Iran says it will give nuclear technology to Islamic nations

Makkonnen

The Quizatz Haderach
BGOL Investor
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RTGAM.20050915.wiran0915/BNStory/International/

Iran offers to spread nuclear know-how


Thursday, September 15, 2005 Updated at 12:07 PM EDT

Associated Press



Tehran — Iran is willing to provide other Islamic nations with nuclear technology, Iran's hard-line President said Thursday.

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad made the comments after meeting Turkey's Prime Minister on the sidelines of a gathering of world leaders at the United Nations, according to the state-run Islamic Republic News Agency.

Mr. Ahmadinejad repeated promises that Iran will not pursue nuclear weapons, IRNA reported. Then he added: “Iran is ready to transfer nuclear know-how to the Islamic countries due to their need.”

Iran has said it is determined to pursue its nuclear program to process uranium and produce energy, despite European attempts to limit it. The United States accuses Tehran of secretly seeking to develop nuclear weapons, a charge that Tehran denies.
 
Greed said:
i bet you're delirious with excitement that america will soon get their's.
oh yeah I am a devout muslim
the only thing greater than this is what TD Jakes and Condi Rice have done for HIV and orphans in Africa
 
i didnt call you a muslim genius but time and time again you and friends have advocated shit just like this to counter evil america.

all of a sudden your memory is failing.

thats ok, thats why i'm here.
 
Greed said:
i didnt call you a muslim genius but time and time again you and friends have advocated shit just like this to counter evil america.

all of a sudden your memory is failing.

thats ok, thats why i'm here.
Did I say you called me muslim genius?
Time and time again me and what friends have advocated what to counter evil america?

I've advocated the spread of nuclear technology throughout the muslim world? Really? To what end? How will knowledge of nuclear power production counter evil America?

All of the sudden your explanation is lacking, again.

That's OK, that's why I'm here. :lol:


In other news all is safe. President Bush is sending Creflo Dollar to Iran to sort things out.
 
Gods Favorite said:
I said I support the removal of the Iranian regime and I don't want them to get nukes. You guys are in support of Irans nuclear program?

Dolemite said:
I support it as being a deterrent to the imperialist agenda of the USA.

http://64.255.174.200/board/showthread.php?p=64851
thats why i'm here.

what i dont get is why do you waste time denying shit you're proud of and endears you to your fans.

i'm just trying to spread your fan base. you're an ingrate. now thank me.
 
Last edited:
Greed said:
thats why i'm here.

what i dont get is why do you waste time denying shit you're proud of and endears you to your fans.

i'm just trying to spread your fan base. you're an ingrate. now thank me.
wow Iran is the entire muslim world

Again "genius" - what did I deny? lmao

you have a map of that muslim world for me? I had no idea Iran was so big!


plus for a dumbass you are pushing it- post shit in context

that thread is discussin America attacking Iran and how America has destroyed democracy in Iran in the past and I actually said

I support it as being a deterrent to the imperialist agenda of the USA.

You seem to have no problem with the largest Terrorist group in the world having nukes.


again where is this entire muslim world?


Please stop getting critical thinking and geography lessons from TD Jakes.
 
i like how you say you arent denying it but at the same time saying i'm not characterizing you correctly and taking shit out of context.

the funniest part is that you think that one extra line makes your post look sensible.

hilarious. i was actually leaving it out to make you look LESS extreme.

you really dont know how you come across in your post do you.

LHOH
 
no maps of the whole muslim world?

still no explanation of your bullshit lies and exaggerations?

Hilarious.

Next time don't half-step just make up something 100% false and claim I said it and post a url rotflmbao


for the record dumbass - id prefer that no one had nuclear weapons or nuclear power plants

quote that one dipshit lmao
 
Still, these do seem like racial motives to me.

Why is america so opposed to "brown" countries having weapons to protect themselves?!??!

Even the most stupid muthafucka in washington knows anybody who comes into power will not use them for fear of destruction of that which they rule.

This just some crusader shit, they want to keep bossin on people.

They dont want anymore chinas or north koreas, people not white that can do what they want without havign to suffer sodams fate.

What country in their right mind wouldnt get nukes to keep america off them?!!?!?!?!??!!?!?

They seen china can keep americas spy plane, they seen north korea can say fuck you, then they see sodam not do shit and get a new asshole.
 
gene cisco said:
Still, these do seem like racial motives to me.

Why is america so opposed to "brown" countries having weapons to protect themselves?!??!

Even the most stupid muthafucka in washington knows anybody who comes into power will not use them for fear of destruction of that which they rule.

This just some crusader shit, they want to keep bossin on people.

They dont want anymore chinas or north koreas, people not white that can do what they want without havign to suffer sodams fate.

What country in their right mind wouldnt get nukes to keep america off them?!!?!?!?!??!!?!?

They seen china can keep americas spy plane, they seen north korea can say fuck you, then they see sodam not do shit and get a new asshole.
do european nuclear powers really think they can prevent this technology from being learned indefinitely?

dont let them africans get any guns or gunpowder

dont sell those injuns no rifles


its only a matter of time before people learn about it

in an effort to circumvent other people fuckin with the US, the US has encouraged the world to fuck with it. And now they don't want people responding to them the way they respond to threats(hiroshima).


Aint no fun when the rabbit has the gun.
 
http://edition.cnn.com/2005/WORLD/meast/09/17/ahmadinejad/

Iranian president: No 'nuclear apartheid'

Saturday, September 17, 2005 Posted: 2315 GMT (0715 HKT)

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad told delegates Saturday at the United Nations General Assembly that his country had a right to pursue nuclear power.

CNN's Christiane Amanpour spoke to Ahmadinejad a few hours before that speech.

Amanpour: You're here in New York ,and you've come to speak to the United Nations and to the world. What proposals are you going to make that will defuse the current crisis over Iran's nuclear activities?

Ahmadinejad: In the name of God. In my opinion we cannot, we shouldn't, use the word "crisis." There are issues between different countries such as ours and they continue. And in the future they'll probably continue in some other forms. The first point is stressing the right of the Islamic Republic of Iran to pursue and have the nuclear cycle.

Number two, the acceptance of all the points and agreements of the International Atomic Energy Agency.

Number three, reserving such rights for all countries.

Number four, the creation of a special committee that controls the proliferation of nuclear weaponry in the countries who have the means to carry such weaponry. And then the continuation of such talks in the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency with other countries.

These are the points that we've considered, on the basis of which we will put forth a proposal. We're against "nuclear apartheid," which means some have the right to possess it, use the fuel, and then sell it to another country for 10 times its value. We're against that. We say clean energy is the right of all countries. But also it is the duty and the responsibility of all countries, including ours, to set up frameworks to stop the proliferation of it.

Amanpour: You do have the right under international law. Is it enough for Iran to have a small laboratory able to do research and, yet, have an outside party deliver your fuel in order to defuse people's suspicions?

Ahmadinejad: Why do others insist on having the fuel and selling it to us? I tell you, we will commit ourselves to -- right now, I give them commitment that we will sell it to them at 30 percent less than the prices that they're proposing. Is that fine?

Amanpour: You are determined? You are determined to proceed?

Ahmadinejad: We are determined. Certainly we are determined. Why should other people have it and sell it to us? We will make it and sell it to them.

Amanpour: So are you saying you're determined to pursue enrichment?

Ahmadinejad: This is the right of a country.

Amanpour: But we're talking about the words now. Are you determined to pursue enrichment? And you said it's your right. I want to know if that's your policy?

Ahmadinejad: This is a nuclear cycle for civilian peaceful purposes, it's a right of a country, and our country will pursue it.

Amanpour: Do you accept at all that the United States, Europe, they're deeply suspicious about your intentions. They just think that you want to build a bomb. Do you understand that? And why do you want to have this crisis?

Ahmadinejad: Yes, you see, we understand, we know that their intentions are bad intentions, their intentions towards us are bad. When have they ever shown or have had clean, clear, pure intentions towards us?

We don't have expectation for anything else coming from them.

What rights do they have when they want to talk about such issues to us, they need to proceed according to international laws. They cannot say that we don't like the intentions -- what we think are the intentions -- of your country, therefore, we want to prevent you.

All of our activities have been transparent to the agency, and we've announced many times that because of our religious views, our cultural views, we're against the creation and or use of nuclear weaponry.

We're a country that rules according to our religious laws. And our religious scholars have issued religious decrees that the creation, the research towards the creation and use of nuclear weapons of mass destruction is not allowed. Therefore, our country cannot allocate any specific budgets or resources to such activities.

Amanpour: If you were referring to the Security Council and if sanctions were imposed on Iran, will you take counter measures? Already, some of your officials have threatened to provoke a rise in oil prices, have potentially threatened to pull out of the NPT [Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty]. What will you do if sanctions are imposed?

Ahmadinejad: I think any intelligent, healthy, smart human being should use every resource in order to maintain his or her freedom and independence.

Amanpour: So you could see interfering with oil prices?

Ahmadinejad: I doubt that the leaders of the United States and Europe are that far removed from reality. I think they're smarter than denying us this legal right.

It is natural, of course. They will use whatever they have in their hand, which is the U.N. Security Council. And our nation has the means to defend and obtain its own rights. Do not doubt that our people will not lose.

Amanpour: It sounds very aggressive, what you're saying. It sounds like we're heading toward real confrontation.

Ahmadinejad: No it isn't. No, we have no such intentions. All we're saying is that we will go according to all of the provisions. There are cameras set up here, you are the ones who are saying do not proceed. According to what law is this being imposed on us? You'll have come, and you are putting, you are interfering in our internal affairs against international laws. Who is at fault? Who is being aggressive?

Now, in this instance if the International Atomic Energy Agency gives us the lawful framework, of course we'll cooperate. The biggest degree of cooperation has been carried out by the International Atomic Agency by the Islamic Republic of Iran. Like I said, in the last 34 years there have not been inspections done, been conducted on any country like they have been with the Islamic Republic of Iran. So this is unprecedented in the history of the agency. So we think that the dictation of rules in the international arena by some powers is unacceptable to us. And this is what we refuse to surrender to.

Amanpour: You know, in your campaign when you ran for president, you talked about increasing economic opportunities for the poor, for the lower middle class in Iran. You talked about making the lives better. How can you do that if you're going to be as isolated? Surely that depends on Iran being integrated with the world.

Ahmadinejad: You see, what I said during the presidential election is what I said generally. Everything we talk about is in order to keep our national interest and what is at the heart of our national interest. We need to keep those at the forefront. One of the slogans during the presidential elections for my campaign was that we will have access to the nuclear supply process.

Amanpour: So is nuclear supply more important than having your country improve its economic situation and having people have a better life? I mean, are you really ready to have a real confrontation with the world over this?

Ahmadinejad: No, we don't want to be at war with the world. I explained, you see, they're trying to impose their will on our country. I'm confident we'll reach both. I have no worries about it. We will have peace, prosperity and the nuclear supply cycle.

Amanpour: Mr. President, on the eve of the elections in Tehran, I spoke to your challenger, Mr. Hashemi Rafsanjani, who said that it was time to mend relations with the United States, to find a way to try to bridge these decades of confrontation. Do you believe it's time to do that?

Ahmadinejad: You see, during the elections, different topics, different issues were addressed, and people chose. I said no such thing.

Amanpour: As you know, there were a number of former American hostages, who were held hostage in Iran in the late '70s, who accused you as being one of the hostage-takers and interrogators during that time. Is that true?

Ahmadinejad: You see, I heard the same news after I was elected and, you know, quite frankly, I laughed at it. Either the memory had been erased and replaced anew. I don't know how they had reached such a conclusion. Back then I didn't have the beard I do now.

Amanpour: So you were not involved?

Ahmadinejad: No, it's not like that. I was not involved. But I have a question. What I would like to say today to the people of the United States and to the government of the United States is that we need to change our views. We need.... We cannot keep imposing our will.

It is not the foundation, the solid foundation for peace. I understand that the United States government, that they had announced this officially. They expected our people to make a different choice than they did.

Obviously the democracy and the people of this country get to decide. They decided. We have a great deal of turnout for this election, and they made their decision. Why is it that after they decided, after the people of Iran decided, why is it that after the decision was made public that such accusations started being leveled against us?

Now let's say I don't like you, for whatever reason there may be. Do I have the right to keep bringing accusations against you in order to discredit you? What kind of behavior is this? You see, we think a new school of thought on the worldwide stage should be applied nowadays. We need to address issues openly.

Ahmadinejad: Let me tell you something else. If we can accept the following: In the relation between countries that, let's say, a country at her own will can bring accusations towards another country. Instead of requesting proof from the accuser we are requesting proof from the accused. What way is this? What way of international norm does this reflect? This is the wrong way to go. This is a hostage taker, this is a terrorist. What kind of thought is this? What kind of words are these. I saw the picture that they tried to impose. It didn't even resemble me.

Amanpour: Let me ask you about terrorism. One if the big issues between Iran and the U.S. and many other countries is that they believe that Iran sponsors terrorism. A state sponsor of terrorism around the world. What can you do and say to stop that and to change that?

Ahmadinejad: We go back to the previous question. They like to accuse us. What are we to do?

And they also believe that they read our intentions before we actually state our intentions. So how can we provide proof for such people? How can we satisfy them? Seventy-two of our biggest leaders were killed by a terrorist group. Our president and one of our prime ministers in the past were killed by a terrorist group. We have been victims of terrorism.

Amanpour: Both governments outside of Iran and many people inside Iran are quite alarmed because your election, they think, symbolizes a step back, a step away from reform, away from democratic progress, away from women's rights.

Ahmadinejad: You see, the people who were not victorious in the election, they would say such things. So how can you say these elections were a step backward? How can elections, the results of them, be a step backward? Election is a result of democracy. When our people turn out in such high numbers and cast their votes, over 60 million votes are cast, how can you call that a step back?
 
<IFRAME SRC="http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,376022,00.html" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://service.spiegel.de/cache/international/0,1518,376022,00.html">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 
Last edited:
IAEA adopts resolution on Iran's nuclear program

IAEA adopts resolution on Iran's nuclear program
2 hours, 37 minutes ago

VIENNA (AFP) - The UN atomic watchdog has adopted by vote an EU proposal that sets Iran up for referral to the UN Security Council, a spokeswoman said, in a sharp escalation of the West's face-off with the Islamic Republic.

The vote was 22-1, with 12 abstentions on the 35-nation board of the International Atomic Energy Agency, IAEA spokeswoman Melissa Fleming told reporters on Saturday.

The resolution finds Iran in violation of international nuclear safeguards, but referral to the Security Council, which could impose sanctions, would only come after a report on Iran by IAEA chief Mohammed ElBaradei, which he will probably make to the next board meeting in November.

Iran, which has maintained that its nuclear program is peaceful, has threatened to react strongly if the resolution was adopted, diplomats said.

The United States has charged that Tehran's efforts to master the nuclear fuel cycle are in fact aimed at developing weapons.

It was the first time the IAEA, which seeks consensus on crucial issues, had voted on a non-compliance question.

The meeting started over two hours late with Russia trying to get the EU to agree to amendments that would have eliminated the automatic requirement of referral to the Security Council.

But the amendments were not accepted, and the resolution was approved in the same form as proposed Friday by Britain.

The only vote against was Venezuela while Russia, which had expressed bitter opposition to the resolution, abstained.

India, a member of the non-aligned movement that had opposed the resolution, voted for it.

Iran has been expected to react strongly if the resolution were adopted,

threatening to make nuclear fuel in a move that could lead the West to advance the calendar for getting the Security Council involved.

Iran has said it will submit a note in writing to the IAEA saying that it will begin to enrich uranium, the nuclear reactor fuel that can also be bomb material, and also cease applying a protocol for wider IAEA inspections if the resolution is adopted, a diplomat close to the IAEA said.

Iran's resumption last month of uranium conversion, a first step in making enriched uranium, set off a crisis in which the United States and the EU want to call in the international weight of the Security Council, which could impose trade sanctions although softer measures are at first expected.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050924/wl_afp/irannucleariaearesolution_050924162735
 
US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread
By Francois Murphy
Mon Sep 26, 2:47 PM ET

VIENNA (Reuters) - The United States said on Monday it would provide nuclear reactor fuel to countries that refrain from enriching uranium in an effort to prevent the process from being used to make atomic weapons.

Enrichment purifies uranium to levels at which it is useable in power plants or, if enriched further, in atomic bombs.

International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) chief Mohamed ElBaradei has suggested setting up an independent, international system to provide states with a guaranteed fuel supply if they abandoned enrichment.

"We are working with major suppliers and the IAEA on a back-up supply mechanism for states that forgo investment in indigenous enrichment or (plutonium) reprocessing capability," U.S. Energy Secretary Samuel Bodman said in a statement issued at the annual IAEA General Conference.

"The United States Department of Energy will reserve up to 17 metric tonnes of highly enriched uranium for an IAEA verifiable assured fuel supply arrangement," he said.

It was unclear how or whether this would fit into any future plan for a fuel supply as envisioned by ElBaradei, who was re-elected to a third four-year term as IAEA chief on Monday.

ElBaradei, in a written statement to the IAEA's 139 members, said that operations related to uranium enrichment and plutonium separation are "a vulnerability" in the non-proliferation regime.

North Korea and Iran are recent examples. North Korea withdrew from the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and expelled U.N. inspectors on December 31, 2002, after which it announced that it had built nuclear weapons.

Washington accuses Iran of using its nuclear program as a cover for an atomic weapons program and wants Iran to give up uranium enrichment. It believes Tehran would use this for a bomb. Iran says it only wants to generate electricity.

The cornerstone of ElBaradei's idea is the notion that the supply must be guaranteed and free from political influence.

"How do you convince a country to give up enrichment if the fuel supply isn't guaranteed?" a Western diplomat close to the IAEA said on condition of anonymity.

The diplomat said ElBaradei hoped to receive a clearer mandate on the issue from this week's meeting of the IAEA.

The U.S. offer would be the first step toward a "neutral bank" of reactor fuel, a senior official from the U.S. Department of Energy said on condition of anonymity.

"The United States felt it was important to show leadership and begin the process of converting some of the discussions ... into actual implementation," the official said.

The fuel would be enough for 10 reactor cores, he said, adding that Washington estimated it would be ready by 2009.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20050926...PhZ.3QA;_ylu=X3oDMTBiMW04NW9mBHNlYwMlJVRPUCUl
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

Dolemite has retired, but somewhere he must be reading this:

.

<font size="5"><center>Venezuela interested in working with Iran
in civilian nuclear technology</font size></center>


Tehran Times
October 4, 2005

CARACAS, Venezuela (AP) -- Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez said Sunday his government is starting research into peaceful uses of nuclear energy.

Chavez did not give details, but he has previously said he is interested in developing nuclear power just like Iran and Brazil are doing. "Brazil has advanced in its nuclear research, nuclear power, and that's valid. Argentina too, and we also are starting to do research and projects in the area of nuclear energy, with peaceful aims of course," Chavez said during his weekly radio and TV program "Hello President."

Chavez, whose country is the world's fifth largest oil exporter, has said he is interested in working with Iran to explore peaceful nuclear energy. Chavez has insisted that Iran has the right to develop nuclear energy despite opposition from the U.S.

The Venezuelan president said he spoke by phone recently with his Iranian counterpart, Mahmud Ahmadinejad, and hoped to visit Iran soon.

"As soon as we can, we will go," Chavez said.

http://www.tehrantimes.com/Description.asp?Da=10/4/2005&Cat=2&Num=2
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

whispers:: playing the role of dolemite is Greed ::whispers

ahem, "i'm for it as long as they both promise to blow up america someday because we deserve it. the rabbit has the gun."
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

<font size="5"><center>Iran Threatens U.S. With 'Harm and Pain'</font size></center>

Associated Press
Mar 8, 9:56 AM (ET)
By GEORGE JAHN

VIENNA, Austria (AP) - Iran threatened the United States with "harm and pain" Wednesday for its role in hauling Tehran before the U.N. Security Council over its nuclear program. But the United States and its European allies said Iran's nuclear intransigence left the world no choice but to ask for Security Council action.

The council could impose economic and political sanctions on Iran.

The statements were delivered to the 35-member board of the International Atomic Energy Agency, which is meeting to focus on Tehran's refusal to freeze uranium enrichment.

The meeting is in effect the last step before the Security Council begins considering Iran's nuclear activities and international fears they could be misused to make weapons. It began with both Iran and nations which oppose its enrichment plans sticking to their positions, reflecting the deadlock that prompted the IAEA board to seek Security Council intervention.

"The United States has the power to cause harm and pain," said a statement delivered by the Iranian delegation. "But the United States is also susceptible to harm and pain. So if that is the path that the U.S. wishes to choose, let the ball roll."

The statement did not elaborate on what Iran meant by "harm and pain," and Iranian officials were not immediately available to comment.

But diplomats accredited to the meeting and in contact with the Iranians said the statement could be a veiled threat to use oil as an economic weapon.

Iran is the second-largest producer within the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, and a boycott could target Europe, China or India.

The republic also could cause difficulties in southern Iraq. On Tuesday, U.S. Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld accused Tehran of dispatching elements of its Revolutionary Guard to stir trouble inside Iraq.

Iran's statement was unusually harsh, reflecting Tehran's frustration at failing to deflect the threat of Security Council action against it in the coming weeks. Tehran maintains its nuclear program is for generating electricity.

"Our nation has made its decision to fully use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes and all have to give in to this decision made by the Iranian nation," Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in Iran. "We have made our choice."

Iran also attacked "warmongers in Washington" for what it said was an unjust accusation that Tehran's nuclear intentions were mainly for military use. It also suggested America was vulnerable, despite its strength.

"Surely we are not naive about the United States' ... intention to flex muscles," the statement said. "But we also see the bone fractures underneath."

It also threatened broader retaliation, without being specific, saying Iran "will adapt our policy and adjust our approach to conform with the new exigencies."

Earlier, U.S. delegate Gregory Schulte insisted in comments to the board that "the time has now come for the Security Council to act."

He ticked off Iran's decision to curtail agency inspections, its expanding uranium enrichment program and worrying conclusions by IAEA inspectors that suggest at least past interest in nuclear arms as contributing to "mounting international concerns" about Tehran's nuclear intentions.

"Iran has still not come clean," he said.

Schulte listed Tehran's possession of plans that could only be used to make nuclear warheads, links between its nuclear programs and the military, and its determination to develop a large-scale enrichment program that could be misused to make nuclear arms.

"IAEA inspectors have no doubt this information was expressly intended for the fabrication of nuclear weapons components," Schulte said of documents showing how to form fissile material into warheads.

Separately, France, Germany and Britain, which spearheaded the Feb. 4 IAEA resolution clearing the path for Security Council action, warned that what is known about Iran's enrichment program could represent only "the tip of the iceberg."

It also spoke of "indicators of a possible military dimension to Iran's (nuclear) program" as "a legitimate source of intense concern."

"We believe that the time has ... come for the U.N. Security Council to reinforce the authority" of the IAEA and its board, the European statement said.

Ahmadinejad's comments - and U.S. and Russian statements the day before rejecting any compromise allowing Tehran to enrich uranium domestically - set the stage for Security Council action once the IAEA board meeting hears about the latest investigations into Iran's nuclear program and debates the issue.

Russia and China, which have Security Council vetoes, may use them to foil any resolution in that chamber that would meaningfully increase pressure on Iran, their political and economic ally. Chinese Foreign Minister Li Zhaoxing appealed Tuesday for more negotiations and suggested Security Council involvement was not needed.

The Chinese and Russian statements to the board were relatively moderate, said delegates inside the closed meeting. China urged "more time for diplomacy" before any Security Council action, one delegate said on condition of anonymity, quoting from the Chinese statement.

---

Associated Press reporter Palma Benczenleitner contributed to this report.

---

On the Net:

International Atomic Energy Agency, http://www.iaea.org

http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20060308/D8G7F1CG0.html?PG=home&SEC=news
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

Iran Threatens U.S. With 'Harm and Pain'

When will the democrat party save us from this? We need to supply our soldiers with skeakers not guns. Run Kerry run!

-VG
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

VegasGuy said:
When will the democrat party save us from this? We need to supply our soldiers with skeakers not guns. Run Kerry run!

-VG

are the republicans gonna save us by bankrupting the federal treasury and having wars on 3 different fronts. if so they are on the right path.
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

this adversarial bullshit is gonna make it a sure thing that when one of these countries does get a bomb, and they will eventually, they will want to use it on guess who
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

anyone who makes decisions along party lines without hearing the issues is an idiot
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

dyhawk said:
anyone who makes decisions along party lines without hearing the issues is an idiot
One of the best things I've heard you say ... ever

QueEx
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

QueEx said:
<font size="5"><center>Iran Threatens U.S. With 'Harm and Pain'</font size></center>

Associated Press
Mar 8, 9:56 AM (ET)
By GEORGE JAHN

VIENNA, Austria (AP) - Iran threatened the United States with "harm and pain" Wednesday for its role in hauling Tehran before the U.N. Security Council over its nuclear program. But the United States and its European allies said Iran's nuclear intransigence left the world no choice but to ask for Security Council action.

wiran12bbig.jpg
 
PNAC, Bush and the GOP know that they have a very slim to nil chance in Nov. Their saber rattling did not work against Iran last year. the phony Strait of Hormuz incident did not rile the American Public and The NIE refuted the presidents claims.

They want to attack, regardless of the facts. Now Israel is on board to make us go all in. his s*** is really ridiculous. They are going to initiate something despite already F-N up in Iraq. This is no longer a democracy.
 
Re: US to provide atomic fuel to stop weapons spread

When will the democrat party save us from this? We need to supply our soldiers with skeakers not guns. Run Kerry run!

-VG
you sound like the dems are all doves, but those democrats can be very hawkish, remember it was a democratic prez that dropped a few A-bombs on Japan.
 
Still, these do seem like racial motives to me.

Why is america so opposed to "brown" countries having weapons to protect themselves?!??!

Even the most stupid muthafucka in washington knows anybody who comes into power will not use them for fear of destruction of that which they rule.

This just some crusader shit, they want to keep bossin on people.

They dont want anymore chinas or north koreas, people not white that can do what they want without havign to suffer sodams fate.

What country in their right mind wouldnt get nukes to keep america off them?!!?!?!?!??!!?!?

They seen china can keep americas spy plane, they seen north korea can say fuck you, then they see sodam not do shit and get a new asshole.

isn't India consider a "brown" country? Research before replying...!!!
 
Meh. Let the jews take them out. Israel will probably attack these facilities long before they reach completion.
 
^^^ I doubt it. Iran 2008 is not Iraq 1981.

Iraq was a bad ass country in 1981. They took out alot of Iranians. I get the point that your trying to make but at the end of the day Israel isnt going to take it laying down that they have nuclear weapons. Unlike alot of other countries Iran will try to take over that region if it had those weapons. Not to mention extra aggresion towards Israel. My money is on it that Israel will act long before the U.S. ever does.
 
Back
Top