FYI> When I first posted in the tread, there was 38 views...
That has nothing to do with what I asked. Please answer the question, I'm trying to understand the comparison you've attempted to make.
Breitbart found DEAD !
- Thread starter QueEx
- Start date
That has nothing to do with what I asked. Please answer the question, I'm trying to understand the comparison you've attempted to make.
H.A.N
Banned
Yes You are ricki ronson.
You'll notice they make an effort to reply to any silly post put up but dodge like bullets good ones that make them defend their indefensible positions.
sarcasm-remarks that mean the opposite of what they seem to say and are intended to mock or deride...
Intelligence would show you the correlation of comments posted and views, that is all I will give you.
Not saying nothing, YOU don't want to know the truth. Tune into your nightly news for the truth, as you were..
Intelligence would show you the correlation of comments posted and views, that is all I will give you.
Not saying nothing, YOU don't want to know the truth. Tune into your nightly news for the truth, as you were..
But why hold out?
What kind of conspiracy theorist refuses to let the world in on the theory
The most celebrated C.T.'s are those whose theories suffer from the greatest lack of credibility. Be Great!
Otherwise, a C.T. with no theory just puts us sheep, to sleep.
I had to ask, maybe she caught something that I'd missed. Breitbart somehow being tied to Steve Bridges...I don't see it.
Well, she and H.A.N have both come back to this thread and neither has said anything of substance.
Their silence is telling.
But I'm used to it. I'm STILL waiting for them to weigh in on the voter suppression bills Republicans are ramming through state legislatures.
Posters like you and a long list behind stay on certain issues as if what your opinion counts. I am not going to entangle myself in this type of discussion. I actually interact, that should register with you and lend credence to the fact that I am posting on the political board because I do know and I do things IN REAL LIFE.
"Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions" in living color, no puppet Tuesday
We are on this today, holla what you catch up yes, you too...
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/04/02/justice/scotus-strip-search-ruling/index.html
Why would they worry about the constitutional abuses that effect them directly every day when they can play hit and run with the facts.
H.A.N
Banned
I won't sit here and wax philosophically for your benefit. My silence is not telling. I have a life outside of this message board. I'm a real gentleman not like you troll and group think followers. I have an opinion that's not taken well but I don't care. Anyone with any sense would know why he's not around. I'm not blind nor am I a stan because we have a brotha in office. I respect the office no matter who holds the title. I follow politics and have taken part in the system outside of voting. I understand how things work.
Posters like you and a long list behind stay on certain issues as if what your opinion counts. I am not going to entangle myself in this type of discussion. I actually interact, that should register with you and lend credence to the fact that I am posting on the political board because I do know and I do things IN REAL LIFE.
"Fools find no pleasure in understanding but delight in airing their own opinions" in living color, no puppet Tuesday
We are on this today, holla what you catch up yes, you too...
http://edition.cnn.com/2012/04/02/justice/scotus-strip-search-ruling/index.html
And they have every excuse in the world to not defend their supposedly preferred political philosophy.
You have all these other things to do but you make plenty of time to a) troll on the main board like HAN does or b) explain sarcasm to an educated man like Que.
Take that effort and engage on some of the other topics.
Claiming "I interact", GYH? Okay. I can't tell by your seeming minsunderstanding of nearly every topic.
What it appears is you want to talk about things you feel make you and your philosophy look better but not ones where you're exposed as hypocrites and liars on your "love" of the Constitution.
But I got it and I see you.
You, HAN, Gunner, Actinanass. I gotcha. Can't even get these last two clowns to back up what they say.
I have a confession: I seriously don't understand the above. Seriously.
If the sarcasm definition was meant to apply to my comments just before - - I wasn't meaning to be sarcastic. I meant what I said, though I was not intending to offend. I was simply eliciting (first from H.A.N., and then from you as you interceded) why anyone would think Breitbart's death was from something other than natural causes.
While you both have implied the death to be suspicious, neither of you have offered anything towards proof in that regard. Of course, no one on this board is obligated to support an opinion, but if not, why are we here, really
If the sarcasm definition was meant to relate to something you said - - I apologize, but how was I to know? A suspicious nature of Brietbart's death is not apparent on its face to me, hence, my "WHY" in an attempt to have someone enlighten me.
Again, if someone thinks the death is from other than natural causes, don't hold out !!!
I have a confession: I seriously don't understand the above. Seriously.
If the sarcasm definition was meant to apply to my comments just before - - I wasn't meaning to be sarcastic. I meant what I said, though I was not intending to offend. I was simply eliciting (first from H.A.N., and then from you as you interceded) why anyone would think Breitbart's death was from something other than natural causes.
While you both have implied the death to be suspicious, neither of you have offered anything towards proof in that regard. Of course, no one on this board is obligated to support an opinion, but if not, why are we here, really
If the sarcasm definition was meant to relate to something you said - - I apologize, but how was I to know? A suspicious nature of Brietbart's death is not apparent on its face to me, hence, my "WHY" in an attempt to have someone enlighten me.
Again, if someone thinks the death is from other than natural causes, don't hold out !!!
I'm not holding my breath on this one, Que.
Similar threads
