B a r a c k O b a m a 0 8

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>
Obama Declares His Candidacy for President</font size></center>



OBAMA_2008.sff_ILDP103_20070210103158.jpg

Hundreds of spectators wait in the cold outside the the Old State
Capitol in Springfield, Ill. where U.S. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill. is
expected to announce his candidacy for president of the United
States on Saturday, Feb. 10, 2007. (AP Photo/Seth Perlman)



Feb 10, 11:10 AM (ET)
Associated Press
By NEDRA PICKLER


SPRINGFIELD, Ill. (AP) - Democrat Barack Obama declared himself a candidate Saturday for the White House in 2008, evoking Abraham Lincoln's ability to unite a nation and promising to lead a new generation as the country's first black president.

The first-term senator announced his candidacy from the state capital where he began his elective career just 10 years ago, and in front of the building where in another century, Lincoln served eight years in the Illinois Legislature.

"We can build a more hopeful America," Obama said in remarks prepared for delivery. "And that is why, in the shadow of the Old State Capitol, where Lincoln once called on a divided house to stand together, where common hopes and common dreams still live, I stand before you today to announce my candidacy for president of the United States."

http://apnews1.iwon.com/article/20070210/D8N6UTG80.html
 

VegasGuy

Star
OG Investor
It's game on now!

Let's see how he manages questions on THE ISSUES. It would be good to hear him say, "I don't have an answer yet" rather than trying to act like he knows every damn thing.

-VG
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="4">
Related Threads:</font size>

<font size="3">The Attack on Obama's Character</font size>
By Muckraker10021
http://198.65.131.81/board/showthread.php?t=149692&highlight=obama


<font size="3">The Official Barak Obama thread</font size>
By QueEx
http://198.65.131.81/board/showthread.php?t=73187&highlight=obama


<font size="3">Neocons wondered who was going to
put the uppity Negro obama in check!!!! </font size>

By Fatsack
http://198.65.131.81/board/showthread.php?t=148445&highlight=obama


<font size="3">Colorblind</font size>
By NAWDOG
http://198.65.131.81/board/showthread.php?t=150348&highlight=obama


`
 

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
<br><img src="http://proquest.umi.com/i/pub/7818.gif"><br>
<font color="#d90000" face="arial black" size="5"><br>
Stop Him Before He Gets More Experience</font>
<font color="#000000" face="Trebuchet MS, Arial Unicode MS, Microsoft sans serif, verdana" size="3"><br>
<img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/04/02/opinion/ts-rich-75.jpg">
<b>by Frank Rich<br>
February 11, 2007 </b>

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/tsc.h...Q2FQ25Q3DQ23Q23Q3D4zpnp4nQ3DQ23Q23)pQ5Dg.giAy

As the official Barack Obama rollout reaches its planned climax on “60 Minutes” tonight, we’ll learn if he has the star power to upstage Anna Nicole Smith. LOL

But at least one rap against him can promptly be laid to rest: his lack of experience. If time in the United States Senate is what counts for presidential seasoning, maybe his two years’ worth is already too much. Better he get out now, before there’s another embarrassing nonvote on a nonbinding measure about what will soon be a four-year-old war.

History is going to look back and laugh at last week’s farce, with the Virginia Republican John Warner voting to kill a debate on his own anti-surge resolution and the West Virginia Democrat Robert Byrd seizing the occasion for an hourlong soliloquy on coal mining. As the Senate pleasured itself with parliamentary one-upmanship, the rate of American casualties in Iraq reached a new high.

The day after the resolution debacle, I spoke with Senator Obama about the war and about his candidacy. Since we talked by phone, I can’t swear he was clean, but he was definitely articulate. He doesn’t yet sound as completely scripted as his opponents — though some talking-point-itis is creeping in — and he isn’t remotely defensive as he shrugs off the race contretemps du jour prompted by his White House run. Not that he’s all sweetness and light. “If the criterion is how long you’ve been in Washington, then we should just go ahead and assign Joe Biden or Chris Dodd the nomination,” he said. “What people are looking for is judgment.”

What Mr. Obama did not have to say is that he had the judgment about Iraq that his rivals lacked. As an Illinois state senator with no access to intelligence reports, he recognized in October 2002 that administration claims of Saddam’s “imminent and direct threat to the United States” were hype and foresaw that an American occupation of Iraq would be of “undetermined length, at undetermined cost, with undetermined consequences.” Nor can he be pilloried as soft on terrorism by the Cheney-Lieberman axis of neo-McCarthyism. “I don’t oppose all wars,” he said in the same Chicago speech. “What I am opposed to is a dumb war.”

Now that Mr. Obama has passed through Men’s Vogue, among other stations of a best-selling author’s cross of hype, he wants to move past the dumb phase of Obamamania. He has begun to realize “how difficult it is to break through the interest in me on the beach or that my wife’s made me stop sneaking cigarettes.” He doesn’t expect to be elected the leader of the free world because he “can tell a good joke on Jay Leno.” It is “an open question and a legitimate question,” he says, whether he can channel his early boomlet into an electoral victory.

No one can answer that question at this absurdly early stage of an absurdly long presidential race. But Mr. Obama is well aware of the serious criticisms he engenders, including the charge that he is conciliatory to a fault. He argues that he is “not interested in just splitting the difference” when he habitually seeks a consensus on tough issues. “There are some times where we need to be less bipartisan,” he says. “I’m not interested in cheap bipartisanship. We should have been less bipartisan in asking tough questions about entering into this Iraq war.”

He has introduced his own end-the-war plan that goes beyond a split-the-difference condemnation of the current escalation. His bill sets a beginning (May) and an end (March 31, 2008) for the phased withdrawal of combat troops, along with certain caveats to allow American military flexibility as “a big, difficult, messy situation” plays out during the endgame.
Unlike the more timid Senate war critics, including Hillary Clinton, Mr. Obama has no qualms about embracing a plan with what he unabashedly labels “a timeline.”

But he has no messianic pretensions and is enough of a realist to own up to the fact that his proposal has no present chance of becoming law. Nor do any of the other end-the-war plans offered by Congressional Democrats — some overlapping his, some calling for a faster exit than his.

If a nonbinding resolution expressing mild criticism of President Bush’s policy can’t even come to a vote in the Senate, legislation demanding actual action is a nonstarter. All the Democrats’ parrying about troop caps, timelines, benchmarks, the cutting off of war funding, whatever, is academic except as an index to the postures being struck by the various presidential hopefuls as they compete for their party’s base. There simply aren’t 60 votes in the Senate to force the hand of a president who, in Mr. Obama’s words, “is hellbent on doing what he’s been doing for the last four years.”

Unless, of course, Republicans join in. The real point of every Iraq proposal, Mr. Obama observes, is to crank up the political heat until “enough pressure builds within the Republican Party that they essentially revolt.” He argues that last week’s refusal to act on a nonbinding resolution revealed just how quickly that pressure is building. If the resolution didn’t matter, he asks, “why were they going through so many hoops to avoid the vote?”
He seconds Chuck Hagel’s celebrated explosion before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, when “he pointed at folks” and demanded that all 100 senators be held accountable for their votes on what Senator Hagel called “the most divisive issue in this country since Vietnam.”

That’s why Mr. Obama is right when he says that the individual 2008 contests for the Senate and the House are at least as important as the presidential race when it comes to winding down the war: “Ultimately what’s going to make the biggest difference is the American people, particularly in swing districts and in Republican districts, sending a message to their representatives: This is intolerable to us.”

That message was already sent by many American voters on Election Day in 2006. Rahm Emanuel, the Illinois congressman who, with his Senate counterpart, Chuck Schumer, oversaw that Democratic takeover, smells the blood of more Republicans in “marginal districts” in 2008. His party is now in the hunt for fresh candidates, including veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan. Such is the sense of impending doom among House Republicans that their leader, John Boehner, told CNN on Jan. 23 that he could render a verdict on whether the latest Bush Iraq strategy is “working” in a mere “60 to 90 days.”

In the Senate, even the rumor of a tough opponent is proving enough to make some incumbents flip overnight from rubber-stamp support of the White House’s war policy to criticism of the surge. Norm Coleman of Minnesota started running away from his own record the moment he saw the whites of Al Franken’s eyes.

Another endangered Republican up for re-election in 2008, John Sununu of New Hampshire, literally sprinted away from the press, The Washington Post reported, rather than field questions about his vote on the nonbinding resolution last week.

My own guess is that the Republican revolt will be hastened more by the harsh reality in Iraq than any pressure applied by Democratic maneuvers in Congress. Events are just moving too fast. While senators played their partisan games on Capitol Hill, they did so against the backdrop of chopper after chopper going down on the evening news. The juxtaposition made Washington’s aura of unreality look obscene.

Senator Warner looked like such a fool voting against his own principles (“No matter how strongly I feel about my resolution,” he said, “I shall vote with my leader”) that by week’s end he abruptly released a letter asserting that he and six Republican colleagues did want a debate on an anti-surge resolution after all. (Of the seven signatories, five are up for re-election in 2008, Mr. Warner among them.)

What anyone in Congress with half a brain knows is that the surge was sabotaged before it began. The latest National Intelligence Estimate said as much when it posited that “even if violence is diminished,” Iraq’s “absence of unifying leaders” makes political reconciliation doubtful.

Not enough capable Iraqi troops are showing up and, as Gen. Peter Pace told the Senate last week, not enough armored vehicles are available to protect the new American deployments. The State Department can’t recruit enough civilian officials to manage the latest push to turn on Baghdad’s electricity and is engaged in its own sectarian hostilities with the Pentagon. Revealingly enough, the surge’s cheerleaders are already searching for post-Rumsfeld scapegoats. William Kristol attacked the new defense secretary, Robert Gates, for “letting the Joint Chiefs slow-walk the brigades in.”

Washington’s conventional wisdom has it that the worse things go in the war, the more voters will want to stick with the tried and true: Clinton, McCain, Giuliani. But as Mr. Obama reminds us, “Nobody had better Washington résumés than Dick Cheney or Donald Rumsfeld.” In the wake of the catastrophe they and their enablers in both parties have made, the inexperienced should have a crack at inheriting the earth, especially if they’re clean.
</font>
<br>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="12"></hr>
<p>
 

Chase Bannon

Star
BGOL Investor
Cornell West sort got into Barack's ass yesterday at the State of the Black Union. He had some real good points about Barack but he still supports him.
 

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
<font face="verdana" size="4" color="#333333">
Peeps, I know you don't read all the articles posted here.....but read this one. In my opinion, the article captures what's "right" about Obama, what's incomplete about Obama and what scares the shit out of "white supremacist" about Obama. A good read.</font>

<p>
<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="8"></hr>
<p>
<font face="arial black" size="6" color="#d90000">
Destiny's Child</font><font face="tahoma" size="4" color="#0000ff"><b>
No candidate since Robert F. Kennedy has sparked as much campaign-trail heat as Barack Obama. But can the one-term senator craft a platform to match his charisma?</font>
<font face="georgia" size="3" color="#000000">
Feb. 07, 2007

by BEN WALLACE-WELLS</b>

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/story/13390609/campaign_08_the_radical_roots_of_barack_obama


Shortly after Barack Obama was elected to the United States Senate in 2004, he began residing, Monday through Thursday, in a one-bedroom apartment a few blocks from the Capitol. For a forty-three-year-old man who had been married for thirteen years and who had two young daughters, it was an isolating experience. The building has a yoga studio and a running track and a decidedly own-and-urban view of some ratty rooftops in the city's tiny Chinatown district; its decor, glass and brick, is less U.S. senator than junior management consultant. In his return to bachelor life, Obama found himself "soft and helpless. My first morning in Washington, I realized I'd forgotten to buy a shower curtain and had to scrunch up against the shower wall in order to avoid flooding the bathroom floor." The other new Democrat elected to the Senate that year, Ken Salazar of Colorado, took an apartment in the same building with his brother John, who is himself a congressman; they spent their time watching documentaries about leathery old cowboys on the Western Channel. Obama spent most of his time reading briefing books.

When Obama first got to Washington, he wanted to be a wonk, to keep his head down and concentrate on small issues. "The plan was: Put Illinois first," one of his aides tells me. Obama himself admits that his initial agenda had a "self-conscious" modesty. His early legislative accomplishments have been useful and bipartisan -- he has even sponsored bills with ultraconservative Sen. Tom Coburn, who believes that high school bathrooms breed lesbianism -- but they have been small-scale and off the headlines: a plan to make it easier for citizens to find out about government spending, increased research into ethanol, more job training and tax credits for "responsible fathers." This is the kind of head-down diligence that plays well in the Senate. "I am amazed by his sheer stamina," says Sen. Dick Lugar, a Republican from Indiana who has become something of a mentor to Obama.

But Washington has plenty of wonks, and Obama wasn't going to distinguish himself through diligence alone. He came to the Capitol equipped with his own, swelling celebrity; the Senate was not a perfect fit. Beyond his considerable charm, Obama can be righteous and cocky. He came to Washington pushing the hope that politics could be better -- but now he can give the impression that he'd rather be just about anywhere other than in Washington. "It can be incredibly frustrating," he tells me. "The maneuverings, the chicanery, the smallness of politics here." Listening to a bloviating colleague at his first meeting of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Obama slipped a three-word note to a member of his staff: "Shoot. Me. Now." On a recent day, as Obama made his way through the Capitol's corridors, his fellow senators seemed like good-natured sportscasters, jolly and easy with their power, bantering about the fortunes of baseball teams in their home states. . Obama is aloof and quiet. He prefers to listen, attentive as a rector, not quite of this world, silently measuring it. "The typical politician pushes himself on people to get them to pay attention," says Frank Luntz, the Republican campaign strategist. "Obama is quieter. He doesn't push -- he has a laid-back feel that pulls you in. That is so rare."

Obama's ascent from rookie senator to presidential contender is one of the more startling and sudden acts in recent political history. Those around him aren't quite sure what has happened, and neither, for that matter, is the senator himself. Obama says he experienced the change as a call from the crowds that always stalk him, a summoning to a new role. First there was Hurricane Katrina, when the talk shows called him, assuming he had something to say. Then there were the throngs that lined the roads on his trip to Africa last summer, and the same excitement from domestic audiences on his book tour last fall. "I realized I didn't feel comfortable standing on the sidelines when so much was at stake," he tells me. "It was hard to maintain the notion that I was a backbencher." The early, wonkish humility was gone, replaced by a man who began to speak of himself in sprawling, historic terms. "Just being the president is not a good way of thinking about it," Obama says now. "You want to be a great president."

It is early January, a few weeks before Obama is set to announce his campaign for the presidency. He is sitting in his Senate office, dangling one leg over the other knee and speaking very, very slowly. It's not just that Obama searches for the right word; it's that the search seems to take him to distant worlds. When I first interviewed him last summer, his office was quiet and offbeat, a warren of tiny corridors and desks, the atmosphere of a faculty lounge. Now the place is intense, the faces drawn, the harried feel of a war room.

Most politicians come to national prominence at the head of a movement: Bill Clinton had neoliberalism, George W. Bush had compassionate conservatism, Reagan had supply-side economics. Even Obama's rivals have political calling cards: John Edwards has devoted himself to a poverty-fighting populism, Hillary Clinton is defined by a hawkish centrism. These identities give them infrastructures, ideologies, natural bases of support. Obama is trying to pull a less-conventional trick: to turn his own person into a movement. "I'm not surprised you're having trouble categorizing him," one of his aides says. "I don't think he's wedded to any ideological frame." With Obama, there is only the man himself -- his youth, his ease, his race, his claim on the new century. His candidacy is essentially a plea for voters to put their trust in his innate capacity for clarity and judgment. There is no Obama-ism, only Obama.

"People don't come to Obama for what he's done in the Senate," says Bruce Reed, president of the centrist Democratic Leadership Council. "They come because of what they hope he could be." What Obama stands for, if anything, is not yet clear. Everywhere he goes he is greeted by thrilled crowds, trailed constantly by a reporter from The Chicago Tribune who is writing a book about the senator with a preliminary title so immodest that it embarrassed even Obama's staff: The Savior. The danger here is that the public has committed the cardinal sin of political love, forcing Obama onto the national stage before knowing him well enough to gauge whether he's ready for it. The candidate they see before them is their own creation -- or, rather, it is the scrambling of a skinny, serious, self-reflective man trying to mold his public's conflicted yearnings into something greater. "Barack has become a kind of human Rorschach test," says Cassandra Butts, a friend of the senator's from law school and now a leader at the Center for American Progress. "People see in him what they want to see."

The Trinity United Church of Christ, the church that Barack Obama attends in Chicago, is at once vast and unprepossessing, a big structure a couple of blocks from the projects, in the long open sore of a ghetto on the city's far South Side. The church is a leftover vision from the Sixties of what a black nationalist future might look like. There's the testifying fervor of the black church, the Afrocentric Bible readings, even the odd dashiki. And there is the Rev. Jeremiah Wright, a sprawling, profane bear of a preacher, a kind of black ministerial institution, with his own radio shows and guest preaching gigs across the country. Wright takes the pulpit here one Sunday and solemnly, sonorously declares that he will recite ten essential facts about the United States. "Fact number one: We've got more black men in prison than there are in college," he intones. "Fact number two: Racism is how this country was founded and how this country is still run!" There is thumping applause; Wright has a cadence and power that make Obama sound like John Kerry. Now the reverend begins to preach. "We are deeply involved in the importing of drugs, the exporting of guns and the training of professional KILLERS. . . . We believe in white supremacy and black inferiority and believe it more than we believe in God. . . . We conducted radiation experiments on our own people. . . . We care nothing about human life if the ends justify the means!" The crowd whoops and amens as Wright builds to his climax: "And. And. And! GAWD! Has GOT! To be SICK! OF THIS SHIT!"

This is as openly radical a background as any significant American political figure has ever emerged from, as much Malcolm X as Martin Luther King Jr. Wright is not an incidental figure in Obama's life, or his politics. The senator "affirmed" his Christian faith in this church; he uses Wright as a "sounding board" to "make sure I'm not losing myself in the hype and hoopla." Both the title of Obama's second book, The Audacity of Hope, and the theme for his keynote address at the Democratic National Convention in 2004 come from Wright's sermons. "If you want to understand where Barack gets his feeling and rhetoric from," says the Rev. Jim Wallis, a leader of the religious left, "just look at Jeremiah Wright."

Obama wasn't born into Wright's world. His parents were atheists, an African bureaucrat and a white grad student, Jerry Falwell's nightmare vision of secular liberals come to life. Obama could have picked any church -- the spare, spiritual places in Hyde Park, the awesome pomp and procession of the cathedrals downtown. He could have picked a mosque, for that matter, or even a synagogue. Obama chose Trinity United. He picked Jeremiah Wright. Obama writes in his autobiography that on the day he chose this church, he felt the spirit of black memory and history moving through Wright, and "felt for the first time how that spirit carried within it, nascent, incomplete, the possibility of moving beyond our narrow dreams."

Obama has now spent two years in the Senate and written two books about himself, both remarkably frank: There is a desire to own his story, to be both his own Boswell and his own investigative reporter. When you read his autobiography, the surprising thing -- for such a measured politician -- is the depth of radical feeling that seeps through, the amount of Jeremiah Wright that's packed in there. Perhaps this shouldn't be surprising. Obama's life story is a splicing of two different roles, and two different ways of thinking about America's. One is that of the consummate insider, someone who has been raised believing that he will help to lead America, who believes in this country's capacity for acts of outstanding virtue. The other is that of a black man who feels very deeply that this country's exercise of its great inherited wealth and power has been grossly unjust. This tension runs through his life; Obama is at once an insider and an outsider, a bomb thrower and the class president. "I'm somebody who believes in this country and its institutions," he tells me. "But I often think they're broken."

Obama was born in Honolulu in 1961, back when the Hawaiian islands were still a wary and weird part of America, half military base, half pan-Pacific outpost. His own background was even more singular and chancy: Obama's father was a Muslim from Kenya, the son of a farmer, who grew up tending his father's goats and who, through an almost impossible succession of luck, won a scholarship to the University of Hawaii. At the time, Barack's mother, Ann Dunham, was eighteen, a student at the university, the daughter of a blue-collar couple from Kansas. When Barack was two, his father left the family and returned to Kenya. Barack's mother remarried, moving with her son to her new husband's home in Indonesia.

To Barack, the country seemed exotic (he briefly owned a pet monkey named Tata) but also "unpredictable and often cruel." He recalls watching floods swamp the countryside and seeing the "desperation" of poor farm families who "scrambled to rescue their goats and their hens even as chunks of their huts washed away." (In January, the conservative Washington Times alleged that Obama had attended a hyper-religious Islamic madrassah as a child in Indonesia -- a charge that the senator has denied.)

Obama spent four years in Jakarta before moving back to Honolulu, where he lived with his grandparents and won a scholarship to the private Punahou Academy, the place in Hawaii where all the Ivy League-bound kids go. (In his autobiography, he notes that when he hung out with a black friend, they together comprised "almost half" of the African-American population of Punahou.) He cops to "experimentation" as a teen, saying he smoked weed and even did "a little blow." He played basketball -- "with a consuming passion that would always exceed my limited talent." Even today, his friends say, Obama talks a mean game. "He's a bit of a trash-talker," says Butts. "You see that competitive side of him come out when he's playing Scrabble or basketball."

After graduating from Columbia University, Obama spent four years as a street-level organizer in Chicago, where he met and worked with Wright, before attending Harvard Law School, where he was made the first black president of the law review. Winning the position required political savvy: "He was able to work with conservatives as well as liberals," recalls his friend Michael Froman, now an executive at Citigroup. Laurence Tribe, the renowned constitutional scholar, considers Obama one of his two best students ever: "He had a very powerful ability to synthesize diverse sources of information." When Obama returned to Chicago, he turned down big-money firms to take a job with a small civil rights practice, filing housing discrimination suits on behalf of low-income residents and teaching constitutional law on the side. He had thought he might enter politics since before he left for law school, and eventually he did, winning a seat in the state Senate at the age of thirty-seven.

"He was a little off-putting at first -- that whole Harvard thing," says Rich Miller, a veteran observer of Illinois politics. "But the bottom line is pretty much everybody I know had a high opinion of him, Republican or Democrat. In this state it's hard for anyone to get along, and even though he was very liberal, he was able to pass a hell of a lot of bills."

Many of the stands Obama took were pretty radical for a candidate who would end up aiming for national office. He led an ambitious but failed effort to provide health care for every citizen of Illinois, fought against predatory lending practices and wrote a bill making Illinois the first state to require police to tape their interrogations of murder suspects. But in 2003, when Obama began to run for the U.S. Senate, his legislative track record wasn't enough to get him elected. He was one of seven Democrats in the field, third or fourth on name recognition and even farther behind in funds. He barely stood a chance.

Then, running preliminary polls, his advisers noticed something remarkable: Women responded more intensely and warmly to Obama than did men. In a seven-candidate field, you don't need to win every vote. His advisers, assuming they would pick up a healthy chunk of black votes, honed in on a different target: Every focus group they ran was composed exclusively of women, nearly all of them white.

There is an amazingly candid moment in Obama's autobiography when he writes of his childhood discomfort at the way his mother would sexualize African-American men. "More than once," he recalls, "my mother would point out: 'Harry Belafonte is the best-looking man on the planet.' " What the focus groups his advisers conducted revealed was that Obama's political career now depends, in some measure, upon a tamer version of this same feeling, on the complicated dynamics of how white women respond to a charismatic black man. "I remember when we realized something magical was happening," says Obama's pollster on the campaign, an earnest Iowan named Paul Harstad. "We were doing a focus group in suburban Chicago, and this woman, seventy years old, looks seventy-five, hears Obama's life story, and she clasps her hand to her chest and says, 'Be still, my heart.' Be still, my heart -- I've been doing this for a quarter century and I've never seen that." The most remarkable thing, for Harstad, was that the woman hadn't even seen the videos he had brought along of Obama speaking, had no idea what the young politician looked like. "All we'd done," he says, "is tell them the Story."

From that moment on, the Story became Obama's calling card, his political rationale and his basic sale. Every American politician has this wrangle he has to pull off, reshaping his life story to fit into Abe Lincoln's log cabin. Some pols (John Edwards, Bill Clinton) have an easier time of it than others (George Bush, Al Gore). Obama's material is simply the best of all. What he has to offer, at the most fundamental level, is not ideology or even inspiration -- it is the Story, the feeling that he embodies, in his own, uniquely American history, a longed-for break from the past. "With Obama, it's all about his difference," says Joe Trippi, the Democratic consultant who masterminded Howard Dean's candidacy. "We see in him this hope that the country might be different, too."

It has become fashionable, given Obama's charisma and compassion, to compare him to Robert F. Kennedy, whose 1968 campaign for the presidency achieved near-rock-star status. But Obama is not Kennedy. Bobby Kennedy grew up studying how to use America's power, and in his forties he began to venture out and notice its imperfections. Barack Obama came up in a study of those flaws, and now, thrust into a position of power in his forties, is trying to figure out what to do with it.

It is in his ambitious, halting attempts to put together a coherent foreign policy that you can most clearly see Obama trying to figure out the algorithm of American power. When he took his seat in the Senate, aides say, he was coming to foreign-policy questions "relatively cold." The imbalance between his near-zero experience and the expectations that accompanied his arrival was absurd: Obama says he "laughed out loud" when he was asked, at his very first press conference in Washington, "Senator, what's your place in history?"

But Obama had something that most first-time senators lack: the clout of celebrity. You could almost see the wheels turning in the minds of Washington's best and brightest: Go to work for Obama, they were thinking, and you might end up running the world. "You spend your life preparing for Bobby Kennedy to walk in the door," says one D.C. pollster, "and then one day he walks in your door."

One of the biggest names to work with Obama is Samantha Power, the scholar and journalist who was awarded the Pulitzer Prize for A Problem From Hell: America and the Age of Genocide. "In 2004, I came out of election night just completely depressed," Power says. "We thought Kerry would win and we'd all get a chance to change the world. But then it was like, 'Nah, same old thing.' " Obama gave her a place to channel her energy. She advised him on the genocide in Darfur, an issue that most politicians at the time were studiously avoiding. "He's a sponge," Power says. "He pushes so hard on policy ideas that fifteen minutes after you've started talking, he's sent you back to the drawing board. He doesn't get weighted down by the limits of American power, but he sees you have to grasp those limits in order to transcend them."

Power is part of a generation of thinkers who, like Obama, came of age after the Cold War. They worry about the problems created by globalization and believe that the most important issues America will confront in the future (terrorism, avian flu, global warming, bioweapons, the disease and nihilism that grow from concentrated poverty) will emanate from neglected and failed states (Afghanistan, the Congo, Sierra Leone). According to Susan Rice, a Brookings Institution scholar who serves as an informal adviser to Obama, their ideas come from the "profound conviction that we are interconnected, that poverty and conflict and health problems and autocracy and environmental degradation in faraway places have the potential to come back and bite us in the behind, and that we ignore such places and such people at our peril."

Over the past two years, Obama has come to adopt this worldview as his own. He came back fascinated from a quick trip to a U.S. project in Ethiopia, where American soldiers had parachuted in to help the victims of a flood: "By investing now," he said, "we avoid an Iraq or Afghanistan later." The foreign-policy initiatives he has fought for and passed have followed this model: He has secured money to fight avian flu, improve security in the Congo and safeguard Russian nuclear weapons. "My comment is not meant to be unkind to mainstream Democrats," says Lugar, "but it seems to me that Barack is studying issues that are very important for the country and for the world."

When I meet with Obama in his office, it becomes clear that his study of foreign policy has only deepened his belief in the potential of American power. "In Africa, you often see that the difference between a village where everybody eats and a village where people starve is government," he tells me. "One has a functioning government, and the other does not. Which is why it bothers me when I hear Grover Norquist or someone say that government is the enemy. They don't understand the fundamental role that government plays."

There are limitations to this view of the world, of course, and there are those who believe that for all his study, Obama has been too cautious on the big issues. When he was running for the Senate, Obama was an early and vocal opponent of the war in Iraq. "I think our foreign policy has been all bluster and saber-rattling and continued mistakes over the last several years," he says. But since he arrived in the Senate, many of those who hoped Obama would become a great liberal champion have been disappointed. He has voted with conservatives on tort reform and industry-friendly provisions in the bankruptcy bill, and the troop-pullout bill he introduced in January was a late and unremarkable entry in the debate over Iraq. "Those of us in the Chicago progressive community still believe in Barack Obama," says Joel Bleifuss, editor of the left-wing magazine In These Times. "But at the moment we're pretty much taking it on faith."

"Obama has set himself a very high bar," says Michael Franc, a conservative scholar at the Heritage Foundation. "People like him for being a fresh face, an out-of-the-box thinker. But on the matrix of issues that will decide this election -- Iraq, Iran, the war on terrorism -- I haven't seen anything from him that strays very far from conventional liberal thinking. To the extent that he sounds like just another Democrat, he's needlessly ceding an advantage he might otherwise create for himself."

Obama seems to recognize that he is caught between the public's eagerness for a fresh approach and its desire for a John Wayne figure who will stand tall against the terrorists. "What we've seen from the Bush administration is a lot of tough talk and poor decisions," he says, as if acknowledging a painful political truth. "But people do want tough."

Over the past six months, as Obama has drawn closer to declaring his candidacy, there have been the beginnings of the first real backlash against him. In early November, the Chicago papers ran a series of stories detailing his relationship with a crooked developer, Tony Rezko. In a complicated but legal deal with Rezko, who bought a vacant lot next door to Obama's in Chicago, the senator was able to secure his own house at $300,000 below the asking price. The Chicago Sun-Times gleefully headlined its account from media darling to media-hounded. The report uncovered no evidence of wrongdoing, but its emergence serves as a reminder that Obama cannot remain above the fray forever. The more successful he is at positioning himself as a political outsider, the more he will inevitably be subjected to the same forces that hobble political insiders. This is the unavoidable truth about falling in love with politicians: The time comes when you have to give them up.

With obama, there are crowds -- always the crowds. In December, in what marked the true beginning of his presidential campaign, he traveled to Manchester, New Hampshire, to test the political waters. The crowd begins with the retirees: Three hours before Obama is due to arrive, hobbling eighty-year-olds show up and badger the staff like teeny-boppers, trying to figure out which entrance the senator will use so they can catch a glimpse of him up close. The creaky old political operatives on hand debate whether this crowd was larger than the one they had seen when John F. Kennedy came to town. One woman compares Obama to Jesus.

In other politicians, charisma often seems like compensation for some deeper, irreducible need: Bill Clinton comes so close, and listens so closely, because he wants to be hugged; George Bush slaps backs and gives his best friends nicknames because he, the draft-dodging son of a fighter pilot, needs to be the manliest creature in the room. With Obama, the charisma seems to stem from a remarkable ease with himself. When Frank Luntz, the conservative political consultant, walked into the young senator's office for the first time, Obama sat on the couch and gestured for Luntz to take the big, formal chair behind the desk. "I've been in many, many senators' offices, and never once have I been offered the senator's chair," Luntz says. "I asked him what he was doing, and he said, 'If I knew you any better, I'd be lying down.' What he was saying was that he was so comfortable with who he was, there was no need for any pretense or power trips."

Now, as Obama takes the stage, his charisma is almost palpable. He speaks about a young soldier he met, returned from Iraq: "An explosion had shattered his face. He had been blinded in both eyes. . . . His arm was no longer functioning. He had two young daughters, just like I do." Meeting the soldier, Obama recalls, "I looked not at him but at his wife, who loved him so much. You thought about their lives going forward." The lesson the senator took from the meeting, he says, was this: "Politics is not a sport. The debates we have in Washington are not about tactical advantages. They are about who we are as people, what we believe in and what we are willing to do to make sure we have a country that our children deserve." Afterward, he signs autographs in the crowd for what seems like hours: He can't, he won't, get away.

This kind of thing has its own effect, a ratcheting-up of the natural tendency of politicians to love themselves as much as the crowds do. In every politician, himself included, Obama says, there is "that ego-driven ambition that I want to be somebody. I want to be in front of the microphone, I want to be in front of the TV, I want to be the most important guy on the committee, I want it to be my bill." You can see this cockiness seeping through. Asked at fund-raisers whether the new role he's assumed is taking a toll on him, Obama waves it off: "Nah, I'm a thoroughbred."

"Look, there's no real preparation for a presidential race," says David Axelrod, Obama's chief political adviser. "Hillary Clinton, there's no question, she's played the course, she knows the sand traps and the lie of the greens. McCain's been through it once before, too. My feeling about this is, we don't know exactly how Barack will respond. I'll be really frank with you: Barack doesn't know exactly how he'll respond."

Throughout the fall, as Obama explored the idea of running for president, he often seemed to hesitate, almost fearful in the face of the exultation that greeted him wherever he went. In late August, for the third time in his life, he traveled to Kogelo, the tiny, grassless village in western Kenya where his father had grown up the son of a Muslim goat herder and where the senator's grandmother still lives. There is something absurd about the collision of Obama's worlds, right now, dozens of microphones thrust in the face of this eighty-five-year-old woman who has spent her life in this amazingly obscure place and barely knows her grandson. But this is part of the Obama legend, the globalized Abe Lincoln: This is his log cabin, a generation removed. When his caravan pulls into the village, thousands of people are waiting for him, a vast and disciplined crowd standing in long, silent lines, like those old photos of British colonials reviewing the Zulus. They are rooting for him to say something big, something feeling, about Africa, about the relation between America and Kenya, about the way history is beginning to shift. Obama, instead, backs away. "I don't come here as a grandson but as a U.S. senator," he tells them. "My time is not my own. Don't expect me to come back here very often." And then again: "I'm not going to be here all the time." He goes on in this vein: He wants to help Kenyans, but he also wants them to help themselves. He begins to sound like any other politician, a deputy to the trade commissioner. The crowd, full of hope, almost visibly deflates.

But on the same trip, it also began to become clear what it might mean if Barack Obama were somehow, despite it all, to become president of the United States -- the resonance it might have not just within the United States but beyond. On a bright morning, the senator's convoy pulled into the Kibera district of Nairobi, which is called, perhaps unscientifically, the largest slum in all of Africa. It is undoubtedly the most compact: There are up to 750,000 people living in less than two square miles of malign-looking shacks, with no electricity and no running water. The whole place stinks of human waste. Kibera has become a common stopping point for American notables touring Africa's stricken zones -- congressmen, Chris Rock, Madeleine Albright -- and the place has assumed a kind of indifference to visiting celebrity. This is not the case with Obama. The senator has no speech planned today -- he is here for a meeting on microfinance -- but thousands of people have choked the dirt paths through the ghettos. Obama biro, yawne yo! they shout -- "Obama's coming, clear the way!" His name, in its local rhythms, sounds almost like a religious chant. Kenyan police on horses, thin and jumpy animals, try to beat back the surging crowd.

When Obama is finished with his meeting, he comes out of a hut: a skinny American dude, looking more like thirty-five than forty-five, his face treadmilled-thin, all teeth and cheekbones, holding a megaphone at his side. The roar is deafening. For a second, Obama looks stunned. He lifts the megaphone to his lips, but he can't make himself heard. When he lowers it, he's grinning. For the first time, it seems as if some resistance has broken in Obama: His reluctance has been replaced by something deeper and more spontaneous. He raises the megaphone again. "Hello!" he calls out in the local dialect. The wave of sound that greets him is awesome. He half-loses it, just starts yelling into the megaphone: "Everyone here is my brother! Everyone here is my sister! I love Kibera!" The crowd is so loud that he can't be heard more than twenty feet from where he is standing, and so he begins to wade into the crowd, shouting into the megaphone again and again: "You are all my brothers and sisters!" The look on his face is one of pure joy. Months later, his eyes still glitter when he recalls the sheer spectacle of it all. "It was a remarkable experience," he says.

The residents in Kibera know little about Obama besides his race, the fact that his father is from this country and what the Kenyan papers have told them: that he represents a younger and more empathetic vision of America. It's enough. Here, at last, is what it would mean to have a black president of the United States, one with a feel for what it means to suffer the rough edge of American power. In Kibera, something raw and basic about global politics began to stir, to make itself heard. These people, among the poorest in the world, are hoping for something more. And in the shouting crowds and the ecstasy of the moment, it has begun to seem, for the first time, as if Obama wants it all, too.</font>
<p>
<hr noshade color="#0000ff" size="8"></hr>
<p>
 

VegasGuy

Star
OG Investor
Muck
I read the title. And that was enough...for now. Establishment democrats and republicans are scared to death of Obama. Even when Jesse ran back in 88, and had as much support as he did, the electorate were not nearly as buzzed about him as they are about Obama. Because even if Barack doesn't get the nomination, something that in my opinion is still up in the air, he will command so much attention that the next election could be decided by him.

I'll read your article and comment later because the title says a lot.

-VG
 

Chase Bannon

Star
BGOL Investor
I got a feeling McCain or some republican will win the next election. Barak needs to stay in the race. I think Hillary will beat him for the pesidential nomination which is a good thing. He can go on another 4 year campaign and get in office with ease. I don't see good times ahead for the next president term. Who ever gets in office will have a war to clean up.
 

Great1

Potential Star
Registered
I look at Barack's running a bit differently. I think that he is now causing the "Black political structure" to change. I think Barack opens the door to different types and styles of "black leadership" other than the "usual suspects" such as Jesse Jackson, Al Sharpton etc. I think he shows the fact you can be with and for black people by using your pure intelect and without trying to use slang in the midst of your big SAT words to show you are down for the cause (i.e Michael eric Dyson). Hopefully, with Barack's having a good showing (even winning a few states) the black political landscape will shift.
 

D-Nice 1

Star
Registered
"My own guess is that the Republican revolt will be hastened more by the harsh reality in Iraq than any pressure applied by Democratic maneuvers in Congress. Events are just moving too fast. While senators played their partisan games on Capitol Hill, they did so against the backdrop of chopper after chopper going down on the evening news. The juxtaposition made Washington’s aura of unreality look obscene."

Can't wait to see more and more conserv/repubs throw Bush's ass under the bus in the coming months.

D-Nice 1 (The Nice One)
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Re: Obama Official Website

<font size="5"><center>Political Web sites get personal</font size><font size="4">
Candidates let backers write blogs, network</font size></center>

Chicago Tribune
By Mike Dorning
Washington Bureau
Published February 16, 2007


WASHINGTON -- Sen. Barack Obama's newly revamped Web site looks a lot like MySpace and Facebook, and that is no accident.

As a presidential candidate offering himself as a generational change agent, Obama is leveraging online social networking in a nearly unprecedented way in yet another clear measure of how the Internet is transforming politics.

The new look of the site, launched this week, invites the user to create a profile for public viewing, complete with an uploaded digital photo. Anyone can create a personal blog. Users also can create their own onsite network of friends and public groups arrayed around any common interest that moves them.

As of Thursday, five days after Obama announced his presidential campaign and the Web site launched, more than 2,400 groups had formed on the site, ranging from Iowa Union Members for Obama and New Hampshire Firefighters for Barack to Hip Hop for Obama.

The campaign says that more than 4,000 people have started blogs on the site. More than 3,000 have set up personal fundraising Web pages. Thefos of Tampa gushes over her 21-year-old daughter's $20 contribution to the Obama campaign while Andrew from mile-high Denver chronicles his efforts to raise $5,280, the number of feet in a mile.

The Obama site is an unabashed attempt to use the power of Web-based social networking to channel a surge of enthusiasm--and a flood of money--for an upstart candidate into a broad-based political movement.

"It's about building those relationships and providing the glue that will bind people together," said Joe Rospars, new media director for the Obama campaign. "The more solid the relationships are among our supporters, the more impact they'll have as advocates in their own community."

Before the campaign did it, supporters acting on their own had created groups. One started last month on Facebook by Farouk Olu Aregbe, a 26-year-old Nigerian immigrant, has drawn more than 276,000 followers and served as a vehicle for organizing one of the campaign's first events, a rally for students held earlier this month at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va., near Washington.

Sites are works in progress

Other presidential campaigns also are incorporating social networking features into their campaign plans. John Edwards' One Corps, for example, encourages detailed public profiles and blogs, and each campaign's Web presence is a work in progress.

But social networking is just one way in which uses of the Internet are altering presidential campaigns. Advances in technology also are changing the way presidential campaigns raise money, organize their volunteers and engage in public debate.

To be sure, technology-driven campaigns like Howard Dean's star-crossed run in 2004 can offer more promise than real results. And this contest for the White House may be more volatile, as each campaign scrambles for advantage on new and unfamiliar terrain.

From the start, it was clear this campaign would be different. Obama and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) announced their presidential exploratory committees through Web videos.

Clinton followed up with a series of highly publicized video Web chats and also has reached out to potential supporters through non-political Internet forums such as Yahoo! Answers. A question that Clinton posed on the Yahoo! site soliciting ideas to improve the health-care system, one of her signature issues, already has drawn more than 38,000 responses.

Two bloggers hired onto the Edwards campaign staff stirred the Democratic presidential candidate's first major controversy because of past personal blog postings in which they made vulgar and incendiary comments about sex and religion. Both of them resigned.

Republican candidate Mitt Romney, who is running as a social conservative, faced his first serious negative attack when a video clip was posted on YouTube showing him declaring his support for abortion rights during a 1994 debate with Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass).

Romney responded to the YouTube posting in kind, defending his change in view with a video that his campaign posted on the same site.

Attacks come from all sides

With the mass media no longer an arbiter, attacks can come from many more directions. Romney did not have to feed the controversy over the abortion comments with a broadcast interview, noted Erik Smith, a Democratic communications operative. "You don't have to force an attack into the mainstream media in order to respond anymore," he said.

The wide-open forum of the Internet and related technologies create the potential for a more wide-ranging political dialogue. Bloggers often operate without the standards of fairness or taste that restrain many media organizations.

An advisory opinion issued by the Federal Election Commission allows campaigns to send text messages to cell phones without the same disclaimers that identify their television commercials and print advertisements. Though campaigns must disclose their role in Web sites, individuals need not--including the kind of wealthy political partisans who had to reveal their role in the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth ads against Democratic nominee John Kerry in 2004.

"I think you will see very hard-hitting messages on the Internet from across the political spectrum," said Michael Toner, an FEC member and general counsel to the 2000 Bush campaign. "The Internet also may be the canary in the coal mine. It's a venue where you can test out different messages, different arguments at very low cost, and if it works out, you can migrate it to the traditional media."

At the same time, e-mail, Web video, online chats and podcasts give candidates more opportunity to bypass the mass media and forge a deeper, more personal relationship. Obama's podcast recently was among the top 20 on the iTunes Web site.

Little effect seen on undecided

Many political professionals say Internet communications still have not shown much power to sway undecided voters. But the Web provides a powerful means to strengthen support once someone has taken an interest in a candidate, said Julie Barko Germany, deputy director of the Institute for Politics, Democracy and the Internet at George Washington University. "In 2008, that relationship building is going to be very important," Germany said.

The Web already has proven itself as a fundraising force, and that capacity has only increased with the expansion of broadband access.

Massachusetts Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick allowed supporters to create personal fundraising pages on his Web site and tracked contributions, ranking the pages and publishing standings. Texas Republican Gov. Rick Perry set up a similar system, rewarding fundraisers with Texas flags and campaign memorabilia as they reached goals.

Obama, Clinton and Romney all have copied the technique of Web-based personal fundraising pages. "Within an online community, that reputation system can be pretty powerful," said Trei Brundrett, a Democratic consultant who was technology director for former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner's abandoned presidential bid.

In his gubernatorial campaign, Patrick gave individual supporters limited access to the campaign's online voter files, encouraging them to canvass prospective voters on their own.

"I think this is going to be big in '08," Brundrett said. "You can allow people to self-organize."

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/...ll=chi-newsnationworld-hed&ctrack=1&cset=true
 

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
<img src="http://proquest.umi.com/i/pub/7818.gif">

<font face="arial black" size="6" color="#d90000">
Obama's Big Screen Test</font>
<font face="trebuchet ms, helvetica, verdana" size="3" color="#000000"><b>
February 21, 2007

<img src="http://graphics8.nytimes.com/images/2006/04/02/opinion/dowd-ts-75.jpg">

By Maureen Dowd</b>

http://select.nytimes.com/gst/tsc.h...Q60)Q7CQ27)Q27I)ym2v2yv)Q27IQ5EypQ5EQ3DQ3BbYT

Hillary is not David Geffen's dreamgirl.

''Whoever is the nominee is going to win, so the stakes are very high,'' says Mr. Geffen, the Hollywood mogul and sultan of ''Dreamgirls,'' as he sits by a crackling fire beneath a Jasper Johns flag and a matched pair of de Koonings in the house that Jack Warner built (which old-time Hollywood stars joked was the house that God would have built). ''Not since the Vietnam War has there been this level of disappointment in the behavior of America throughout the world, and I don't think that another incredibly polarizing figure, no matter how smart she is and no matter how ambitious she is -- and God knows, is there anybody more ambitious than Hillary Clinton? -- can bring the country together.

''Obama is inspirational, and he's not from the Bush royal family or the Clinton royal family. Americans are dying every day in Iraq. And I'm tired of hearing James Carville on television.''

Barack Obama has made an entrance in Hollywood unmatched since Scarlett O'Hara swept into the Twelve Oaks barbecue. Instead of the Tarleton twins, the Illinois senator is flirting with the DreamWorks trio: Mr. Geffen, Steven Spielberg and Jeffrey Katzenberg, who gave him a party last night that raised $1.3 million and Hillary's hackles.

She didn't stand outside the gates to the Geffen mansion, where glitterati wolfed down Wolfgang Puck savories, singing the Jennifer Hudson protest anthem ''And I Am Telling You I'm Not Going.'' But she's not exactly Little Miss Sunshine, either. Hillary loyalists have hissed at defecting donors to remember the good old days of jumping on the Lincoln Bedroom bed.

''Hillary is livid that Obama's getting the first big fund-raiser here,'' one friend of hers said.

Who can pay attention to the Oscar battle between ''The Queen'' and ''Dreamgirls'' when you've got a political battle between a Queen and a Dreamboy?

Terry McAuliffe and First Groupie Bill have tried to hoard the best A.T.M. machine in politics for the Missus, but there's some Clinton fatigue among fatigued Clinton donors, who fret that Bill will ''pull the focus'' and shelve his wife's campaign.

''I don't think anybody believes that in the last six years, all of a sudden Bill Clinton has become a different person,'' Mr. Geffen says, adding that if Republicans are digging up dirt, they'll wait until Hillary's the nominee to use it. ''I think they believe she's the easiest to defeat.''

She is overproduced and overscripted. ''It's not a very big thing to say, 'I made a mistake' on the war, and typical of Hillary Clinton that she can't,'' Mr. Geffen says. ''She's so advised by so many smart advisers who are covering every base. I think that America was better served when the candidates were chosen in smoke-filled rooms.''

The babble here is not about ''Babel''; it's about the battle of the billionaires. Not only have Ron Burkle and David Geffen been vying to buy The Los Angeles Times -- they have been vying to raise money for competing candidates. Mr. Burkle, a supermarket magnate, is close to the Clintons, and is helping Hillary parry Barry Obama by arranging a fund-raiser for her in March, with a contribution from Mr. Spielberg.

Did Mr. Spielberg get in trouble with the Clintons for helping Senator Obama? ''Yes,'' Mr. Geffen replies, slyly. Can Obambi stand up to Clinton Inc.? ''I hope so,'' he says, ''because that machine is going to be very unpleasant and unattractive and effective.''

Once, David Geffen and Bill Clinton were tight as ticks. Mr. Geffen helped raise some $18 million for Bill and slept in the Lincoln Bedroom twice. Bill chilled at Chateau Geffen. Now, the DreamWorks co-chairman calls the former president ''a reckless guy'' who ''gave his enemies a lot of ammunition to hurt him and to distract the country.''

They fell out in 2001, when Mr. Clinton gave a pardon to Marc Rich after rebuffing Mr. Geffen's request for one for Leonard Peltier. ''Marc Rich getting pardoned? An oil-profiteer expatriate who left the country rather than pay taxes or face justice?'' Mr. Geffen says. ''Yet another time when the Clintons were unwilling to stand for the things that they genuinely believe in. Everybody in politics lies, but they do it with such ease, it's troubling.''

The mogul knows it's easy to mock Hollywood -- ''people with Priuses and private planes'' -- and agrees with George Clooney that it's probably not helpful for stars to campaign for candidates, given the caricatures of Hollywood.

I ask what he will say if he ever runs into Bill Clinton again. '' 'Hi,' '' he replies. And will he be upset if Hillary wins and he never gets to sleep in the Lincoln Bedroom again?

''No,'' he says with a puckish smile. ''It's not as nice as my bedroom.''

</font>
<p>
<hr noshade color="#FF0000" size="12"></hr>
<p>
 

COINTELPRO

Transnational Member
Registered
I don't see the love affair by black people for Bill Clinton. He passed welfare reform, NAFTA (deindustrialized the inner city), pushed to get communist China into the WTO, layed off a bunch of civil servants, and ignored the genocide in Rwanda (went into Bosnia though). He was a weak commander & chief by letting Al-Qaeda grow unchecked.

His affair turned off voters enabled Bush to get into office. Gore could have easily won the election if Clinton had not messed up. I also don't think he made a difference with the economy since the metrics are the same as Bush.

If you close your eyes, he acted like a Republican in office.

Black people should vote for Obama rather than Hilary to get a fresh start. If Bill Clinton has another affair in office while Hilary is president, it will be Republican domnination for 20 years. Hilary will have to explain over and over again why she voted for the war but is now against it. Obama doesn't have that baggage to deal with. He is also for national healthcare which I agree, too many people uninsured.
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Obama Blasts Dick Cheney

<font size="5"><center>Obama Ridicules Cheney's Iraq Comments</font size></center>


Feb 24, 12:51 AM (ET)
Associated Press
By KELLEY SHANNON

AUSTIN, Texas (AP) - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama ridiculed Vice President Dick Cheney on Friday for saying Britain's decision to pull troops from Iraq is a good sign that fits with the strategy for stabilizing the country.

Obama, speaking at a massive outdoor rally in Austin, Texas, said British Prime Minister Tony Blair's decision this week to withdraw 1,600 troops is a recognition that Iraq's problems can't be solved militarily.

"Now if Tony Blair can understand that, then why can't George Bush and Dick Cheney understand that?" Obama asked thousands of supporters who gathered in the rain to hear him. "In fact, Dick Cheney said this is all part of the plan (and) it was a good thing that Tony Blair was withdrawing, even as the administration is preparing to put 20,000 more of our young men and women in.

"Now, keep in mind, this is the same guy that said we'd be greeted as liberators, the same guy that said that we're in the last throes. I'm sure he forecast sun today," Obama said to laughter from supporters holding campaign signs over their heads to keep dry. "When Dick Cheney says it's a good thing, you know that you've probably got some big problems."

A spokeswoman for Cheney, traveling with him in Australia, said they had no comment on Obama's remarks.

Cheney told ABC News earlier this week that Blair's announcement was good news, calling it an affirmation that parts of Iraq have been stabilized.

Obama's Austin appearance was part of a campaign swing across the country to raise money for his two-week old candidacy and build his reputation nationally.

While in Texas, Obama raised money in Houston Thursday night, where he said he'd like to see an end to the "tit-for-tat" that dominates politics.

The Obama and Clinton campaigns fired off dueling press releases this week over a top Hollywood donor who was a supporter of Bill Clinton but is backing Obama in this race.

Obama told the Austin crowd that they should try to recruit their friends to support his campaign. "I want you to tell them, 'It's time for you to turn off the TV and stop playing GameBoy,'" Obama said. "We've got work to do."

Tickets to the rally were free, but Obama asked the attendees to give even $5 or $10. "I don't want to have to raise money in Hollywood all the time," he said.

---

On the Net:

http://www.barackobama.com


http://apnews1.iwon.com//article/20070224/D8NFT51G0.html
 

mike_mac

Star
BGOL Patreon Investor
Re: Obama Blasts Dick Cheney

good look. i missed him last week when he was in la. sure he'll be back. many times.
 

Pimpin KillBillABitch

Star
Registered
Re: Obama Blasts Dick Cheney

QueEx said:
The Obama and Clinton campaigns fired off dueling press releases this week over a top Hollywood donor who was a supporter of Bill Clinton but is backing Obama in this race.
:lol: @Obama stealing Hilary Clinton's donors and television set! That's some real nigga shit :yes:
 

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
<div align="left">
<!-- MSTableType="layout" --><br>
<img src="http://images.salon.com/src/cover/salonlogo_p.gif" align="left"></div><font face="arial black" size="5" color="#d90000">How Obama Learned To Be A Natural</font>
<font face="tahoma" size="4" color="#0000FF"><b>
Today he drips with charisma and inspires fawning admiration from all quarters. But Obama began his journey as a smug young man with little political future.</b></font>


<font face="century, georgia" size="3" color="#000000">
<b>| Feb. 12, 2007 |

by Edward McClelland</b>
<br> When reporters go one on one with <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/barack_obama/index.html">Barack Obama,</a> they end up writing things they'll regret in the morning papers. It's a phenomenon called &quot;drinking the Obama juice.&quot; One besotted scribe called him &quot;tall, fresh and elegant.&quot; And the august Atlantic Monthly mooned about Obama's &quot;charisma, intelligence and ambition, tempered by a self-deprecating wit,&quot; titling its article <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200409/lizza" target="new">&quot;The Natural.&quot;</a>
<br>OK, Obama is tall (6 feet 2 inches), intelligent (Harvard Law, two bestselling books), and damn, he's ambitious (running for president after two years in Congress). But he's no natural.

<div align="right"><!-- MSTableType="layout" --><img src="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/12/obama_natural/story.jpg" align="right"></div> <br>As a correspondent for the <a href="http://www.chicagoreader.com/" target="new">Chicago Reader,</a> I covered Obama's 2000 campaign to unseat Bobby Rush, the ex-<a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/black_panthers/index.html">Black Panther</a> who's been a Democratic congressman from Chicago's South Side since 1993. It's the only election Obama has ever lost. As even one of his admirers put it, &quot;He was a stiff.&quot; You think John Kerry looked wooden and condescending on the campaign trail? You should have seen this kid Obama. He was the elitist Ivy League Democrat to top them all. Only after losing that race, in humiliating fashion, did he develop the voice, the style, the track record and the agenda that have made him a celebrity senator, and a Next President.
<br>I got my first sight of Obama early that winter, at a church in the South Side's Bronzeville neighborhood. It was a Saturday afternoon -- as a greenhorn challenger, Obama wasn't getting the Sunday pulpit invitations -- and maybe a dozen people were scattered in the worn pews. Obama was a mere two-term state senator, and this was half a decade before &quot;-mania&quot; was added to his name. Weak December light strained through the stained glass. Obama wore a suit and tie -- he hadn't yet pioneered high-fashioned, open-necked campaign casual -- and, posing uncomfortably before the baptismal, tried to relax the crowd with self-deprecating wit.
<br>&quot;The first thing people ask me is, 'How did you get that name, Obama,' although they don't always pronounce it right. Some people say 'Alabama,' some people say 'Yo Mama.' I got my name from Kenya, which is where my father's from, and I got my accent from Kansas, which is where my mother's from.&quot;
<br>At the time, Obama was teaching constitutional law at the University of Chicago, and this was the sort of awkward, beginning-of-the-semester joke you hear from a professor trying too hard to prove a sense of humor. If anyone caught that Obama was trying to connect himself both to the birthplace of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/civil_rights/index.html">civil rights</a> and a time-honored black party joke, they didn't laugh or nod. He went on to give a speech attacking Rush as &quot;reactive.&quot; Afterwards, when I polled his listeners, one told me Obama represented a new generation of black leadership, which is the wrong way to sell yourself in a primary election dominated by senior citizens. Another was a hip-hop poet. He handed me a business card with a photo of himself wearing clown makeup.
<br>Every account of that campaign points out that Obama was tagged as <a href="http://dir.salon.com/opinion/feature/2007/01/22/obama/index.html">&quot;not black enough&quot;</a> for the South Side. State Sen. Donne Trotter, the third wheel in the primary, told me then, with a sneer, that &quot;Barack is viewed in part to be the white man in blackface in our community.&quot; Black nationalists grumbled about an &quot;Obama project,&quot; led by the candidate's political godfather, former Clinton White House counsel Abner Mikva. But no one appreciates how hard the man tried to earn his ghetto pass. At a rally for South Side teachers, held in a dim, tiny nightclub called Honeysuckle's, Obama lashed out at the critics who were calling him too bright and too white.
<br><b>&quot;When Congressman Rush and his allies attack me for going to Harvard and teaching at the University of Chicago, they're sending a signal to black kids that if you're well-educated, somehow you're not 'keeping it real.'&quot; </b>
<br>The air quotes hung over the silent gathering.
<br>Wherever Obama went, he talked like a poli-sci thesis. Here's how he bragged on himself back then, as I reported in the Reader: &quot;My experience of being able to walk into a public housing development and turn around and walk into a corporate boardroom and communicate effectively in either venue means I'm more likely to build the kinds of coalitions and craft the sort of message that appeals to a broad range of people.&quot;
<br>Obama just couldn't -- or wouldn't -- loosen up. The dignified demeanor that had won him a state Senate seat in the university community of Hyde Park did not translate to the district's inner-city precincts. His internal rhythm was set to &quot;Pomp and Circumstance.&quot; &quot;Arrogant,&quot; scoffed a South Side radio host. Even his body language signaled he was slumming. During a debate with Trotter, in the dank basement of a park field house, he sat with his lanky legs crossed, chin cocked at a heroic angle. He wasn't even trying to conceal his impatience with a mere state Senate peer, or with this grungy necessity of campaigning. Trotter, who embodied bourgeois black Chicago, from his bow ties to his soul food lunches to the smooth jazz oozing from the speakers of his Jeep, hunched over his microphone, taking digs at his increasing irritated rival. When he finally needled Obama for failing to pass a child-support bill, the calm dissolved.
<br>&quot;Senator, that's a distortion!&quot; Obama snapped. His baritone went full fathom five, but he never unbent from his patrician pose.
<br>Obama may have been testy because he did have a reputation as an ineffectual legislator -- for many of the same reasons he was tanking as a campaigner. Some of his colleagues saw him as a self-righteous goo-goo who thought he was too cool for the chamber and who disdained the hard work of digging up votes.
<br>&quot;Barack is a very intelligent man,&quot; Rich Miller, publisher of <a href="http://www.thecapitolfaxblog.com" target="new">Capitol Fax,</a> a statehouse news service, told me in 2000. &quot;He hasn't had a lot of success here, and it could be because he places himself above everybody. He likes people to know he went to Harvard.&quot;
<br>Obama had been a golden boy for so long: embraced by the Ivy League, profiled in the New York Times, published by Times Books. At 38, it gnawed at him that others his age were already moving up the political ladder. U.S. Sen. Peter Fitzgerald, whose seat Obama now holds, was only a year older. But for the first time in Obama's life, his ambitions were blocked. The world was pushing back. His impatience showed in condescension to his surroundings.
<br>Back in 2000, when I interviewed Obama in his cubicle-size office at a downtown law firm, he started the meeting by checking his watch. Then he dissed his congressional district, half-joking that he was more committed to the South Side than his opponents, because, number one, he'd moved there from Hawaii, and number two, he could have been raking it in on Wall Street.
<br>&quot;I really have to want to live here,&quot; he said. &quot;I'm like a salmon swimming upstream on the South Side of Chicago. At every juncture of my life, I could have taken the path of least resistance but much higher pay. Being the president of the Harvard Law Review is a big deal. The typical path for someone like myself is to clerk for the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/supreme_court/index.html">Supreme Court,</a> and then basically you have your pick of any law firm in the country.&quot;
<br>Didn't the people appreciate the sacrifices he'd made? To grind out a voter registration drive when he could have been earning $200K a year at a white-shoe firm? They didn't. On Primary Day, Obama received 31 percent of the vote. He didn't lose because he was &quot;too white.&quot; He lost because he was a presumptuous young man challenging a popular incumbent. If anything, his whiteness spared him a bigger beating. He ran strongly in Beverly, an enclave of Irish cops who had never forgiven Rush for his Black Panther past.
<br>Trotter, who is plenty black, got 7 percent. In fact, Obama may be lucky he didn't win. It's harder to get to the U.S. <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/senate/index.html">Senate</a> -- or the cover of Men's Vogue, or the drawing rooms of Manhattan donors -- from a black-majority district.
<br>Obama returned to Springfield a loser. The week of his defeat, he sat down to his regular poker game at the home of state Sen. Terry Link, a fellow Democrat from the Chicago suburbs. The same words were on the lips of every pol at that table: I told you so. Obama didn't need to hear it. He knew he'd blundered.
<br>&quot;He made a lot of mistakes, and he learned,&quot; Link says now. &quot;He forgot who he was. That he's Barack. He tried to sell to a crowd who wasn't buying.&quot;
<br>Around that time, Obama also had a soul-searching drink with Miller, the Capitol Fax publisher. He was upset about the way Miller had characterized him, but &quot;he took that criticism the right way,&quot; Miller remembers six years later, &quot;and he could have taken it the wrong way.&quot;
<br>&quot;A lot of politicians, they know that they're smart,&quot; Miller says. &quot;They know that they're capable. It messes with their minds. Politics is not a game of qualifications. It's a game of winning. That congressional campaign really showed that to him.&quot;
<br>On the state Senate floor, Miller saw a more focused, more collegial Obama, who began to take his work -- and his fellow legislators -- seriously. Using his experience in constitutional law, he passed legislation to curtail racially motivated traffic stops and to require police to videotape murder confessions. He sponsored legislation that added 20,000 children to the state's health insurance program.
<br>&quot;I just can't emphasize enough how much this guy became respected, and how transformative it was,&quot; Miller says. &quot;By 2004, he just had this aura about him.&quot;
<br>Even black legislators, who had resented Obama in his early years, were won over. He earned the respect of Trotter, who watched his fellow senator mature from a r&eacute;sum&eacute; in search of an office to an effective legislator. Trotter was so impressed, he now sits on Obama's presidential exploratory committee.
<br>&quot;I wouldn't say losing humbled him,&quot; Trotter says, swatting away a term used by many of his white colleagues. &quot;Barack is a competitor, and being a competitor, you don't like to lose. When he came back, he really immersed himself in the process. He learned he had to get an agenda, to get issues he felt passionately about. He also learned some of those 'get-along' qualities you need to get a bill passed. He has proven himself to me that he can take advice. He's not a one-man operation.&quot;
<br>I'd thought Obama had campaigned like an ass, but I expected him to run for the U.S. Senate. And I expected him to win. His white upbringing would appeal to suburbanites, while South Siders might figure that Obama was as black a senator as they were going to get, after the Carol Moseley Braun debacle. His braininess, his haughtiness, his sense of entitlement -- they could only be pluses in a Senate campaign. They don't call that place Ego Mountain for nothing.
<br>In 2004, I went down to his Michigan Avenue campaign office to interview him for the Reader. His press secretary had already scolded me for the &quot;negative&quot; quotes in my last article. I was expecting another preening, insecure performance. But Obama charmed me right away. He did it to dozens of reporters that year. &quot;Good to see you again,&quot; he intoned, casually, gliding across the room like Fred Astaire playing Abe Lincoln. He had doffed his suit coat for shirtsleeves.
<br>We went into his office, where, sitting under a giant photo of <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/muhammad_ali/index.html">Muhammad Ali</a> knocking out Sonny Liston, Obama tried out some lines he would use at the Democratic National Convention.
<br>&quot;There is a tradition of politics that says we are all connected,&quot; he said. &quot;If there is a child on the South Side who cannot read, it makes a difference in my life, even if it's not my child. If there's an Arab-American family who's being rounded up by <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/john_ashcroft/index.html">John Ashcroft</a> without benefit of due process, that threatens my civil liberties. Black folks, white folks, gay, straight, Asian -- the reason we can share this space is that we have a mutual regard. That's what this country's about: e pluribus unum. Out of many, one.&quot;
<br>That was the mission statement of 21st-century Obama. As a black candidate, he'd been too inhibited, too embarrassed, to force out phrases like &quot;our community.&quot; Finally, he was comfortable in his own skin, now that he'd accepted that the skin was half-white. Obama wasn't born to be a voice of black empowerment, like Rush or <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/jesse_jackson/index.html">Jesse Jackson.</a> It's not just a racial thing. It's generational, too. Confrontational '60s-style politics are not his bag. But as a multicultural politician, trying to find the unified theory of ethnic politics, he was rolling like Tiger Woods at the Masters. The aloofness was gone as well. Very intently, he laid out his plan for a federal Children's Health Insurance Program.
<br>&quot;I think it'd be a good opportunity to lay the groundwork toward expanding health care to all the uninsured,&quot; he said.
<br>Obama was no longer selling himself. Now, he had a legislative goal and a strategy for making it happen. Or maybe, because he knew I was one of his skeptics, he was selling me on the idea that he wasn't selling himself. In the words of an old police reporter, Obama makes grease look gritty. Just as he was looking two moves ahead, politically, I'm sure he was two moves ahead of my expectations. It was working. I was impressed that he finally believed in something. He was a big-government liberal, no weaseling about it.
<br>&quot;How would you have voted on the <a href="http://dir.salon.com/topics/iraq_war/index.html">Iraq war</a> resolution?&quot; I asked.
<br>&quot;I would have voted no.&quot; And then, with a simplicity that his old self might have thought simple-minded, he said, &quot;I'm not opposed to all wars. I'm opposed to dumb wars.&quot;
<br>Then I asked him about his race against Bobby Rush.
<br>&quot;I got a good spanking,&quot; he said, evenly. &quot;I think that was youthful impatience on my part. I knew I was going to lose on Election Day. I was standing outside a polling place, and old ladies kept coming up to me and saying, 'You seem like a nice young man, but Bobby hasn't done anything wrong.'&quot;
<br>Later, when I called his office for follow-up questions, Obama jumped on the line and drilled me with more details of his healthcare plan. He also repeated his &quot;E Pluribus Unum&quot; speech, tweaking a few words. He was proud of that one.
<br>A few weeks after that, I heard him speak at a North Side organic restaurant known for its liberal politics. The Heartland Caf&eacute; had welcomed Harold Washington during his run for mayor, and now it welcomed this new South Side phenom. Obama climbed up on the bandstand and filled that dining room with the same energy he'd project across the Fleet Center: &quot;If there is a child on the South Side who cannot read ... If there is an Arab-American family who's being rounded up by John Ashcroft!&quot; I was startled. The pedantic lecturer had been retired. Now, Obama was a fight announcer, a preacher and a motivational speaker, all on the same platform. Full of conviction, he drove his words into our ears like a carpenter pounding nails. The white folks loved him because he was liberal. The black folks loved him because, as one said to me, &quot;We need someone who can reach beyond the race. He can go to Washington and talk their language.&quot;
<br>That wasn't the Obama I'd known. But it was the Obama America came to know. I was sold. I voted for him twice that year. That July, the Democrats made him the keynote speaker at their convention. It was partly a defensive move against a rumored candidacy by ex-Chicago Bears coach Mike Ditka. Obama delivered a maiden speech to rival that of Hubert Humphrey in 1948, or William Jennings Bryan in 1896.
<br>Terry Link believes that losing that congressional race liberated Obama to be the real Obama -- the bright young charmer Link had met as a fellow freshman in Springfield.
<br>&quot;When he ran for the Senate, he was so comfortable,&quot; Link says. &quot;It's like speaking from your heart, against speaking from notes. I thought, 'This is the one I knew. It's Barack again.'&quot; Trotter saw a different dynamic: &quot;He grew up around whites, so he's very comfortable in those venues. That was obvious when he went over to [the South Side Irish enclave of] Beverly. His comfort zone was in those circles. That is who he is. This is the face of his grandparents.&quot;
<br>So what do you make of a campaigner whose persona changed so drastically in four years? That he's finally learned to be himself, or that he's putting on an act? He's doing both. All great politicians are also great performers. Obama has been called the Democrats' Ronald Reagan because he has the personality to sell the public on programs it might reject on their merits. (In Reagan's case, it was supply-side economics. In Obama's, it would be national healthcare.) They're alike in another way. Reagan was a washed-up thesp, doing Vegas and General Electric ads, until he was cast as governor of California, then president. Obama has also grown into the character he was born to play: the great uniter who can bring together old and young, black and white, Democrat and Republican. So far, he's playing it brilliantly. Even his comic timing has improved -- he's got his new audiences <em>laughing</em> at the same old Alabama/Yo Mama joke. And <a href="http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/231872,CST-NWS-obama27.article" target="new">Bobby Rush</a> has backed him for president.
<br>Some of us, though, are still trying to figure out how he got to be Elvis, Lord Byron and Bobby Kennedy, all in the same dark suit.
<br>&quot;Charisma is in the eye of the beholder,&quot; says Donne Trotter. Much as he admires Obama, he's not going to drink The Juice over a community organizer from his old neighborhood. &quot;I can't define him as being this charismatic guy. He's no Svengali or Jim Jones. Certainly, he has learned, though. He's a very fast learner.&quot;

http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2007/02/12/obama_natural/
</font>
<br>
<hr noshade color="#ff0000" size="12"></hr>
<p>
 

Bain316

Star
Registered
Obama Son Of America

Obama's presidential lineage
Sen. Barack Obama has commander-in-chief genes
By Karin Stanton
Associated Press

KAILUA-KONA » A Big Island genealogist says presidential hopeful U.S. Sen. Barack Obama has some ancestral ties to the White House.

Bruce Harrison, founder of the Waikoloa-based Family Forest Project, said he found links between the Democratic senator from Illinois and Presidents George Washington, James Madison, Harry Truman and Jimmy Carter.

On the Net

» Family Forest: www.FamilyForest.com
Millisecond Publishing Co., the company that was first to establish the cousin relationship between President Bush and Sen. John Kerry in the 2004 race, traced Obama's maternal ancestors in establishing his relationship to the former presidents.

Harrison said Obama's exact relationships are calculations based on a wealth of fully sourced knowledge within the "Family Forest," his company's proprietary family history research tool.

The company searched the ancestors of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, dating back many centuries.

He said the Family Forest shows Dunham having a number of her ancestral pathways leading back to early colonial Virginia and New England, and some extend back for many centuries into Europe.

One of her ancestral pathways leads to one of Obama's 12th great-grandfathers, the Hon. Laurence Washington, who built Sulgrave Manor in Northamptonshire, England.

Over the course of five centuries, according to recorded history, he became the ancestor of Washington, Carter, Gen. George S. Patton, Gov. Adlai Stevenson and Quincy Jones, Harrison said.

"Of course, the Honorable Laurence Washington is also the ancestor of at least a million other living people, including some very famous ones, but most are everyday folks," he said.

Harrison, who has spent tens of thousands of hours poring over historical documents and entering the data into a genealogy software program, said links also popped up to four other presidential contenders.

The Hawaii-born Obama shares ancestors with former North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, Arizona Sen. John McCain, New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney.

Harrison, who founded the Family Forest Project with wife Kristine in 1995, said the ancestry research program has enough data now to map generation-by-generation ancestral pathways of up to 2 billion people. If all the charts were printed out, he said, it would top 30 billion pages.

http://starbulletin.com/2007/02/06/news/story05.html
 

Bain316

Star
Registered
ut up or shut up, Obama tells Howard

By Peter Mitchell and Peter Veness in Los Angeles

February 12, 2007 01:32pm
Article from: AAP

Font size: + -

Send this article: Print Email

US presidential candidate Barack Obama has told Prime Minister John Howard to put up or shut up.
Mr Obama, speaking at a packed press conference in Iowa today, said if MrHoward was concerned about the situation in Iraq he should send 20,000 Australian troops to the strife-torn nation.

The Illinois senator added that if Mr Howard did not send the troops, then the prime minister's attack on the Democrat presidential hopeful's Iraq policy was "empty rhetoric''.

"I would also note that we have close to 140,000 troops on the ground now and my understanding is that Mr Howard has deployed 1400,''Mr Obama, who next year could become the first African American to be elected US president, said.

"So, if he's ginned up to fight the good fight in Iraq, I would suggest he calls up another 20,000 Australians and sends them up to Iraq.

"Otherwise, it's just a bunch of empty rhetoric.''

Mr Howard sparked the war of words yesterday when he took the extraordinary step of declaring that he hoped Mr Obama did not become president of the US, and that his election would be disastrous for the war on terrorism.

Mr Howard said Mr Obama's plan to pull America's combat brigades out of Iraq by March 31, 2008, was a strategy that would "destabilise and destroy Iraq, and create chaos and a victory for the terrorists''.

"If I were running al-Qaeda in Iraq, I would put a circle around March 2008 and be praying as many times as possible for a victory, not only for Obama but also for the Democrats,'' Mr Howard said.

Mr Howard's comments came a day after Mr Obama officially launched his US presidential campaign and the clash quickly became one of the top news stories in the US.

Spokesman for Mr Obama, Robert Gibbs, travelling with the senator in Iowa, told American reporters Mr Howard should contribute more Australian troops "so some American troops can come home''.

"It's easy to talk tough when it's not your country or your troops making the sacrifices,'' Mr Gibbs said.

Mr Howard's attack also drew criticism from other senior US Democrats.

Oregon senator Ron Wyden said: "The most charitable thing you can say about Mr Howard's comment is bizarre''.

"We'll make our own judgments in this country with respect to elections and Barack Obama is a terrific public servant.''

Mr Obama and Terry McAuliffe, a former chairman of the Democratic National Convention, noted Mr Howard's close relationship with Republican president George W Bush.

"I think it's flattering that one of George Bush's allies on the other side of the world started attacking me the day after I announced,'' Mr Obama said.

"I take that as a compliment.''

Mr Howard also managed to upset at least one Republican senator.

"I would prefer that Mr Howard stay out of our domestic politics and we will stay out of his domestic politics,'' Texas Republican senator John Cornyn said.

Mr Obama, 45, is the top challenger to Hillary Rodham Clinton to be the Democratic Party's candidate for next year's US presidential election.

Mr Obama has vowed to end the Iraq war if elected president.

Mr Howard's comments received plenty of airplay in the US, with 24-hour news channels CNN and Fox News regularly running reports about the war of words.

But he appeared unrepentant today, saying Mr Obama had failed to address the substance of the war in Iraq.

"I think the most interesting thing about (Senator Obama's comments) is that it didn't really address the substance of the issue,'' Howard told ABC Radio.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,21210989-1702,00.html
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Obama hurries to build an army</font size>
<font size="4">Obama has characterized his campaign as the
"Joshua generation" -- the generation of Americans
who grew up after the 1960s civil rights movement
and benefit from the work of the "Moses generation"
of leaders who participated in it. </font size></center>

By Brian DeBose
THE WASHINGTON TIMES
April 3, 2007

Sen. Barack Obama, Illinois Democrat, is rapidly building a presidential campaign organization using students, the Internet, grass-roots organizers and the support from up-and-coming young politicians to do battle against Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's cadre of established campaign operatives and long-time party bigwigs.

Generating new Democrats and tapping newly elected leaders not tied to former President Bill Clinton is the best way for Mr. Obama to run competitively against Mrs. Clinton in the early going, say Mr. Obama's backers, though they say at some point his successes will earn him the broader support he will need to face the front-runner.

"He is building a strong organization in Iowa and New Hampshire, and as his momentum builds in those states, you will see more elected officials come along," said Rep. Artur Davis, Alabama Democrat and one of the young politicians who has endorsed Mr. Obama, as have freshman Rep. Keith Ellison, Minnesota Democrat, and Virginia Gov. Timothy M. Kaine, a Democrat.

Mr. Davis predicted that by summer's end Mr. Obama, will be tied in national polls with Mrs. Clinton -- the New York Democrat and former first lady who is currently leading polls among Democratic presidential contenders -- and tied or ahead of her in either Iowa or New Hampshire.

Mr. Davis said that will begin to eat away at Mrs. Clinton's biggest advantage -- the elected lawmakers and union officials who make up the so-called "super delegates" who wield important clout in the Democrats' nomination process.

"A lot of super delegates want to be with the winner," said Mr. Davis, predicting that Mr. Obama's poll numbers would improve "in direct proportion as people get to know who he is. I mean his numbers move as soon as people get up to hear him speak and speak to him."

Mr. Obama has already won the support of some establishment Democrats, including former Sen. Tom Daschle of South Dakota, and garnered the backing of two key figures in the key early caucus state of Iowa, Attorney General Tom Miller and State Treasurer Michael Fitzgerald.

His next test will be to prove he can raise the money necessary to go up against Mrs. Clinton when first-quarter numbers are submitted this month.

"If he reaches the $10 million threshold, that shows people that he is a serious candidate, and I think he will be at $10 million plus," said political strategist Morris Reid, a former Clinton administration adviser and managing director of Westin Rinehart, a Washington-based communications firm.

Mr. Obama's campaign said he will surpass that.

"Published reports have us at $8-10 million, but we feel good about it being more," an Obama campaign official said. The campaign has not yet released the official tally of their fundraising, which must be completed by April 15.

Several Democratic strategists said Mr. Obama should be heartened by some of the crowds in his first three weeks on the campaign trail: 20,000 in Austin, Texas; 8,000 in Oklahoma; and 5,000 in Iowa.

But Mr. Reid said Mr. Obama cannot become the Howard Dean of 2008, able to mobilize and generate excitement from young Americans but unable to translate them into votes, saying he needs to be more like John F. Kennedy in 1960, who was able to create a new base of young voters that went on to change American politics.

Mr. Obama has characterized his campaign as the "Joshua generation" -- the generation of Americans who grew up after the 1960s civil rights movement and benefit from the work of the "Moses generation" of leaders who participated in it.

He said the movement must now shift to economics and political empowerment, an ideology that is robust among young American minorities. Those younger supporters have become the backbone of Mr. Obama's political organization.

"Whenever people ask me 'Why do you think Barack has a better chance than Hillary,' I tell them the basic point is Democrats have to find a way to bring people in to the process who have not been a part of it," Mr. Davis said. "If we bring everybody into the political process, who is eligible to vote and shares Democratic values, we win every election in this country, and Barack Obama has the best chance of bringing those voters into the process in 2008."

The youth movement manifested itself even before Mr. Obama officially announced his campaign with young supporters begging him to join the race.

Ben Stanfield, 26, a computer technician, started the DraftObama.org Web blog in October. That site grew rapidly, incorporating other Web sites such as Independents for Obama (http://independents.forobama.org), started by Seth Tobey, 22, a law student at the University of Iowa.

There is also Students for Barack Obama (www.studentsforbarackobama.com), a collection of college undergraduates who met on the Facebook.com group named "Barack Obama for President in 2008," and boasted 31,000 members in early January.

"We have 66,787 members right now, and we're following the tone from Senator Obama to grow the grass-roots movement ourselves," said Famid Sinha, 22, a political science student at the University of Pennsylvania who is on the students' group leadership team. He said they have chapters at more than 160 schools.

Mr. Sinha said the youth movement underscores Mr. Obama's entire campaign, focused on energizing young Americans "disillusioned" with politics, corruption and negative campaigns.

"What we think is that he more than the other candidates really cares about us and our views and he wants to empower us in the campaign," Mr. Sinha said.


http://www.washtimes.com/national/20070403-123133-5915r.htm
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Obama Built Donor Network From Roots Up </font size></center>


03obama-600.jpg

Senator Barack Obama, campaigned Monday in Peterborough, N.H.

By CHRISTOPHER DREW and MIKE McINTIRE
Published: April 3, 2007

CHICAGO — When Barack Obama announced to friends over brunch in 2002 that he planned to run for the United States Senate, one of their first questions was how he could possibly raise the necessary millions.

After all, two and a half years after he had taken quite a “spanking,” as he put it, in his bid to unseat an incumbent congressman, he was still struggling to pay off a $20,000 debt, eking out donations of $1,000 here, $2,000 there.

Improbably, Mr. Obama, running as something of an outsider, wound up raising $15 million and winning that 2004 Senate race. Now that he is running for president, his fund-raising prowess has helped make him the chief rival to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York.

[Aides said Monday that he had collected more than $20 million in donations in the first three months of the campaign, enough to ratchet up the anxiety in the Clinton camp, which announced it had raised $26 million. Mr. Obama’s campaign has yet to release precise information on its total donations or contributors.]

A look at his 2004 Senate race shows how he laid the foundation for his current fund-raising drive. Even as he cultivated an image as an unconventional candidate devoted to the people, not the establishment, he systematically built a sophisticated, and in many ways quite conventional, money machine.

Interviews and campaign finance reports show Mr. Obama drew crucial early support from Chicago’s thriving black professional class, using it as a springboard to other rainmakers within the broader party establishment. Soon he was drawing money — and, just as valuable, buzz — among wealthy Chicago families like the Crowns and the Pritzkers, as well as friends from Harvard Law School and the University of Chicago, where Mr. Obama taught constitutional law and his wife worked in community relations. As his popularity surged after his rousing speech at the Democratic National Convention in July 2004, big fund-raisers on Wall Street and in Hollywood hopped aboard, and grass-roots contributions began pouring in as well.

Mr. Obama has written that at the beginning he felt uncomfortable asking for money, but he developed a skill at cultivating donors, often with the same disarming directness he uses on the campaign trail.

“I met him on the first hole,” Steven S. Rogers, a former business owner who teaches at the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University, recalled recently about a golf game in 2001. “By the sixth hole, he said, ‘Steve, I want to run for the Senate.’ And by the ninth hole, he said he needed help to clear up some debts.”

Mr. Obama’s breakthrough in the 2004 Senate race was also made possible by a new wrinkle in the election laws. Faced with a self-financed opponent in the Democratic primary, Blair Hull, who pumped more than $28 million of his own money into the race, Mr. Obama was able to accept up to $12,000 from each donor, or six times the limit at that time.

As a result, nearly half of the more than $5 million that Mr. Obama raised in the primary came from just 300 donors. In a stroke of luck, he had just enough money to pay for a television advertising blitz in the final weeks as Mr. Hull’s campaign crumbled amid accusations that he had abused a former wife.

Some longtime Obama donors said they were glad to be able to exploit the financing loophole to help him.

James S. Crown, a senior member of the Crown family, said that despite the “formidable competition” in the Senate primary, he was so impressed after meeting Mr. Obama for breakfast in early 2003 that he quickly lent his support.

“I was just taken with his sensibility, his intelligence, his values and how he conducted himself during that campaign,” said Mr. Crown, who is Mr. Obama’s chief presidential fund-raiser in Illinois.

Mr. Obama appears to have such a firm hold on so many of Chicago’s big donors that Mrs. Clinton, who grew up in a Chicago suburb, did not even have a fund-raiser here during the crucial first quarter of this year. At the same time, Mr. Obama’s campaign says its grass-roots support is expanding rapidly, in part through $25-a-ticket fund-raisers designed for a new generation of donors.

Mr. Obama declined to be interviewed for this article. But in his book “The Audacity of Hope,” he sounded prescient about the dangers of the money chase, noting that he could not assume it “didn’t alter me in some ways.” At the simplest level, he wrote, it “eliminated any sense of shame” about asking for donations.

But, he added, he also worries that spending so much time courting wealthy donors has caused him to spend “more and more time above the fray,” away from the concerns of ordinary voters.

Mr. Obama, who grew up mostly in Hawaii, began making political contacts in Chicago as a community organizer in the 1980s. After graduating from Harvard Law School in 1991, he returned to Chicago and led a drive that registered more than 100,000 voters for the 1992 elections.

Mr. Obama asked John R. Schmidt, a lawyer who was co-chairman of Bill Clinton’s Illinois fund-raising operation, to raise money for the voter drive. Mr. Schmidt said he invited donors to meet Mr. Obama over lunch at the University Club of Chicago, and he and some of the others later became major donors to his political campaigns.

But perhaps Mr. Obama’s most crucial early support came from the city’s longstanding cadre of highly successful black executives and entrepreneurs.

John W. Rogers Jr., chief executive of Ariel Capital Management, which oversees $16 billion in investments, played basketball with Mr. Obama’s brother-in-law at Princeton University. Quintin E. Primo III, who made a fortune financing commercial real-estate deals, and Louis A. Holland, an investment manager, have also contributed to nearly all the senator’s races.

Under its first black mayor, Harold Washington, the City of Chicago had expanded its contracts with minority business in the 1980s. But, Mr. Rogers said, the state “was not as open and inclusive as it could be.” As a state senator, he said, Mr. Obama pushed to open up more contracting and to give minority investment companies a greater stake in managing state pension funds.

When Mr. Obama decided to run for Congress in 2000 against the former Black Panther Bobby Rush, he used a $9,500 personal loan to help finance the campaign. When he lost, he found himself broke and fielding questions from the Federal Election Commission about his campaign finances. He later had to lend his campaign committee $11,100 more to cover refunds to donors who had inadvertently given too much.

It took him two years to repay his own loans, mostly with small checks from black executives who agreed to help him prepare for another run.

Robert D. Blackwell Sr., a management consultant whose family contributed a few thousand dollars to Mr. Obama then, said that after the House race, it would have been natural for some supporters to hesitate.

“But Barack has almost devout followers who are people of action,” Mr. Blackwell said, “and they rallied behind him.”

When Mr. Obama told his closest friends about his Senate plans, Valerie Jarrett, a Chicago businesswoman who led his finance committee, said: “Our initial reaction was, ‘It’s too soon. You just lost, and if you lose again, where are you?’ ”

Ms. Jarrett said Mr. Obama replied that he was willing to gamble all on one more shot. David Axelrod, Mr. Obama’s strategist for his Senate and presidential campaigns, said Mr. Obama believed that if he polled well among blacks and white liberals, he would have a chance.

At least initially, few donors seemed to agree. Besides Mr. Hull, a former securities trader, another opponent was the state comptroller, Dan Hynes, whose father had been a major Illinois political figure.

After three months of calling longtime supporters and other Democratic donors, Mr. Obama had raised only $250,000. Even some Harvard friends were wondering if the race made sense.

David B. Wilkins, a Harvard law professor and friend of Mr. Obama, recalled, “I held one of his first fund-raisers here in Cambridge, and I had to beg people to come, because they said: ‘What is this? This guy thinks he’s going to win? Come on.’ ”

At first, only a handful of Obama supporters took advantage of the increased contribution limits, newly available under a so-called millionaire’s amendment to federal campaign laws.

From his Chicago circle of black professionals came John Rogers, who gave $11,000. Among the other investment managers, Mr. Primo and his wife gave $18,000. And Mr. Holland, his wife and two of his partners donated a total of $35,000.

At Harvard, Mr. Wilkins helped tap into professors and alumni, including George Haywood, an investor who, with his wife, Cheryl, contributed $12,000 in April 2003.

Mr. Haywood and Mr. Obama became friends, and it was Mr. Haywood whom then-Senator Obama turned to in early 2005 when he needed a broker to help manage money from a book deal. Mr. Haywood’s broker later invested $100,000 of Mr. Obama’s cash in two speculative stocks that Mr. Haywood owned.

Antoin Rezko, a Chicago businessman who was later involved in a land deal with the Obamas, gave $10,500.

Mr. Obama’s support also widened among Chicago’s business elite. Members of the Pritzker family, which founded the Hyatt Hotel chain, donated $40,000; Penny Pritzker is now the senator’s national finance chairwoman.

Mr. Crown, whose family’s investments include a major stake in the military contractor General Dynamics, said family members normally avoided taking sides in a primary, in part because it was not good for business. But with Mr. Obama, they made an exception, with 10 family members giving a total of $112,500.

“I was just so personally impressed with Barack that it was worth the risk,” Mr. Crown said.

Mr. Obama also attracted major national Democratic donors, including George Soros and members of his family, who gave a total of $60,000.

Other major donors included executives at a Texas-based securities firm, Tejas Inc., who gave $56,000. Its chairman, John Gorman, told The Austin American-Statesman in 2004 that he had been introduced to Mr. Obama by Vernon E. Jordan Jr., the Washington power broker.

Though he helped raise money for Mr. Obama in 2004, Mr. Jordan, a longtime Clinton friend and confidant, is now aligned with Mrs. Clinton’s presidential campaign. In fact, many people who once backed both Mr. Obama’s Senate campaign and the Clintons are now having to choose sides.

Some traditional Clinton supporters, including the Rev. Jesse Jackson, David Geffen, the Hollywood mogul, and Michael Froman, a Citigroup executive, have migrated to Mr. Obama.

And Chicago has become almost completely an Obama town. Though Democrats here still express respect for Mrs. Clinton, "if she’s raising any money in Chicago, I don’t know who’s doing it," said Mr. Schmidt, the lawyer who was once co-chairman of President Clinton’s fund-raising here.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/03/us/politics/03obama.html?_r=2&hp&oref=slogin&oref=slogin
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
Re: Obama Son Of America

<font size="4"><center>
Tiny Irish Village Is Latest Place to Claim Obama as Its Own</font size></center>



PH2007051201553.jpg
luckotheirish.jpg

"I've got pieces of everybody
in me," Obama has acknowledged.
(Orlin Wagner - AP)


By Mary Jordan
Washington Post Foreign Service
Sunday, May 13, 2007; Page A14

MONEYGALL, Ireland -- Here they call him O'Bama.

Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, Democratic candidate for president, is the talk of this village because recently unearthed records indicate that he is a son of Moneygall.

Stephen Neill, a local Anglican rector, said church documents he has found, along with census, immigration and other records tracked down by U.S. genealogists, appear to show that Obama's great-great-great-grandfather, Fulmuth Kearney, was reared in Moneygall, then left for America in 1850, when he was 19.

Megan Smolenyak, chief family historian for Ancestry.com, an online repository of family history records, said that although no single "smoking gun" document was found, there are about 20 different records that when pieced together make her "absolutely certain" of Obama's Moneygall roots.

Kearney sailed to New York aboard the S.S. Marmion at a time when legions of Irish were leaving their famine-stricken island. The shoemaker's son made a life in America, and his family line eventually produced Ann Durham, who was born in Kansas, according to Ancestry.com. The Web site has posted some of Obama's records online.

Durham married a Kenyan, also named Barack Obama, who was studying in Hawaii, and in 1961 they had a son, now a leading candidate to become president of the United States.

While neither Obama nor his campaign has confirmed the connection, it has created a buzz in Moneygall, which has one stoplight, two pubs and a population of 298.

"Sure, it's great!" said Henry Healy, 22, a villager who said family records indicate he is distantly related to Obama. Like many Moneygall residents, he is suddenly following the U.S. presidential race more closely and rooting for his kinsman. "It would be brilliant if he won because for one thing, he is related to me, and also it would be good for the village."

When Ronald Reagan became president, it brought notoriety and tourism to his ancestral home in Ballyporeen, in County Tipperary. Moneygall, on the Tipperary-Offaly border, wouldn't mind that kind of a boost; there is already talk here of a need for a coffee shop to cater to the curious who might stop by.

Many U.S. presidents have Irish roots, including Bill Clinton, but none so famously as John F. Kennedy. Since Kennedy's 1963 tour through Ireland, when it seemed that nearly the whole country turned out to greet him, this country has changed dramatically: Joblessness has been replaced by prosperity, and rather than Irish youths leaving for work abroad, East Europeans and others are moving here in search of a better life.

Despite Ireland's rapid urbanization, Moneygall remains a quiet stop on the busy N7 road that runs through the green, hilly heart of the country, a place where families still have cows and time to chat.

"It's brought an uplift to the village," said Daphne Powell, who serves soft ice cream on the main street. There hasn't been such excitement here since a locally bred horse, Papillon, won the prestigious Grand National in England seven years ago, overcoming 33-1 odds.

In one of the village's two pubs -- which face each other and are owned by different members of the Hayes family -- Julia Hayes offered ham sandwiches and tea to a visitor as the smell of a turf fire filled the cool spring air.

"It's very exciting," she said, noting that local and foreign journalists have started to arrive. "I was hoping Hillary [Clinton] would get in, but now this has come up and I'd love to see him win."

Neill, the rector, said he had found baptismal and other church records related to the Kearney family in old, handwritten books that had been kept in a parishioner's home. Kyle Betit, a U.S. genealogist also involved in the Obama research, said that "many pieces of evidence on both sides of the water" link Obama to Moneygall.

Obama, the only African American in the U.S. Senate, has said about his diverse roots, "I've got pieces of everybody in me." Obama spokesman Bill Burton declined to comment on questions about a Moneygall connection.

Just over 1 percent of Ireland's population is black, and 88 percent of the population is Roman Catholic. That makes Obama's Irish Anglican connections quite a "novelty," said Healy, who now considers Obama to be family.

Neill said he faxed the Obama camp the church records he had found and hopes he gets a response.

Others are setting their sights on an Obama visit.

So many Irish people left their homeland in dire times, Neill said, that it is uplifting to see an emigrant's family faring well.

"We like to see people working their way to the top," he said.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/05/12/AR2007051201551.html?hpid=topnews
 

QueEx

Rising Star
Super Moderator
<font size="5"><center>Obama Leads Four Republicans in U.S. Race</font size></center>

May 29, 2007
Angus Reid Global Monitor : Polls & Research

(Angus Reid Global Monitor) - Democrat Barack Obama is the top 2008 presidential contender in the United States, according to a poll by Zogby International. At least 46 per cent of respondents would support the Illinois senator in head-to-head contests against four prospective Republican nominees.

Obama holds a three-point edge over Arizona senator John McCain, a six-point lead over former New York City mayor Rudy Giuliani, and a 17-point advantage over both former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney and actor and former Tennessee senator Fred Thompson.

In other contests, both New York senator Hillary Rodham Clinton and former North Carolina senator John Edwards lead Romney and Thompson, but trail Giuliani and McCain. New Mexico governor Bill Richardson is virtually tied with Thompson, leads Romney by three points, and trails Giuliani and McCain.

On May 27, Obama pledged to provide proper assistance for active duty soldiers, declaring, "We’re falling far short in addressing the mental health care needs of these heroes, and that’s inexcusable. I believe strongly that there is a sacred trust between this country and those who serve it. That trust begins the moment a service member signs on and lasts the duration of his or her life."

In American elections, candidates require 270 votes in the Electoral College to win the White House. In November 2004, Republican George W. Bush earned a second term after securing 286 electoral votes from 31 states. Democratic nominee John Kerry received 252 electoral votes from 19 states and the District of Columbia.

Bush is ineligible for a third term in office. The next presidential election is scheduled for November 2008.

Polling Data

Possible match-ups - 2008 U.S. presidential election

Rudy Giuliani (R) 42% - 48% Barack Obama (D)
John McCain (R) 43% - 46% Barack Obama (D)
Mitt Romney (R) 35% - 52% Barack Obama (D)
Fred Thompson (R) 35% - 52% Barack Obama (D)

Rudy Giuliani (R) 48% - 43% Hillary Rodham Clinton (D)
John McCain (R) 47% - 43% Hillary Rodham Clinton (D)
Mitt Romney (R) 40% - 48% Hillary Rodham Clinton (D)
Fred Thompson (R) 41% - 48% Hillary Rodham Clinton (D)

Rudy Giuliani (R) 47% - 43% John Edwards (D)
John McCain (R) 46% - 41% John Edwards (D)
Mitt Romney (R) 36% - 50% John Edwards (D)
Fred Thompson (R) 40% - 48% John Edwards (D)

Rudy Giuliani (R) 50% - 35% Bill Richardson (D)
John McCain (R) 52% - 31% Bill Richardson (D)
Mitt Romney (R) 37% - 40% Bill Richardson (D)
Fred Thompson (R) 40% - 39% Bill Richardson (D)

Source: Zogby International
Methodology: Telephone interviews with 378 likely Republican voters, conducted from May 17 to May 20, 2007. Margin of error is 5.0 per cent.


http://www.angus-reid.com/polls/index.cfm/fuseaction/viewItem/itemID/15905
 

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
Barack Obama; Aims, & Finally Fires -can he hit the target??



Former republican, Andrew Sullivan’s ‘Atlantic Blog’ post covers Barak Obama’s speech at DePaul University where he finally stops trying to coast solely on his charisma and fund raising abilities, and specifically delineates his concrete policy differences with ‘team clinton’.
Barack’s correct assertion, earlier this year, that ‘team clinton’s’ foreign policy positions are nothing more than “Cheney-Bush Lite” needs to be repeated loudly and often. Hillary’s negative ratings, justified or not, remain in the 40 percent range. Among democratic voters who will vote for any democratic candidate over a RepubliKlan her negatives are still in the high 20 percent range.
‘Team Clinton’ internal memos show that the democratic primary candidate they are most afraid of is Barack. As Dr. Cornel West said recently about Barack - ‘Barack is standing on the top of the media mountain with a clean slate, millions of dollars & followers, SAY SOMETHING!!!




banner-text.jpg


Obama Aims, Fires

obamaclintonbrendansmialowskigetty.jpg



by Andrew Sullivan

October 2nd 2007


http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/10/obama-lets-it-r.html#more

This is more like it (his speech last night at DePaul University). The war is his issue; and it is his ace against Clinton:

The conventional thinking in Washington has a way of buying into stories that make political sense even if they don't make practical sense. We were told that the only way to prevent Iraq from getting nuclear weapons was with military force. Some leading Democrats echoed the Administration's erroneous line that there was a connection between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda. We were counseled by some of the most experienced voices in Washington that the only way for Democrats to look tough was to talk, act and vote like a Republican.

As Ted Sorensen's old boss President Kennedy once said "the pursuit of peace is not as dramatic as the pursuit of war - and frequently the words of the pursuer fall on deaf ears." In the fall of 2002, those deaf ears were in Washington. They belonged to a President who didn't tell the whole truth to the American people; who disdained diplomacy and bullied allies; and who squandered our unity and the support of the world after 9/11.

But it doesn't end there. Because the American people weren't just failed by a President - they were failed by much of Washington. By a media that too often reported spin instead of facts. By a foreign policy elite that largely boarded the bandwagon for war. And most of all by the majority of a Congress - "a coequal branch of government" - that voted to give the President the open-ended authority to wage war that he uses to this day. Let's be clear: without that vote, there would be no war.

Then this: the most forthright declaration in this campaign that the detention and interrogation policies of this indecent and un-American administration must be ended, and repudiated:

To lead the world, we must lead by example. We must be willing to acknowledge our failings, not just trumpet our victories. And when I'm President, we'll reject torture - without exception or equivocation; we'll close Guantanamo; we'll be the country that credibly tells the dissidents in the prison camps around the world that America is your voice, America is your dream, America is your light of justice.

I've been waiting a long time to hear a politician say these words as starkly and as passionately as he or she should. McCain crumbled; Clinton is too careful. Obama has come through.


Read the entire speech using the link below

http://andrewsullivan.theatlantic.com/the_daily_dish/2007/10/obama-lets-it-r.html#more



Q you should consider turning the html code ON on the politics board. It's deactivation precludes posting a lot of good stuff
 

Jakesnake

Potential Star
Registered
Is Obama to smart for us?

Here is a snipet of what was said on CNN last night.

COOPER: Paul, what is -- what is Obama doing wrong?

BEGALA: You know, Anderson, he's so talented.

I think the problem he's got is, he's too ethereal. He's too cerebral. You know, I -- I'm probably a pretty typical Democrat, in that I don't really like smart people very much.

(LAUGHTER)

BEGALA: And, you know, I really want someone who is accessible. Bill Clinton, pretty smart guy, all in all, but, more importantly, he was accessible.

And, if I were coaching Barack, I would say, you know, like we say back home, put the jam on the lower shelf, where the little folk can reach it. In other words, talk more like the community organizer he once was and a lot less like the law professor that he once was.

He's too ethereal, too philosophical for me. I think he has got to really get into the nitty-gritty. Hillary has mastered that. I mean, she's plenty smart, too, but she does a really good job getting into the bread-and-butter issues that people talk about.

Here is the whole transcript

http://transcripts.cnn.com/TRANSCRIPTS/0710/16/acd.01.html
 

MASTERBAKER

༺ S❤️PER❤️ ᗰOD ༻
Super Moderator
Barack Obama, proven leadership and judgement

[FLASH]http://www.liveleak.com/player.swf?token=c5d_1193291479[/FLASH]In hindsight it appears we would all have been better off to to have accepted good judgment over insider experience. Especially the 3837 dead servicemen and their families.
 

afroyale

Star
Registered
Obama Rocked The House @ Jefferson-Jackson Dinner

This is history in the making. Are there any bgolers in Iowa? Better sign up to caucus, show up on caucus day, and DON'T LEAVE until he gets nominated.


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/tydfsfSQiYc[/FLASH]


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/voX9v7pgtOA[/FLASH]


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/Z3ywOVN7w7A[/FLASH]


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/Ybk4MeUGBVo[/FLASH]


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/SQFLXj3-THc[/FLASH]


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/kfsEOJNC3UE[/FLASH]


[FLASH]http://www.youtube.com/v/GNsje0k0k2w[/FLASH]
 

muckraker10021

Superstar *****
BGOL Investor
Re: Barack Obama, proven leadership and judgement

Why is it only Black writers saying "Obama Can not win?" I don't hear this from any White Person.

What makes people think folks are voting for Obama because he's Black? They got Millions of Whites voting for Obama, not just Blacks.


Correct!!

On the surface it is inexplicable why African American voters who are predominately comprised of females – “Church Ladies” – would vote for as Chris Rock said - “the white lady”- rather than Barack Obama.

The answer to this conundrum is rooted in AmeriKKKa’s torturous, vile, & contemptuous history with African Americans. The title of Carter G. Woodson seminal book, “The Miseducation of the Negro” aptly describes the mental condition of the – “Church Ladies” –. Hopefully they will awaken from their ‘stockholm syndrome’ stupor.

Meanwhile a significant and growing percentage of “reality-based” college educated whites, both conservative & liberal support Obama. The reason for their embrace and the rational for their support is outlined in the article below from the December 2007 ‘Atlantic ’.

http://www.theatlantic.com/doc/200712/obama

http://mywebpage.netscape.com/camarilla10027/OBAMAATL.pdf



toplogo_small.png


1207cover.jpg



[pdf]http://mywebpage.netscape.com/camarilla10027/OBAMAATL.pdf[/pdf]
 

Deuterion

Support BGOL
Registered
Re: Barack Obama, proven leadership and judgement

Barack is my boy but he's pro War in Iran so that's enough for him to lose my vote.
 
Top