The Reason Occupy Wall Street is Leaderless

[SPECTRE1]

The elites have people on the payroll sitting in Mexico like Earl Ray with fake passports that can put a hit on somebody and be in another country afterwards like a ghost.

April 4, 1967 - MLK- Beyond Vietnam Speech (Communism - Massive Redistribution of Wealth from the Top)

April 4, 1968 - MLK-Killed

Tim McVeigh tried the same tactic of killing people on an anniversary to send a message. In their minds, the don't plan to get caught, but want to leave a clue or message behind for everybody else. Because James Ray was living overseas right before initiating his hit, the co-conpirators know it would be difficult to get testimony and subpoenas to determine their role in a foreign country.



When you are talking about a new economic system that change the pattern of wealth distribution, you need to get security and kevlar vest up. These people at the top won't reply with a protest, letter or speech.

 

[QueEx]

The Reason Occupy Wall Street is Leaderless

[is]

The elites have people . . . with fake passports that can put a hit on somebody and be in another country afterwards like a ghost.

. . . the[y] don't plan to get caught, but want to leave a clue or message behind for everybody else.

. . . living overseas . . . the co-conpirators know it would be difficult to get testimony and subpoenas to determine their role in a foreign country.

Wouldn't that mean that the organizers and participants in OWS are fearful of a "hit from abroad" ???

Have you spoken to any organizers/participants that possess such a fear ???

Is there an article or something where they have publicly expressed that fear ???

 

[SPECTRE1]

Yeah...

 

[QueEx]

Wow.

 

[QueEx]

Yeah...

Obviously, my "Wow" reply was in response to more than just, "Yeah."

Why did you delete the 3 paragraphs or so that I responded to ??? - which spoke about corporate entities hiding in the shadows, "leaderlessly" (their method to avoid detection) manipulating the rest of us; and that the OWS doesn't have leaders because it is mimicking big corporations, etc., by being "leaderless" etc., which is the OWS's means to avoid harm (assassination, etc.) by the agents of the corporate entities.

???

 

[SPECTRE1]

Obviously, my "Wow" reply was in response to more than just, "Yeah."

Why did you delete the 3 paragraphs or so that I responded to ??? - which spoke about corporate entities hiding in the shadows, "leaderlessly" (their method to avoid detection) manipulating the rest of us; and that the OWS doesn't have leaders because it is mimicking big corporations, etc., by being "leaderless" etc., which is the OWS's means to avoid harm (assassination, etc.) by the agents of the corporate entities.

???

I have seen these people in the shadows for years, some sort of secret police connected to business or the government, based on websites, other people have called it gangstalking, a technique used by the one per centers to stifle dissent. They operate with impunity and unaccountability, conduct extensive surveillance, have access to bank accounts activity and internet logs. When the OWS ends, the people involved could be subjected to life-long persecution by these people in retaliation similar to what I have gone through where you are harassed in an undetectable way to avoid leaving evidence for LE.

Definitely taking down names, and putting people on permanent blacklists. I would wear ski mask, discard your cell phone, and not use any bank cards in that area. You should conduct multiple false activities to frustrate and detect surveillance.

People should check out services like TOR to enhance privacy online.

Michael Moore, complained about the Iraq War at the Academy Awards, had to hire 24 hour security due to the death threats, attempted bombing, and physical assaults. I seen him mentioned other security threats from his role in the discussion of health care.

Now he rolls with 3 former Navy Seals as protection, these people at the top who are morally at the bottom don't play!!!

There public record of criminal activity bounces back nothing, but their real one is a mile long with charges of fraud, extortion, attempted murder, murder, trespassing, securities fraud, invasion of privacy, manslaughter. They are worse than the people locked up but LE gives them a pass to do their thing.

 

[Majestic Lion]

I agree. No target is even better than a moving target.

 

[nittie]

Ya'll got to understand we are being governed. That means any info we get is filtered for effect. Take MLK he was a great man but he was a ideologue, he believed everyone was created equal that's the same way the Founding Fathers thought. He was murdered because he became a threat to the 1% who govern. Wish I could say more but the internet is a way for the rulers to monitor the masses speaking truth here can be a hazard to your health lol.

 

[QueEx]

Ya'll got to understand we are being governed. That means any info we get is filtered for effect.

Help me out, please.

Give us one significant occurrence and tell us:

Who exactly is doing the filtering?

What has been filtered?

What was it before it got filtered, (because you must know what that is in order to know that its been filtered) ?​

And can you please don't go off the wall someplace before you answer.

Thanking you in advance.

 

[nittie]

Help me out, please.

Give us one significant occurrence and tell us:

Who exactly is doing the filtering?

What has been filtered?

What was it before it got filtered, (because you must know what that is in order to know that its been filtered) ?​

And can you please don't go off the wall someplace before you answer.

Thanking you in advance.

You are a moderator, you edit content on this board, you must realize if you filter content here someone in media and govt does the same. I can't name names but the act of governing means

gov·ern (gvrn)
v. gov·erned, gov·ern·ing, gov·erns
v.tr.
1. To make and administer the public policy and affairs of; exercise sovereign authority in.2. To control the speed or magnitude of; regulate: a valve that governs fuel intake.
3. To control the actions or behavior of: Govern yourselves like civilized people.
4. To keep under control; restrain: a student who could not govern his impulses.
5. To exercise a deciding or determining influence on: Chance usually governs the outcome of the game.
6. Grammar To require (a specific morphological form) of accompanying words.
v.intr.

 

[QueEx]

You are a moderator, you edit content on this board, you must realize if you filter content here someone in media and govt does the same. I can't name names but the act of governing means

gov·ern (gvrn)
v. gov·erned, gov·ern·ing, gov·erns
v.tr.
1. To make and administer the public policy and affairs of; exercise sovereign authority in.2. To control the speed or magnitude of; regulate: a valve that governs fuel intake.
3. To control the actions or behavior of: Govern yourselves like civilized people.
4. To keep under control; restrain: a student who could not govern his impulses.
5. To exercise a deciding or determining influence on: Chance usually governs the outcome of the game.
6. Grammar To require (a specific morphological form) of accompanying words.
v.intr.

Like I thought; full of accusations and no facts to back them up.

 

[ShotzSho]

So you say that the occupy protests are leaderless due to fear of assasination? It seems that the occupy protesters would guard their own leader. I think a leader is what they need. If being truthfully is getting people killed so the one percent can be on permavacation...... I'd rather die holding my head high with the educational promise of the truth. Fuck ducking and dodging.

 

[deputy dawg]

Like the 'Tea Party' it's about the cause and not a person leading.

The cause has an organization, The American Dream progressive movement:

http://current.com/shows/countdown/...ments-success-rallying-around-specific-issues

 

[nittie]

Most grass root movements get co-opted by the status quo maybe OWS is trying to avoid that by not having a leader or obvious goals. The Tea Party seems to be the old Religious Right now and local govts have pulled the plug on OWS. It will be interesting to see if when the nation's attention is focused on the upcoming elections will OWS die out completely.

 

[SPECTRE1]

An identified [redacted] of October planned to engage in sniper attacks against protestors in Houston, Texas, if deemed necessary. An identified [redacted] had received intelligence that indicated the protesters in New York and Seattle planned similar protests in Houston, Dallas, San Antonio, and Austin, Texas. [Redacted] planned to gather intelligence against the leaders of the protest groups and obtain photographs then formulate a plan to kill the leadership via suppressed sniper rifles. (Page 61)

It remains unclear as to who or what this report is referring to, yet the FBI decided to disclose it under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) to the Partnership For Civil Justice Fund – the document is on page 61.

All that is known is that this individual/group was identified by the FBI as having a plan to kill Occupy Protesters. Who was involved? How far did this plot go? Will there be charges?

All unknown.


<iframe width="640" height="480" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ZMayuqfDpuI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

It looks like Corporate America was going to put a hit on the leaders of OWS. It has me thinking that Dr. King was not killed by a racists, but a contract killer related to his activities with the sanitation strike. Walter Reuther, a Union labor leader, was shot in his home that made him blind in one eye in the same manner of MLK.

The FBI did nothing to warn people about the plot, if it had been a CEO, they would have 24 hour protection courtesy of the government.