Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads

Gaddafi Reported killed In His Hometown [MERGED]

jhoonvill said:
Here's a simple quote: history always repeats itself. Since their previous ruler was a ruthless dictator, history says their next ruler is going to be ruthless. Those people love ruthless leaders. :confused:
Click to expand...

history doesn't always repeat itself, and even if it does, it isn't necessarily always in the same sequence.

You people and your simplistic cliches.
 
cmac105 said:
I'm still looking for a reason for America to bring warrant action against him in the first? People haven't explained this one yet.
Click to expand...

Dont ask why:hmm:

The_Wire_Snoop.jpg
 
jhoonvill said:
Here's a simple quote: history always repeats itself. Since their previous ruler was a ruthless dictator, history says their next ruler is going to be ruthless. Those people love ruthless leaders. :confused:
Click to expand...

Man these CAC are doing the same exact thing they did, the last time there was a great depression, create false flag situations and use it as an excuse to loot other nations.
 
cmac105 said:
I'm still wondering what did this guy do to warrant such actions against him? :confused::confused::confused: So If America doesn't like what a country says we're just going to Debo them and kill there leader? And I'm suppose to respect that type of shit. :smh::smh::smh:
Click to expand...

This has little or nothing to do with "America" but with the global, national and local system of racism/white supremacy aka white hegemony... Let's leave "America" out of this!
 
OPEC ( /ˈoʊpɛk/ oh-pek; Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries) is an intergovernmental organization of twelve developing countries made up of Algeria, Angola, Ecuador, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya, Nigeria, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Venezuela.




Algeria=done

Angola=done
Ecuador=done
Iran=done
Iraq =done
Kuwait=done
Libya =done
Nigeria=done
Qatar=done
Saudi Arabia=done
United Arab Emirates=done
Venezuela=the last one

The troops are being used and bp and other gas companies are getting more money!

:smh:
 
kefta said:
This has little or nothing to do with "America" but with the global, national and local system of racism/white supremacy aka white hegemony... Let's leave "America" out of this!
Click to expand...


If we are sending troops over there to aid this country why doesn't it have to do with America. And nobody has given me a explanation on why this man warrant such actions. Do you guys not know. :dunno: Or you haven't found nothing on Google yet.
 
This country dont produce shit, and we are in trillions of dollars, in debt, so what do crooks do when they go broke? You got it, they jack people of their grip. Look I've been in the streets long enough to know when a power move is going down.
Just like Germany, they more we get in debt, the more enemies we are going to find to jack.
 
THREAD_CRITIC said:
fuck you going to do? Really? and by 3pm you wont even give a shit anymore:cool:
Click to expand...


Really pimpin? Every time I see something like this I smh. Our govenment(Pimps) and Citizens(Hoes). They tell us this is the way it is and we're just suppose to go along with it and not ask why.
 
exiledking said:
and since WE use oil WE DO benefit from it. All this fake outrage- Ghadafi doesn't need allies like these pussies who sit here and PRETEND to sympathize with him, while they push their car 50 miles to work a day, using every petroleum product known to man in a minute span.

You fuckers NEED the shit he's sitting on, and you aint got the balls to admit it.
Click to expand...

Exactly. Every fucking thing, from our cars, to the products we use are based on oil. No oil, no America. No xbox, no iPod, no ps3. People are suckering themselves into believing that life as they are accustomed to will continue without it.
 
cmac105 said:
If we are sending troops over there to aid this country why doesn't it have to do with America. And nobody has given me a explanation on why this man warrant such actions. Do you guys not know. :dunno: Or you haven't found nothing on Google yet.
Click to expand...

that guy has one gear and one answer to everything dude.
 
cmac105 said:
If we are sending troops over there to aid this country why doesn't it have to do with America. And nobody has given me a explanation on why this man warrant such actions. Do you guys not know. :dunno: Or you haven't found nothing on Google yet.
Click to expand...

"America" is a concept and concepts don't kill people... Lets keep the focus on the people in charge...

Other than that, there is no logical explanation as to why but the maintainace of racism/white supremacy. If you are clear about this then everything else will start making sense. TRUST ME!
 
kefta said:
"America" is a concept and concepts don't kill people... Lets keep the focus on the people in charge...

Other than that, there is no logical explanation as to why but the maintainace of racism/white supremacy. If you are clear about thsi then everything else will start to make sense. TRUST ME!
Click to expand...


I know man shit just makes me :smh: a lot. And you're are 100% on the concept part. Shit just makes me :angry::( at the same time.
 
RoadRage said:
This country dont produce shit, and we are in trillions of dollars, in debt, so what do crooks do when they go broke? You got it, they jack people of their grip. Look I've been in the streets long enough to know when a power move is going down.
Just like Germany, they more we get in debt, the more enemies we are going to find to jack.
Click to expand...

This^:yes:
 
jhoonvill said:
I don't think Obama is going to allow the Libyans to fumble that event.
Click to expand...

BenQ said:
Obama is a chess master
Click to expand...

5 pages and Obama is mentioned twice, lamely.

Allow me to help you cats with your vitamin O deficiencies...







http://www.newstatesman.com/topics/africa

The Son of Africa claims a continent’s crown jewels

John Pilger
Published 20 October 2011


Barack Obama is leading the US at the head of a pack of western nations intent on the new scramble to exploit Africa’s resources. Their chief aim? To squeeze a China hungry for raw materials.


20111019_2011+43pilger_w.jpg



On 14 October, President Barack Obama announced that he was sending United States special forces to Uganda to join the civil war there. In the next few months, US combat troops will be sent to South Sudan, Congo and Central African Republic. They will "engage" only for "self-defence", says Obama, satirically. With Libya secured, an American invasion of the African continent is under way.

The press describes Obama's decision as "highly unusual" and "surprising", even "weird". It is none of these things. It is the logic of US foreign policy since 1945. Take Vietnam. The priority was to halt the alleged influence of China, an imperial rival, and "protect" Indonesia, which President Richard Nixon called "the region's richest hoard of natural resources . . . the greatest prize". Vietnam got in the way; the slaughter of more than three million Vietnamese and the devastation and poisoning of their land were the price of America achieving its goal.

As in all subsequent invasions by America, a trail of blood stretching from Latin America to Iraq and Afghanistan, the rationale was "self-defence" or "humanitarian", words long emptied of their dictionary meaning.

Proxy war

In Africa, says Obama, the "humanitarian mission" is to assist the government of Uganda to defeat the Lord's Resistance Army (LRA), which "has murdered, raped and kidnapped tens of thousands of men, women and children in Central Africa". This is an accurate description of the LRA, evoking multiple atrocities administered by the US, such as the bloodbath in the 1960s following the CIA-arranged murder of Patrice Lumumba, the independence leader and first legally elected prime minister of Congo, and the CIA coup that installed Mobutu Sese Seko, regarded as Africa's most venal tyrant.

Obama's other justification also invites satire. This is the "national security of the United States". The LRA has been doing its nasty work for 24 years. Today, it has fewer than 400 fighters, and has never been weaker. However, "US national security" usually means buying a corrupt and thuggish regime that has something Washington wants. Uganda's "president-for-life", Yoweri Museveni, is already receiving the larger part of $45m in US military "aid" - including Obama's favoured drones. This is his bribe to fight a proxy war against America's latest phantom Islamic enemy, the ragtag al-Shabaab, based in Somalia. The LRA will play a public relations role, distracting western journalists with its perennial horror stories.

However, the main reason the US is invading Africa is no different from that which ignited the Vietnam war. It is China. In the world of self-serving, institutionalised paranoia that justifies what General David Petraeus, the former US commander and now CIA director, implies is a state of perpetual war, China is replacing al-Qaeda as the official "threat".

When I interviewed Bryan Whitman, a dep*uty assistant secretary of defence, at the Pentagon last year, I asked him to describe the current danger to America. Struggling visibly, he repeated, "Asymmetric threats . . . asymmetric threats." These justify the money-laundering, state-sponsored arms conglomerates and the biggest military and war budget in history. With Osama Bin Laden airbrushed, China takes the mantle.

Africa is China's success story. Where the Americans bring drones and destabilisation, the Chinese bring roads, bridges and dams. What they want is resources, especially fossil fuels. With Africa's greatest oil reserves, Libya under Muammar al-Gaddafi was one of China's most important sources of fuel. When civil war broke out and Nato backed the "rebels" with a fabricated story about Gaddafi planning "genocide" in Benghazi, China evacuated its 30,000 workers in Libya. The subsequent UN Security Council resolution that allowed the west's "humanitarian intervention" was explained succinctly in a proposal to the French government by the "rebel" National Transitional Council, disclosed last month in the newspaper Libération, in which France was offered 35 per cent of Libya's gross national oil production "in exchange" (the term used) for "total and permanent" French support for the NTC. Running up the Stars and Stripes in "liberated" Tripoli, the US ambassador, Gene Cretz, blurted out: "We know that oil is the jewel in the crown of Libyan natural resources."

World domination

The de facto conquest of Libya by the US and its imperial partners heralds a modern version of the "Scramble for Africa" at the end of the 19th century. Like in the "victory" in Iraq, journalists have played a critical role in distinguishing between worthy and unworthy Libyan victims. A recent Guardian front page carried a photograph of a terrified "pro-Gaddafi" fighter and his wild-eyed captors who, the caption said, "celebrate". According to General Petraeus, there are now wars "of perception . . . conducted continuously through the news media".

For more than a decade, the US has tried to establish a command on the African continent, AFRICOM, but has been rebuffed by governments fearful of the regional tensions this would cause. Libya, and now Uganda, South Sudan and Congo, provide the main chance. As WikiLeaks cables and the US National Strategy for Counter-terrorism show, American plans for Africa are part of a global design in which 60,000 special forces, including death squads, operate in 75 countries. As the then defense secretary Dick Cheney pointed out in the 1990s, America simply wants to rule the world.

That this is now the gift of Barack Obama, the "Son of Africa", is supremely ironic. Or is it? As Frantz Fanon explained in Black Skin, White Masks, what matters is not so much the colour of your skin as the power you serve and the millions you betray.


http://www.newstatesman.com/international-politics/2011/10/pilger-china-obama-africa
 
Yall want to get paid, go invest in Halliburton stock (if you can) because you know they are going to get the contract to rebuild Libya.
 
im not to versed in global politics
but why is it that america always has some cobra commander type evil villian which we need to dispose of/

life is seriously looking like an epispode out of a comic book

examples :hitler, noriega,sadam hussein, bin laden, kadafi
 
RoadRage said:
People like that is beyond sad!!!! White man has made it clear that he does not respect people of color, go against him and he will kill you. Notice he dont do that shit to white leaders of other countries. :smh:
Click to expand...

Similar thing happened to Chauchesku, but I get your point.

A lot of darker nations taking major L's under Obama's administration.:hmm:
 

Make a Contribution to Remove NSFW Ads
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Database Error
Man killed family of 3 when wife wouldn’t leave husband for him
Replies
30
Views
672
717jet
717jet
lightbright
Seems like Japan's got a bit of a bear problem....
Replies
1
Views
45
lightbright
lightbright
lightbright
Live by the sword, die by it! 41yr old man steals car then dies when it goes airborne, hits a building then gets split in two on a tree 20ft away
Replies
22
Views
424
King Mob
K
lightbright
Truck driver arrested on homicide charges in fiery wreck that killed 8 family members
Replies
5
Views
186
HNIC
HNIC
Database Error
Fiend allegedly kept 4 adults captive in his basement for over 10 years
Replies
14
Views
387
shaddyvillethug
shaddyvillethug
Back
Top