Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads

World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - China & Japan (U.S.) gonna BOX! shits slowly boiling...

geechiedan

geechiedan

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
131126-diaoyu-jsw-134p.photoblog600.jpg


Chinese protesters pelted the Japanese embassy in Beijing with eggs and bottles in response to the Japanese government’s announcement of a proposed plan to bring the “privately-held” Senkaku/Diaoyu islands under national ownership.
Decrying Japanese imperialism while touting signs emblazoned with Chairman Mao’s iconic portrait, Chinese university students took to the streets and called for war with Japan. Japanese news outlets relayed tales of violence against Japanese nationals within China, prompting China’s foreign ministry to issue a statement declaring that the public anger was not at the Japanese people and any Japanese citizens within China would be protected in accordance with Chinese law.

http://www.demagaga.com/2012/09/17/...s-purchase-of-disputed-senkakudiaoyu-islands/




Just a quick summary as far as I can tell...

In the last few weeks the chinese have been boycotting and burning Japanese business and manufacturing companies in China. Over 100 cities (no exaggeration) have experience near riots akin to what we saw with American embassies the last 2 two weeks.

At issue... alot of bad history and more importantly disputes over islands and resources in S.E. Asia. China is making claims as well as Japan and Taiwan. Shits gettin heated and the US according to treaty is obligated to fight on Japans side if push comes to shove.

And with the way China is feeling backed against the wall (their claim is disputed since they weren't in the UN when those territories were divided up way back after WW2) it may come down to shoving.

and we thought WW3 would kick off in Iran..:smh::smh:
 
Last edited:
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

how shit is going, no telling where this stuff will start at.
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

those asian coons, why don't they unify based on the fact that they're asians?:angry:
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

japan already beat that ass once

keep us informed
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

alexw said:
japan already beat that ass once

keep us informed
Click to expand...

word - China's military don't want it wit Japan - US still got bases there. Plus no other county gives a shit about some piss ass island dispute between China and Japan - so even if shit pops off between China and Japan, and the US steps in on Japans behalf, Russia and Iran will not give a single fuck about it...so no World War.
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

Count23 said:
those asian coons, why don't they unify based on the fact that they're asians?:angry:
Click to expand...

This Video is Mild
The Total Slaughterer & Rape Japan did in China was Complete
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

a war with japan is a war with the USA - we have to protect them by treaty law
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

BadKredyt said:
word - China's military don't want it wit Japan - US still got bases there. Plus no other county gives a shit about some piss ass island dispute between China and Japan - so even if shit pops off between China and Japan, and the US steps in on Japans behalf, Russia and Iran will not give a single fuck about it...so no World War.
Click to expand...

those islands are believed to be rich in oil and natural gas as well as fishing areas... no one is willing to fight over barren rocks in the sea...

and have you ever heard of war by proxy...who do you think we were really fighting in Vietnam???
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

China need to go head and break bread with that land. You'd think china would be content with it's size.:rolleyes: Seriously tho, Im sure the island is strategically located... Those young chinese students don't know nothing about war, they need to be careful what they ask for...:smh:
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

THe op is an idiot... Please nobody take any thread this clown posts seriously... He's in the same league as esther, destrehen, godbody.
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO




:dunno:
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

mit-dropout said:
THe op is an idiot... Please nobody take any thread this clown posts seriously... He's in the same league as esther, destrehen, godbody.
Click to expand...

if you have better information then post it and stop acting like a dickhole:hmm:
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

kwazdog said:
China need to go head and break bread with that land. You'd think china would be content with it's size.:rolleyes: Seriously tho, Im sure the island is strategically located... Those young chinese students don't know nothing about war, they need to be careful what they ask for...:smh:
Click to expand...

that was before china became a nuclear power...this isn't the 1940s anymore. Japan can't have an offensive military mainly because they don't play well with others..anytime japan gets an army they have tendency to wanna take over shit. That was one of the conditions of their surrender.
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

There is a long history of rivalry and animosity between these two countries on many levels. It goes much deeper than just WWII atrocities. It's only a matter of time before simmering tensions boil over. However, nowadays wars are fought in the realm of economics. Despite all the "chest puffing" most of these disputes will be settled by way of economic sanctions and cutting off of exports/imports rather than actual military intervention.
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

YounGunnCam9395 said:
There is a long history of rivalry and animosity between these two countries on many levels. It goes much deeper than just WWII atrocities. It's only a matter of time before simmering tensions boil over. However, nowadays wars are fought in the realm of economics. Despite all the "chest puffing" most of these disputes will be settled by way of economic sanctions and cutting off of exports/imports rather than actual military intervention.
Click to expand...

oh really:rolleyes::rolleyes:

The US is set to reposition its Navy fleet with the majority of its warships to be assigned to the Asia-Pacific by 2020. But this military strategy has nothing to do with US-Chinese rivalry in the region, the defense secretary assures.

The US would reposition its Navy so that 60 per cent of its warships would be assigned to the Asia-Pacificregion by 2020, compared to about 50 per cent now, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told senior civilian and military leaders from about 30 Asia-Pacific nations at an annual security forum in Singapore.

"Some view the increased emphasis by the United States on the Asia-Pacific region as some kind of challenge to China. I reject that view entirely," he said. "Our effort to renew and intensify our involvement in Asia is fully compatible… with the development and growth of China. Indeed, increased US involvement in this region will benefit China as it advances our shared security and prosperity for the future."

But in laying out core US principles in the region, Panetta made clear Washington opposed any attempt by Beijing to make unilateral moves in its push for territorial rights in the oil-rich South China Sea.

http://indrus.in/articles/2012/06/05/us_to_move_majority_of_warships_to_asia-pacific_15914.html


When a senior U.S. general met in Beijing recently with Lt. Gen. Cai Yingting, the deputy chief of China's armed forces, Cai forcefully objected to America's expanding military presence in Asia and the Pacific, describing it as an effort to encircle his country.

"Why are you containing us?" Cai demanded, according to a U.S. official who was present and described the incident in return for anonymity.

The Obama administration is forging closer defense ties to countries near China, including India, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and Singapore; repositioning troops, planes and ships; and stepping up aid in the South Pacific to offset attention from Beijing.

The Obama administration is in talks with the Philippine government on regaining access to the Subic Bay naval base and Clark Air Base, two Cold War-era installations on or near the South China Sea. Pentagon planners say they are not interested in returning U.S. military personnel permanently to the Philippines but rather see it as a possible logistics hub, especially for humanitarian supplies.

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/16/world/la-fg-panetta-asia-20120916

that was back in June...no one was paying attention to that..:rolleyes:
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

geechiedan said:
oh really:rolleyes::rolleyes:

The US is set to reposition its Navy fleet with the majority of its warships to be assigned to the Asia-Pacific by 2020. But this military strategy has nothing to do with US-Chinese rivalry in the region, the defense secretary assures.

The US would reposition its Navy so that 60 per cent of its warships would be assigned to the Asia-Pacificregion by 2020, compared to about 50 per cent now, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told senior civilian and military leaders from about 30 Asia-Pacific nations at an annual security forum in Singapore.

"Some view the increased emphasis by the United States on the Asia-Pacific region as some kind of challenge to China. I reject that view entirely," he said. "Our effort to renew and intensify our involvement in Asia is fully compatible… with the development and growth of China. Indeed, increased US involvement in this region will benefit China as it advances our shared security and prosperity for the future."

But in laying out core US principles in the region, Panetta made clear Washington opposed any attempt by Beijing to make unilateral moves in its push for territorial rights in the oil-rich South China Sea.

http://indrus.in/articles/2012/06/05/us_to_move_majority_of_warships_to_asia-pacific_15914.html


When a senior U.S. general met in Beijing recently with Lt. Gen. Cai Yingting, the deputy chief of China's armed forces, Cai forcefully objected to America's expanding military presence in Asia and the Pacific, describing it as an effort to encircle his country.

"Why are you containing us?" Cai demanded, according to a U.S. official who was present and described the incident in return for anonymity.

The Obama administration is forging closer defense ties to countries near China, including India, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and Singapore; repositioning troops, planes and ships; and stepping up aid in the South Pacific to offset attention from Beijing.

The Obama administration is in talks with the Philippine government on regaining access to the Subic Bay naval base and Clark Air Base, two Cold War-era installations on or near the South China Sea. Pentagon planners say they are not interested in returning U.S. military personnel permanently to the Philippines but rather see it as a possible logistics hub, especially for humanitarian supplies.

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/16/world/la-fg-panetta-asia-20120916

that was back in June...no one was paying attention to that..:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

The sad thing is that "we" (humans) would still have the need for "warships" now or in 2020!!! :smh:
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

geechiedan said:
oh really:rolleyes::rolleyes:

The US is set to reposition its Navy fleet with the majority of its warships to be assigned to the Asia-Pacific by 2020. But this military strategy has nothing to do with US-Chinese rivalry in the region, the defense secretary assures.

The US would reposition its Navy so that 60 per cent of its warships would be assigned to the Asia-Pacificregion by 2020, compared to about 50 per cent now, US Defense Secretary Leon Panetta told senior civilian and military leaders from about 30 Asia-Pacific nations at an annual security forum in Singapore.

"Some view the increased emphasis by the United States on the Asia-Pacific region as some kind of challenge to China. I reject that view entirely," he said. "Our effort to renew and intensify our involvement in Asia is fully compatible… with the development and growth of China. Indeed, increased US involvement in this region will benefit China as it advances our shared security and prosperity for the future."

But in laying out core US principles in the region, Panetta made clear Washington opposed any attempt by Beijing to make unilateral moves in its push for territorial rights in the oil-rich South China Sea.

http://indrus.in/articles/2012/06/05/us_to_move_majority_of_warships_to_asia-pacific_15914.html


When a senior U.S. general met in Beijing recently with Lt. Gen. Cai Yingting, the deputy chief of China's armed forces, Cai forcefully objected to America's expanding military presence in Asia and the Pacific, describing it as an effort to encircle his country.

"Why are you containing us?" Cai demanded, according to a U.S. official who was present and described the incident in return for anonymity.

The Obama administration is forging closer defense ties to countries near China, including India, Vietnam, the Philippines, Indonesia and Singapore; repositioning troops, planes and ships; and stepping up aid in the South Pacific to offset attention from Beijing.

The Obama administration is in talks with the Philippine government on regaining access to the Subic Bay naval base and Clark Air Base, two Cold War-era installations on or near the South China Sea. Pentagon planners say they are not interested in returning U.S. military personnel permanently to the Philippines but rather see it as a possible logistics hub, especially for humanitarian supplies.

http://articles.latimes.com/2012/sep/16/world/la-fg-panetta-asia-20120916

that was back in June...no one was paying attention to that..:rolleyes:
Click to expand...

What else is new?...The U.S. flexing our military muscles again getting involved in issues we have no business in. Instead of encouraging diplomacy between the 2 nations, we lead in with our warships. It's obvious the U.S. has been looking for any reason to start some isht with China. All these years they've been strategically feeding us anti-Chinese propaganda, demonizing them in every way possible to sway public opinion and paint a portrait of our slant-eyed enemy. If u ask me it's kinda similar to Nazi anti-semetic propaganda used to incite the German people against the Jewish race. Just look at the presidential campaign, it's turned into a "who's tougher on China" pissing contest. On top of that, the U.S. stay pushing China's buttons on sensitive issues (Taiwan/Tibet) with no regard, looking to provoke them into some sort of perceived hostile reaction.

It certainly wouldn't surprise me if one of our warships somehow gets sunk amidst the tension and we have to retaliate with yet another war to protect the Japanese people against the big bad bully.
 
Re: World War III: Return to the Pacific Rim - forget the M.E. China & Japan gonna BO

Calmness and patience are needed between China, U.S. in South China Sea

(CNN)The competition for influence between the United States and China in the South China Sea entered a new stage when the warship U.S.S. Lassen sailed near China's two man-made islands, aiming to demonstrate that the U.S. will go anywhere international laws allow.

There is no doubt that the U.S. has officially stepped into a very complicated matter in the South China Sea -- and it is a risky one.

The Chinese government has strongly protested against the U.S. move by issuing stern warnings to Washington and summoning its ambassador to Beijing. Further action would be taken to ensure China's national sovereignty, the Chinese government promised. Such words should not be taken lightly; after all China regards the South China Sea as one of its core national interests. That means, if necessary, China would go to war to defend them -- though war is always the last resort when everything else fails.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/30/opinions/south-china-sea-dispute-chen/
 
Why Lifting the Vietnam Arms Embargo Is All About China

President Obama issued his own Gulf of Tonkin resolution Monday, declaring that his decision to end a 50-year old U.S. arms embargo on Vietnam was “not based on China.” The statement had a whiff of theoriginal 1964 Gulf of Tonkin resolution. That’s when President Lyndon B. Johnson misled the American people and Congress about a naval skirmish to justify a mammoth deployment of U.S. troops into what became the Vietnam War, which eventually killed 58,220 U.S. troops.

In fact, Obama’s decision to “fully” end the arms embargo was driven by China’s growing aggressiveness in seeking control of nearly all of the South China Sea, actions have unnerved Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan—as well as Vietnam and the U.S. “It’s all about China,” says Anthony Zinni, a retired four-star Marine general who fought in Vietnam. “No matter how much he denies it.”

If Obama had linked the embargo’s end to China’s actions, some Pentagon officials believe, it would have signaled to China that its moves have triggered a military reaction. Denying any linkage, they believe, simply delays an inevitable day of reckoning.

Tom Pepinsky, a southeast Asian expert, says lifting the embargo is all about China. “This decision is ultimately driven by regional concerns, with Vietnam emerging as a key strategic partner for the United States,” says the associate professor of government at Cornell University. “Although the Obama Administration denies that continued tensions in the South China Sea are at the heart of its decision to resume arms exports to Vietnam, this decision signals U.S. plans to contain China’s regional ambitions with Vietnam as a partner.”


http://time.com/4345639/vietnam-arms-embargo-barack-obama-china/

no one is paying to this shit....:smh::smh::smh::smh::smh:
 
Don’t start a fire in Asia, China warns Obama after Vietnam arms deal

BEIJING — China warned President Obama on Tuesday not to spark a fire in Asia after he announced the lifting of a longstanding embargo on lethal arms sales to Vietnam.

Obama unveiled the historic step on Monday during his first visit to Vietnam, insisting the move was “not based on China” while simultaneously acknowledging that both nations share a common concern about China’s actions in the South China Sea.

Beijing, not surprisingly, was unimpressed. It enjoys a complex relationship with its southern neighbor: the two governments are united in their communist ideology and distaste for Western democracy, but fought a bloody border war as recently as 1979. They now fiercely contest sovereignty over many small islands in the South China Sea.

The United States and Vietnam must not spark a “regional tinderbox,” the Communist Party mouthpiece, China Daily, warned in an editorial Tuesday, noting concerns that Obama’s move was meant to “curb the rise of China.”

The United States accuses China of militarizing the South China Sea by turning contested reefs and rocks into putative military bases.

Beijing says it is only asserting its “indisputable” sovereignty over the islands and blames the United States for interfering, by encouraging rival claimants to antagonize China.

The nationalist Global Times tabloid called Obama’s claim that the Vietnam move was not aimed at China “a very poor lie,” adding it would exacerbate the “strategic antagonism between Washington and Beijing.”

http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world...after-vietnam-arms-deal/ar-BBtoZsn?li=BBnbfcL
 

Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top