wasn't trying to kill ol boy? He didn't give a Fuck about the other people at that party
 
This was to send a message that you cannot bust your guns on a bunch of innocent college students that wild shit you gotta leave in the hood....thats the message they are sending.
 
This was to send a message that you cannot bust your guns on a bunch of innocent college students that wild shit you gotta leave in the hood....thats the message they are sending.

basically..

also as far as theyre concerned they DID give him leniency considering they could have run his sentence consecutively rather than concurrently..
 
My boy that does security at USC told me about this story last month and he was actually right there when it happened, said he had to grab a few guys back. Even was called into court during this trial. :smh:

The first thing my boy said is he don't get why a dude would even wanna be into any fights when there were nothing but beautiful USC dimes everywhere, but i guess that's how it goes when you see a enemy and you're young and dumb.. :smh:
 
I hate when people use the word MISTAKE because they almost ALWAYS use it incorrectly..

that man did NOT make a mistake...everything he did that night was thought out and deliberate.

He saw a rival gangbanger at a party...left the party..CAME BACK WITH A GUN and shot at him (apparently poorly) with INTENT to kill and injured other people in the process. There was nothing he did that night that was mistaken. Or if there was one it was that he didn't kill the person he was after and he accidentally shot up a bunch of others in the process those were his mistakes...beyond that the shooting period was NOT a mistake.

bringing up how rich cacs are treated is totally beside the point. Like I said earlier (and no one answered) WHAT IS BEING BLACK IN AMERICA 101??

Answer: Understanding that you as a black person and most likely a POOR black person WILL not get the same treatment as CACs doing the same thing. Its historical and institutional.

So if your a young black man acting out you open yourself up to the HISTORICAL FUCKING OVER the US judicial system WILL do to you.

you and black camus are making an argument coming from a different mindset that deals with the world and country as it SHOULD BE rather than AS IT IS..

This sums up perfectly what that dude thought and was hoping for for..

23eb3d8b5891a08b8e8cde73694a116b507ec6da117b17fb3e77b01d0ec7df88.jpg


the second he decided to get his gun and come back to that campus his fate was SEALED:smh::smh::smh:

I get all that but he did make a mistake fuck how you slice it. 40 years is too much time given for the actual results. If anybody died yes 40 might be lenient. For nobody to have been killed I think 40 years is too much plain and simple. I think this is one of those "situations" where this incident could've brought about change in the individual. When he went home and decided to get the gun is a huge mental lapse. My thinking is since no one was hurt you should not award more time than if he actually killed someone. 5-7 may be lenient. Maybe I'd feel different if I had kids, family members, or friends that were or could have been affected. 40 years is too much for this crime. 15-20 years should've been max IMO.

I only want to see the same sentence handed down to every criminal regardless of color. I'm tired of seeing non black people get lenient sentences and then when you have a black person commit a crime it's always the harshest of the sentences.
 
I get all that but he did make a mistake fuck how you slice it. 40 years is too much time given for the actual results. If anybody died yes 40 might be lenient. For nobody to have been killed I think 40 years is too much plain and simple. I think this is one of those "situations" where this incident could've brought about change in the individual. When he went home and decided to get the gun is a huge mental lapse. My thinking is since no one was hurt you should not award more time than if he actually killed someone. 5-7 may be lenient. Maybe I'd feel different if I had kids, family members, or friends that were or could have been affected. 40 years is too much for this crime. 15-20 years should've been max IMO.

I only want to see the same sentence handed down to every criminal regardless of color. I'm tired of seeing non black people get lenient sentences and then when you have a black person commit a crime it's always the harshest of the sentences.

They're making an example of him, is what it is :smh:

He should of got 20-25 yrs to life with eligibility to parole out in 20 or so with good behavior! Instead he got 40+ to life wont even get a parole hearing til 25-30 yrs later instead of 20-25 he can start the process in 10-15 see the diff?
 
Clarke said he disagreed with imposing consecutive sentences because it would have been equivalent to the punishment for killing all four victims.
Clarke denounced gang violence and acknowledged that the location of the shooting was a factor in his decision. Two USC graduate students were murdered just outside the campus six months before, and the campus "had not yet healed its wounds," Clarke said.


http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/...ntence-20140418,0,5761516.story#ixzz2zYb0pH5c
 
Was that a gang enhancement sentence??



California's Gang Sentencing Enhancement Law
Penal Code 186.22 PC
Explained by Criminal Defense Lawyers



Penal Code 186.22 PC is part of the "California Street Terrorism Enforcement and Prevention Act" – more commonly referred to as the California "STEP Act" . . . or as California's street gang enhancement law.

The California street gang sentencing enhancement law actually has two main parts (only one of which is an actual sentence enhancement). These are:

1. Penal Code 186.22(a) PC, the crime of participation in a gang

This part of the law makes it a crime to participate in a street gang and assist in any felony criminal conduct by the gang's members.

The penalties for participation in a gang, in violation of Penal Code 186.22(a) PC, can include one (1) year in county jail . . . or a felony sentence of sixteen (16) months, two (2) years or three (3) years in state prison.1

2. Penal Code 186.22(b) PC, the gang sentencing enhancement.

This part of the law provides that anyone who commits a felony for the benefit of a gang will receive a mandatory prison sentence . . . in addition and consecutive to the penalty s/he receives for the underlying felony.2

Depending on the circumstances of the offense, Penal Code 186.22(b) PC could mean an additional two (2) to fifteen (15) years, or even twenty-five (25)-years-to-life, in prison...even if you're not a gang member, and even if you aren't the individual who was most directly responsible for committing the underlying felony!3


So, as you can see, California law, through the STEP Act, punishes gang members...and those who associate with gang members...much more harshly than people who have no gang ties.

Examples

Here are some examples of situations in which the California street gang sentencing enhancement law might apply:

Charles is a member of a street gang that engages in drug trafficking. He is arrested and charged with possession of a controlled substance for sale. And he is also charged with Penal Code 186.22(a) PC . . . the California crime of participation in a gang . . . which increases his total potential sentence.
Nicole is not a gang member, but her boyfriend Raul is. One day she helps Raul threaten someone who owes money to the gang...thus committing the California crime of extortion. Because she acted for the benefit of a gang...even though she is not a gang member...Nicole may face an additional sentence of up to ten (10) years on top of her sentence for committing extortion.4
http://www.shouselaw.com/street-gang.html



California Penal Code Section 186.22


186.22. (a) Any person who actively participates in any criminal
street gang with knowledge that its members engage in or have engaged
in a pattern of criminal gang activity, and who willfully promotes,
furthers, or assists in any felonious criminal conduct by members of
that gang, shall be punished by imprisonment in a county jail for a
period not to exceed one year, or by imprisonment in the state prison
for 16 months, or two or three years.


(b) (1) Except as provided in paragraphs (4) and (5), any person
who is convicted of a felony committed for the benefit of, at the
direction of, or in association with any criminal street gang, with
the specific intent to promote, further, or assist in any criminal
conduct by gang members, shall, upon conviction of that felony, in
addition and consecutive to the punishment prescribed for the felony
or attempted felony of which he or she has been convicted, be
punished as follows:

(A) Except as provided in subparagraphs (B) and (C), the person
shall be punished by an additional term of two, three, or four years
at the court's discretion.

(B) If the felony is a serious felony, as defined in subdivision
(c) of Section 1192.7, the person shall be punished by an additional
term of five years.


(C) If the felony is a violent felony, as defined in subdivision
(c) of Section 667.5, the person shall be punished by an additional
term of 10 years.


(2) If the underlying felony described in paragraph (1) is
committed on the grounds of, or within 1,000 feet of, a public or
private elementary, vocational, junior high, or high school, during
hours in which the facility is open for classes or school-related
programs or when minors are using the facility, that fact shall be a
circumstance in aggravation of the crime in imposing a term under
paragraph (1).

(3) The court shall select the sentence enhancement which, in the
court's discretion, best serves the interests of justice and shall
state the reasons for its choice on the record at the time of the
sentencing in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (d) of
Section 1170.1.

http://law.onecle.com/california/penal/186.22.html

dudes case seems to fall within that..

Legal defenses

But just because the prosecution charges you with a street gang sentencing enhancement doesn't mean it will stick. A good California criminal defense attorney knows this and may be able to help make sure that it doesn't.

Potentially helpful legal defenses against a Penal Code 186.22 PC charge include:

You didn't commit the underlying felony;

You are not an "active participant" in a gang;

You weren't acting for the benefit of a gang;

The prosecutor is seeking to apply the gang sentencing enhancement in an illegal way; and/or

Imposing the gang sentencing enhancement would go against "the interests of justice."
 
Bye, ninja. Shame none of your buddies in gangs will learn a lesson from your example and get their shit together.

Expect more of these videos.
 
My friend's father was shot to death by an errant shotgun spray because two gangbangers decided to be macho over a dice game across the street from their house.

AND the muthafucka is still not in jail.

Shit he'll be out in 15 years. I'd say he got off easy. The innocent's may not have died but they have/had bullets in their bodies. Lost time at work or certain abilities are possible if not probable.

While I feel the judge may have been harsh in regards to others sentenced for similar crimes. His macho ass should've thought of that before blasting. Hope he gets fucked.
 
So the cat gets shot and survives and now wants a second chance at life? He had a second chance at life already. Busting into crowds. The worst type of 'gangster'. Type who kills and maims innocent bystanders.

Not every nigga got a code like Omar.

Busting into crowds has been commonplace for a minute.
 
One of the most important if not THE most important thing you can teach your son is how to MANAGE HIS EMOTIONAL STATE.

This ability or inability is the difference between countless situations like this.

How many young black men are doing 25 years or more right now because they never learned to control their emotions.

We have to teach children at a young age to channel emotions that do not serve them to things that do. Anger is not bad...anger that leads to violence or stupid decisions is bad. Anger that motivates you to get a better job, start a business, make a positive change in your life is a GOOD THING.

When you think about it, being able to manage your emotional state at any given time is the only thing you control in this world. The ONLY thing.
 
Back
Top