TSA starting to reveal what their REAL PURPOSE is??? check this bullshit out!!

[destrehan]

The TSA has responsibilities covering railroads, ports, etc also...not just airports. Now, that may be something that you don't like, and that may be very reasonable, but it doesn't negate the fact that they actually do have responsibilities outside of airports.

http://www.tsa.gov/what_we_do/tsnm/index.shtm


Now, are you saying that whatever congressional or executive orders that brought the agency about (I think they're part of homeland security now) explicitly says that they're only to operate in airports? If that's the case, and there have been no upgrade to their charter since their creation, I'd be apt to agree with what you're saying.

what part of WE DON'T NEED THE TSA for our safety don't you people understand?

WHAT PART OF "THIS IS A RACKET" DON'T YALL GET?

 

[destrehan]

the problem with trying to have this arguement/debate or discussion is that when you have someone like destrehan who has made up his mind nothing is going to change it. Everyone has an agenda, even these so-called 'truth tellers'

the only agenda i have is to raise serious discussion about what's going on in this country. I have 2 kids that i'm trying to raise in this shithole and i'm sick of everybody walking around acting like nothing's wrong.

 

[Djmarkxr7]

what part of WE DON'T NEED THE TSA for our safety don't you people understand?

WHAT PART OF "THIS IS A RACKET" DON'T YALL GET?

So then you're saying that even though the US gov't is up to all kinds of shenanigans all over the world that we do not have to worry about any outside interests trying to do harm to us?

That we don't need metal detectors or security of any kind @ our airports or train stations?

Is this TRULY what you're espousing?

 

[destrehan]

muthafucka spouting about the 16th amendment, not knowing it was a straight jack move. they classify the income tax as not being a direct tax because the irs is not a govt organization, a private company, just like the federal reserve. why cosign this?


Income taxes pre-Pollock

To raise revenue to fund the Civil War, Congress introduced the income tax through the Revenue Act of 1861.[7] It levied a flat tax of 3% on annual income above $800, which was equivalent to $19,490 in today's money.[8] This act was replaced the following year with the Revenue Act of 1862, which levied a graduated tax of 3–5% on income above $600 (worth $13,156 today[8]) and specified a termination of income taxation in 1866.

The Socialist Labor Party advocated a graduated income tax in 1887.[9] The Populist Party "demand[ed] a graduated income tax" in its 1892 platform.[10] The Democratic Party, led by William Jennings Bryan, advocated the income tax law passed in 1894,[11] and proposed an income tax in its 1908 platform.[12]

Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., all income taxes had been considered to be indirect taxes and so were required to be imposed with geographical uniformity; as opposed to being direct taxes, which are required to be apportioned among the states according to population.[13][14]

The Wilson–Gorman Tariff Act of 1894 attempted to impose a federal tax of 2% on incomes over $4,000 (worth $101,200 today[8]). Derided as "un-Democratic, inquisitorial, and wrong in principle,"[15] it was challenged in federal court.
The Pollock case

In Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. the Supreme Court declared certain taxes on incomes — such as those from property under the 1894 Act — to be unconstitutionally unapportioned direct taxes. The Court reasoned that a tax on income from property should be treated as a tax on "property by reason of its ownership" and so should be required to be apportioned. The reasoning was that taxes on the rents from land, the dividends from stocks and so forth burdened the property generating the income in the same way that a tax on "property by reason of its ownership" burdened that property


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution


AND THERE IS EVER-EXISTING OPPOSITION STATING THIS BULLSHIT WAS NEVER FULLY RATIFIED http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/new/home.asp


http://www.apfn.net/Doc-100_bankruptcy20.htm

 

[destrehan]

So then you're saying that even though the US gov't is up to all kinds of shenanigans all over the world that we do not have to worry about any outside interests trying to do harm to us?

That we don't need metal detectors or security of any kind @ our airports or train stations?

Is this TRULY what you're espousing?

you dumb son of a bitch. how can you think i'm espousing no security? i'm espousing the fact we didn't need these fuckers before, and we don't need them now. PERIOD.

 

[Upgrade Dave]

as usual, you clowns ignore the message, and shoot the messenger. what the fuck is your problem with michelle bachman? and taxation without representation is against the constitution. it should also be against your personal code seeing as how the tax is clearly not to our benefit. but i guess all the credible people like former irs agents etc are just hacks too huh?

the mere mention of a "right wing" is proof you have no desire to understand anything but the information the govt gives you.

You have representation and you get to pick representation every two years for the federal House and six years for the Senate.
Not really amazingly, you seem to accept the word of people who agree with you unquestioningly with not an ounce of skepticism. You should learn to question not just those you oppose, but those you support. Then you wouldn't be having Michelle Bachmann as a spokesperson.

what part of WE DON'T NEED THE TSA for our safety don't you people understand?

This is as idiotic as people saying we shouldn't have the IRS. Even if they got rid of the TSA, they would still have to have security and they would just name it something else.

muthafucka spouting about the 16th amendment, not knowing it was a straight jack move. they classify the income tax as not being a direct tax because the irs is not a govt organization, a private company, just like the federal reserve. why cosign this?


Income taxes pre-Pollock

To raise revenue to fund the Civil War, Congress introduced the income tax through the Revenue Act of 1861.[7] It levied a flat tax of 3% on annual income above $800, which was equivalent to $19,490 in today's money.[8] This act was replaced the following year with the Revenue Act of 1862, which levied a graduated tax of 3–5% on income above $600 (worth $13,156 today[8]) and specified a termination of income taxation in 1866.

The Socialist Labor Party advocated a graduated income tax in 1887.[9] The Populist Party "demand[ed] a graduated income tax" in its 1892 platform.[10] The Democratic Party, led by William Jennings Bryan, advocated the income tax law passed in 1894,[11] and proposed an income tax in its 1908 platform.[12]

Prior to the Supreme Court's decision in Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co., all income taxes had been considered to be indirect taxes and so were required to be imposed with geographical uniformity; as opposed to being direct taxes, which are required to be apportioned among the states according to population.[13][14]

The Wilson–Gorman Tariff Act of 1894 attempted to impose a federal tax of 2% on incomes over $4,000 (worth $101,200 today[8]). Derided as "un-Democratic, inquisitorial, and wrong in principle,"[15] it was challenged in federal court.
The Pollock case

In Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. the Supreme Court declared certain taxes on incomes — such as those from property under the 1894 Act — to be unconstitutionally unapportioned direct taxes. The Court reasoned that a tax on income from property should be treated as a tax on "property by reason of its ownership" and so should be required to be apportioned. The reasoning was that taxes on the rents from land, the dividends from stocks and so forth burdened the property generating the income in the same way that a tax on "property by reason of its ownership" burdened that property


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

I read all that and read it on the same site and page you did. It does not say anything about the income tax being unconstitutional. In fact it says that the 16th Amendment overturned the Pollock decision.

Here, some more info
The courts have ruled that the Sixteenth Amendment allows a direct tax on "wages, salaries, commissions, etc. without apportionment

AND THERE IS EVER-EXISTING OPPOSITION STATING THIS BULLSHIT WAS NEVER FULLY RATIFIED http://www.thelawthatneverwas.com/new/home.asp

There are people that still believe the Earth is flat so there's always a fool.
That same page that you quoted above addresses this and lists all the states that ratified it with Delaware being last of the first 36. The shit is right there. Stop arguing known historical facts. You look like an asshole.

 

[destrehan]

You have representation and you get to pick representation every two years for the federal House and six years for the Senate.
Not really amazingly, you seem to accept the word of people who agree with you unquestioningly with not an ounce of skepticism. You should learn to question not just those you oppose, but those you support. Then you wouldn't be having Michelle Bachmann as a spokesperson.


This is as idiotic as people saying we shouldn't have the IRS. Even if they got rid of the TSA, they would still have to have security and they would just name it something else.



I read all that and read it on the same site and page you did. It does not say anything about the income tax being unconstitutional. In fact it says that the 16th Amendment overturned the Pollock decision.

Here, some more info
The courts have ruled that the Sixteenth Amendment allows a direct tax on "wages, salaries, commissions, etc. without apportionment





There are people that still believe the Earth is flat so there's always a fool.
That same page that you quoted above addresses this and lists all the states that ratified it with Delaware being last of the first 36. The shit is right there. Stop arguing known historical facts. You look like an asshole.

how the fuck is it idiotic to say we shouldn't have the IRS? you really believe in having your income stolen you stupid prick?


and for you to not recognize the fact that people viciously fought against income tax at its inception and that we should also fight against it as well just proves that you are a broken, weak, shell of a man and i am completely lowering my own stature by communicating with a fucking SLAVE.

 

[destrehan]

You have representation and you get to pick representation every two years for the federal House and six years for the Senate.
Not really amazingly, you seem to accept the word of people who agree with you unquestioningly with not an ounce of skepticism. You should learn to question not just those you oppose, but those you support. Then you wouldn't be having Michelle Bachmann as a spokesperson.


This is as idiotic as people saying we shouldn't have the IRS. Even if they got rid of the TSA, they would still have to have security and they would just name it something else.



I read all that and read it on the same site and page you did. It does not say anything about the income tax being unconstitutional. In fact it says that the 16th Amendment overturned the Pollock decision.

Here, some more info
The courts have ruled that the Sixteenth Amendment allows a direct tax on "wages, salaries, commissions, etc. without apportionment





There are people that still believe the Earth is flat so there's always a fool.
That same page that you quoted above addresses this and lists all the states that ratified it with Delaware being last of the first 36. The shit is right there. Stop arguing known historical facts. You look like an asshole.

how the fuck is it idiotic to say we shouldn't have the IRS? you really believe in having your income stolen you stupid prick?


and for you to not recognize the fact that people viciously fought against income tax at its inception and that we should also fight against it as well just proves that you are a broken, weak, shell of a man and i am completely lowering my own stature by communicating with a fucking SLAVE.

 

[Djmarkxr7]

you dumb son of a bitch. how can you think i'm espousing no security? i'm espousing the fact we didn't need these fuckers before, and we don't need them now. PERIOD.

So now in your world we don't have to worry about planes getting hijacked then?

So now you're going to what that video you posted showed?

That no planes hit the Twin Towers even though I myself saw the second plane hit?

You should also know that the feed for that bullshit video you posted fucked up, NOT everyone elses!

Peep the vid that I posted dun, the feeds don't black out.

You should take Upgrade Dave's advice and question your own sources more thoroughly, the amount of misinformation you're spewing is reaching epic proportions.

Apparently now tens of thousands of people that were within blocks of the Towers imagined an airplane flying over their heads?!?

Trust me dude, I know that our government is dirty, as are most others, but what you're missing here is accountability, that is what the TSA represents @ the airports.

You're probably too young to remember back in the 70s when planes used to get hijacked all over the world INCLUDING HERE IN THE US!

The difference between back then and now is that not only do more people travel by air but most importantly we have seen the usage of passenger airplanes as weapons of destruction, whereas before they were a means to an end, the people on them were held hostage.

I also find it quite funny that you use a Republican shill to prove a point yet it's those very same Republicans that are doing exactly what you say you are against the most!

 

[crossovernegro]

I was responded to what you said here:

the point of this thread is to illustrate that the TSA is not supposed to be anywhere outside of a fucking airport.

You said that the TSA is not supposed to be anywhere outside of a fucking airport. I said that they have responsibilities outside of airports (posted a link showing their other responsibilities) and asked if any legislative or executive orders explicitly said otherwise, or if any their charter had changed in either direction since the inception of the agency. I didn't even attempt to get into a "do we or don't we need the TSA" conversation... so why are you asking me this question? I posted something that went directly against your previous statement about TSA only belonging in airports.

what part of WE DON'T NEED THE TSA for our safety don't you people understand?

WHAT PART OF "THIS IS A RACKET" DON'T YALL GET?

 

[Djmarkxr7]

how the fuck is it idiotic to say we shouldn't have the IRS? you really believe in having your income stolen you stupid prick?


and for you to not recognize the fact that people viciously fought against income tax at its inception and that we should also fight against it as well just proves that you are a broken, weak, shell of a man and i am completely lowering my own stature by communicating with a fucking SLAVE.

Damn bruh, as UD pointed out, do you not really understand the term "taxation without representation?"

Do you not understand that the Parliament of Great Britain ruled the colonies of the new world like they were little children, THAT NOT ONE INDIVIDUAL FROM THE COLONIES VOTED ON ANYTHING THAT PARLIAMENT RULED ON FOR THE COLONIES, hence the term "taxation w/o representation."

And as UD pointed out "We the People" vote directly on one branch of Congress (Legislative) and indirectly on the second (Executive) so yes, we do indeed have "representation" when it comes to federal taxes.

On the local level the states vary but here in NY we have a State Senate and a State Assembly that "We the People" vote for.

Dude, you should have learned all of this in grade school, why do we have to give a civics lesson to adults?

 

[Cybts1]

I feel safer now that I know this.

 

[destrehan]

Damn bruh, as UD pointed out, do you not really understand the term "taxation without representation?"

Do you not understand that the Parliament of Great Britain ruled the colonies of the new world like they were little children, THAT NOT ONE INDIVIDUAL FROM THE COLONIES VOTED ON ANYTHING THAT PARLIAMENT RULED ON FOR THE COLONIES, hence the term "taxation w/o representation."

And as UD pointed out "We the People" vote directly on one branch of Congress (Legislative) and indirectly on the second (Executive) so yes, we do indeed have "representation" when it comes to federal taxes.

On the local level the states vary but here in NY we have a State Senate and a State Assembly that "We the People" vote for.

Dude, you should have learned all of this in grade school, why do we have to give a civics lesson to adults?

I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS SHIT!


you ACTUALLY BELIEVE the political system in this country WORKS???

LOOK WHERE IT'S GOTTEN US!!

WAKE THE FUCK UP!!


to think i don't know the fucking process only speaks to your lack of critical thought. all my sentiments are centered around freedom from a corrupt system with a lying political structure that is operating off an evil capitalistic economy that is causing more and more americans to be impoverished.

yall are some myopic fucks for real

 

[destrehan]

I was responded to what you said here:




You said that the TSA is not supposed to be anywhere outside of a fucking airport. I said that they have responsibilities outside of airports (posted a link showing their other responsibilities) and asked if any legislative or executive orders explicitly said otherwise, or if any their charter had changed in either direction since the inception of the agency. I didn't even attempt to get into a "do we or don't we need the TSA" conversation... so why are you asking me this question? I posted something that went directly against your previous statement about TSA only belonging in airports.

i had not read the tsa charter. and i don't actually care what it says. my point has been made. i don't care to debate about where the tsa should be, more than i care to debate the reason for their existence. i was able to tolerate their existence until i realized through this article that they are going to be doing more to make america a harder place to live in.

 

[Djmarkxr7]

I CANNOT BELIEVE THIS SHIT!


you ACTUALLY BELIEVE the political system in this country WORKS???

LOOK WHERE IT'S GOTTEN US!!

WAKE THE FUCK UP!!


to think i don't know the fucking process only speaks to your lack of critical thought. all my sentiments are centered around freedom from a corrupt system with a lying political structure that is operating off an evil capitalistic economy that is causing more and more americans to be impoverished.

yall are some myopic fucks for real

Damn bruh, I hope that you realize that with every post you are just making youself look more and more like a tin foil hat wearing loon.

You're saying look where it's gotten us while raising two kids and being able to freely express yourself on the internet, regardless of what your opinions are.

I assume that you have a roof over your head, that your children are fed and are probably able to play video games and watch cable TV.

My what a fucked up life you have, I can understand why you're angry, but don't worry, China will take us over soon and then the good times will roll!!!

 

[destrehan]

Damn bruh, I hope that you realize that with every post you are just making youself look more and more like a tin foil hat wearing loon.

You're saying look where it's gotten us while raising two kids and being able to freely express yourself on the internet, regardless of what your opinions are.

I assume that you have a roof over your head, that your children are fed and are probably able to play video games and watch cable TV.

My what a fucked up life you have, I can understand why you're angry, but don't worry, China will take us over soon and then the good times will roll!!!

so basically you're saying that there's nothing more to life, and if im not one of the millions of unemployed and homeless i should be happy?


well im not that dumb and i care about more than just my personal safety/security, shame on you for trying to insult me for not accepting what a mess this country has become. the govt is a runaway train to hell and we're the passengers.

that shit doesn't sit well with me and fuck you if it sits well with you. the TSA will not save anybody from anything. nor will any other govt agency, no matter how many fucking "safety measures" these assholes pretend to take.

i definitely see who you are now, and it doesn't surprise me they got internet cointelpro running around this bitch. they're on all the forums.

and you did NOT see any planes hit the towers asshole. they were missiles, and i know they were missiles because nobody on the ground could fathom it being missiles so they automatically assumed it was planes. the buildings would've never fell, nor would they have fallen the way they fell, without the weapon that was actually used to disintegrate them.

feel free to actually read the book i posted. it's not bullshit. research Dr. Judy Wood. she wouldn't put her fucking career on the line for some bullshit. you simps and gumps believe whatever you see on tv or newyorktimes.com

 

[Upgrade Dave]

how the fuck is it idiotic to say we shouldn't have the IRS? you really believe in having your income stolen you stupid prick?

I actually answered this in that post. Re-read it.

and for you to not recognize the fact that people viciously fought against income tax at its inception and that we should also fight against it as well just proves that you are a broken, weak, shell of a man and i am completely lowering my own stature by communicating with a fucking SLAVE.

Before I could answer this shit...

Damn bruh, as UD pointed out, do you not really understand the term "taxation without representation?"

Do you not understand that the Parliament of Great Britain ruled the colonies of the new world like they were little children, THAT NOT ONE INDIVIDUAL FROM THE COLONIES VOTED ON ANYTHING THAT PARLIAMENT RULED ON FOR THE COLONIES, hence the term "taxation w/o representation."

And as UD pointed out "We the People" vote directly on one branch of Congress (Legislative) and indirectly on the second (Executive) so yes, we do indeed have "representation" when it comes to federal taxes.

On the local level the states vary but here in NY we have a State Senate and a State Assembly that "We the People" vote for.

Dude, you should have learned all of this in grade school, why do we have to give a civics lesson to adults?

Apparently now tens of thousands of people that were within blocks of the Towers imagined an airplane flying over their heads?!?

Trust me dude, I know that our government is dirty, as are most others, but what you're missing here is accountability, that is what the TSA represents @ the airports.

You're probably too young to remember back in the 70s when planes used to get hijacked all over the world INCLUDING HERE IN THE US!

The difference between back then and now is that not only do more people travel by air but most importantly we have seen the usage of passenger airplanes as weapons of destruction, whereas before they were a means to an end, the people on them were held hostage.

I also find it quite funny that you use a Republican shill to prove a point yet it's those very same Republicans that are doing exactly what you say you are against the most!

Yep to all points.

Damn bruh, I hope that you realize that with every post you are just making youself look more and more like a tin foil hat wearing loon.

You're saying look where it's gotten us while raising two kids and being able to freely express yourself on the internet, regardless of what your opinions are.

I assume that you have a roof over your head, that your children are fed and are probably able to play video games and watch cable TV.

My what a fucked up life you have, I can understand why you're angry, but don't worry, China will take us over soon and then the good times will roll!!!

Yep.
The political system is hardly perfect because we keep electing people and there are no perfect people.

 

[destrehan]

Damn bruh, I hope that you realize that with every post you are just making youself look more and more like a tin foil hat wearing loon.

You're saying look where it's gotten us while raising two kids and being able to freely express yourself on the internet, regardless of what your opinions are.

I assume that you have a roof over your head, that your children are fed and are probably able to play video games and watch cable TV.

My what a fucked up life you have, I can understand why you're angry, but don't worry, China will take us over soon and then the good times will roll!!!

so basically you're saying that there's nothing more to life, and if im not one of the millions of unemployed and homeless i should be happy?


well im not that dumb and i care about more than just my personal safety/security, shame on you for trying to insult me for not accepting what a mess this country has become. the govt is a runaway train to hell and we're the passengers.

that shit doesn't sit well with me and fuck you if it sits well with you. the TSA will not save anybody from anything. nor will any other govt agency, no matter how many fucking "safety measures" these assholes pretend to take.

i definitely see who you are now, and it doesn't surprise me they got internet cointelpro running around this bitch. they're on all the forums.

and you did NOT see any planes hit the towers asshole. they were missiles, and i know they were missiles because nobody on the ground could fathom it being missiles so they automatically assumed it was planes. the buildings would've never fell, nor would they have fallen the way they fell, without the weapon that was actually used to disintegrate them.

feel free to actually read the book i posted. it's not bullshit. research Dr. Judy Wood. she wouldn't put her fucking career on the line for some bullshit. you simps and gumps believe whatever you see on tv or newyorktimes.com

 

[destrehan]

Agenda 21 and the Movement Toward a One-World Govt Quote [+] #

Take a look around. See the Stack-N-Pack apartment/condo buildings going up everywhere?

Your new box awaits you.

Notice how these Stack-N-Packs are built above small shops...why? Because you will not be able to travel anywhere; you will be corralled, kept in a very small area. Need a haircut? Go downstairs. Need some GMO food? Go downstairs. Need Sundries? Go downstairs.

You will not be able to walk freely on your own planet. You are given a few acres called a 'Park' in which to ponder your slave existence. Notice how camping grounds keep getting fewer and fewer, smaller and Smaller?

The Elites want the planet to themselves. All land will be off limits to you as you are only here to serve the Elites. And, they don't need too many of us to serve them; after all, they are also planning on Artificial Intelligence to serve them - much better, no whining, no possible rioting, no need to feed, clothe them...

Think The Nature Conservancy is about conserving millions of acres FOR you??? No, it's about locking up MILLIONS of acres FROM you!!!

Three questions to ask yourself:

1. Why do we have to PAY to live on a planet we were Born on?

2. WHO are we Paying??

3. And, WHO made them the Boss???

 

[Upgrade Dave]

and you did NOT see any planes hit the towers asshole. they were missiles, and i know they were missiles because nobody on the ground could fathom it being missiles so they automatically assumed it was planes. the buildings would've never fell, nor would they have fallen the way they fell, without the weapon that was actually used to disintegrate them.

feel free to actually read the book i posted. it's not bullshit. research Dr. Judy Wood. she wouldn't put her fucking career on the line for some bullshit. you simps and gumps believe whatever you see on tv or newyorktimes.com

Wow.
If you have anything left, DJ, have at it. Again, who are you supposed to believe: me or your lying eyes.

 

[destrehan]

I actually answered this in that post. Re-read it.




Before I could answer this shit...







Yep to all points.



Yep.
The political system is hardly perfect because we keep electing people and there are no perfect people.

there is NO REASON THE IRS SHOULD EXIST.

if there is, name it.

 

[Upgrade Dave]

Agenda 21 and the Movement Toward a One-World Govt Quote [+] #

Take a look around. See the Stack-N-Pack apartment/condo buildings going up everywhere?

Your new box awaits you.

Notice how these Stack-N-Packs are built above small shops...why? Because you will not be able to travel anywhere; you will be corralled, kept in a very small area. Need a haircut? Go downstairs. Need some GMO food? Go downstairs. Need Sundries? Go downstairs.

You will not be able to walk freely on your own planet. You are given a few acres called a 'Park' in which to ponder your slave existence. Notice how camping grounds keep getting fewer and fewer, smaller and Smaller?

The Elites want the planet to themselves. All land will be off limits to you as you are only here to serve the Elites. And, they don't need too many of us to serve them; after all, they are also planning on Artificial Intelligence to serve them - much better, no whining, no possible rioting, no need to feed, clothe them...

Think The Nature Conservancy is about conserving millions of acres FOR you??? No, it's about locking up MILLIONS of acres FROM you!!!

Three questions to ask yourself:

1. Why do we have to PAY to live on a planet we were Born on?

2. WHO are we Paying??

3. And, WHO made them the Boss???

You are one frightened ass Black man. Nigga, that's slavery.

 

[Upgrade Dave]

there is NO REASON THE IRS SHOULD EXIST.

if there is, name it.

My last go around with you because you are trying hard to win "Dumbest Poster on BGOL"

Even if they dismantled the IRS tonight, someone would still need to collect the taxes so that would be called something else to placate those of you scared of the letters I-R-S. Nothing would be accomplished.

 

[destrehan]

What is Agenda 21? If you do not know about it, you should.

Agenda 21 is a two-decade old, grand plan for global ’Sustainable Development,’ brought to you from the United Nations. George H.W. Bush (and 177 other world leaders) agreed to it back in 1992, and in 1995, Bill Clinton signed Executive Order #12858, creating a Presidential Council on ‘Sustainable Development.’ This effectively pushed the UN plan into America’s large, churning government machine without the need for any review or discussion by Congress or the American people.

‘Sustainable Development’ sounds like a nice idea, right? It sounds nice, until you scratch the surface and find that Agenda 21 and Sustainable Development are really cloaked plans to impose the tenets of Social Justice/Socialism on the world.

At risk from Agenda 21;

Private Property ownership
Single-Family homes
Private car ownership and individual travel choices
Privately owned farms
The Agenda 21 plan openly targets private property. For over thirty-five years the UN has made their stance very clear on the issue of individuals owning land;

Land… cannot be treated as an ordinary asset, controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument of accumulation and concentration of wealth and therefore contributes to social injustice; if unchecked, it may become a major obstacle in the planning and implementation of development schemes. The provision of decent dwellings and healthy conditions for the people can only be achieved if land is used in the interest of society as a whole.
Source: United Nations Conference on Human Settlements (Habitat I),Vancouver, BC, May 31 – June 11, 1976. Preamble to Agenda Item 10 of the Conference Report.
There are two more, very good reasons to be wary of Agenda 21 and the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) that supports it: George Soros and the United Nations. Soros money has been tracked to funding parts of ICLEI ;

In 1997, George Soros’s Open Society gave ICLEI a $2,147,415 grant to support its Local Agenda 21 Project.

As regards the UN, that organization‘s problems with America’s appreciation of freedom and self-determination is one that needs no explanation.

Currently in California, Agenda 21 is working to implement plans to create plans for sustainable management of ‘open spaces.‘ The definition of what is to be considered an ’open space’ has sparked some heated exchanges between those directing the planning meetings and citizens who want private property rights to be respected and protected. (The East Bay Tea Party video featuring a Liberal Democrat arguing against ICLEI can be seen at the end of this article.)

This type of global plan could not be implemented without a large and well-funded group pushing through its priorities. For that, Agenda 21 has the International Council of Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI). And ICLEI is deeply entrenched in America;

ICLEI USA was launched in 1995 and has grown from a handful of local governments participating in a pilot project to a solid network of more than 600 cities, towns and counties actively striving to achieve tangible reductions in greenhouse gas emissions and create more sustainable communities. ICLEI USA is the domestic leader on climate protection and adaptation, and sustainable development at the local government level.
Over six hundred cities,towns and counties in America are members of ICLEI? Do you support your local government agreeing to rules and regulations set up by a UN-based organization that wants private property transferred to government control? If you would like to see if your community is a member of ICLEI, you can visit their website - [link to www.icleiusa.org]

In the world of business Agenda 21 is not a free market friend, preferring PPPs or Private Public Partnerships where the government decides which companies will receive tax breaks and are allowed to stay in business. In light of this realization, the cozy relationship between the current administration and GE (a company that paid no tax in 2010) should raise eyebrows. And the WH efforts to tell Boeing in which state they can operate seems to further bolster the belief that Agenda 21 ideals are already making headway in America.

The seeds for Agenda 21 were planted back in 1987 when the writings of Gro Harlem Brundtland (a woman who was first Vice-President of the Socialist International) caught the eye of the UN. Dr. Brundtland wrote a report for the UN called, ‘Our Common Future’ eventually got into the business of environmentalism as a tool to control all the people of the world and establish a global government. The growth of ICLEI and the framework being put in place by supporters of Agenda 21 appear to be bringing Dr. Brundtland’s ideas closer to reality

 

[destrehan]

You are one frightened ass Black man. Nigga, that's slavery.

NOTHING in that post spell frightened you braindead piece of shit.


http://www.reveresride.net/2011/06/...er-relegated-to-the-realm-of-conspiracy-nuts/

 

[destrehan]

My last go around with you because you are trying hard to win "Dumbest Poster on BGOL"

Even if they dismantled the IRS tonight, someone would still need to collect the taxes so that would be called something else to placate those of you scared of the letters I-R-S. Nothing would be accomplished.

SOMEONE would still need to collect taxes FOR WHAT muthafucka??? are you retarded??? you think income tax is supposed to exist?? they don't go to any public services you do know that shit right? WOW!!!

 

[NightMare Paint]

Destrehan just shut the fuck up..goddamn...

You let the dumbest shit take up your life

Whos keeping an eye on the twins while you are on a porn board all day?












Novus Ordo Seclorum my nigga....

 

[ionblast]

Nothing surprises me about this info. What does surprise me is how many AmeriCANT sheeple still buy the "official story" (read: LIE) of the events surrounding 9/11. I make it a point not to even trip these days. The sheeple get the type of government they deserve. I content with knowing I'll have the pleasure and satisfaction of saying "I told you so".

[HEBREW ISRAELITE FLASHBACK] YO ESAU! HURRY UP WITH THAT MARTIAL LAW, RACE WARS AND THOSE MISSILES SO I CAN GET DELIVERED THE FUCK UP OUT OF HERE BY ONE OF THOSE CHARIOTS AKA SO-CALLED "UFOs" AND WATCH THESE FOOLS GET BURNT ALIVE BY THOSE INTERCONTINENTAL BALLISTIC MISSSSSSSSSSUUUUUULES! MO MISSIILES! MO MISSILES! AND MO MISSILES!!!!! BOOOOOOM NIGGA!!![/HEBREW ISRAELITE FLASHBACK]

 

[Mixd]

So what y'all saying?

NO?

+

= GENERAL TSO' BEAN PIES?

 

[NightMare Paint]

So what y'all saying?

NO?

+

= GENERAL TSO' BEAN PIES?

yessir