Those Damn Guns Again

Greed

Star
Registered
It's not targeted as well as it should be due to interference from the gun manufacturer's lobby (the NRA).
Still, if the complaint isn't that you won't be able to get guns but you might have to take an extra step to get them, this is a childish argument.
At least you're consistent in your never ending efforts to blame anyone other than who's actually at fault.

Instead of blaming people who put guns into the hands of criminals or the way we deal with the mentally ill, you would rather go after people who live their lives harming no one. Instead of blaming the lack of gun law enforcements or outright incompetence on politicians and bureaucrats, you blame the NRA. The NRA doesn't have single duty to you for maintaining the public good.

Such a magnificent effort by you to hold everyone accountable except for the people responsible.

And what do you consider a childish argument? I consider something childish when people act without principle with no regards to the long-term consequences. Like going after citizens who have done nothing wrong just because they will follow the laws once they're passed. Doing what you can get away with while not addressing the problem is childish. What do you think?
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
18 U.S.C. § 925 Exceptions: Relief from disabilities

(a)(1) The provisions of this chapter, except for sections
922(d)(9) and 922(g)(9) and provisions relating to firearms subject
to the prohibitions of section 922(p), shall not apply with respect
to the transportation, shipment, receipt, possession, or
importation of any firearm or ammunition imported for, sold or
shipped to, or issued for the use of, the United States or any
department or agency thereof or any State or any department,
agency, or political subdivision thereof.

(2) The provisions of this chapter, except for provisions
relating to firearms subject to the prohibitions of section 922(p),
shall not apply with respect to (A) the shipment or receipt of
firearms or ammunition when sold or issued by the Secretary of the
Army pursuant to section 4308 of title 10 before the repeal of such
section by section 1624(a) of the Corporation for the Promotion of
Rifle Practice and Firearms Safety Act, and (B) the transportation
of any such firearm or ammunition carried out to enable a person,
who lawfully received such firearm or ammunition from the Secretary
of the Army, to engage in military training or in competitions.

(3) Unless otherwise prohibited by this chapter, except for
provisions relating to firearms subject to the prohibitions of
section 922(p), or any other Federal law, a licensed importer,
licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer may ship to a member of
the United States Armed Forces on active duty outside the United
States or to clubs, recognized by the Department of Defense, whose
entire membership is composed of such members, and such members or
clubs may receive a firearm or ammunition determined by the
Attorney General to be generally recognized as particularly
suitable for sporting purposes and intended for the personal use of
such member or club.

(4) When established to the satisfaction of the Attorney General
to be consistent with the provisions of this chapter, except for
provisions relating to firearms subject to the prohibitions of
section 922(p), and other applicable Federal and State laws and
published ordinances, the Attorney General may authorize the
transportation, shipment, receipt, or importation into the United
States to the place of residence of any member of the United States
Armed Forces who is on active duty outside the United States (or
who has been on active duty outside the United States within the
sixty day period immediately preceding the transportation,
shipment, receipt, or importation), of any firearm or ammunition
which is (A) determined by the Attorney General to be generally
recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes, or
determined by the Department of Defense to be a type of firearm
normally classified as a war souvenir, and (B) intended for the
personal use of such member.

(5) For the purpose of paragraph (3) of this subsection, the term
"United States" means each of the several States and the District
of Columbia.



(b)
A licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer,
or licensed collector who is indicted for a crime punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, may, notwithstanding
any other provision of this chapter, continue operation pursuant to
his existing license (if prior to the expiration of the term of the
existing license timely application is made for a new license)
during the term of such indictment and until any conviction
pursuant to the indictment becomes final.


(c)
<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00"> A person who is prohibited from possessing, shipping,
transporting, or receiving firearms or ammunition may make
application to the Attorney General for relief from the
disabilities imposed by Federal laws with respect to the
acquisition, receipt, transfer, shipment, transportation, or
possession of firearms</span>, and the Attorney General may grant such
relief if it is established to his satisfaction that the
circumstances regarding the disability, and the applicant's record
and reputation, are such that the applicant will not be likely to
act in a manner dangerous to public safety and that the granting of
the relief would not be contrary to the public interest. Any person
whose application for relief from disabilities is denied by the
Attorney General may file a petition with the United States
district court for the district in which he resides for a judicial
review of such denial. The court may in its discretion admit
additional evidence where failure to do so would result in a
miscarriage of justice. A licensed importer, licensed manufacturer,
licensed dealer, or licensed collector conducting operations under
this chapter, who makes application for relief from the
disabilities incurred under this chapter, shall not be barred by
such disability from further operations under his license pending
final action on an application for relief filed pursuant to this
section. Whenever the Attorney General grants relief to any person
pursuant to this section he shall promptly publish in the Federal
Register notice of such action, together with the reasons therefor.


(d)
The Attorney General shall authorize a firearm or ammunition
to be imported or brought into the United States or any possession
thereof if the firearm or ammunition -

(1) is being imported or brought in for scientific or research
purposes, or is for use in connection with competition or
training pursuant to chapter 401 of title 10;

(2) is an unserviceable firearm, other than a machinegun as
defined in section 5845(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
(not readily restorable to firing condition), imported or brought
in as a curio or museum piece;

(3) is of a type that does not fall within the definition of a
firearm as defined in section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 and is generally recognized as particularly suitable
for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes, excluding surplus
military firearms, except in any case where the Attorney General
has not authorized the importation of the firearm pursuant to
this paragraph, it shall be unlawful to import any frame,
receiver, or barrel of such firearm which would be prohibited if
assembled; or

(4) was previously taken out of the United States or a
possession by the person who is bringing in the firearm or
ammunition.

The Attorney General shall permit the conditional importation or
bringing in of a firearm or ammunition for examination and testing
in connection with the making of a determination as to whether the
importation or bringing in of such firearm or ammunition will be
allowed under this subsection.


(e)
Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the
Attorney General shall authorize the importation of, by any
licensed importer, the following:

(1) All rifles and shotguns listed as curios or relics by the
Attorney General pursuant to section 921(a)(13), and

(2) All handguns, listed as curios or relics by the Attorney
General pursuant to section 921(a)(13), provided that such
handguns are generally recognized as particularly suitable for or
readily adaptable to sporting purposes.


(f
) The Attorney General shall not authorize, under subsection
(d), the importation of any firearm the importation of which is
prohibited by section 922(p).
 

Greed

Star
Registered
18 U.S.C. § 925 Exceptions: Relief from disabilities

(a)(1) The provisions of this chapter, except for sections
922(d)(9) and 922(g)(9) and provisions relating to firearms subject
to the prohibitions of section 922(p), shall not apply with respect
to the transportation, shipment, receipt, possession, or
importation of any firearm or ammunition imported for, sold or
shipped to, or issued for the use of, the United States or any
department or agency thereof or any State or any department,
agency, or political subdivision thereof.

(2) The provisions of this chapter, except for provisions
relating to firearms subject to the prohibitions of section 922(p),
shall not apply with respect to (A) the shipment or receipt of
firearms or ammunition when sold or issued by the Secretary of the
Army pursuant to section 4308 of title 10 before the repeal of such
section by section 1624(a) of the Corporation for the Promotion of
Rifle Practice and Firearms Safety Act, and (B) the transportation
of any such firearm or ammunition carried out to enable a person,
who lawfully received such firearm or ammunition from the Secretary
of the Army, to engage in military training or in competitions.

(3) Unless otherwise prohibited by this chapter, except for
provisions relating to firearms subject to the prohibitions of
section 922(p), or any other Federal law, a licensed importer,
licensed manufacturer, or licensed dealer may ship to a member of
the United States Armed Forces on active duty outside the United
States or to clubs, recognized by the Department of Defense, whose
entire membership is composed of such members, and such members or
clubs may receive a firearm or ammunition determined by the
Attorney General to be generally recognized as particularly
suitable for sporting purposes and intended for the personal use of
such member or club.

(4) When established to the satisfaction of the Attorney General
to be consistent with the provisions of this chapter, except for
provisions relating to firearms subject to the prohibitions of
section 922(p), and other applicable Federal and State laws and
published ordinances, the Attorney General may authorize the
transportation, shipment, receipt, or importation into the United
States to the place of residence of any member of the United States
Armed Forces who is on active duty outside the United States (or
who has been on active duty outside the United States within the
sixty day period immediately preceding the transportation,
shipment, receipt, or importation), of any firearm or ammunition
which is (A) determined by the Attorney General to be generally
recognized as particularly suitable for sporting purposes, or
determined by the Department of Defense to be a type of firearm
normally classified as a war souvenir, and (B) intended for the
personal use of such member.

(5) For the purpose of paragraph (3) of this subsection, the term
"United States" means each of the several States and the District
of Columbia.



(b)
A licensed importer, licensed manufacturer, licensed dealer,
or licensed collector who is indicted for a crime punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding one year, may, notwithstanding
any other provision of this chapter, continue operation pursuant to
his existing license (if prior to the expiration of the term of the
existing license timely application is made for a new license)
during the term of such indictment and until any conviction
pursuant to the indictment becomes final.


(c)
<SPAN style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff00"> A person who is prohibited from possessing, shipping,
transporting, or receiving firearms or ammunition may make
application to the Attorney General for relief from the
disabilities imposed by Federal laws with respect to the
acquisition, receipt, transfer, shipment, transportation, or
possession of firearms</span>, and the Attorney General may grant such
relief if it is established to his satisfaction that the
circumstances regarding the disability, and the applicant's record
and reputation, are such that the applicant will not be likely to
act in a manner dangerous to public safety and that the granting of
the relief would not be contrary to the public interest. Any person
whose application for relief from disabilities is denied by the
Attorney General may file a petition with the United States
district court for the district in which he resides for a judicial
review of such denial. The court may in its discretion admit
additional evidence where failure to do so would result in a
miscarriage of justice. A licensed importer, licensed manufacturer,
licensed dealer, or licensed collector conducting operations under
this chapter, who makes application for relief from the
disabilities incurred under this chapter, shall not be barred by
such disability from further operations under his license pending
final action on an application for relief filed pursuant to this
section. Whenever the Attorney General grants relief to any person
pursuant to this section he shall promptly publish in the Federal
Register notice of such action, together with the reasons therefor.


(d)
The Attorney General shall authorize a firearm or ammunition
to be imported or brought into the United States or any possession
thereof if the firearm or ammunition -

(1) is being imported or brought in for scientific or research
purposes, or is for use in connection with competition or
training pursuant to chapter 401 of title 10;

(2) is an unserviceable firearm, other than a machinegun as
defined in section 5845(b) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
(not readily restorable to firing condition), imported or brought
in as a curio or museum piece;

(3) is of a type that does not fall within the definition of a
firearm as defined in section 5845(a) of the Internal Revenue
Code of 1986 and is generally recognized as particularly suitable
for or readily adaptable to sporting purposes, excluding surplus
military firearms, except in any case where the Attorney General
has not authorized the importation of the firearm pursuant to
this paragraph, it shall be unlawful to import any frame,
receiver, or barrel of such firearm which would be prohibited if
assembled; or

(4) was previously taken out of the United States or a
possession by the person who is bringing in the firearm or
ammunition.

The Attorney General shall permit the conditional importation or
bringing in of a firearm or ammunition for examination and testing
in connection with the making of a determination as to whether the
importation or bringing in of such firearm or ammunition will be
allowed under this subsection.


(e)
Notwithstanding any other provision of this title, the
Attorney General shall authorize the importation of, by any
licensed importer, the following:

(1) All rifles and shotguns listed as curios or relics by the
Attorney General pursuant to section 921(a)(13), and

(2) All handguns, listed as curios or relics by the Attorney
General pursuant to section 921(a)(13), provided that such
handguns are generally recognized as particularly suitable for or
readily adaptable to sporting purposes.


(f
) The Attorney General shall not authorize, under subsection
(d), the importation of any firearm the importation of which is
prohibited by section 922(p).
Which would then make it legal for a felon to have a gun, and it represents a small sample of felon gun ownership.

Is this what you were referring to Dave when you mentioned enabling felons? Exemptions made by authorities?
 

Upgrade Dave

Rising Star
Registered
Can you explain how the gun manufacturers and the NRA sells guns to felons?

I actually hold the manufacturer's to the smallest degree of blame. They make guns to satisfy a market, like alcohol makers or pharmaceutial companies.
But the NRA actively fights any gun/ammunition control measures including ones that would close gunshow loopholes and ATF inspections of gun shops.
For example
The Firearm Owners Protection Act of 1986, for example, prohibits A.T.F. agents from making more than one unannounced inspection per year of licensed gun dealers. The law also reduced the falsification of records by dealers to a misdemeanor and put in place vague language defining what it meant to “engage in business” without a dealer’s license.

Both provisions, said William J. Vizzard, an emeritus professor of criminal justice at California State University, Sacramento, and a former A.T.F. special agent, made it more difficult for the bureau to go after gun sellers who broke the law.

The so-called Tiahrt amendments — named for Todd Tiahrt, a former Republican congressman from Kansas, and first attached as riders to appropriations bills in 2003 and 2004 — limited the A.T.F.’s ability to share tracing information on firearms linked to crimes with local and state law enforcement agencies and with the public. Those restrictions have been loosened in subsequent versions of the amendments. But under the most recent Tiahrt amendment, adopted in 2010, the A.T.F. still cannot release anything but aggregate data to the public. The amendment still prohibits the bureau from using tracing data in some legal proceedings to suspend or revoke a dealer’s license, and it requires that records of background checks of gun buyers be destroyed within 24 hours of approval. Advocates of tighter regulation say this makes it harder to identify dealers who falsify records or buyers who make “straw” purchases for others.

Again, if legitimate gun owners and gun shop owners were all truly law abiding citizens, this wouldn't be an issue but it's been long proven that many are not. The NRA, through their puppet legislators, make it nearly impossible to separate one from the other.
As a gun rights person, the NRA is not your ally. They work for gun manufacturers and they like a good massacre because it and the possibility of impending restrictive legislation spurs sales.
 

dcdieseling

Support BGOL
Registered
How about ban all handguns? It is a cowardly weapon anyway.

Make it easy as pie to own a long gun (rifle, shotgun, assault rifle) with lots of training options.

If you look at the national crime statistics, handguns account (far and away) for most murders in this country.

If you combine ALL long guns, they do not equal 1/10 of the murders of hand guns. In fact, ALL long guns account for fewer murders than bare hands.


This.
 

Greed

Star
Registered
I actually hold the manufacturer's to the smallest degree of blame. They make guns to satisfy a market, like alcohol makers or pharmaceutial companies.
But the NRA actively fights any gun/ammunition control measures including ones that would close gunshow loopholes and ATF inspections of gun shops.
For example


Again, if legitimate gun owners and gun shop owners were all truly law abiding citizens, this wouldn't be an issue but it's been long proven that many are not. The NRA, through their puppet legislators, make it nearly impossible to separate one from the other.
As a gun rights person, the NRA is not your ally. They work for gun manufacturers and they like a good massacre because it and the possibility of impending restrictive legislation spurs sales.
This only works if you're saying what they are doing is immoral. All a manufacturer is doing is creating a legal product for consumption.

Are you promoting that it is immoral to manufacture a gun? If not then how does it turn into a blame assignment because the third or tenth person down the line committed an illegal act with their product. If it is immoral to manufacture, then you are anti-gun and not pro gun control. Of course, the answer is already evident in your assertion that manufacturers "like a good massacre," so they can increase revenue.

And the NRA is one of thousands of registered lobbyists successfully buying politicians with money. The Brady people are no more moral than the NRA, they are just poorer. Maybe you shouldn't advocated a "get away with it government," then we can assume right or wrong drives politics rather than a quarterly disclosure statements.

You only keep lumping everyone together because it's easier than punishing lawbreakers and protecting law abiders. The same way it's easier to blame the NRA than blame the principle-less politicians you voted for.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
twp_logo_300.gif

White House weighs broad gun-control
agenda in wake of Newtown shootings





The White House is weighing a far broader and more comprehensive approach to curbing the nation’s gun violence than simply reinstating an expired ban on assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition, according to multiple people involved in the administration’s discussions. A working group led by Vice President Biden is seriously considering measures backed by key law enforcement leaders that would:[/font]


  • Require universal background checks for firearm buyers;

  • Track the movement and sale of weapons through a national database;


  • Strengthen mental health checks, and


  • Stiffen penalties for carrying guns near schools or giving them to minors.

To sell such changes, the White House is developing strategies to work around the National Rifle Association that one source said could include rallying support from Wal-Mart and other gun retailers for measures that would benefit their businesses.

In addition to potential legislative proposals, Biden’s group has expanded its focus to include measures that would not need congressional approval and could be quickly implemented by executive action, according to interest-group leaders who have discussed options with Biden and key Cabinet secretaries. Possibilities include changes to federal mental-health programs and modernization of gun-tracking efforts by the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives.


 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator

I would like to add this one:


  • Make the person criminally responsible and civilly liable who fails to secure his gun such that it is permitted or allowed to become accessible to a child or person with known mental deficiencies who commits a crime using the gun.


 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<IFRAME SRC="http://www.demandaplan.org/" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://www.demandaplan.org/">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator

Gabrielle Giffords and her Husband Aim Fire at
NRA as They Launch New Gun Control Group




145210390.jpg.CROP.article568-large.jpg

Gabrielle Giffords and husband Mark Kelly point out that the country has "seen an astound-
ing 11 mass shootings" since the former lawmaker was shot in the head two years ago.
Photo by Valerie Macon/Getty Images


Two years ago today, then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords was critically injured in Tucson when Jared Lee Loughner opened fire while she was meeting with constituents, killing six people. Since then “Congress has done something quite extraordinary—nothing at all,” write Giffords and her husband Mark Kelly write in a USA Today op-ed announcing the launch of Americans for Responsible Solutions. The group, a new political action committee that aims to decrease gun violence, “will raise the funds necessary to balance the influence of the gun lobby,” Giffords and Kelly write.


The couple sat down with ABC’s Diane Sawyer for an interview that will be airing Tuesday. "I think we all need to try to do something about [gun violence]," Kelly told Sawyer. "It's obvious to everybody we have a problem. And problems can be solved."


The former lawmaker and former astronaut make clear that they are supporters of gun rights, noting they have two guns in their home. But they want to create a powerful counterpart to the NRA to end the lopsided nature of political contributions in the gun debate. “We saw from the NRA leadership's defiant and unsympathetic response to the Newtown, Conn., massacre that winning even the most common-sense reforms will require a fight,” they write.


Today, Tucson will mark the anniversary of the shooting by ringing bells across the city at the very moment when Loughner opened fire, reports the Associated Press.



http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slat..._control_group_americans_for_responsible.html



 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<IFRAME SRC="http://americansforresponsiblesolutions.org/" WIDTH=780 HEIGHT=1500>
<A HREF="http://americansforresponsiblesolutions.org/">link</A>

</IFRAME>
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
biden-foot-in-mouth.jpg


What the hell did Biden mean when he said the President might use an executive order to restrict access to guns or ammunition ???


"The president is going to act," Biden said in a briefing to reporters before the inaugural meeting of a new national task force on gun control. "Executive order, executive action that can be taken; we haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and all the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action, we believe, is required."​


I'm interesting in something actually getting done that would be useful to reducing gun violence in this country. And, I think we might be at one of those crucial times in American gun-history where something constructive might actually be possible. In my lowly opinion, however, saying things that will unnecessarily rile the "other side" and especially saying things that give them ammunition (said differently: material that amounts to fodder for their fear and disinformation campaign) should be avoided, JOE BIDEN! :(

Everyone (except some in the avid gun nut population) knows that the 2nd Amendment is a Constitutional provision and that an executive order can't "take our guns away" (and I don't think serious pro-regulation people want that) -- but mentioning executive orders in this context, especially without saying what the fuck you're talking about or thinking of, is in my opinion politically not smart, at a time like this.

Hey Joe,
please do me a favor, Think before you speak !!!



 

Upgrade Dave

Rising Star
Registered
This only works if you're saying what they are doing is immoral. All a manufacturer is doing is creating a legal product for consumption.

Are you promoting that it is immoral to manufacture a gun? If not then how does it turn into a blame assignment because the third or tenth person down the line committed an illegal act with their product. If it is immoral to manufacture, then you are anti-gun and not pro gun control. Of course, the answer is already evident in your assertion that manufacturers "like a good massacre," so they can increase revenue.

I answered this with the post you quoted. Making a legal item to satisfy a market isn't in itself immoral. But they do like a good massacre because it sells guns and this isn't even disputable. Nut kills a bunch of people, guns fly off the shelves.

And the NRA is one of thousands of registered lobbyists successfully buying politicians with money. The Brady people are no more moral than the NRA, they are just poorer. Maybe you shouldn't advocated a "get away with it government," then we can assume right or wrong drives politics rather than a quarterly disclosure statements.

This has nothing to do with what I said. The NRA works for gun manufacturers, not gun owners.

You only keep lumping everyone together because it's easier than punishing lawbreakers and protecting law abiders. The same way it's easier to blame the NRA than blame the principle-less politicians you voted for.

Is there a law that only affects lawbreakers without affecting law abiders?
 

mc2

Rising Star
Registered
I joined the NRA after all this talk about banning these "Assault Weapons".. Their logic behind this doesnt make sense...

More than half of the people killed each year from guns die from handguns and not these "deadly assault rifles.." Using this logic why not start a movement to ban handguns?

Get the fuck out of here.. Like the NRA mentions, the states with the strictest gun laws are states that have some of the highest crime rates.. Look at New York and Look at New Jersey, Chicago, DC, etc...

Damn I regret that I voted for Obama :smh:
 

Upgrade Dave

Rising Star
Registered
I joined the NRA after all this talk about banning these "Assault Weapons".. Their logic behind this doesnt make sense...

More than half of the people killed each year from guns die from handguns and not these "deadly assault rifles.." Using this logic why not start a movement to ban handguns?

Get the fuck out of here.. Like the NRA mentions, the states with the strictest gun laws are states that have some of the highest crime rates.. Look at New York and Look at New Jersey, Chicago, DC, etc...
Damn I regret that I voted for Obama :smh:

This is not true. It's an old Rightwing lie that people believe and regurgitate. NY and NJ aren't even in the top ten.
The states with the most lenient gun laws are among the most violent states.
http://247wallst.com/2012/04/26/americas-most-and-least-peaceful-states/
 

Upgrade Dave

Rising Star
Registered
biden-foot-in-mouth.jpg


What the hell did Biden mean when he said the President might use an executive order to restrict access to guns or ammunition ???


"The president is going to act," Biden said in a briefing to reporters before the inaugural meeting of a new national task force on gun control. "Executive order, executive action that can be taken; we haven't decided what that is yet. But we're compiling it all with the help of the attorney general and all the rest of the cabinet members as well as legislative action, we believe, is required."​


I'm interesting in something actually getting done that would be useful to reducing gun violence in this country. And, I think we might be at one of those crucial times in American gun-history where something constructive might actually be possible. In my lowly opinion, however, saying things that will unnecessarily rile the "other side" and especially saying things that give them ammunition (said differently: material that amounts to fodder for their fear and disinformation campaign) should be avoided, JOE BIDEN! :(

Everyone (except some in the avid gun nut population) knows that the 2nd Amendment is a Constitutional provision and that an executive order can't "take our guns away" (and I don't think serious pro-regulation people want that) -- but mentioning executive orders in this context, especially without saying what the fuck you're talking about or thinking of, is in my opinion politically not smart, at a time like this.

Hey Joe,
please do me a favor, Think before you speak !!!




Intellectually, I agree but "the other side" doesn't need any riling up. Doing nothing got them riled up so Joe, not known as a guy who always says the most politically savvy things, at worst just added wood to a flaming inferno.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator

A month after the shootings in Newtown, Conn.:


  • Nearly four in 10 Americans say they are dissatisfied with current gun laws and want them strengthened, according to a new poll out by Gallup/USA Today;

  • At 38 percent, the survey reported a 13-point spike from last year in those Americans who expressed were unhappy with current laws and supported stricter ones.

  • A 2012 Gallup poll showed just 25 percent expressing that attitude.



Poll: Spike in dissatisfaction over gun laws





 

Greed

Star
Registered
Obama announces 23 executive actions, asks Congress to pass gun laws

http://news.blogs.cnn.com/2013/01/16/obama-to-announce-gun-control-proposals-shortly/?hpt=hp_c1

[Updated at 12:22 p.m. ET] The announcement is over, and Obama is signing the 23 executive actions. These actions are in addition to laws that Obama wants Congress to pass. Here, according to the White House, are the 23 executive actions that he and his administration will do:

1. "Issue a presidential memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system."

2. "Address unnecessary legal barriers, particularly relating to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, that may prevent states from making information available to the background check system."

3. "Improve incentives for states to share information with the background check system."

4. "Direct the attorney general to review categories of individuals prohibited from having a gun to make sure dangerous people are not slipping through the cracks."

5. "Propose rulemaking to give law enforcement the ability to run a full background check on an individual before returning a seized gun."

6. "Publish a letter from ATF to federally licensed gun dealers providing guidance on how to run background checks for private sellers."

7. "Launch a national safe and responsible gun ownership campaign."

8. "Review safety standards for gun locks and gun safes (Consumer Product Safety Commission)."

9. "Issue a presidential Memorandum to require federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations."

10. "Release a DOJ report analyzing information on lost and stolen guns and make it widely available to law enforcement."

11. "Nominate an ATF director."

12. "Provide law enforcement, first responders, and school officials with proper training for active shooter situations."

13. "Maximize enforcement efforts to prevent gun violence and prosecute gun crime."

14. "Issue a presidential memorandum directing the Centers for Disease Control to research the causes and prevention of gun violence."

15. "Direct the attorney general to issue a report on the availability and most effective use of new gun safety technologies and challenge the private sector to develop innovative technologies."

16. "Clarify that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit doctors asking their patients about guns in their homes."

17. "Release a letter to health care providers clarifying that no federal law prohibits them from reporting threats of violence to law enforcement authorities."

18. "Provide incentives for schools to hire school resource officers."

19. "Develop model emergency response plans for schools, houses of worship and institutions of higher education."

20. "Release a letter to state health officials clarifying the scope of mental health services that Medicaid plans must cover."

21. "Finalize regulations clarifying essential health benefits and parity requirements within ACA exchanges."

22. "Commit to finalizing mental health parity regulations."

23. "Launch a national dialogue led by Secretaries Sebelius and Duncan on mental health."
 

thoughtone

Rising Star
BGOL Investor
<iframe src="http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2012/12/mass-shootings-mother-jones-full-data" width=800 height=1000></iframe>
 
Top